Cover not available
Part of
Information-Structural Perspectives on Discourse Particles
Edited by Pierre-Yves Modicom and Olivier Duplâtre
[Studies in Language Companion Series 213] 2020
► pp. 277–300

Chapter 11
Modal particles in Basque

Two cases of interaction between ote and information structure

| University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU
The interaction between modal particles and information structure has received no attention within Basque linguistics. Although the standard behaviour of modal particles in Basque shows, no connection with information structure, in this article I present two dialectal uses only found in Eastern Basque where the discourse particle ote interacts with focus: on the one hand, ote, which can behave as a weak adverb in these varieties, is only licensed when there is narrow focus occupying the Focus Phrase. On the other hand, the particle can attach wh-words creating a configuration also found in languages such as German or Japanese as will be discussed throughout the article; this combination seems to attract emphasis for intensity cross-linguistically.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Modal particles in Basque: A brief analysis of common ote
  • 3.MP ote’s dependency on FocP in Eastern dialects
  • 4.Microvariations on the MP ote in North-Eastern dialects: ‘wh-word ote’
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 4 March 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.213.11mon
References (69)
References
Abraham, Werner. 1991. Discourse particles in German: How does their illocutive force come about? In Discourse Particles: Descriptive and Theoretical Investigations on the Logical, Syntactic and Pragmatic Properties of Discourse Particles in German [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 12], Werner Abraham (ed), 203–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alcázar, Asier. 2017. A syntactic analysis of rhetorical questions. In Proceedings of the 34th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Aaron Kaplan (ed.), 32–41. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Aldai, Gontzal. 2010. Euskararen kasu-markaketaren aldakortasun dialektala. In Euskara eta euskarak: Aldakortasun sintaktikoa aztergai 52, Beatriz Fernández, Pablo Albizu & Ricardo Etxepare (eds), 5–19.Google Scholar
Artiagoitia, Xabier & Elordieta, Arantzazu. 2016. On the semantic function and selection of Basque finite complementizers, In Complementizer Semantics in European Languages, Kasper Boyer & Petar Kehayov, 379–411. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Badan, Linda & Francesca Del Gobbo. 2015. The even-construction and the low periphery in Mandarin Chinese. Cartography of Chinese Syntax: 33–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Josef & Volker Struckmeier. 2017. Discourse Particles: Formal Approaches to Their Syntax and Semantics. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Josef. 2009. Discourse particles in questions. Paper presented at GLOW Asia.
Bayer, Josef & Obenauer, Hans-Georg. 2011. Discourse particles, clause structure, and question types. Linguistic Review 28(4): 449–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Josef & Trotzke, Andreas. 2015. The derivation and interpretation of left peripheral discourse particles. In Discourse-Oriented Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 226], Josef Bayer, Roland Hinterhölzl & Andreas Trotzke (eds), 13–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa & Sheehan, Michelle. 2011. Introduction: Particles through a modern syntactic lens. The Linguistic Review 28(4): 387–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biezma, Maria, Butt, Miriam & Jabeen, Farhat. 2018. Polar questions vs. Kya-questions in Hindi/Urdu. Paper presented at GLOW 41.
Borda, Itxaro. 2005. Zeruetako erresuma. Zarautz: Susa.Google Scholar
Camino, Iñaki. 2017. Amikuzeko eskualdeko (h)euskara. Bilbao: Euskaltzaindia.Google Scholar
. 2013. “Alphonsa rodriguez jesusen compagnhaco aitaren guiristhinho perfeccioniaren praticaren pparte bat (1782)”. edizioa eta azterketa. Anuario Del Seminario De Filología Vasca Julio De Urquijo: International Journal of Basque Linguistics and Philology 47(1): 3–486.Google Scholar
. 2009. Mugako hiztun eta aldaerak ipar-mendebaleko zuberoan. Fontes Linguae Vasconum (FLV) 111: 153–218.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna. 2011. German and Italian modal particles and clause structure. The Linguistic Review 28(4): 493–531. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casenave-Harigile, Junes. 1997. Basabürüko ipuinak. Izpegi.Google Scholar
Cecchetto, Carlo & Donati, Caterina. 2012. Perché Rizzi is right. In Enjoy Linguistics: Papers Offered to Luigi Rizzi on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday, Valentina Bianchi & Cristiano Chesi (eds), 54–62. Siena: Centro Interdisciplinare di Studi Cognitivi sul Linguaggio.Google Scholar
Coniglio, Marco. 2008. Modal particles in italian. Working Papers in Linguistics 18: 91–129.Google Scholar
. 2007. German modal particles in the IP-domain. Rivista Di Grammatica Generativa 32: 3–37.Google Scholar
Nguyen, Anne. 2018. A scalar semantics of the Vietnamese sentence-final particle cơ. (Paper presented at the conference Triple A, Konstanz, 27–29 June 2018).
De Cuba, Carlos. 2017. Noun complement clauses as referential modifiers. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 2(1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth, Bert Cornillie & Paola Pietrandrea. 2013. Discourse markers and modal particles: Categorization and description. Amsterdam/ Phidadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duguine, Maia & Irurtzun, Aritz. 2014. From obligatory wh-movement to optional wh-in-situ in labourdin Basque. Language 90 (1): 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egg, Markus & Mursell, Johannes. 2017. The syntax and semantics of discourse particles. In Discourse Particles: Formal Approaches to their Syntax and Semantics, Josef Bayer & Volker Struckmeier (eds), 15–48. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Egg, Markus & Zimmermann, Malte. 2012. Stressed out! Accented discourse particles – The case of DOCH. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 16, Vol. 1, Ana Aguilar Guevara, Anna Chernilovskaya & Rick Nouwen (eds), 225–238. Cambridge MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Elordieta, Arantzazu. 2001. Verb Movement and Constituent Permutation in Basque. Utrecht: Landelijke Onderzoekschool Taalwetenschap Publications.Google Scholar
Elordieta, Arantzazu & Haddican Bill. 2018. Truncation feeds intervention. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 36(2): 403–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elordieta, Gorka. 1997. Morphosyntactic Feature Chains and Phonological Domains. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Endo, Yoshio. 2018. Exploring the right periphery in Japanese by RM: Expressive meaning questions. Handout from the workshop Clause Typing and the Syntax-to-Discourse Relation in Head-Final Languages, Josef Bayer & Yvonne Viesel (org). Konstanz: University of Konstanz.Google Scholar
Etxepare, Ricardo. 1997. Two types of focus in Basque. In Proceedings of the 15th West Coast Conference in Formal Linguistics, Brian Agbayani & Sze-Wing Tang (eds), 113–129. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Etxepare, Ricardo & Uria, Larraitz. 2016. Microsyntactic variation in the Basque hearsay evidential. In Microparameters in the Grammar of Basque [Language Faculty and Beyond 13], Beatriz Fernández & Jon Ortiz de Urbina (eds), 265–288. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Euskaltzaindia [The Royal Academy of the Basque Language]. 1987. Euskal gramatika. Lehen urratsak II Bilbao: Euskaltzaindia.Google Scholar
Faller, Martina. 2002. Semantics and pragmatics of evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. Palo Alto: Stanford University. (Doctoral dissertation.).Google Scholar
Fernández, Beatriz & Etxepare, Ricardo. 2013. Variation in Datives: A Microcomparative Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Garmendia, Joana. 2014. ote: hiztunaren ziurtasunik eza. Gogoa: Euskal Herriko Unibersitateko hizkuntza, ezagutza, komunikazio eta ekintzari buruzko aldizkaria 12: 7–26.Google Scholar
Göksel, Aslı & A. S. Özsoy. 2003. dA: a focus/topic associated clitic in Turkish. Lingua 113(11): 1143–1167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hack, Franziska Maria. 2014. The particle po in the varieties of dolomitic Ladin–Grammaticalisation from a temporal adverb into an interrogative marker. Studia Linguistica 68(1): 49–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiriart-Urruty, Jean. 1972. Zezenak errepublikan. Arantzazu: Jakin.Google Scholar
Hualde, José I. & Jon Ortiz de Urbina. 2003. A grammar of Basque. Berlin & Boston: de Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Inchauspe, Emmanuel T. 1856. Le Saint Évangile de Jésus-Christ selon Saint Mathieu/traduit en basque souletin par l’abbé Inchauspe, pour le Prince Louis-Lucien Bonaparte. Baiona: Imprimerie de Veuve Lamaignère née Teulières.Google Scholar
Irigoyen, Alfonso. 1957. Cartas de mariano mendigacha a D. resurrección maría de azkue, escritas en vascuence roncalés y en castellano. Euskera II: 119–70.Google Scholar
Irurtzun, Aritz. 2016. Strategies for argument and adjunct focalization in Basque. In Microparameters in the Grammar of Basque [Language Faculty and Beyond 13], Beatriz Fernández & Jon Ortiz de Urbina (eds), 243–264. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuwabara, Kazuki. 2013. Peripheral effects in Japanese questions and the fine structure of CP. Lingua 126: 92–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landart, Daniel. 1999. Anaiaren azken hitzak. Donostia-San Sebastian: Elkarlanean.Google Scholar
Lhande, Pierre. 1926. Dictionnaire Basque: Français et français-basque:(Dialectes labourdin, bas-navarrais et souletin), Tome I: Dictionnaire basque-français. Gabriel Beauchesne.Google Scholar
Lizardi-Ituarte, Aitor. in press. Particles in Basque: a neoperformative approach to ba. [Manuscript accepted for publication.]
Littell, Patrick, Lisa Matthewson & Tyler Peterson. 2010. On the semantics of conjectural questions. In Tyle Peterson & Uli Sauerland (eds.). Evidence from evidentials, University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics, 89–104. Vancouver: University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Mitxelena, Koldo & Sarasola, Ibon. 2017. Orotariko euskal hiztegia. Euskaltzaindia.Google Scholar
Monforte, Sergio. 2019. Hori emain ote nauzu? On the pragmatic development of modal particles. [Manuscript submitted for publication.]Google Scholar
Munaro, Nicola & Poletto, Cecilia. 2002. Ways of clausal typing. Rivista Di Grammatica Generativa 27: 87–105.Google Scholar
Oihenarte, Jakes. 1971. Kaniko eta belxitina. Donostia: Lur Editoriala.Google Scholar
Oñederra, Lourdes. 1999. Eta emakumeari sugeak esan zion. Donostia: Erein Argitaletxea.Google Scholar
Ormaetxea, José L. 2005. Aramaioko euskara (azterketa dialektologikoa). Vitoria-Gasteiz: University of the Basque Country (Doctoral dissertation.).Google Scholar
Ortiz de Urbina, Jon. 1999a. Focus in Basque. In The Grammar of Focus [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 24], Georges Rebuschi & Laurice Tuller (eds), 311–334. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999b. Focus phrases, force phrases and left heads in Basque. In Grammatical Analyses in Basque and Romance Linguistics: Papers in honor of Mario Saltarelli [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 187], Jon Franco, Alazne Landa & Juan Martin (eds), 179–94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pagola, Rosa Miren. 2004. Bonaparte ondareko eskuizkribuak. Bilduma Osoaren Edizio Digitala.Google Scholar
Peillen, Txomin. 1979. Quelques aspects dénotatifs et connotatifs de l’interrogation en basque souletin. Fontes Linguae Vasconum: Studia Et Documenta 11(33): 407–421.Google Scholar
Rijk, Rudolf d. 2008. Standard Basque: A progressive grammar (Current Studies in Linguistics). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rebuschi, Georges. 2013. On embedded interrogatives and related constructions in Northern Basque. In Morphologie, syntaxe et sémantique des subordonnants, Colette Bodelot, Hana Gruet-Skrabalova & François Trouilleux (eds.), 209–224. Clermont-Ferrand: Presses universitaires Blaise Pascal.Google Scholar
Rezac, Milan & Fernández, Beatriz. 2013. Dative displacement in Basque. In Variation in Datives, Beatriz Fernandez & Ricardo Etxepare (eds), 256–282. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 2004. Locality and left periphery. In Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 3, Adriana Belletti (ed.), 223–251. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2001. On the position “Int(errogative)” in the left periphery of the clause. In Current Studies in Italian Syntax: Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi, Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds), 287–96. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Salaberry, Etienne. 1978. Ene sinestea: Iragan biziari gibeletik beha. Zarautz: [s.n.].Google Scholar
Struckmeier, Volker. 2014. Ja doch wohl C? Modal particles in German as c-related elements. Studia Linguistica 68(1): 16–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suñer, Margarita. 1993. About indirect questions and semi-questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 16(1): 45–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trotzke, Andreas & Monforte, Sergio. 2019. Basque question particles: Implications for a syntax of discourse particles. Linguistic Variation (online). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trotzke, Andreas & Turco, Giuseppina. 2015. The grammatical reflexes of emphasis: Evidence from German wh-questions. Lingua 168: 37–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zubeldia, Larraitz. 2013. (Non)-determining the original speaker: Reportative particles versus verbs. Research in Language 11(2): 103–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar