Chapter published in:
Usage-Based Studies in Modern Hebrew: Background, Morpho-lexicon, and Syntax
Edited by Ruth A. Berman
[Studies in Language Companion Series 210] 2020
► pp. 623658
References

References

Amir, Noam, Silber-Varod, Vered & Izre’el, Shlomo
2004.Characteristics of intonation unit boundaries in spontaneous spoken Hebrew: Perception and acoustic correlates. In Speech Prosody 2004: Proceedings, Nara, Japan, March 23–26 , Bernand Bel & Isabelle Marlien (eds), 677–680.Google Scholar
Ariel, Mira
In press. Why use or? Linguistics .
Barsalou, Lawrence
1983Ad hoc categories. Memory and Cognition 11: 211–227. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berman, Ruth A.
2008The psycholinguistics of developing text construction. Journal of Child Language 35: 735–771. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000 In press. From pre-grammaticality to proficiency in L1: Development in use of Hebrew infinitives. Psychology of Language and Communication.Google Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, Claire, Bilger, Mireille, Rouget, Christine & Van den Eynde, Karel
1990Le français parlé. Etudes grammaticales. Paris: Editions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, Claire
1987Syntaxe, choix du lexique et lieux de bafouillage. DRLAV: 36–37, 123–157.Google Scholar
Bonvino, Elisabetta, Masini, Francesca & Pietrandrea, Paola
2009List Constructions: A Semantic Network. Grammars in Construction(s) – 3rd International AFLiCo Conference (University Paris Ouest – Nanterre – La Défense – May 27–29.)Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Selting, Margaret
2001Introducing interactional linguistics. In Studies in Interactional Linguistics [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 10], Margaret Selting & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (eds), 1–21. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Selting, Margret
2018Online Chapter F: Further practices with language. In Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction . Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J.
1989Grammatical construction theory and the familiar dichotomies. In Language Processing in Social Context, Rainer Dietrich & Carl F. Graumann (eds), 17–38. Amsterdam: North-Holland. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fried, Mirjam & Östman, Jan-Ola
2004Construction Grammar: A thumbnail sketch. In Construction Grammar in a Cross-Language Perspective [Constructional Approaches to Language 2], Mirjam Fried & Jan O. Östman (eds), 11–87. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gerdes, Kim & Kahane, Sylvain
2008Speaking in piles: Paradigmatic annotation of a French Spoken Corpus. Proceedings of the 5 th Corpus Linguistic Conference , Liverpool.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Grenoble, Lenoren A.
2013Talking out of turn: (Co)-constructing Russian conversation. In Approaches to Slavic Interaction, Nadine Thielemann & Peter Kosta (eds), 17–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guénot, Marie-Laure
2005La coordination considérée comme un entassement paradigmatique: Description, formalization et intégration. Piet Mertens 2005, CENTAL 178–187. <hal-00137274>Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2004Coordinating constructions: An overview. In Coordinating Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 58], Martin Haspelmath (ed.), 3–39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Inbar, Anna
2016The meaning of Hebrew ve ‘and’: Evidence from asyndetic clause linkage. 49 th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea. (31 August – 3 September 2016. Naples, Italy.)Google Scholar
2017Coordination or distinction? From semantic analysis of asyndetic clause linkage to the function of the particle ve ‘and’. National Association of Professors of Hebrew (NAPH). (New York University (NYU), June 27, 2017. New York, USA.)Google Scholar
2018List constructions and list constructing in gestures: A view from Israeli Hebrew. 8th Conference of the International Society for Gesture Studies – Gesture and Diversity. (July 4–8, 2018. Cape Sun, Cape Town.)Google Scholar
Izre’el, Shlomo & Mettouchi, Amina
2015Representation of speech in CorpAfroAs: Transcriptional strategies and prosodic units. In Corpus-based Studies of Lesser-described Languages: The CorpAfroAs Corpus of Spoken AfroAsiatic Languages [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 68], Amina Mettouchi, Martine Vanhove & Dominique Caubet (eds), 13–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Izre’el, Shlomo
Forthcoming. The basic unit of spoken language and the interface between prosody, discourse and syntax: A view from spontaneous spoken Hebrew. In Search of a Reference Unit for Speech: A Corpus-driven Cross-linguistic Approach to Spontaneous Spoken Communication , Shlomo Izre’el, Heliana Mello, Alessandro Panunzi & Tommaso Raso eds Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jefferson, Gail
1990List construction as a task and resource. In Interactional Competence, George Psathas (ed.), 63–92. New York NY: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
Kirsner, Robert
1985Iconicity and grammatical meaning. In Iconicity in Syntax [Typological Studies in Language 6], John Haiman (ed.), 249–264. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Gene
1994Responsive list construction. Language and Social Psychology 13: 20–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lichtenberk, Frantisek
2000Inclusory pronominals. Oceanic Linguistics 39: 1–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martínez, Ignacio M. Palacios
2011‘I might, I might go I mean it depends on money things and stuff.’ A preliminary analysis of general extenders in British teenagers’ discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 43 (9): 2452–2470. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Masini, Francesca, Mauri, Caterina & Pietrandrea, Paola
(eds) 2018Lists: Description, delimitation, definition. Special Issue of Italian Journal of Linguistics 29(1).Google Scholar
Mauri, Caterina
2008The parallelism of clausal coordination. Revue de Sémantique et Pragmatique 24: 145–175.Google Scholar
2017Building and interpreting ad hoc categories: A linguistic analysis. In Formal models in the study of language: Applications in Interdisciplinary Contexts , Joanna Blochowiak, Cristina Grisot, Stephanie Durrleman-Tame & Christopher Laenzlinger (eds), 1–23. Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meir, Irit
2008Sentence-phrase coordination in Hebrew and the syntax-pragmatics interface. Studies in Language 32: 1–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi & Thompson, Sandra A.
1995What can conversation tell us about syntax? In Alternative Linguistics. Descriptive and Theoretical Models [Current Studies in Linguistic Theory 102], Philip W. Davis (ed.), 213–271. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Overstreet, Maryann & Yule, George
1997On being inexplicit and stuff in contemporary American English. Journal of English Linguistics 25(3): 250–258. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Overstreet, Maryann
1999Whales, Candlelight, and Stuff Like That: General Extenders in English Discourse. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1994Making a list. Discourse Processes 17: 377–406. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sellberg, Oskar
2015Women’s and men’s language use and all that stuff: A corpus analysis of general extenders. Essay, Lund University.Google Scholar
Selting, Margret
2007Lists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction as an interactional resource. Journal of Pragmatics 39 : 483–526. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shor, Leon
2017When a single mention is not enough: Expanded referent introduction in spoken Israeli Hebrew. 15 th International Pragmatics Conference (IPrA). (July 16–21 2017. Belfast, Northern Ireland.)
Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre
1986Relevance: Communication and Cognition, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Spooren, Wilbert
1997The processing of underspecified coherence relations. Discourse Processes 24 : 149–168. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wichmann, Anne
2000Intonation in Text and Discourse: Beginnings, Middles and Ends. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Carston, Robyn
2007A unitary approach to lexical pragmatics: Relevance, inference and ad hoc concepts. In Pragmatics , Noel Burton-Roberts (ed.), 230–259. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar