Cover not available
Part of
Usage-Based Studies in Modern Hebrew: Background, Morpho-lexicon, and Syntax
Edited by Ruth A. Berman
[Studies in Language Companion Series 210] 2020
► pp. 1–16

Introduction

| Tel Aviv University
| Tel Aviv University
Article outline
  • Chapter summaries
    • Part I.Background
    • Part II.Morphology-lexicon
    • Part III.Syntax
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 18 March 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.210.01ber
References
Amir-Coffin, Edna & Bolozky, Shmuel
2005 A Reference Grammar of Modern Hebrew. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Armon-Lotem, Sharon, Danon, Gabi & Rothstein, Susan
2008 Current Issues in Generative Hebrew Linguistics [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 134]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bat-El, Outi
2008 Morphologically conditioned V–Ø alternation in Hebrew: Distinction among nouns, adjectives & participles, and verbs. In Current Issues in Generative Hebrew Linguistics [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 134], Sharon Armon-Lotem, Gabi Danon & Susan Rothstein (eds), 27–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar
Bat-El, Outi, Cohen, Evan G., & Faust, Noam
2019. Phonetics and Phonology of Modern Hebrew. Brill’s Journal of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics [Special Issue of BJALL]. Leiden: Brill.
Beckner, Clay, Blythe, Richard, Bybee, Joan, Christiansen, Morten H., Croft, William, Ellis, Nick C., Holland, John, Ke, Jinyun, Larsen-Freeman, Diane & Schoenemann, Tom
2009 Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language Learning 59(1): 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berman, Ruth A.
1978 Modern Hebrew Structure. Tel Aviv: Universities Publishing Projects.Google Scholar
1988 On the ability to relate events in narratives. Discourse Processes 11(4): 469–497. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 The psycholinguistics of developing text construction. Journal of Child Language 35(4): 735–771. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 Typology, acquisition, and development: The view from Israeli Hebrew. In Acquisition and Development of Hebrew: From Infancy to Adolescence [Trends In Language Acquisition Research 19], Berman Ruth A. (ed.), 1–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berman, Ruth A. & Nir-Sagiv, Bracha
2004 Linguistic indicators of inter-genre differentiation in later language development. Journal of Child Language 31(2): 339–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borer, Hagit
1988 On the morphological parallelism between compounds and constructs. In Yearbook of Morphology, Vol. I, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 45–65. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
2009 Compounds: Afro-Asiatic, Semitic: Hebrew. In The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 491–511. New York NY: OUP.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan
2009 Language universals and usage-based theory. In Language Universals, Morten H. Christiansen, Christopher Collins & Shimon Edelman (eds), 17–29. Oxford Scholarship Online. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard, Haspelmath, Martin & Bickel, Balthasar
2015 The Leipzig Glossing Rules: Conventions for interlinear morpheme-by-morpheme glosses. < [URL]Google Scholar
Corpus of Spoken Israeli Hebrew [CoSIH]
2001–2002 < [URL] (5 February 2018).
Cristofaro, Sonia & Zúñiga, Fernando
2018 Synchronic vs. diachronic approaches to typological hierarchies. In Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony [Typological Studies in Language 121], Sonia Cristofaro & Fernando Zúñiga (eds), 3–27. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Croft, William, Bhattacharya, Tanmoy, Kleinschmidt, Dave, Smith, Eric D. & Jaeger, T. Florian
2011 Greenbergian universals, diachrony and statistical analysis. Linguistic Typology 15(2): 433–453. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dattner, Elitzur
2008 Lower Transitivity Constructions in Hebrew: The Case of Motion Verbs. MA Thesis, Tel Aviv University.Google Scholar
2015 Enabling and allowing in Hebrew: A Usage-Based Construction Grammar account. In Causation, Permission, and Transfer: Argument Realisation in get, take, put, give and let Verbs [Studies in Language Companion Series 167], Brian Nolan, Gudrun Rawoens & Elike Diedrichsen (eds), 271–293. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. <
https://doi.org/
 > Google Scholar
Dekel, Nurit
2014 Colloquial Israeli Hebrew: A Corpus-Based Survey. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W.
2010 Basic Linguistic Theory, Vol I. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Doron, Edit
2016 Language Contact and the Development of Modern Hebrew [Studies in Semitic Languages 84]. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Doron, Edit & Meir, Irit
2013 Construct state: Modern Hebrew. In The Encyclopedia of Hebrew Language and Linguistics, Vol. 1, Geoffrey Khan (ed.), 581–589. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas & Levinson, Stephen
2009 The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral & Brain Sciences 32: 429–492. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., Kay, Paul & O’Connor, Catherine
1988 Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone . Language 64(3): 501–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glinert, Lewis
1995 Modern Hebrew: An Essential Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goldberg , Adele E.
1995 Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Pres.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1978 Diachrony, synchrony and language universals. In Universals of Human Language, Vol. 1, Joseph H. Greenberg, Charles F. Ferguson & Edith Moravcsik (eds), 61–91. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1979 Rethinking linguistics diachronically. Language 55(2): 275–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halevy, Rivka
2013 Syntax: Modern Hebrew. In The Encyclopedia of Hebrew Language and Linguistics, Vol. 3, Geoffrey Khan (ed.), 707–723. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Horvath, Julia, & Siloni, Tal
2008 Active lexicon: Adjectival and verbal passives. In Current Issues in Generative Hebrew Linguistics [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 134], Sharon Armon-Lotem, Gabi Danon & Susan Rothstein (eds), 105–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar
Ibbotson Paul
2013 The scope of usage-based theory. Frontiers in Psychology 4: Article 255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakubíček, Milos, Kilgarriff, Adam, Kovář, Vojtěch, Rychlý, Pavel & Suchomel, Vít
2013 The TenTen corpus family. In 7th International Corpus Linguistics Conference CL , 125–127.
Kemmer, Suzanne & Barlow, Michael
2000 Introduction: A usage-based conception of language. In Usage-Based Models of Language, Michael Barlow & Suzanne Kemmer (eds), vii–xxviii. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Khan, Geoffrey
2013 The Encyclopedia of Hebrew Language and Linguistics. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Melnik, Nurit
2006 A constructional approach to verb-initial constructions in Modern Hebrew. Cognitive Linguistics 17(2): 153–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nir (-Sagiv), Bracha
2008 Clause-packages as Constructions in Developing Narrative Discourse. PhD dissertation, Tel Aviv University.Google Scholar
Preminger, Omer
2009 Breaking agreements: Distinguishing agreement and clitic-doubling by their failures. Linguistic Inquiry 40(4): 619–666. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rabin, Chaim
1963/2005 A Short History of the Hebrew Language. (Originally printed in 1963. Jerusalem: World Zionist Organization). <[URL]Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya & Reuland, Eric
1993 Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry 24(4): 657–720.Google Scholar
Rosén, Haiim B.
1956 haʕivrit šelanu – dmuta leʔor šitot habalšanut (Our Hebrew – Viewed in the Light of Linguistic Methodology). Tel Aviv: Am Oved.Google Scholar
1962 A Textbook of Israeli Hebrew. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
1977 Contemporary Hebrew [Trends in Linguistics: State-of-the Art Reports 11]. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seroussi, Batia
2011 The Morphology-Semantics Interface in the Mental Lexicon: The Case of Hebrew. PhD dissertation, Tel Aviv University.Google Scholar
Shatil, Nimrod
2014 hitpatħuyot bilšon yameynu (Developments in Contemporary Hebrew). Jerusalem: The Academy of the Hebrew Language.Google Scholar
Wintner, Shuly
2004 Hebrew computational linguistics: Past and future. Artificial Intelligence Review 21(2): 113–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar