Cover not available
Part of
Morphological Variation: Theoretical and empirical perspectives
Edited by Antje Dammel and Oliver Schallert
[Studies in Language Companion Series 207] 2019
► pp. 223–242

The interaction of phonological and morphological variation in Zurich German

| University of Zurich
Zurich German shows an intriguing case of variation in the inflectional paradigm of the indefinite article. This corpus-based study shows there are competing forms in the dative cell of the indefinite article. These forms can vary phonologically or morphologically depending on gender as well as syntactic factors. In this paper, a canonical approach is used to distinguish between these two different types of variation. Both shape conditioning and overabundance are briefly characterized and their co-occurrence in the same cell of an inflectional paradigm is discussed under the notion of higher order exceptionality.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methodology and data discussion
    • 2.1Phonological variation
      • 2.1.1Dative forms in NPs
      • 2.1.2Dative forms in PPs
    • 2.2Morphological variation
  • 3.Theoretical framework
    • 3.1Canonical inflectional system
    • 3.2Shape conditioning
    • 3.3Overabundance
    • 3.4Higher-order exceptionality
  • 4.Results
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 27 June 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.207.08has
References (22)
References
Baerman, Matthew. 2007. Morphological typology of deponency. In Deponency and Morphological Mismatches [Proceedings of the British Academy 145], Matthew Baerman, Greville Corbett, Dunstan Brown & Andrew Hippisley (eds), 1–19. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ball, Martin J. & Müller, Nicole. 1992. Mutation in Welsh. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bošnjak Botica, Tomislava & Hržica, Gordana. 2016. Overabundance in Croatian dual-class verbs. Fluminensia 28(1): 83–106.Google Scholar
Brown, Dunstan & Chumakina, Marina. 2013. What there might be and what there is: an introduction to canonical typology. In Canonical Morphology and Syntax, Dunstan Brown, Marina Chumakina & Greville Corbett (eds), 1–19. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville. 2005. The canonical approach in typology. In Linguistic Diversity and Language Theories [Studies in Language Companion Series 72], Zygmunt Frajzyngier, Adam Hodges & David S. Rood (eds), 25–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007a. Canonical typology, suppletion and possible words. Language 83(1): 8–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007b. Deponency, syncretism, and what lies between. In Deponency and Morphological Mismatches [Proceedings of the British Academy 145], Greville Corbett, Dunstan Brown & Andrew Hippisley (eds), 21–43. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Higher order exceptionality in inflectional morphology. In Expecting the Unexpected [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 216], Horst J. Simon & Heike Wiese (eds), 107–126. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fehringer, Carol. 2011. Allomorphy in the German genitive. A paradigmatic account. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 39: 90–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fleischer, Jürg & Schmid, Stephan. 2006. Zurich German. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 36(2): 243–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hennig, Mathilde (ed.). 2016. Duden – Das Wörterbuch der sprachlichen Zweifelsfälle. Richtiges und gutes Deutsch, 8th edn. Berlin: Dudenverlag.Google Scholar
Hotzenköcherle, Rudolf. 1975. Sprachatlas der deutschen Schweiz, Band III: Formengeographie. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Kaye, Alan S. 2007. Arabic morphology. In Morphologies of Asia and Africa, Alan S. Kaye (ed.), 211–247. Winona Lake IN: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Moulton, William G. 1986. Sandhi in Swiss German dialects. In Sandhi Phenomena in the Languages of Europe, Henning Andersen (ed.), 385–392. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nübling, Damaris. 1992. Klitika im Deutschen: Schriftsprache, Umgangssprache, alemannische Dialekte [Script-Oralia 42]. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Reese, Johannes. 2007. Swiss German: The Modern Alemannic Vernacular in and around Zurich. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Schobinger, Viktor. 2007. Zürichdeutsche Kurzgrammatik, 3rd edn. Zurich: Schobinger.Google Scholar
. 2008. Säit me soo oder andersch? Dialäkt zum Naaschlaa wien im Wörterbuech, 5th edn. Zurich: Schobinger.Google Scholar
Thornton, Anna. 2011a. Overabundance (multiple forms realizing the same cell): A non-canonical phenomenon in Italian verb morphology. In Morphological autonomy, Martin Maiden, John Charles Smith, Maria Goldbach & Marc-Olivier Hinzelin (eds), 358–381. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2011b, April 08. Shape conditions and paradigms. Unpublished lecture notes, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.Google Scholar
Weber, Albert. 1923. Die Mundart des Zürcher Oberlandes [Beiträge zur Schweizerdeutschen Grammatik 15]. Frauenfeld: Huber.Google Scholar
. 1948. Zürichdeutsche Grammatik: Ein Wegweiser zur guten Mundart [Grammatiken und Wörterbücher des Schweizerdeutschen in allgemeinverständlicher Darstellung 1]. Zurich: Schweizer Spiegel Verlag.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Hasse, Anja
2023. Chapter 7. Stability of inflectional variation. In Free Variation in Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series, 234], ► pp. 202 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.