Chapter published in:
Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Vietnamese Linguistics
Edited by Nigel Duffield, Trang Phan and Tue Trinh
[Studies in Language Companion Series 211] 2019
► pp. 275–300

Effects of grammatical roles and parallelism on referential form production in Vietnamese spoken and written narratives

| University of Southern California, USA
| University of Southern California, USA
| University of Southern California, USA
This study investigates the use of null and overt pronouns and noun phrases in Vietnamese spoken and written narratives, with a focus on referents’ grammatical roles and grammatical parallelism. Looking at Vietnamese allows us to address questions left open in prior work regarding the effects of pronominal form (null, overt) on reference resolution in different grammatical positions. Furthermore, looking at the use of Vietnamese pronouns adds typological breadth to the literature on reference resolution: Vietnamese overt pronouns differ typologically from pronouns in English-type languages as they also function as kin terms. Results from data we collected involving spoken and written narratives show that referential form choice is influenced not only by the grammatical role of the antecedent but also the grammatical role of the pronominal element. When the subject of the current clause refers to the subject of the preceding clause (subject parallelism), we find a high rate of (null and overt) pronouns. Lack of parallelism triggers mostly NPs. When the object of the current clause refers to the object of the preceding clause (object parallelism), more pronouns were produced than in non-parallel cases. Crucially, we find no clear differences in the distribution of null vs. overt pronouns, suggesting that grammatical roles and parallelism have the same effects on both pronoun types. Our results also show no effects of written vs. spoken modality, which indicates that modality does not play a role in the interaction between grammatical factors and referential form choice.
Keywords: reference resolution, pronouns, Vietnamese, subjecthood, parallelism, narrative
Published online: 09 October 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.211.13ngo
References

References

Alonso-Ovalle, Luis, Fernández-Solera, Susana, Frazier, Lyn, & Clifton Jr., Charles
2002 Null vs. overt pronouns and the topic-focus articulation in Spanish. Italian Journal of Linguistics 14: 151–170.Google Scholar
Amano, Shigeaki, & Kondo, Tadahisa
2000 Nihongo-no Goi-tokusei (Lexical properties of Japanese), Vol. 7. Tokyo: Sansei-do.Google Scholar
Ariel, Mira
1990 Accessing Noun-phrase Antecedents. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barbosa, Pilar
2011  Pro-drop and theories of pro in the minimalist program, Part 2: Pronoun deletion analyses of null subjects and partial, discourse and semi pro-drop. Language and Linguistics Compass 5(8): 571–587. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bel, Aurora, Perera, Joan, & Salas, Namyé
2010 Anaphoric devices in written and spoken narrative discourse: Data from Catalan. Written Language and Literacy 13(2): 236–259. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Brennan, Susan E., Friedman, Marilyn W., & Pollard, Carl
1987 A centering approach to pronouns. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Stanford, California, 155–162. Stroudsberg PA: Association for Computational Linguistics. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carminati, Maria Nella
2002 The Processing of Italian Subject Pronouns. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L.
(ed.) 1980 The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
1976 Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In Subject and Topic, Charles Li (ed.), 25–56. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. & Tannen, Deborah
1987 The relation between written and spoken language. Annual Review of Anthropology 16(1): 383–407. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, Craig & Smyth, Ron
1998 Structural parallelism and discourse coherence: A test of centering theory. Journal of Memory and Language 39(4): 593–608. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Ping
1986 Referent Introducing and Tracking in Chinese Narratives. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Christensen, Matthew B.
2000 Anaphoric reference in spoken and written Chinese narrative discourse. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 28(2): 303–336.Google Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M.
1980 Referential choice in English and Japanese narrative discourse. In The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production, Wallace L. Chafe (ed.), 127–202. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
1982 Written and spoken style in Japanese narratives. In Spoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy, Deborah Tannen (ed.), 55–76 Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Crawley, Rosalind A. & Stevenson, Rosemary J.
1990 Reference in single sentences and in texts. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 19(3): 191–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drieman, G. H. J.
1962 Differences between written and spoken languages: an exploratory study. Acta Psychologica 20: 78–100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fedele, Emily
2016 Discourse-level Processing and Pronoun Interpretation. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Fukumura, Kumiko & Van Gompel, Roger P.
2010 Choosing anaphoric expressions: Do people take into account likelihood of reference? Journal of Memory and Language 62(1): 52–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
(ed.) 1983 Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-Language Study [Typological Studies in Language 3]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Peter C. & Chan, Davina
1995 Pronouns, passives and discourse coherence. Journal of Memory and Language 34: 216–223. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Peter C., Grosz, Barbara J., & Gilliom, Laura A.
1993 Pronouns, names, and the centering of attention in discourse. Cognitive Science 17(3): 311–347. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette K., Hedberg, Nancy, & Zacharski, Ron
1993 Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69(2): 274–307. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hinds, John
1975 Third person pronouns in Japanese. In Language in Japanese Society, Fred C. Peng (ed.), 129–157. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
1983 Topic continuity in Japanese. In Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-Language Study [Typological Studies in Language 3], Talmy Givón (ed.), 47–93. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, Milton W. & Newman, John B.
1964 Spoken and written expression: An experimental analysis. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 68(6): 640. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hurewitz, Felicia
1998 A quantitative look at discourse coherence. In Centering Theory in Discourse, Marilyn A. Walker, Arvind K. Joshi & Ellen F. Prince (eds), 273–291. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Elsi & Trueswell, John C.
2008 Interpreting pronouns and demonstratives in Finnish: Evidence for a form-specific approach to reference resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes 23(5): 709–748. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kehler, Andrew
2002 Coherence, Reference, and the Theory of Grammar. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
2008 Rethinking the SMASH approach to pronoun interpretation. In Reference: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Jeanette K. Gundel & Nancy Hedberg (eds), 95–122. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kehler, Andrew & Rohde, Hannah
2013 A probabilistic reconciliation of coherence-driven and centering-driven theories of pronoun interpretation. Theoretical Linguistics 39(1): 1–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuroda, Shige-Yuki
1965 Generative Grammatical Studies in the Japanese Language. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knut
1994 Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sandra A.
1981 Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
1979 Third person pronouns and zero anaphora in Chinese discourse. In Syntax and Semantics 12: Discourse and Syntax, Talmy Givón (ed.), 311–335. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Neeleman, Ad & Szendrői, Kriszta
2007 Radical pro drop and the morphology of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 38(4): 671–714. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ngo, Binh & Kaiser, Elsi
2018 Effects of grammatical roles and topicality on Vietnamese referential form production. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America 3(57): 1–12. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Passonneau, Rebecca J.
1998 Interaction of discourse structure with explicitness of discourse anaphoric noun phrases. In Centering Theory in Discourse, Marilyn A. Walker, Arvind K. Joshi & Ellen F. Prince (eds), 327–358. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Perfetti, Charles A. & Goldman, Susan R.
1974 Thematization and sentence retrieval. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 13(1): 70–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, Andrew, Wu, Zoe, & Li, Yan
2016 Grammatical roles, coherence relations, and the interpretation of pronouns in Chinese. Lingua Sinica 2(1): 1–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, Ron
1994 Grammatical determinants of ambiguous pronoun resolution. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 23(3): 197–229. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, Rosemary J., Nelson, Alexander W. R., & Stenning, Keith
1995 The role of parallelism in strategies of pronoun comprehension. Language and Speech 38(4): 393–418. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
1980 Spoken/written language and the oral/literate continuum. In Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 207–218. Berkeley CA: BLS. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ueno, Mieko & Kehler, Andrew
2016 Grammatical and pragmatic factors in the interpretation of Japanese null and overt pronouns. Linguistics 54(6): 1165–1221. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Marilyn A., Joshi, Arvind K., & Prince, Ellen F.
1998 Centering Theory in Discourse. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Yang, Chin Lung, Gordon, Peter C., Hendrick, Randall & Wu, Jei Tun
1999 Comprehension of referring expressions in Chinese. Language and Cognitive Processes 14(5–6): 715–743. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Chin Lung, Gordon, Peter C., Hendrick, Randall, & Hue, Chih Wei
2003 Constraining the comprehension of pronominal expressions in Chinese. Cognition 86(3): 283–315. CrossrefGoogle Scholar