Part of
Possession in Languages of Europe and North and Central Asia
Edited by Lars Johanson, Lidia Federica Mazzitelli and Irina Nevskaya
[Studies in Language Companion Series 206] 2019
► pp. 365392
References (36)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2013. Possession and ownership: A cross linguistic perspective. In Possession and Ownership, Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds), 1–64. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Baggio, Serenella & Sanga, Glauco. 1995. Sul volgare in età longobarda (On vernacular in Lombard times). In Italia settentrionale: Crocevia di idiomi romanzi. Atti del convegno internazionale di studi, Emanuele Banfi, Giovanni Bonfadini, Patrizia Cordin & Maria Iliescu (eds), 247–260. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Baldi, Philip & Nuti, Andrea. 2010. Possession. In New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax, Vol. 3: Constituent Syntax: Quantification, Numerals, Possession, Anaphora, Philip Baldi & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds), 239–387. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Bonnet, Max. 1890. Le latin de Grégoire de Tours. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Carlier, Anne, Goyens, Michèle & Lamiroy, Béatrice. 2013. De: A genitive marker in French? Its grammaticalization path from Latin to French, in The Genitive [Case and Grammatical Relations across Languages 5], Anne Carlier & Jean-Christophe Verstraete (eds), 141–216. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
CDL: Codice Diplomatico Longobardo, vol. 1–2. 1929–33. Luigi Schiaparelli (ed.). Roma: Istituto Storico Italiano.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1989. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Syntax and Morphology. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
de Dardel, Robert. 1999. L’origine du génitif-datif. Vox Romanica 58: 26–56.Google Scholar
Ernout, Alfred & Thomas, François. 1951. Syntaxe latine. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A. 1959. Diglossia. Word 15: 325–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Francovich Onesti, Nicoletta. 1999. Vestigia longobarde in Italia (568–774). Lessico e antroponimia (Lombard relics in Italy (568–774). Lexicon and anthroponymy). Roma: Artemide.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 1997. Possession: Cognitive Sources, Forces and Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Narrog, Heiko. 2015. Grammaticalization and linguistic analysis. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), 401–423. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, Johann Baptist & Szantyr, Anton. 1965. Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria. 2002. Adnominal possession in the European languages: Form and function. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 55(2): 141–172.Google Scholar
Korkiakangas, Timo. 2016. Subject Case in the Latin of Tuscan Charters of the 8th and 9th Centuries. PhD dissertation, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1995. Possession and possessive constructions. In Language and the Cognitive Construal of the World, John R. Taylor & R. E. MacLaury (eds), 51–79. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Larson, Pär. 2000. Tra linguistica e fonti diplomatiche: Quello che le carte dicono e non dicono (Between linguistics and diplomatic documents: What charters do and do not say). In La preistoria dell’italiano. Atti della Tavola Rotonda di Linguistica Storica, Università Ca’ Foscari di Venezia 11–13 giugno 1998, József Herman & Anna Marinetti (eds), 151–166. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1998. Possession in Yucatec Maya. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
. 2015. Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Berlin: Language Science Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lüdi, Georges. 1990. Diglossie et polyglossie. In Lexikon der Romanistischen Linguistik, 5(1): Französisch, Günter Holtus, Michael Metxeltin & Christian Schmitt (eds), 307–334. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Magni, Elisabetta. 2013. Synchronic gradience and language change in Latin genitive constructions. In Synchrony and Diachrony: A Dynamic Interface [Studies in Language Companion Series 133], Anna Giacalone Ramat, Caterina Mauri & Piera Molinelli (eds), 177–200. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mazzitelli, Lidia Federica. 2015. The Expression of Predicative Possession. A Comparative Study of Belarusian and Lithuanian. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Norberg, Dag. 1943. Syntaktische Forschungen auf dem Gebiete des Spätlateins und des frühen Mittellateins. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Pinkster, Harm. 1990. Latin Syntax and Semantics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2015. The Oxford Latin Syntax. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sabatini, Francesco. 1965. Esigenze di realismo e dislocazione morfologica in testi preromanzi [Need of realism and morphologic displacement in pre-Romance texts]. Rivista di Cultura Classica e Medioevale 7: 972–998.Google Scholar
Salonius, Aarne Henrik. 1920. Vitae Patrum. Kritische Untersuchungen über Text, Syntax und Wortschatz der spätlateinischen Vitae Patrum. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Schiaparelli, Luigi. 1933. Note diplomatiche sulle carte longobarde (Diplomatic notes about Lombard charters). Archivio storico italiano 19: 3–66.Google Scholar
Seiler, Hansjakob. 1983. Possession as an Operational Dimension of Language. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Spevak, Olga. 2014. Noun valency in Latin. In Noun Valency [Studies in Language Companion Series 158], Olga Spevak (ed.), 183–210. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tekavčić, Pavao. 1975. Agli albori dell’italiano (At the dawning of Italian). Linguistica 15: 209–239.Google Scholar
TLL: Thesaurus Linguae Latinae. 1900–. Leipzig: TeubnerGoogle Scholar
Väänänen, Veikko. 1954. Sur la préposition de marquant la notion partitive. Acta Philologica Fennica 1: 192–198.Google Scholar
. 1956. La préposition de et le génitif. Une mise au point. Revue de Linguistique Romane 20: 1–20.Google Scholar
Zamboni, Alberto. 2000. Alle origini dell’italiano. Dinamiche e tipologie della transizione dal latino (At the Source of Italian: Dynamics and Typology of the Transition from Latin). Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar