Chapter published in:
Possession in Languages of Europe and North and Central Asia
Edited by Lars Johanson, Lidia Federica Mazzitelli and Irina Nevskaya
[Studies in Language Companion Series 206] 2019
► pp. 365392
References

References

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2013Possession and ownership: A cross linguistic perspective. In Possession and Ownership, Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds), 1–64. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Baggio, Serenella & Sanga, Glauco
1995Sul volgare in età longobarda (On vernacular in Lombard times). In Italia settentrionale: Crocevia di idiomi romanzi. Atti del convegno internazionale di studi, Emanuele Banfi, Giovanni Bonfadini, Patrizia Cordin & Maria Iliescu (eds), 247–260. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Baldi, Philip & Nuti, Andrea
2010Possession. In New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax, Vol. 3: Constituent Syntax: Quantification, Numerals, Possession, Anaphora, Philip Baldi & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds), 239–387. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Bonnet, Max
1890Le latin de Grégoire de Tours. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Carlier, Anne, Goyens, Michèle & Lamiroy, Béatrice
2013 De: A genitive marker in French? Its grammaticalization path from Latin to French, in The Genitive [Case and Grammatical Relations across Languages 5], Anne Carlier & Jean-Christophe Verstraete (eds), 141–216. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
CDL: Codice diplomatico longobardo
, vol. 1–2 1929–33Luigi Schiaparelli (ed.). Roma: Istituto Storico Italiano.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1989Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Syntax and Morphology. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
de Dardel, Robert
1999L’origine du génitif-datif. Vox Romanica 58: 26–56.Google Scholar
Ernout, Alfred & Thomas, François
1951Syntaxe latine. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A.
1959Diglossia. Word 15: 325–340. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Francovich Onesti, Nicoletta
1999Vestigia longobarde in Italia (568–774). Lessico e antroponimia (Lombard relics in Italy (568–774). Lexicon and anthroponymy). Roma: Artemide.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd
1997Possession: Cognitive Sources, Forces and Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Narrog, Heiko
2015Grammaticalization and linguistic analysis. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), 401–423. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, Johann Baptist & Szantyr, Anton
1965Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria
2002Adnominal possession in the European languages: Form and function. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 55(2): 141–172.Google Scholar
Korkiakangas, Timo
2016Subject Case in the Latin of Tuscan Charters of the 8th and 9th Centuries. PhD dissertation, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1995Possession and possessive constructions. In Language and the Cognitive Construal of the World, John R. Taylor & R. E. MacLaury (eds), 51–79. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Larson, Pär
2000Tra linguistica e fonti diplomatiche: Quello che le carte dicono e non dicono (Between linguistics and diplomatic documents: What charters do and do not say). In La preistoria dell’italiano. Atti della Tavola Rotonda di Linguistica Storica, Università Ca’ Foscari di Venezia 11–13 giugno 1998, József Herman & Anna Marinetti (eds), 151–166. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1998Possession in Yucatec Maya. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
2015Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Berlin: Language Science Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lüdi, Georges
1990Diglossie et polyglossie. In Lexikon der Romanistischen Linguistik, 5(1): Französisch, Günter Holtus, Michael Metxeltin & Christian Schmitt (eds), 307–334. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Magni, Elisabetta
2013Synchronic gradience and language change in Latin genitive constructions. In Synchrony and Diachrony: A Dynamic Interface [Studies in Language Companion Series 133], Anna Giacalone Ramat, Caterina Mauri & Piera Molinelli (eds), 177–200. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mazzitelli, Lidia Federica
2015The Expression of Predicative Possession. A Comparative Study of Belarusian and Lithuanian. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Norberg, Dag
1943Syntaktische Forschungen auf dem Gebiete des Spätlateins und des frühen Mittellateins. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Pinkster, Harm
1990Latin Syntax and Semantics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2015The Oxford Latin Syntax. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sabatini, Francesco
1965Esigenze di realismo e dislocazione morfologica in testi preromanzi [Need of realism and morphologic displacement in pre-Romance texts]. Rivista di Cultura Classica e Medioevale 7: 972–998.Google Scholar
Salonius, Aarne Henrik
1920Vitae Patrum. Kritische Untersuchungen über Text, Syntax und Wortschatz der spätlateinischen Vitae Patrum. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Schiaparelli, Luigi
1933Note diplomatiche sulle carte longobarde (Diplomatic notes about Lombard charters). Archivio storico italiano 19: 3–66.Google Scholar
Seiler, Hansjakob
1983Possession as an Operational Dimension of Language. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Spevak, Olga
2014Noun valency in Latin. In Noun Valency [Studies in Language Companion Series 158], Olga Spevak (ed.), 183–210. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tekavčić, Pavao
1975Agli albori dell’italiano (At the dawning of Italian). Linguistica 15: 209–239.Google Scholar
TLL: Thesaurus Linguae Latinae
1900– Leipzig: TeubnerGoogle Scholar
Väänänen, Veikko
1954Sur la préposition de marquant la notion partitive. Acta Philologica Fennica 1: 192–198.Google Scholar
1956La préposition de et le génitif. Une mise au point. Revue de Linguistique Romane 20: 1–20.Google Scholar
Zamboni, Alberto
2000Alle origini dell’italiano. Dinamiche e tipologie della transizione dal latino (At the Source of Italian: Dynamics and Typology of the Transition from Latin). Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar