Cover not available
Part of
Usage-Based Studies in Modern Hebrew: Background, Morpho-lexicon, and Syntax
Edited by Ruth A. Berman
[Studies in Language Companion Series 210] 2020
► pp. 41–50

Chapter 3
Genetic affiliation

| Penn State University
The chapter opens with a description of “the Semitic family of languages”, then describes characteristically Semitic facets of Hebrew morphology with reference to the consonantal root, the pronominal, nominal, and verbal systems, and the lexicon. It concludes with comments on the controversial status of MH, viewed by some as an independent “Ísraeli” as against a language still closely affiliated with its Semitic roots.
Article outline
  • 1.The Semitic family
  • 2.Hebrew morphology as Semitic
    • 2.1The consonantal root system
    • 2.2Pronominal system
    • 2.3Nominal system
    • 2.4Verbal derivation (verbal stems)
    • 2.5Verbal inflection
  • 3.Lexicon
  • 4.The controversial status of Modern Hebrew
  • References
Published online: 18 March 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.210.04rub
References (20)
References
Goldenberg, Gideon. 1996. haʕivrit klašon šemit ħayah (Hebrew as a living Semitic language). In Evolution and Renewal: Trends in the Development of the Hebrew Language, Zofia Lasman (ed.), 148–190. Jerusalem: Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities.Google Scholar
Hayward, Richard J. 2000. Afroasiatic. In African Languages: An Introduction, Bernd Heine & Derek Nurse (eds.), 74–98. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Hetzron, Robert. 1976. Two principles of genetic reconstruction. Lingua 38(2): 89–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huehnergard, John. 2004. Afro-Asiatic. In Cambridge Encyclopedia of the World’s Ancient Languages, Roger D. Woodard (ed.), 138–159. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. 2005. Features of Central Semitic. In Biblical and Oriental Essays in Memory of William L. Moran [Biblica et Orientalia 48], Agustinus Gianto (ed.), 155–203. Rome: Pontificio Istituto Biblico.Google Scholar
Kogan, Leonid. 2015. Genealogical Classification of Semitic: The Lexical Isoglosses. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, Stephen J. 1986. The Afro-Asiatic background of the Semitic N-stem: Towards the origins of the stem-afformatives of the Semitic and Afro-Asiatic verbs. Bibliotheca Orientalis 43(5–6): 577–628.Google Scholar
Rosenhouse, Judith. 2013a. English influence on Hebrew. In Encyclopedia of Hebrew Language and Linguistics, Vol. I, Geoffrey Khan et al. (eds.), 821–822. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
. 2013b. English loanwords. In Encyclopedia of Hebrew Language and Linguistics, Vol. I, Geoffrey Khan et al. (eds.), 824–828. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Rubin, Aaron D. 2008. The subgrouping of the Semitic languages. Language and Linguistics Compass 2(1): 79–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. A Brief Introduction to the Semitic Languages [Gorgias Handbooks 19]. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias.Google Scholar
2017. The Semitic language family. In The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology, Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M. W. Dixon (eds), 854–886. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shlesinger, Yitzhak. 2013. Borrowing in Modern Hebrew. In Encyclopedia of Hebrew Language and Linguistics, Vol. I, Geoffrey Khan et al. (eds.), 375–381. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna. 2004. Person. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weninger, Stefan, with Khan, Geoffrey, Streck, Michael P., & Watson, Janet C. E. (eds.), 2011. The Semitic Languages: An International Handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wexler, Paul. 1990. The Schizoid Nature of Modern Hebrew: A Slavic Language in Search of a Semitic Past [Mediterranean Language and Culture Monograph 4]. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Yadin, Azzan. 2013. Neologism. In Encyclopedia of Hebrew Language and Linguistics, Vol. II, Geoffrey Khan et al. (eds.), 815–817. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Zeldes, Amir. 2013. Is Modern Hebrew Standard Average European? The view from European. Linguistic Typology 17(3): 439–470. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zuckermann, Ghil’ad. 2006. A new vision for Israeli Hebrew: Theoretical and practical implications of analyzing Israel’s main language as a semi-engineered Semito-European hybrid language. Journal of Modern Jewish Studies 5(1): 57–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. yisraʔelit safah yafah (Israeli, a Beautiful Language). Tel Aviv: Am Oved.Google Scholar