Cover not available
Part of
Chapters of Dependency Grammar: A historical survey from Antiquity to Tesnière
Edited by András Imrényi and Nicolas Mazziotta
[Studies in Language Companion Series 212] 2020
► pp. 215–252

Chapter 7
Some aspects of dependency in Otto Jespersen’s structural syntax

| University of Copenhagen, NorS
This paper aims to challenge the assumption according to which Otto Jespersen’s syntactic model represents an anticipation of the immediate constituent analysis. In our opinion, there are elements that rather align with a more dependency-oriented framework, as it is the case of Jespersen’s notorious theory of three ranks (1913, 1921, 1937). This was developed over more than twenty years and was meant to constitute the necessary presupposition (and thus the theoretical base) for the very distinction between junction and nexus, grounding it on a pure functional base. Albeit not always consistently or exhaustively fleshed out, the theory of three ranks represents one of Jespersen’s most interesting ideas. The model will be described in detail, focusing on the latest and more formalized version given in Analytic Syntax (1937), by discussing the notation adopted and checking if it fits the five basic requirements for a dependency-based model, as per Mazziotta & Kahane (2017). Finally, it will be shown how Jespersen’s model was taken over by Louis Hjelmslev (1928), in order to develop a purely relations-oriented morphosyntactic theory.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Basic structures
    • 2.1Nexus and junction
    • 2.2The functional model of ranks
      • 2.2.1Objects
      • 2.2.2Predicatives
      • 2.2.3Verbs: Life-givers or trouble-makers?
  • 3.Jespersen’s notation
    • 3.1Connection-basedness
    • 3.2Binarity
    • 3.3Headedness
    • 3.4Node-to-word mapping
    • 3.5Flatness
  • 4.A case of critical reinterpretation
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 6 February 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.212.08cig
References (39)
References
A. Primary sources
Diderichsen, P. (1939). Review of Analytic Syntax by Otto Jespersen. Acta Linguistica, 1, 200-205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gladkij, A. V. (1966). Leckii po matematičeskoj linguistike dlya studentov [Lectures on mathematical linguistics]. Novosibirsk: NGU (French transl: Leçons de linguistique mathématique, fasc. 1, 1970, Paris: Dunod)Google Scholar
Hjelmslev, L. (1928). Principes de Grammaire Générale. Kgl. Danske Videnskabernes Selskab. Historisk-filologiske Meddelelser, XVI, 1.Google Scholar
(1961). Prolegomena to a theory of language. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press (Danish original edition published 1943).Google Scholar
(1970), Language. An introduction. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
(1971). Essais linguistiques. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
(1971a). Essai d’une théorie de morphèmes. In Hjelmslev 1971, pp.161–173. (Original work published 1938)Google Scholar
(1971b). La notion de rection. In Hjelmslev 1971, pp.148–160. (Original work published 1939)Google Scholar
(1971c). Le verbe et la phrase nominale. In Hjelmslev 1971, pp.174–200. (Original work published 1948)Google Scholar
(1972). La catégorie des cas. Étude de grammaire générale. München: Fink Vorlag. (Original work published 1935–1937)Google Scholar
(2002). Otto Jespersen. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.). Portraits of linguists. A biographical source book for the history of Western linguistics 1746–1963, Volume 2: From Edward Sapir to Benjamin Lee Whorf (pp.158–173). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. (Original paper published 1942)Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1889). The articulation of speech sounds represented by means of analphabetic system. Marburg: Elwert.Google Scholar
(1962). The role of the verb. In Selected writings of Otto Jespersen, (pp.355–360). London: Allen & Unwin. (Original work published 1911)Google Scholar
(1913), Sprogets logik [The logic of language]. København: J. H. Schultz.Google Scholar
(1921), De to hovedarter af grammatiske forbindelser [The two main types of grammatical connection]. Hovedkommissionær: A. F. Høst.Google Scholar
(1924). The philosophy of grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
(1954). A modern English grammar on historical principles, Part II. Syntax. First Volume. Allen & Unwin: London. (Original work published 1927)Google Scholar
(1969). Analytic syntax. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. (Original work published 1937)Google Scholar
Lecerf, Y. (1961). Une représentation algébrique de la structure des phrases dans diverses langues naturelles. Compte Rendu de l’Académie des Sciences 252, 232–234.Google Scholar
Tesnière, L. (2015). Elements of structural syntax (Trans. by T. Osborne, & S. Kahane). Amsterdam: John Benjamins (Trans. of Éléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck, 1966, 2nd ed.; 1st ed., 1959).Google Scholar
Western, A. (1934). Elementær analyse. Maal og Minne 1–3, 73–76.Google Scholar
B. Critical sources
Chomsky, N. (1977). Questions of form and interpretation. In Essays on Form and Interpretation, (pp.25–29). New York, NY: North Holland.Google Scholar
Graffi, G. (2001). 200 Years of syntax. A critical survey. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hewson, J. (2015). Book review of Kim Gerdes, Eva Hajičová, & Leo Wanner (Eds.), 2014, Dependency Linguistics. Recent advances in linguistic theory using dependency structures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Folia Linguistica Historica , 36, 287–296.Google Scholar
Hudson, R. A. (1980). Constituency and dependency. Linguistics 18, 179–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Imrényi, A., & Vladár, Z. (2020). Chapter 5. Sámuel Brassai in the history of dependency grammar. In A. Imrényi & N. Mazziotta (Eds.), Chapters of Dependency Grammar. A historical survey from Antiquity to Tesnière (Studies in Language Companion Series 212). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kahane, S. (2001). Grammaire de dépendance formelles et théorie Sens-Texte. Tutoriel. In Actes de TALN 2001, Tours, 60 p. Retrieved from <[URL]>Google Scholar
Kahane, S., & Osborne, T. (2015). Translator’s introduction. In L. Tesnière, Elements of structural syntax (pp.xxix–lxxiii). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Levin, S. R. (1969). Foreword. In Jespersen, 1937/1969, v–viii.Google Scholar
Mazziotta, N. (2020). Chapter 4. Dependency in early sentence diagrams: Stephen W. Clark. In A. Imrényi & N. Mazziotta (Eds.), Chapters of Dependency Grammar. A historical survey from Antiquity to Tesnière (Studies in Language Companion Series 212). John Benjamins: Amsterdam. (this volume) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mazziotta, N., & Kahane, S. (2017). To what extent is Immediate Constituency Analysis dependency–based? A survey of foundational texts. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Dependency Linguistics (Depling 2017) (pp.116–126). Pisa.Google Scholar
McCawley, J. (1970). Review of Analytic Syntax by Otto Jespersen, Samuel R. Levin. Language 46(2), 442–449. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nelson Francis, W. (1989). Otto Jespersen as grammarian. In A. Juul & H. Frede Nielsen (Eds.), Otto Jespersen: Facets of his life and work (pp.79–100). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Osborne, T. (2013). A look at Tesnière’s Éléments through the lens of modern syntactic theory. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Dependency Linguistics (Depling 2013), 262–271.Google Scholar
(2020). Chapter 4. Franz Kern. An early dependency grammarian. In A. Imrényi & N. Mazziotta (Eds.), Chapters of Dependency Grammar. A historical survey from Antiquity to Tesnière (Studies in Language Companion Series 212). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Percival, K. (1990). Reflections on the history of dependency notions in linguistics. Historiographia Linguistica 17, 29–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rischel, J. (1989). Otto Jespersen's Contribution to Danish and General Phonetics. In A. Juul & H. Frede Nielsen (Eds.), Otto Jespersen: Facets of his life and work (pp. 43–60). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J. J. (1970), Dependency structures and transformation rules. Languages 46, 259–285.Google Scholar
Sørensen, H. C., & Spang-Thomsen, B. (Eds.). (1970). Choix de communications et d’interventions au débat lors des séances tenues entre septembre 1941 et mai 1965 [Special issue]. Bulletin du Cercle linguistique de Copenhague 1941–1965, 8–31.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Imrényi, András & Zsuzsa Vladár
2020. Chapter 5. Sámuel Brassai in the history of dependency grammar. In Chapters of Dependency Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series, 212], ► pp. 164 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.