Part of
Morphological Complexity within and across Boundaries: In honour of Aslı Göksel
Edited by Aslı Gürer, Dilek Uygun-Gökmen and Balkız Öztürk
[Studies in Language Companion Series 215] 2020
► pp. 121154
References (12)
References
Brendemoen, Bernt. 2014. The late Ottoman use of the infinitives in -mA and -mAklIk. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi 2014(2): 25–35.Google Scholar
Dede, Müşerref. 1986. Definiteness and referentiality in Turkish verbal sentences. In Studies in Turkish Linguistics [Typological Studies in Language 8], Dan Isaac Slobin & Karl Zimmer (eds), 147–163. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deny, Jean. 1941. Türk Dili Grameri (Osmanlı Lehçesi), Ali Ulvi Elöve (tr. and ed.). Istanbul: Maarif Vekâleti.Google Scholar
Erguvanlı Taylan, Eser. 1994. Yantümcelerde Tamlayan Ekinin İşlevi Üzerine. Dilbilim Araştırmaları 1994: 31–41.Google Scholar
Findley, Carter V. 1980. Bureaucratic Reform in the Ottoman Empire. The Sublime Porte, 1789–1922. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Göksel, Aslı & Kerslake, Celia. 2005. Turkish: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haig, Geoffrey. 1998. Relative Constructions in Turkish. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Kerslake, Celia. 1998. La construction d’une langue nationale sortie d’un vernaculaire impérial enflé: La transformation stylistique et conceptuelle du turc ottoman. In Langues et pouvoir. De l’Afrique du Nord à l’Extrême-Orient, Salem Chaker (ed.), 129–138. Aix-en-Provence: Edisud.Google Scholar
Nilsson, Birgit. 1985. Case Marking Semantics in Turkish. Stockholm: Department of Linguistics, University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
Prokosch, Erich. 1980. Studien zur Grammatik des Osmanisch-Türkischen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Vulgarosmanisch-Türkischen. Freiburg: Klaus Schwarz Verlag.Google Scholar
Trask, Robert Lawrence. 1996. Historical Linguistics. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Tura, Sabahat Sansa. 1986. Definiteness and referentiality in Turkish nonverbal sentences. In Studies in Turkish Linguistics [Typological Studies in Language 8], Dan Isaac Slobin & Karl Zimmer (eds), 165–194. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar