Chapter 1
Syntactic relations in ancient and medieval grammatical theory
It was the Stoics among the ancient philosophers who most vividly
developed the philosophy of language as part of their logic. Within their
theory of meaning, they recognized various types of predicates which
required one or more cases or ‘arguments’ to complete their meaning. A
minimal complete statement consisting of a verb and one or two nominals
formed a logical proposition. This minimal statement also became the point
of departure for syntactic analysis when a theory of syntax began to be
integrated in grammars. Indeed, some of the basic elements of Stoic logic
were adopted into the earliest grammatical theory of syntax, the one
composed by the Greek grammarian Apollonius Dyscolus (2nd century AD). His
theory, as transmitted to the Middle Ages by the Latin grammar of Priscian
(c. 500 AD), established itself as the foundation of the Western theory of
syntax. Within this framework, the verb was regarded as an incomplete
expression, which needed one or more nominal cases to perfect its meaning.
It would then appear that the approach was verb-centered, as it was the verb
that drew the nominal parts of speech into a construction. In the Middle
Ages, grammar came under the influence of Aristotelian logic, and the
functional notions of subject and predicate were incorporated into medieval
syntactic theory. As the predicate was defined as saying something about the
subject, it could be maintained that logically the subject is prior to its
predicate. The same view was implied in the medieval idea of a logical or
natural ordering of the parts of speech, whereby the noun occupied the
primary position. Thus, the noun occupied the first place, because the verb
drew some of its features from the noun, such as number and gender. Such
tensions in the inherited theories provided ingredients for lively scholarly
discussions throughout the Middle Ages.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Stoic logic
- 2.1Stoic proposition
- 2.2Self-sufficiency (Autoteleia)
- 2.3Stoic predicate types
- 2.4Referentiality
- 3.Ancient theory of syntax
- 3.1Rationalistic grammar
- 3.2Meaning (intelligibile)
- 3.3Definition of sentence
- 3.4Congruity (katallelotes, congruitas)
- 3.5Noun-centered view
- 3.6Verb-centered view
- 3.7Transitivity
- 3.7.1Genus verbi (Diathesis)
- 3.7.2A third actant?
- 3.7.3Mixed criteria
- 3.8Concord and coreferentiality
- 4.Syntactic theory in the High Middle Ages
- 4.1Hugh of St. Victor’s De grammatica
- 4.1.1Well-formed and perfect construction
- 4.1.2Transitivity
- 4.2The Summa super Priscianum of Peter Helias
- 4.2.1Causae inventionis
- 4.2.2Modi significandi
- 4.2.3Sentence (oratio) and construction (constructio)
- 4.2.4Government (regimen)
- 4.2.4.1Government of nouns
- 4.2.4.2Government of verbs
- 4.2.5Transitivity
- 5.The speculative grammar of the late Middle Ages
- 5.1Modes of signifying
- 5.2Transitivity
- 5.3New dependency relations
- 5.3.1Dependens – terminans
- 5.3.2Primum/secundum
- 5.4Grammaticality and well-formedness
- 6.Conclusions
-
Notes
-
References
References
A. Primary sources
Apollonius Dyscolus
(
1878–1910)
Apollonii Dyscoli quae supersunt. Grammatici Graeci II.1 & 3. Ed. by
R. Schneider. Leipniz: Teubner. (2nd c. AD)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aristotle
(
1938)
The categories. On interpretation (De
interpretatione). Ed. and transl.
H. P. Cook. London: Heinemann; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aristotle
(
1933–1935)
Metaphysics. Ed. and transl. by
H. Tredennick. 2 Vols. London: Heinemann; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aristotle
(
1957–1960)
Physics. Ed. and transl. by
P. H. Wicksteed &
Francis M. Cornford. 2 Vols. (
Loeb Classical Library.) London: Heinemann; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bacon, R.
(
1940)
Summa grammatica. Ed. by
Robert Steele. (=
Opera hactenus inedita Rogeri Baconi, 15.) Oxford: Clarendon Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boethius, A. M. S.
(
1876, 1880)
Commentarii in librum Aristotelis ‘Peri hermeneias’. Ed. by
C. Meiser. Leipzig: Teubner, V.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boethius, A. M. S.
(
1998)
De divisione. Ed.
J. Magee. Leiden: Brill.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boethius Dacus
(
1969)
Modi significandi sive quaestiones super Priscianum
maiorem. Ed. by
Jan Pinborg &
Heinrich Roos. Copenhague: G.E.C. Gad.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
CIMAGL = Cahiers de l’institut du Moyen Âge grec et
latin
. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen
1969– .
[URL] since 2010.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
DL = Diogenes Laertius
(
1950)
Lives of eminent philosophers with an English translation by
Robert D. Hicks. 2 vols. (
Loeb Classical Library.) London: Heinemann.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
GG = Schneider, H., & Uhlig, G.
(
1878–1910)
Grammatici Graeci. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner. (
Repr., Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1965)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
GL = Keil, H.
(Ed.) (
1981/1855–1880)
Grammatici Latini.
Repr., Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 8 vols.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fredborg, K. M.
(Ed.) (
2011)
Glosa Victorina super partem Prisciani de
Constructione (ms Paris Bibliothèque de l’Arsénal 910) (
Studia Artistarum, 27). Turnhout: Brepols.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fredborg, K. M., & Kneepkens, C. H.
(Eds.) (
1988)
Grammatica Porretana.
CIMAGL 57, 11–67.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grotans, A., & Porter, D.
(Eds.) (
1995)
The St. Gall Tractate: A medieval guide to rhetorical
syntax. Columbia: Camden House.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hugh of St. Victor
(
1966)
De grammatica. Hugonis de Sancto Victore opera
propaedeutica. Ed. by
Roger Baron (pp.67–166). (
University of Notre Dame Publications in Medieval
Studies, 20). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jordanus
(
1980)
Notulae super Priscianum Minoren Magistri Jordani (
CIMAGL 36), Ed. by
Mary Sirridge. Copenhagen.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martianus Capella
(
1978)
De Nuptiis Philologiae et Mercurii. Ed. by
A. Dick. Stuttgart: Teubner.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martinus de Dacia
(
1961) =
Martini de Dacia Opera. Ed. by
Heinrich Roos (
Corpus Philosophorum Danicorum, 2). Copenhagen: Gad.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Notae Dunelmenses
(
2017) Ed. with introduction by
Anne Grondeux &
Irène Rosier-Catach.
Priscien lu par Guillaume de Champeaux et son
école. Les Notae Dunelmensees (Durham, D.C.L., C.IV.29). 2 vols. Turnhout: Brepols.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Petrus Helias
(
1993)
Summa super Priscianum. Ed. by
Leo Reilly. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Priscian [Priscianus Caesariensis]
(
1855–1859)
Institutionum grammaticarum libri XVIII ex recensione
Martini Hertzii. In
H. Keil (Ed.).
Grammatici Latini (Vols. 2–3). Leipzig: Teubner. (= GL II–III). (Original work published ca. 526–527)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Promisimus
(
1999) Ed. by
K. M. Fredborg.
CIMAGL 70, 81–228.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Simon Dacus Modista
(
1963)
Quaestiones super secundum minoris voluminis Prisciani.
Simonis Daci opera. Ed. by
Alfred Otto (
Corpus Philosophorum Danicorum Medii Aevi, III, 89–178). Copenhagen: G. E. C. Gad.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Siger de Courtrai
(
1998)
Summa modorum significandi. Ed. by
Jan Pinborg (
Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic
Science, III. Studies in the History of Linguistics, 14). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Simon Dacus Domifex
(
1963)
Domus grammaticae. Simonis Daci opera. Ed. by
Alfred Otto. (
Corpus Philosophorum Danicorum Medii Aevi, III, 1–88). Copenhague: G. E. C. Gad.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tesnière, L.
(
2015)
Elements of structural syntax. Transl. by
T. Osborne &
S. Kahane). Amsterdam: John Benjamins (Trans. of Éléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck 1966, 2nd ed.; 1st ed. 1959).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thomas of Erfurt
(
1972)
Grammatica speculativa. Ed. by
Geoffrey L. Bursill-Hall. London: Longman.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
William of Conches
Glose super Priscianum. Ms. Paris, Bibliothèque nationale de France, Lat. 15130 (late version).
B. Critical sources
Ackrill, J. L.
(
1963)
Aristotle’s Categories and De interpretatione, translated with notes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baratin, M.
(
1989)
La naissance de la syntaxe a Rome. Paris: Éditions de minuit.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blank, D.
(
1982)
Ancient philosophy and grammar. The syntax of Apollonius
Dyscolus. (
American Classical Studies, 10). Chico, CA: Scholars Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brehier, E.
(
1951)
Chrysippe et l’ancien stoicisme. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Covington, M.
(
1984)
Syntactic theory in the High Middle Ages: Modistic models of
sentence structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fredborg, K. M.
(
1973) “
The dependence of Petrus Helias’ Summa super
Priscianum on William of Conches’ Glose super
Priscianum”.
CIMAGL 11, 1–57.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fredborg, K. M.
(
1977) “
Tractatus glosarum Prisciani in MS Vat. lat.
1486”.
CIMAGL 21, 27–44.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fredborg, K. M.
(
1981)
Some notes on the grammar of William of
Conches.
CIMAGL 37, 21–41.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fredborg, K. M.
(
1988)
Speculative grammar. In
P. Dronke (Ed.),
A history of twelfth-century Western philosophy (pp.177–195). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frede, M.
(
1977)
The origins of traditional grammar. In
R. E. Butts &
J. Hintikka (Eds.),
Historical and philosophical dimensions of logic,
methodology, and philosophy of science (pp.51–79). Dordrecht: Reidel.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gibson, M.
(
1979)
The early scholastic ‘Glosule’ to Priscian,
Institutiones grammaticae: The text and its
influene.
Studi Medievali, 3(ser. 21:1), 235–254.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grondeux, A., & Rosier-Catach, I.
(
2011)
Les Glosulae super Priscianum et leur tradition. Arts
du langage et théologie aux confins des xie/xiie
siècles.
Studia Artistarum 26, 107–180.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hunt, R. W
1941-43 “
Studies on Priscian in the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries. I. Petrus Helias and his Predecessors”.
Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 194231 [repr. in
The History of Grammar in the Middle Ages. Collected Papers, Bursill-Hall, Geoffrey L. ed., Amsterdam, John Benjamins, 1980, 1-38].
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kahane, S., & Osborne, T.
(
2015)
Translators’ introduction. In
L. Tesnière,
Elements of structural syntax (pp.ixxx–lxiii). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kneepkens, C. H.
(
1978)
Master Guido and his view on government: On
twelfth-century linguistic thought.
Vivarium 16(2), 108–141.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kneepkens, C. H.
1987 Het iudicium constructionis: Het Leersstuk van de Constructio in de 2de Helft van de 12de Eeuw. 4 vols. Nijmegen: Ingenium.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lallot, J.
(
1997)
Apollonius Dyscolus. De la
construction. 2 vols. Paris: J. Vrin.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lloyd, A. C.
(
1978)
Definite propositions and the concept of
reference. In
J. Brunschwig (Ed.),
Stoiciens et leur logique (pp.285–295). Chantilly: Centre d’Etudes et de Recherches Interdisciplinaires de Chantilly.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Long, A. A., & Sedley. D. N.
(
1987)
The Hellenistic philosophers 2 Vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Luhtala, A.
(
2000a)
On the origin of syntactical description in Stoic
logic (
The Henry Sweet Society Studies in the History of
Linguistics, 8.) Münster: Nodus Publikationen.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Luhtala, A.
(
2000b)
Early medieval commentary on
Priscian’s Institutiones grammaticae. CIMAGL 71, 115–188.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Luhtala, A.
(
2013)
Pedagogical grammars before the eighteenth
century. In
K. Allan (Ed.),
The Oxford handbook of the history of linguistcs (pp.341–358). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Luhtala, A., & Amsler, M.
(Eds.) (
2017)
Latin grammars in transition
1200–1600.
Special issue of Historiographia Linguistica 44(2/3).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marmo, C.
(
1994)
Semiotica e linguaggio nella Scolastica: Parigi, Bologna,
Erfurt 1270–1330. La semiotica dei Modisti. Roma: Istituto Storico Italiano per il Medioevo.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martinelli, C.
(
2017)
Some pedagogical and syntactical aspects of Francesco
da Buti’s Regule grammaticales. In
A. Luhtala &
M. Amsler (Eds.),
Latin Grammars in Transition: 1200–1600.
Special issue of Historiogaphia Linguistica
, 44(2/3), 204–227.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pinborg, J.
(
1975)
Classical antiquity: Greece. In
T. A. Sebeok (Ed.).
Historiography of linguistics (
Current Trends in Linguistics, 13.1) (pp.69–126). The Hague: Mouton.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rosier-Catach, I.
(
1983)
La grammaire spéculative des Modistes. Lille: Presses Universitaires.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rosier-Catach, I.
(
1984)
Transitivité et ordre des mots chez les
grammairiens médiévaux. In
S. Auroux,
M. Glatigny et al. (Eds.),
Matériaux pour une histoire des théories
linguistiques (pp.181–190). Lille: Presses Universitaires.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rosier-Catach, I.
(
1994)
L’Introduction des notions de sujet et
de prédicat dans la grammaire médiévale.
Archives et documents de la SHESL 10, 81–119.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rosier-Catach, I.
(
2010)
Grammar. In
R. Pasnau &
C. Van Dyke (Eds.),
Cambridge history of medieval philosophy (Vol. I, pp.196–216). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tesnière, L.
(
2015)
Elements of structural syntax, transl.
S. Kahane &
T. Osborne. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Imrényi, András & Zsuzsa Vladár
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.