Cover not available
Part of
Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Vietnamese Linguistics
Edited by Nigel Duffield, Trang Phan and Tue Trinh
[Studies in Language Companion Series 211] 2019
► pp. 81–112

Chapter 5
Illusory islands

On ‘wh-questions in Vietnamese’

| Konan University, Japan
This paper offers an extended critique of an article by Bruening & Tran (2006) concerning wh-questions in Vietnamese. Drawing on both language-internal and cross-linguistic evidence, attention is brought to bear on several empirical shortcomings in Bruening & Tran’s analysis, as a result of which the constituency of wh-question constructions in this language is misrepresented. An alternative treatment is proposed which attempts to remedy these difficulties, and, in so doing, may also explain some additional distributional and interpretive anomalies.
Keywords: Vietnamese syntax, wh-questions, island constraints, covert movement vs. unselective binding
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Original arguments
    • 2.1Is thế a sentential element at all?
    • 2.2Non-equivalence of pre-verbal TAM markers
    • 2.3Establishing a base-line: dissociating movement and interpretation
  • 3.Re-analyzing islands
    • 3.1‘Complex NP-islands’ as consecutive main clauses
    • 3.2Alternative analyses of ‘Sentential Subjects’
    • 3.3‘Adjunct islands’ are main clauses, too
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 9 October 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.211.05duf
References (26)
References
Adams, Marianne. 1985. Government of empty subject in factive clausal complements. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 305–313.Google Scholar
Andersen, Gisle. 2001. Pragmatic Markers and Sociolinguistic Variation: A Relevance-theoretic Approach to the Language of Adolescents [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 84]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruening, Benjamin & Tran, Thuan. 2006. Wh-questions in Vietnamese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 15: 319–341. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cao, Xuân Hạo. 2003. Tiếng Việt. Mấy Vấn đề Ngữ Âm, Ngữ Pháp, Ngữ Nghĩa (Vietnamese: Some Issues in Phonetics, Grammar, Semantics). Đà Nẵng: Nhà xuất bản Giáo dục.Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen. 1997. On the Typology of Wh-Questions [Oustanding dissertations in Linguistics]. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Clark, Marybeth. 1992. Conjunction as topicalizer in Vietnamese. Mon-Khmer Studies 20: 91–110.Google Scholar
Duffield, Nigel. 2007. Aspects of Vietnamese clause structure: Separating tense from assertion. Linguistics 45(4): 765–814. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013a. Head-first: On the head-initiality of Vietnamese clauses. In Linguistics of Vietnamese: An International Survey, Daniel Hole & Elisabeth Löbel (eds), 127–155. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013b. On polarity emphasis, assertion and mood in English and Vietnamese. Lingua 137: 248–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. On what projects in Vietnamese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 26(4): 351–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. Parsing Out in English and in Vietnamese. In Proceedings of 5th NAFOSTED Conference on Information and Computer Science (NICS), Ho Tu Bao, Le Anh Cuong, Ho Van Khuong & Bui Thu Lam (eds), 311–316. Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam: Science and Technics Publishing House.Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 2013. Turn-initial position and some of its occupants. Journal of Pragmatics 57: 331–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liberman, Mark. 1973. Some Observations on Semantic Scope. MA thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
McCloskey, James. 1990. Resumptive pronouns, A’-Binding and levels of representation in Irish. In Syntax and Semantics 23: The Syntax of the Modern Celtic Languages, Randall Hendrick (ed). New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. The morphosyntax of wh-extraction in Irish. Journal of Linguistics 37(1): 67–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. Resumption, successive cyclicity, and the locality of operations. In Derivation and Explanation, David Epstein & Daniel Seeley (eds), 184–226. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
McCloskey, James & Sells, Peter. 1988. Control and A-chains in Modern Irish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 143–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nishigauchi, Taisuke. 1983. Japanese LF: Subjacency vs. ECP. Seoul Workshop on Formal Grammar. Sponsored by the Linguistic Society of Korea, Seoul. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oshima, David Y. 2006. On factive islands: Pragmatic anomaly vs. pragmatic infelicity. In JSAI Conference and Workshops, Takashi Washio, Ken Satoh, Hideaki Takeda & Akihiro Inokuchi (eds), 147–161. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David. 1987. WH-in-situ, movement and unselective binding. In The Representation of (In)definiteness, Eric Reuland & Alice ter Meulen (eds), 98–129. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Phan, Trang. 2013. Syntax of Vietnamese Aspect. PhD dissertation, University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
Pollard, Carl & Sag, Ivan A. 1994. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rooryck, Johann. 1992. Negative and factive islands revisited. Journal of Linguistics 28: 343–373. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schlegloff, Emanuel A. 1996. Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In Interaction and Grammar, Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schlegloff & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 52–133. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Andrew. 1991. Morphological Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1957. Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review 66(2): 143–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar