Cover not available
Part of
Usage-Based Studies in Modern Hebrew: Background, Morpho-lexicon, and Syntax
Edited by Ruth A. Berman
[Studies in Language Companion Series 210] 2020
► pp. 623–658

Chapter 17
List constructions

| Tel Aviv University

The primary concern of this study is to examine list constructions in spoken Hebrew, from two perspectives: an intentional perspective setting out the properties that a linguistic expression needs in order to be considered a list construction (the concept) and an extensional perspective specifying the objects that fall under this construction (typology). The study reviews the nature of list constructions in general, with the grammatical, lexical, semantic, and prosodic features of such constructions analyzed in relation to their discourse functions in everyday spoken Hebrew. The description of list constructions is based on examples from the CoSIH database of conversational interactions recorded during 2001 and 2002.

Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Sentence level vs. discourse level
  • 3.Number of listees
  • 4.Cognitive processes, coherence relations, and discourse functions
  • 5.Semantic relations and discourse functions
  • 6.Lists and discourse structure
  • 7.Prosody
  • 8.List interpreters
  • 9.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 18 March 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.210.18inb
References
Amir, Noam, Silber-Varod, Vered & Izre’el, Shlomo
2004.Characteristics of intonation unit boundaries in spontaneous spoken Hebrew: Perception and acoustic correlates. In Speech Prosody 2004: Proceedings, Nara, Japan, March 23–26 , Bernand Bel & Isabelle Marlien (eds), 677–680.Google Scholar
Ariel, Mira & Caterina, Mauri
2018 Why use or? Linguistics 56(5): 939–994.
Barsalou, Lawrence
1983 Ad hoc categories. Memory and Cognition 11: 211–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berman, Ruth A.
2008 The psycholinguistics of developing text construction. Journal of Child Language 35: 735–771. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 From pre-grammaticality to proficiency in L1: Development in use of Hebrew infinitives Psychology of Language and Communication 22(1): 558–580.Google Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, Claire, Bilger, Mireille, Rouget, Christine & Van den Eynde, Karel
1990 Le français parlé. Etudes grammaticales. Paris: Editions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, Claire
1987 Syntaxe, choix du lexique et lieux de bafouillage. DRLAV: 36–37, 123–157.Google Scholar
Bonvino, Elisabetta, Masini, Francesca & Pietrandrea, Paola
2009 List Constructions: A Semantic Network. Grammars in Construction(s) – 3rd International AFLiCo Conference (University Paris Ouest – Nanterre – La Défense – May 27–29.)Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Selting, Margaret
2001 Introducing interactional linguistics. In Studies in Interactional Linguistics [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 10], Margaret Selting & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (eds), 1–21. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Selting, Margret
2018 Online Chapter F: Further practices with language. In Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J.
1989 Grammatical construction theory and the familiar dichotomies. In Language Processing in Social Context, Rainer Dietrich & Carl F. Graumann (eds), 17–38. Amsterdam: North-Holland. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fried, Mirjam & Östman, Jan-Ola
2004 Construction Grammar: A thumbnail sketch. In Construction Grammar in a Cross-Language Perspective [Constructional Approaches to Language 2], Mirjam Fried & Jan O. Östman (eds), 11–87. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerdes, Kim & Kahane, Sylvain
2008 Speaking in piles: Paradigmatic annotation of a French Spoken Corpus. Proceedings of the 5 th Corpus Linguistic Conference, Liverpool.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995 Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Grenoble, Lenoren A.
2013 Talking out of turn: (Co)-constructing Russian conversation. In Approaches to Slavic Interaction, Nadine Thielemann & Peter Kosta (eds), 17–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guénot, Marie-Laure
2005 La coordination considérée comme un entassement paradigmatique: Description, formalization et intégration. Piet Mertens 2005, CENTAL 178–187. <hal-00137274>Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2004 Coordinating constructions: An overview. In Coordinating Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 58], Martin Haspelmath (ed.), 3–39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Inbar, Anna
2016 The meaning of Hebrew ve ‘and’: Evidence from asyndetic clause linkage. 49 th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea. (31 August – 3 September 2016. Naples, Italy.)Google Scholar
2017 Coordination or distinction? From semantic analysis of asyndetic clause linkage to the function of the particle ve ‘and’. National Association of Professors of Hebrew (NAPH). (New York University (NYU), June 27, 2017. New York, USA.)Google Scholar
2018 List constructions and list constructing in gestures: A view from Israeli Hebrew. 8th Conference of the International Society for Gesture Studies – Gesture and Diversity. (July 4–8, 2018. Cape Sun, Cape Town.)Google Scholar
Izre’el, Shlomo & Mettouchi, Amina
2015 Representation of speech in CorpAfroAs: Transcriptional strategies and prosodic units. In Corpus-based Studies of Lesser-described Languages: The CorpAfroAs Corpus of Spoken AfroAsiatic Languages [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 68], Amina Mettouchi, Martine Vanhove & Dominique Caubet (eds), 13–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Izre’el, Shlomo
2016 The basic units of spoken language: Prosody, discourse and syntax. In Studies in Spoken Hebrew, Einat Gonen (ed.), 153–182.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
1990 List construction as a task and resource. In Interactional Competence, George Psathas (ed.), 63–92. New York NY: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
Kirsner, Robert
1985 Iconicity and grammatical meaning. In Iconicity in Syntax [Typological Studies in Language 6], John Haiman (ed.), 249–264. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Gene
1994 Responsive list construction. Language and Social Psychology 13: 20–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lichtenberk, Frantisek
2000 Inclusory pronominals. Oceanic Linguistics 39: 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martínez, Ignacio M. Palacios
2011 ‘I might, I might go I mean it depends on money things and stuff.’ A preliminary analysis of general extenders in British teenagers’ discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 43 (9): 2452–2470. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Masini, Francesca, Mauri, Caterina & Pietrandrea, Paola
(eds) 2018 Lists: Description, delimitation, definition. Italian Journal of Linguistics 30(1): 41–48.Google Scholar
Mauri, Caterina
2008 The parallelism of clausal coordination. Revue de Sémantique et Pragmatique 24: 145–175.Google Scholar
2017 Building and interpreting ad hoc categories: A linguistic analysis. In Formal models in the study of language: Applications in Interdisciplinary Contexts, Joanna Blochowiak, Cristina Grisot, Stephanie Durrleman-Tame & Christopher Laenzlinger (eds), 1–23. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meir, Irit
2008 Sentence-phrase coordination in Hebrew and the syntax-pragmatics interface. Studies in Language 32: 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi & Thompson, Sandra A.
1995 What can conversation tell us about syntax? In Alternative Linguistics. Descriptive and Theoretical Models [Current Studies in Linguistic Theory 102], Philip W. Davis (ed.), 213–271. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Overstreet, Maryann & Yule, George
1997 On being inexplicit and stuff in contemporary American English. Journal of English Linguistics 25(3): 250–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Overstreet, Maryann
1999 Whales, Candlelight, and Stuff Like That: General Extenders in English Discourse. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1994 Making a list. Discourse Processes 17: 377–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sellberg, Oskar
2015 Women’s and men’s language use and all that stuff: A corpus analysis of general extenders. Essay, Lund University.Google Scholar
Selting, Margret
2007 Lists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction as an interactional resource. Journal of Pragmatics 39 : 483–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shor, Leon
2017 When a single mention is not enough: Expanded referent introduction in spoken Israeli Hebrew. 15 th International Pragmatics Conference (IPrA). (July 16–21 2017. Belfast, Northern Ireland.)
Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre
1986 Relevance: Communication and Cognition, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wichmann, Anne
2000 Intonation in Text and Discourse: Beginnings, Middles and Ends. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Carston, Robyn
2007 A unitary approach to lexical pragmatics: Relevance, inference and ad hoc concepts. In Pragmatics, Noel Burton-Roberts (ed.), 230–259. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Masini, Francesca & Simone Mattiola
2022. Syntactic discontinuous reduplication with antonymic pairs: a case study from Italian. Linguistics 60:1 ► pp. 315 ff. DOI logo
Shor, Leon & Michal Marmorstein
2024. Self-repeat as a multimodal retraction practice. Interactional Linguistics DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.