Chapter published in:
Possession in Languages of Europe and North and Central Asia
Edited by Lars Johanson, Lidia Federica Mazzitelli and Irina Nevskaya
[Studies in Language Companion Series 206] 2019
► pp. 291311


Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & Dixon, R. M. W.
2013Possession and Ownership: A Cross-linguistic Typology. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Alatyrev, Vasiliy I.
1970Vydelitelno-ukazatelnaya kategoriya v udmurtskom jazyke (The restrictive demonstrative category in Udmurt). Izhevsk: Udmurt Institute of History, Economics, Literature and Language.Google Scholar
Alatyrev, Vasily I.
1983Kratkiy grammaticheskiy ocherk udmurtskogo yazyka (A brief grammatical sketch of Udmurt). Udmurt-Russian Dictionary, 561–591. Moscow: Russkiy yazyk.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1994Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Collinder, Björn
1960Comparative Grammar of the Uralic Languages. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
1957Survey of the Uralic Languages. Stockholm: Almkvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
1997Grammaticalization and the gradience of categories. Relator nouns and postpositions in Tibetan and Burmese. In Essays on Language Function and Language Type, Joan L. Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), 51–69. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Décsy, Gyula
1990The Uralic Protolanguage: A Comprehensive Reconstruction. Bloomington IN: Eurolingua.Google Scholar
Fraurud, Kari
2001Possessives with extensive use: A source of definite articles? In Dimensions of Possession [Typological Studies in Language 47], Irène Baron, Michael Herslund & Finn Sørensen (eds), 243–267. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fried, Mirjam
2009Construction Grammar as a tool for diachronic analysis. Constructions and Frames 1 (2): 262–291. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gerland, Doris
2014Definitely not possessed? Possessive suffixes with definiteness marking function. In Frames and Concept Types. Applications in Language and Philosophy [Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 94], Thomas Gamerschlag, Doris Gerland, Rainer Osswald & Wiebke Petersen (eds), 269–292. Cham: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geurts, Bart
1998Presuppositions and anaphors in attitude contexts. Linguistics and Philosophy 21: 545–601. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
(ed.) 1983Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-Language Study [Typological Studies in Language 3]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John
1978Definiteness and Indefiniteness. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Hayashi, Makoto & Yoon, Kyung-Eun
2006A cross-linguistic exploration of demonstratives in interaction: With particular reference to the context of word-formulation trouble. Studies in Language 30(3): 485–540. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernard
1997Possession: Cognitive Sources, Forces and Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2003Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johanson, Lars & Csató, Éva Á.
1998The Turkic. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kibrik, Andrey A.
2011Reference in Discourse. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klumpp, Gerson
2008Differentielle Objektmarkierung & Informationsstruktur in Dialekten des Komi. Ms, Munich.Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria
2002Adnominal possession in the European languages: Form and function. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 55(2): 141–172.Google Scholar
Künnap, Ago
2006Historically Problematic Morphosyntactic Features in Uralic Languages. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, Ariadna I.
2003Kumulaciya grammaticheskix znachenij v agglutinativnyx pokazatelax: Deikticheskiye funkcii posessiva v uralskix jazykax (Several grammatical meanings in agglutinative markers: Deictic functions of possessive markers in Uralic). In Finno-ugorskije jazyki: fragmenty grammaticheskogo opisanija, Formalnyj i funkcionalnyj podkhody (Finno-Ugric languages: Fragments of grammatical description. Formal and functional approaches), Ariadna I. Kuznetsova e.a. (eds), 250–262. Moscow: Russkiye slovari.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
2015Thoughts on Grammaticalization, 3rd edn [Classics in Linguistics 1]. Berlin: Language Science Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
1999The Languages of Native North America. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna & Bickel, Balthasar
2013Possessive classification. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/59 (23 February 2016).Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, Irina A.
2003Possessive affixes as markers of information structuring: Evidence from Uralic. In International Symposium on Deictic Systems and Quantification in Languages Spoken in Europe and North and Central Asia. Collection of papers, Pirkko Suihkonen & Bernard Comrie (eds), 130–145. Izhevsk & Leipzig: Udmurt State University & Max Planck Institute of Evolutionary Anthropology.Google Scholar
Plungian, Vladimir A.
2011Vvedeniye v grammaticheskuyu semantiku: Grammaticheskiye znacheniya i grammaticheskiye sistemy jazykov mira (Introduction into grammatical semantics: Grammatical meanings and grammatical system of the world’s languages). Moscow: RSUH.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen F.
1981Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In Radical Pragmatics, Peter Cole (ed.), 223–255. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rubin, Aaron D.
2010: The development of the Amharic definite article and an Indonesian parallel. Journal of Semitic Studies 55(1): 103–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schlachter, Wolfgang
1960Studien zum Possessivsuffix des Syrjänischen. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Serdobolskaya, Natalia V. & Toldova, Svetlana Ju
2012Differencirovannoye markirovaniye pryamogo dopolneniya v finno-ugorskix jazykax (Differential object marking in Finno-Ugric languages). In Finno-ugorskiye jazyki: Fragmenty grammaticheskogo opisaniya. Formalnyj i funkcionalnyj podxody (Finno-ugric languages: fragments of grammartical description. Formal and functional approaches), Ariadna I. Kuznetsova e.a. (ed.), 59–142. Moscow: Jazyki slavyanskix kultur.Google Scholar
Siegl, Florian
2015The structure of noun phrases with referential Px.2p in Northern Samoyedic. Tomsk Journal of Linguistic and Anthropology 1(7): 21–31.Google Scholar
Spencer, Andrew & Luís, Ana R.
2012Clitics: An Introduction. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Starosta, Stan
1985Relator nouns as a source of case inflection. In For Gordon H. Fairbanks, Veneeta Z. Acson, & Richard L. Leed (eds), 111–133. Honolulu HI: University Press of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Suihkonen, Pirkko
2005On the categories and functions developed from the possessive and deictic suffixes in Udmurt. Lihkkun lehkos! Beiträge zur Finnougristik aus Anlaß des sechzigsten Geburtstages von Hans-Hermann Bartens, Cornelius Hasselblatt, Eino Koponen & Anna Widmer (eds), 401–432. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Tauli, Valter
1966Structural Tendencies in Uralic Languages [Indiana University Publications; Uralic and Altaic Series 17]. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
von Heusinger, Klaus & Kornfilt, Jaklin
2005The case of the direct object in Turkish: Semantics, syntax and morphology. Turkic Languages 9: 3–44.Google Scholar
Winkler, Eberhard
2011Udmurtische Grammatik. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Yedygarova, Svetlana
2010Kategoriya posessivnosti v udmurtskom yazyke (The category of possession in Udmurt). PhD dissertation. Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus.Google Scholar