Cover not available
Part of
Information-Structural Perspectives on Discourse Particles
Edited by Pierre-Yves Modicom and Olivier Duplâtre
[Studies in Language Companion Series 213] 2020
► pp. 47–70

Chapter 2
Information-structural properties of is that clauses

| University of Vienna
This article is concerned with what are known as inferential constructions, i.e. clauses where the expressions it’s (just) that or it’s not that have gained the function of discourse markers. Similar expressions also exist in Romance. The corresponding construction in Spanish is introduced by es que and the content of the following clause is always focal, in the sense that it contains information that relates to a variable inferable from the context (exhaustive information focus). The particular information-structural properties presented by both the es que-construction and its negative and interrogative counterparts can only be explained by an analysis of their underlying development. In this respect, these constructions constitute a good illustration of the interplay of discourse and grammaticalization, especially the interface between syntax and pragmatics, where information-structural properties are located.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The semantic and pragmatic properties of is that constructions
  • 3.Predecessors of is that constructions
  • 4.Information-structural partitions
    • 4.1Inverse copula construction
    • 4.2Clefts and pseudo-clefts
    • 4.3Information-structural parallelism
    • 4.4Analysis
  • 5.Presuppositional meaning and relevance
    • 5.1Negation: No es que
    • 5.2Interrogative: ¿es que…?
    • 5.3Further observations on the morpho-syntactic properties of es que
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 4 March 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.213.02rem
References (38)
References
Beaver, David I. & Geurts, Bart. 2011. Presupposition. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy <[URL]> (26 February 2019).
Bosque, Ignacio & Demonte, Violeta (eds). 1999. Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Vol. III: Cuarta parte. Entre la oración y el discurso. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio & Gutiérrez-Rexach, Javier. 2009. Fundamentos de sintaxis formal. Madrid: Akal.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen C. 1987. Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1991. Mica: Note di sintassi e pragmatica. In Teoria linguistica e sintassi italiana, Guglielmo Cinque, 311–323. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
CORDE – Real Academia Española, Corpus diacrónico del Español <[URL]> (8 July 2016).
Corpus del Español – Mark Davies: Corpus del Español <[URL]> (18 April 2016).
CREA – Real Academia Española, Banco de datos (CREA) [online]. Corpus Referencia del Español Actual <[URL]> (8 July 2016).
Cruschina, Silvio. 2010. Aspetti morfologici e sintattici degli avverbi in siciliano. Quaderni di Lavoro dell’ASIt 11: 19–39.Google Scholar
. 2015. The expression of evidentiality and epistemicity: Cases of grammaticalization in Italian and Sicilian. Probus 27: 1–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Curzan, Anne. 2012. Revisiting the reduplicative copula with corpus-based evidence. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds), 211–222. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cvijetinović, Dušanka. 2016. Der Diskursmarker es que im Spanischen: Eine korpusgestützte Analyse. Diploma thesis, University of Vienna.Google Scholar
Declerck, Renaat. 1992. The inferential is that-construction and its congeners. Lingua 87(3): 203–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delahunty, Gerald. 1990. Inferentials: The story of a forgotten evidential. Kansas Working papers of Linguistics 15(1): 1–28.Google Scholar
. 1995. The inferential construction. Pragmatics 5(3): 341–364. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Discourse functions of inferential sentences. Linguistics 39: 517–545. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delahunty, Gerald & Gatzkiewicz, Laura. 2000. On the Spanish inferential construction ser que. Pragmatics 10: 301–322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dufter, Andreas. 2008. Evolución pragmática de las oraciones hendidas en español. El papel de los usos no focalizadores. In Actas del VII Congreso internacional de la Lengua (Mérida, México, 4–8 de septiembre de 2006), Vol. 2, Concepción Company Company & Humberto López Morales (eds), 1763–1780. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Escandell Vidal, M.a Victoria. 1999. Los enunciados interrogatives. Aspectos semánticos y pragmáticos. In Bosque & Demonte (1999), 3929–3991.Google Scholar
Fernández Leborans, María Jesús. 1992. La oración del tipo: ‘es que…’. Verba 19: 223–239. <[URL]> (11 May 2014).
. 1999. La predicación: Las oraciones copulativas. In Bosque, & Demonte (1999), 2357–2460.Google Scholar
Fernández Ramírez, Salvador. 1951. Gramática española. Los sonidos, el nombre y el pronombre. Madrid: Revista de Occidente.Google Scholar
Fernández Soriano, Olga & Táboas Baylín, Susana. 1999. Construcciones impersonales no reflejas. In Bosque & Demonte (1999), 1723–1778.Google Scholar
Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina. 1997. Los conectores en la lengua oral: Es que como introductor de enunciado. Verba: Anuario galego de filoloxia 24: 237–263 <[URL]> (11 May 2014).
Garzonio, Jacopo & Poletto, Cecilia. 2015a. On polarity particles in Italian varieties. In Discourse-oriented Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 226], Josef Bayer, Roland Hinterhölzl & Andreas Trotzke (eds), 211–228. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015b. On preverbal negation in Sicilian and syntactic parasitism. Isogloss 18: 133–149. (Special issue). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gaston, Phoebe. 2014. Double is. Yale Grammatical Diversity Project: English in North America. <[URL]> (18 August 2018). Updated by Tom McCoy (2015) and Katie Martin (2018).
Ledgeway, Adam. 2017. Marking presuppositional negation in the dialects of southern Italy. In Negation: Syntax, Semantics & Variation, Silvio Cruschina, Katharina Hartmann & Eva-Maria Remberger (eds), 105–130. Göttingen: V&R/Vienna University Press.Google Scholar
Moreno Cabrera, Juan Carlos. 1999. Las funciones informativas: Las perífrasis de relativo y otras construcciones perifrásticas. In Bosque & Demonte (1999), 4245–4304.Google Scholar
Moro, Andrea. 1993. I predicati nominali e la struttura della frase. Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar
. 1997. The Raising of Predicates. Predicative Noun Phrases and the Theory of Clause Structure. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Penello, Nicoletta & Pescarini, Diego. 2008. Osservazioni su mica in italiano e alcuni dialetti veneti. Quaderni di lavoro dell’ASIt 8: 43–56.Google Scholar
Pescarini, Diego. 2005. Mica nell’area metropolitana di Verona. In Dialetti in città, Gianna Marcato (ed.), 283–288. Padua: Unipress.Google Scholar
Remberger, Eva-Maria. Submitted. Discourse and pragmatic markers in Romance. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia (ORE). Oxford: OUP.
. 2017. X + THAT elements in Romance. Talk at the Romance Linguistic Seminar, Faculty of Linguistics, Philology and Phonetics & Faculty of Medieval and Modern Languages, University of Oxford, 9 March.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Romera, Magdalena. 2009. The multiple origin of es que in modern Spanish: Diachronic evidence. In Current Trends in Diachronic Semantics and Pragmatics, Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen & Visconti, Jacqueline (eds), 148–164. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Squartini, Mario. 2017. Italian non-canonical negations as modal particles. In Pragmatic Markers, Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: New Perspectives [Studies in Language Companion Series 186], Chiara Fedriani & Andrea Sansó (eds), 203–228. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar