Cover not available
Part of
Recent Developments in Functional Discourse Grammar
Edited by Evelien Keizer and Hella Olbertz
[Studies in Language Companion Series 205] 2018
► pp. 169–206

Premodification in evaluative of-binominal noun phrases

An FDG vs a zone-based account

| University of Vienna
Premodification patterns play a central role in the analysis of the evaluative binominal noun phrase (EBNP; a beast of a man). This is, on the one hand, because the EBNP sometimes demonstrates non-canonical premodification: modifiers in front of the first noun can be selected by the second noun (e.g. a bitchy iceberg of a woman), and, on the other hand, because some of the EBNPs have evolved into evaluative modifiers (EMs; a beastuva day), with [N1 of a] integrating itself into the pre-existing premodification patterns. In the context of the premodification distinctions relevant to the evaluative of-binominal family, this study will juxtapose a hierarchical, Functional Discourse Grammar (FDG; Hengeveld & Mackenzie 2008; Keizer 2015) analysis of the premodification patterns against those of a linear zone-based, Construction Grammar (Ghesquière 2014) approach to premodification. In particular, this chapter, using corpus data from the Corpus of Contemporary American English and the Corpus of Historical American English, compares the categories proposed by each theory and discusses to what extent each model is able to account for the shifting premodification patterns found in the evaluative of-binominal family. This chapter concludes that although a zone-based account can, to a great extent, model these differences, this form of model does not provide an explanation as to why these changes have taken place. On the other hand, FDG can model and provide an explanation for the irregular premodification patterns, and captures the critical distinction between pragmatic and semantic modifiers, which also plays a role in this explanation. This study also provides evidence that the [N1 of a] chunk has integrated into pre-existing premodification patterns, and that, therefore, an integration of these two approaches to modeling premodification may be possible.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical models
    • 2.1The zone-based approach to premodification
    • 2.2The FDG model of premodification
  • 3.The evaluative of-binominal family
    • 3.1N+PP
    • 3.2Head-qualifier
    • 3.3Evaluative binominal noun phrase
    • 3.4Evaluative modifier
    • 3.5Binominal intensifier
    • 3.6Historical development
  • 4.The analysis
    • 4.1A zone-based explanation
    • 4.2An FDG explanation
      • 4.2.1N+PP constructions
      • 4.2.2Head-qualifiers
      • 4.2.3Evaluative binominal noun phrases
      • 4.2.4Evaluative modifier phrases
      • 4.2.5Binominal Intensifier
      • 4.2.6Summary
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Corpora
Published online: 22 November 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.205.06ten
References
Aarts, Bas
1998 English binominal noun phrases. Transactions of the Philological Society 96: 117–158.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adamson, Sylvia
2000 A lovely little example: Word order options and category shift in the premodifying string. In Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English [Studies in Language Companion Series, 53] Olga Fischer, Annetter Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds), 39–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aijmer, Karin
1997 I think: An English modal particle. In Modality in Germanic Languages: Historical and Comparative Perspectives, Toril Swan & Olaf Jansen Westvik (eds), 1–47. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Haegeman, Liliane & Stavrou, Melita
2007 Noun Phrase in the Generative Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anttila, Raimo
1989 [1972] Historical and Comparative Linguistics, 2nd revised edn [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bache, Carl
2000 Essentials of Mastering English: A Concise Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
1972 Degree Words. The Hague: Mouton.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breban, Tine
2010 English Adjectives of Comparison: Lexical and Grammaticalized Uses. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breban, Tine & Davidse, Kristin
2016 A functional-cognitive analysis of the order of adjectival modifiers in the English NP. Presented at the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Sprachwissenschaft Conference in Konstanz, 24–26 February.
Brems, Lieselotte
2011 Layering of Size and Type Noun Constructions in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brems, Lieselotte & Davidse, Kristin
2010 The grammaticalisation of nominal type noun constructions with kind/sort of: Chronology and paths of change. English Studies 91: 180–202.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2005 Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1994 On the evidence for partial N movement in the Romance DP. In Paths towards a Universal Grammar, Guglielmo Cinque, Jan Koster, Jean-Yves Pollock, Luigi Rizzi & Raffaella Zanuttini (eds), 85–110. Washington DC: Georgetown University.Google Scholar
2010 The Syntax of Adjectives: A Comparative Study. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 The semantic classification of adjectives: A view from syntax. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 35(1): 1–30.Google Scholar
Corver, Norbert
1998 Predicative movement in pseudopartitive constructions. In Possessors, Predicates and Movement in the Determiner Phrase [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 22], Artemis Alexiadou & Chris Wilder (eds), 215–258. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
2001 Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin & Ghesquière, Lobke
2016 Content-purport, contents, substance and structure: Focusing mere and merely . Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 48(1): 85–109.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
den Dikken, Marcel
2006 Relators and Linkers: The Syntax of Predication, Predicate Inversion and Copulas. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
2006 Discourse particles and modal particles as grammatical elements. In Approaches to Discourse Particles, Kerstin Fischer (ed.), 403–425. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
2011 Grammaticalization and pragmaticalization. In Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), 450–461. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W.
1982 Where Have All the Adjectives Gone? Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Basic Linguistic Theory, Vol 2. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Feist, Jim
2009 Premodifier order in English nominal phrases: A semantic account. Cognitive Linguistics 20(2): 301–340.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Premodifiers in English: Their Structure and Significance. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga
2008 On analogy as the motivation for grammaticalization. Studies in Language 32(2): 336–382.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García Velasco, Daniel
2013 Degree words in English: A Functional Discourse Grammar account. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 67: 79–96.Google Scholar
Ghesquière, Lobke
2009 From determining to emphasizing meanings: The adjectives of specificity. Folia Linguistica 43(2): 311–343.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 The Directionality of (Inter)subjectification in the English Noun Phrase. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 Intensification and focusing: The case of pure(ly) and mere(ly) . In Exploring Intensification: Synchronic, Diachronic and Cross-Linguistic Perspectives [Studies in Language Companion Series 189], Maria Napoli & Miriam Ravetto (eds), 33–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giacalone Ramat, Anna
1998 Testing the boundaries of grammaticalization. In The Limits of Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 37] Anna Giacalone Ramat & Paul Hopper (eds), 107–127. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1993 English Grammar: A Function-based Introduction, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Günthner, Susanne
1999 Entwickelt sich der Konzessivkonnektor obwohl zum Diskursmarker? Grammatikalisierungstendenzen im gesprochenen Deutsch. Linguistische Berichte 180: 409–446.Google Scholar
Günthner, Susanne & Mutz, Katrin
2004 Grammaticalization vs. pragmaticalization? The development of pragmatic markers in German and Italian. In What Makes Grammaticalization? A Look from its Fringes and its Components, Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds), 77–107. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Halliday, Micheal A. K.
1985 An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, Micheal A. K. & Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M.
2014 An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th edn, revised by Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. London: Routledge.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haas, Florian
2007 The development of English each other: Grammaticalization, lexicalization, or both? English Language and Linguistics 1(1): 31–50.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Narrog, Heiko
2010 Grammaticalization and linguistic analysis. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), 401–423. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees
2017 A hierarchical approach to grammaticalization. In The Grammaticalization of Tense, Aspect, Modality, and Evidentiality: A Functional Perspective, Kees Hengeveld, Heiko Narrog & Hella Olbertz (eds), 1–17. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
2008 Functional Discourse Grammar: A Typologically-based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hetzron, Robert
1978 On the relative order of adjectives. In Language Universals: Papers from the Conference held at Gummersbach/Cologne, German, October 3–8, 1976, Hansjakob Seiler (ed.), 165–184. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
2004 Lexicalization and grammaticalization: Opposite or orthogonal? In What Makes Grammaticalization? A Look from its Fringes and its Components, Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds), 21–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul & Traugott, Elizabeth C.
2003 Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kamp, Hans
1975 Two theories about adjectives. In Formal Semantics of Natural Language, Edward L. Keenan (ed.), 123–155. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keizer, Evelien
2007a The English Noun Phrase: The Nature of Linguistic Categorization. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007b The lexical-grammatical dichotomy in Functional Discourse Grammar. ALFA: Revista de Linguística 51(2): 35–56.Google Scholar
2015 A Functional Discourse Grammar for English. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kim, Jong-Bok & Sells, Peter
2015 English binominal NPs: A construction-based perspective. Journal of Linguistics 51: 41–73.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laenzlinger, Christopher
2005 French adjective ordering: Perspectives on DP-internal movement types. Lingua 115: 645–689.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1991 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. II: Descriptive Application. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
2002 Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar, 2nd edn. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2008 Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
2002 [1982] Thoughts on Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Erfurt: Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, Douglas
2005 Can the lexicalization/grammaticalization distinction be reconciled? Studies in Language 29(3): 583–615.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, Gunter
2002 Really worthwhile or not really significant? A corpus-based approach to the delexicalization and grammaticalization of intensifiers in modern English. In New Reflections on Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 49], Ilse Wischer &, Gabriele Diewald (eds), 143–161. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthews, Peter H.
2014 The positions of adjectives in English. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCawley, James D.
1987 A case of syntactic mimicry. In Functionalism in Linguistics [Linguistic and Literary Studies in Eastern Europe 20], René Dirven & Vilém Fried (eds), 459–470. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morzycki, Marcin
2009 Degree modification of extreme adjectives. In Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistics Society (CLS) 45, Ryan Bochnack, Nassira Nicola, Peter Klecha, Jasmin Urban, Alice Lemieux & Christina Weaver (eds). Chicago IL: CLS.Google Scholar
2012 Adjectival extremeness: Degree modification and contextually restricted scales. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 30(2): 567–609.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 Modification. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Napoli, Donna Jo
1989 Predication Theory: A Case Study for Indexing Theory. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olbertz, Hella
2016 Lexical auxiliaries in Spanish: How and why? Linguistics 54(5): 947–979.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, Carita
2001 Adjectives and boundedness. Cognitive Linguistics 12(1): 47–65.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partington, Alan
1993 Corpus evidence of language change – the case of the intensifier. In Text and Technology. In Honour of John Sinclair, Mona Baker, Francis Tognini-Bonelli & Elena Tognini-Bonelli (eds), 177–192. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Portero Muñoz, Carmen
2013 Adjective-Noun sequences at the crossroads between morphology and syntax: An FDG perspective. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 67: 123–140.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Scontras, Gregory, Degen, Judith & Goodman, Noah D.
2017 Subjectivity predicts adjective ordering preferences. Open Mind 1(1): 53–66.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, Gary-John
1998 Stacked adjectival modification and the structure of nominal phrases. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 8: 59–89.Google Scholar
2002 Stacked adjectival modification and the structure of nominal phrases. In Functional Structure in DP and IP, Guglielmo Cinque (ed.), 91–120. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Seiler, Hansjakob
1978 Determination: A functional dimension for interlanguage comparison. In Language Universals: Papers from the Conference Held at Gummersbach/Cologne, German, October 3–8, 1976, Hansjakob Seiler (ed.), 301–328. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Sproat, Richard & Shih, Chilin
1988 Prenominal adjective ordering in English and Mandarin. In Proceedings of NELS 18, James Belvins & Juli Carter (eds), 465–489. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
1991 The cross-linguistic distribution of adjective ordering restrictions. In Interdisciplinary Approaches to Language, Carol Georgopoulos & Roberta Ishihara (eds), 565–593. Dodrecht: Kluwer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ten Wolde, Elnora
2018 Diversity and Diversification among of-binominal Noun Phrases: The Case of the Evaluative Binominal Noun Phrase Family. PhD dissertation, University of Vienna.Google Scholar
In press. Linear vs hierarchical: Two accounts of premodification in the of-binominal noun phrase. Linguistics.
Ten Wolde, Elnora & Keizer, Evelien
2016 Structure and substance in Functional Discourse Grammar: The case of the binominal noun phrase. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 48(1): 134–157.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2003 Constructions in grammaticalization. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Brian Joseph & Richard Janda (eds), 624–647. Malden MA: Blackwell.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Grammaticalization, constructions and the incremental development of language: Suggestions from the development of degree modifiers in English. In Variation, Selection, Development – Probing the Evolutionary Model of Language Change, Regine Eckardt, Gerhard Jäger & Tonjes Veenstra (eds), 219–250. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Trousdale, Graeme
2012 Grammaticalization, constructions, and the grammaticalization of constructions. In Grammaticalization and Language Change: New Reflections [Studies in Language Companion Series, 130], Kristin Davidse, Tina Breban, Lieselotte Brems & Tanja Mortelmans (eds), 167–194. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trueswell, Robert
2009 Attributive adjectives and nominal templates. Linguistic Inquiry 40: 525–533.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan
2002 More thoughts on degrammaticalization. In New Reflections on Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 49], Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds), 19–29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van de Velde, Freek
2007 Interpersonal modification in the English noun phrase. Functions of Language 14: 203–230.DOI logoGoogle Scholar

Corpora

[COCA] Davies, Mark
2008– The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 million Words, 1990–present. [URL]
[COHA] Davies, Mark
2010– The Corpus of Historical American English: 400 million Words, 1810–2009. [URL]
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Keizer, Evelien, Thomas Schwaiger & Elnora ten Wolde
2022. Modification in Functional Discourse Grammar: State of the art and issues addressed. Open Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 512 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.