Chapter published in:
Morphological Complexity within and across Boundaries: In honour of Aslı Göksel
Edited by Aslı Gürer, Dilek Uygun-Gökmen and Balkız Öztürk
[Studies in Language Companion Series 215] 2020
► pp. 191210
References
Adamovic, Milan
1985Konjugationsgeschichte der türkischen Sprache. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Akça, Hakan
2011Ankara ilinin ağızlarında şimdiki zaman ekinin varyantları. Turkish Studies: International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic 6(1): 611–619.Google Scholar
Altmann, Heidi
2006The Perception and Production of Second Language Stress: A Cross-linguistic Experimental Study. PhD dissertation, University of Delaware.
Domahs, Ulrike, Genç, Safiye, Knaus, Johannes, Wiese, Richard & Kabak, Barış
2012Processing (un)-predictable word stress: ERP evidence from Turkish. Language and Cognitive Processes 28(3): 1–20.Google Scholar
Erdal, Marcel
2004A Grammar of Old Turkic. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Göksel, Aslı & Kerslake, Celia
2005Turkish: A Comprehensive Grammar. Abingdon: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Göksel, Aslı & Güneş, Güliz
2013Discourse and information structure within the WORD. Poster presented at the 9th Mediterranean Morphology Meeting, Dubrovnik, 15–18 September.
Good, Jeff & Yu, Alan
2005Morphosyntax of two Turkish subject pronominal paradigms. In Clitic and Affix Combinations: Theoretical Perspectives [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 74], Lorie Heggie & Francisco Ordóñez (eds), 315–341. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gülensoy, Tuncer
1985Anadolu ağızlarında şimdiki zaman eki. Türk Kültürü Araştırmaları, Prof. Dr. İbrahim Kafesoğlu’nun Hatırasına Armağan 23(1–2): 281–295. Ankara: Türk Kültürü Araştırmaları Enstitüsü.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M.
2009How (not) to do phonological typology: The case of pitch-accent. Language Sciences 31(2–3): 213–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019Positional prominence versus word accent: Is there a difference? In The Study of Word Stress and Accent: Theories, Methods and Data, Rob Goedemans, Jeffrey Heinz & Harry van der Hulst (eds), 60–75. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Inkelas, Sharon
1999Exceptional stress-attracting suffixes in Turkish: Representation versus the grammar. In The Prosody-morphology Interface, René Kager, Harry van der Hulst & Wim Zonneveld (eds), 134–187. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kabak, Barış & Revithiadou, Anthi
2009From edgemost to lexical stress: Diachronic paths, typology and representation. Linguistic Review 26: 1–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kabak, Barış
2016Refin(d)ing Turkish stress as a multifaceted phenomenon. Second Conference on Central Asian Languages and Linguistics (ConCALL-2), Indiana University.
Kabak, Barış & Vogel, Irene
2001The phonological word and stress assignment in Turkish. Phonology 18(3): 315–360. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Exceptions to stress and harmony: cophonologies or prespecification? In Expecting the Unexpected: Exceptions in Grammar, Horst J. Simon & Heike Wiese (eds), 59–94. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kamali Aknoun Azad, Beste
2011Topics at the PF Interface of Turkish. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.
Korkmaz, Zeynep
2003Türkiye Türkçesi Grameri (Şekil Bilgisi) [Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları 827]. Ankara: Atatürk Kültür, Dil ve Tarih Yüksek Kurumu.Google Scholar
Kornfilt, Jaklin
1996On copular clitic forms in Turkish. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 6: 96–114.Google Scholar
1997Turkish. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert
2008[1996]2. Intonational Phonology. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lees, Robert B.
1961The Phonology of Modern Standard Turkish [Indiana University publications / Uralic and Altaic Series 6]. Bloomington IN: Indiana University.Google Scholar
Levi, Susannah V.
2005Acoustic correlates of lexical accent in Turkish. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 35(1): 73–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Minkova, Donka
2013A Historical Phonology of English. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Öner, Mustafa
2016Genel Türkçede ekleşen yardımcı fiiller: Gramerleşme üzerine tarihî-karşılaştırmalı bir inceleme. XI. Uluslararası Büyük Türk Dili Kurultayı Bildirileri Kitabı, Budapeşte – Macaristan, 26–27 Eylül 2016, 9–14. Bilkent Üniversitesi.Google Scholar
Özçelik, Öner
2014Prosodic faithfulness to foot edges: the case of Turkish stress. Phonology 31(2): 229–269. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peperkamp, Sharon & Dupoux, Emmanuel
2002A typological study of stress “deafness”. In Laboratory Phonology 7, Carlos Gussenhoven & Natasha Warner (eds), 203–240. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pycha, Anne
2006A duration-based solution to the problem of stress realization in Turkish. UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Reports 2.Google Scholar
The Institute of Language Research, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies
2006Multilingual Spoken Corpus (Turkish) http://​www​.coelang​.tufs​.ac​.jp/​/multilingual​_corpus​/tr/ (2 January 2020).
Underhill, Robert
1976Turkish Grammar. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zadok, Gila & Bat-El, Outi
2015Inter-paradigm leveling in Hebrew verbal system. Morphology 25: 271–297. CrossrefGoogle Scholar