Chapter published in:
Chapters of Dependency Grammar: A historical survey from Antiquity to TesnièreEdited by András Imrényi and Nicolas Mazziotta
[Studies in Language Companion Series 212] 2020
► pp. 23–58
Chapter 1Syntactic relations in ancient and medieval grammatical theory
Anneli Luhtala | University of Helsinki
It was the Stoics among the ancient philosophers who most vividly
developed the philosophy of language as part of their logic. Within their
theory of meaning, they recognized various types of predicates which
required one or more cases or ‘arguments’ to complete their meaning. A
minimal complete statement consisting of a verb and one or two nominals
formed a logical proposition. This minimal statement also became the point
of departure for syntactic analysis when a theory of syntax began to be
integrated in grammars. Indeed, some of the basic elements of Stoic logic
were adopted into the earliest grammatical theory of syntax, the one
composed by the Greek grammarian Apollonius Dyscolus (2nd century AD). His
theory, as transmitted to the Middle Ages by the Latin grammar of Priscian
(c. 500 AD), established itself as the foundation of the Western theory of
syntax. Within this framework, the verb was regarded as an incomplete
expression, which needed one or more nominal cases to perfect its meaning.
It would then appear that the approach was verb-centered, as it was the verb
that drew the nominal parts of speech into a construction. In the Middle
Ages, grammar came under the influence of Aristotelian logic, and the
functional notions of subject and predicate were incorporated into medieval
syntactic theory. As the predicate was defined as saying something about the
subject, it could be maintained that logically the subject is prior to its
predicate. The same view was implied in the medieval idea of a logical or
natural ordering of the parts of speech, whereby the noun occupied the
primary position. Thus, the noun occupied the first place, because the verb
drew some of its features from the noun, such as number and gender. Such
tensions in the inherited theories provided ingredients for lively scholarly
discussions throughout the Middle Ages.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Stoic logic
- 2.1Stoic proposition
- 2.2Self-sufficiency (Autoteleia)
- 2.3Stoic predicate types
- 2.4Referentiality
- 3.Ancient theory of syntax
- 3.1Rationalistic grammar
- 3.2Meaning (intelligibile)
- 3.3Definition of sentence
- 3.4Congruity (katallelotes, congruitas)
- 3.5Noun-centered view
- 3.6Verb-centered view
- 3.7Transitivity
- 3.7.1Genus verbi (Diathesis)
- 3.7.2A third actant?
- 3.7.3Mixed criteria
- 3.8Concord and coreferentiality
- 4.Syntactic theory in the High Middle Ages
- 4.1Hugh of St. Victor’s De grammatica
- 4.1.1Well-formed and perfect construction
- 4.1.2Transitivity
- 4.2The Summa super Priscianum of Peter Helias
- 4.2.1Causae inventionis
- 4.2.2Modi significandi
- 4.2.3Sentence (oratio) and construction (constructio)
- 4.2.4Government (regimen)
- 4.2.4.1Government of nouns
- 4.2.4.2Government of verbs
- 4.2.5Transitivity
- 4.1Hugh of St. Victor’s De grammatica
- 5.The speculative grammar of the late Middle Ages
- 5.1Modes of signifying
- 5.2Transitivity
- 5.3New dependency relations
- 5.3.1Dependens – terminans
- 5.3.2Primum/secundum
- 5.4Grammaticality and well-formedness
- 6.Conclusions
-
Notes -
References
Published online: 06 February 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.212.02luh
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.212.02luh
References
A. Primary sources
Apollonius Dyscolus
Aristotle
Bacon, R.
Boethius, A. M. S.
Boethius Dacus
CIMAGL = Cahiers de l’institut du Moyen Âge grec et
latin
DL = Diogenes Laertius
GG = Schneider, H., & Uhlig, G.
Fredborg, K. M.
Grotans, A., & Porter, D.
Hugh of St. Victor
Jordanus
Martinus de Dacia
Notae Dunelmenses
Petrus Helias
Priscian [Priscianus Caesariensis]
Simon Dacus Modista
Siger de Courtrai
Simon Dacus Domifex
Tesnière, L.
William of Conches
Glose super Priscianum. Ms. Paris, Bibliothèque nationale de France, Lat. 15130 (late version).
B. Critical sources
Ackrill, J. L.
Arens, H.
Blank, D.
Colombat, B.
(2020) Chapter 2. The notion of dependency in Latin grammar
in the Renaissance and the 17th century. In A. Imrényi & N. Mazziotta (Eds.), Chapters of dependency grammar. A historical survey from
Antiquity to Tesnière (Studies in Language Companion Series 212). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume) 

Covington, M.
Fredborg, K. M.
Frede, M.
Gibson, M.
Grondeux, A., & Rosier-Catach, I.
Householder, F. W.
Hunt, R. W
Kelly, L. G.
Kahane, S., & Osborne, T.
Kneepkens, C. H.
(1990) Transitivity, intransitivity and related concepts in
12th century grammar. An explorative study. In G. L. Bursill-Hall, S. Ebbesen, & K. Koerner (Eds.). De ortu grammaticae. Studies in Medieval Grammar and
Linguistic Theory in memory of Jan Pinborg (Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 43) (pp.161–189). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 

Lloyd, A. C.
Long, A. A., & Sedley. D. N.
Luhtala, A.
Luhtala, A., & Amsler, M.
Marmo, C.
Martinelli, C.
Pinborg, J.
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Colombat, Bernard
Imrényi, András & Zsuzsa Vladár
Mazziotta, Nicolas
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.