Chapter published in:
Re-Assessing Modalising Expressions: Categories, co-text, and context
Edited by Pascal Hohaus and Rainer Schulze
[Studies in Language Companion Series 216] 2020
► pp. 173194


Abraham, Werner
2015Strong modality and truth disposability in syntactic subordination: What is the locus of the phase edge validating modal adverbials? Studia Linguistica 69(2): 119–159. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Akatsuka, Noriko
1986Conditionals are discourse-bound. In On Conditonals, Elizabeth Closs Traugott, Alice ter Meulen, Judy Snitzer Reilly & Charles A. Ferguson (eds), 333–351. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arita, Setsuko
2020Jōkentsuki meirei, iraibun – nihongo jōkenbun no modariti seiyaku saikō (Imperatives and demands with conditions – rethinking on modality in Japanese conditional sentences). In Deeta ni motoduku nihongo no modariti kenkyū (Data-based Research on Japanese Modality), Yukinori Takubo & Hisashi Noda (eds), 143–162. Tokyo: KuroshioGoogle Scholar
Baumann, Carolin
2017Bedeutung und Gebrauch der deutschen Modalverben. Lexikalische Einheit als Basis kontextueller Vielheit. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Breitbarth, Anne
2014The development of conditional should in English. In Language Change at the Syntax-Semantics Interface, Chiara Gianollo, Agnes Jäger & Doris Penka (eds), 293–322. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Brünner, Gisela
1983Modalverben in schlusstragenden Konstruktionen. In Studien zur Verwendung der Modalverben, Gisela Brünner & Angelika Redder (eds), 165–225. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Bussmann, Hadumod
1996Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Coniglio, Marco
2009Deutsche Modalpartikeln in Haupt- und Nebensätzen. In Modalität. Epistemik und Evidentialität bei Modalverb, Adverb, Modalpartikel und Modus, Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 191–221. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Dufaye, Lionel
2018SHOULD in conditional clauses: When epistemicity meets appreciative modality. In Epistemic Modalities and Evidentiality in Cross-Linguistic Perspective, Zlatka Guentchéva (ed.), 52–66. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ezoe, Michiko
2003Nihongo no jōken hyōgen no tsukaiwake (Differences in usage between the Japanese conditional expressions). JCLA 3: 127–137.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy.
2001Syntax. An Introduction, Vol. II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees
1988Illocution, mood and modality in a functional grammar of Spanish. Journal of Semantics 6: 227–269. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hunston, Susan & Thompson Geoff
2000Introduction to Channell, Joanna “Corpus-based analysis of evaluative lexis”. In Evaluation in Text. Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds), 38–39. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Iwasaki, Shoichi
2013Japanese [London Oriental and African Language Library 17], rev. edn. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Yuki
2003Modality and the Japanese Language. Ann Arbor MI: The University of Michigan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John
1977Semantics, Vol. 2. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Masuoka, Takashi
1993Jōken hyōgen to bun no gainen reberu (Conditional expressions and the conceptual level of the clause). In Nihongo no jōken hyōgen, Takashi Masuoka (ed.), 23–39. Tōkyō: Kuroshio shuppan.Google Scholar
2000Jōken hyōgen saikō (Rethinking conditional expressions). In Nihongo bunpō no shosō (Aspects of Japanese Grammar), 153–175. Tōkyō: Kuroshio shuppan.Google Scholar
Minami, Fujio
1974Gendai Nihongo no Kōzō (The Structure of Modern Japanese). Tōkyō: Taishūkan shoten.Google Scholar
1993Gendai nihongo bunpō no rinkaku (Outline of Modern Japanese Grammar). Tōkyō: Taishūkan shoten.Google Scholar
Morita, Yoshiyuki
2002Nihongo bunpō no hassō (The concepts of Japanese Grammar). Tokyo: Hitsuji Shobo.Google Scholar
Narrog, Heiko
2012Modality, Subjectivity, and Semantic Change. A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Topic phrases in conditional and in causal clauses - Evidence for different degrees of clause integration. Linguistische Berichte, Sonderheft 20: 143–162.Google Scholar
2020The scope of modal categories - An empirical study. In Re-assessing Modalising Expressions. Categories, Co-text, and Context [Studies in Language Companion Series 216]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ohori, Toshio
1994Diachrony of clause linkage. TE and BA in Old through Middle Japanese. In Perspectives on Grammaticalization [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 109], William Pagliuca (ed.), 135–149. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rickmeyer, Jens
1995Japanische Morphosyntax. Heidelberg: Julius Groos.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve
1990From Etymology to Pragmatics. Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sztencel, Magdalena & Duffy, Sarah E.
2019Reporting conditionals with modals. In Indirect Reports and Pragmatics in the World’s Languages, Alessandro Capone, Manuel Garcia-Carpintero & Allesandra Falzone (eds), 201–226. Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, Hiroshi
1994Jōken hyōgen to kihon bunkei (Conditional Expressions and Basic Clause Patterns). Nihongogaku 13(8): 60–72.Google Scholar
Tsunoda, Mie
2004Nihongo no setsu, bun no rensetsu to modariti (Modality and the Connection between Clauses and Sentences in Japanese). Tōkyō: Kuroshio shuppan.Google Scholar
Van Valin Jr., Robert D.
2005Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yamaoka, Masanori
1995Jūzokusetsu no modariti (Modality in subordinate clauses). In Fukubun no kenkyū, Vol. 2, Yoshio Nitta (ed.), 309–326. Tōkyō: Kuroshio shuppan.Google Scholar
Zvolenszky, Zsofia
2006A semantic constraint on the logic of modal conditionals. In Proceedings of the Ninth Symposium on Logic and Language, Besenyőtelek, Hungary, August 24–26, 2006 (LoLa 9), Gyuris Beáta (ed.), 167–177. Budapest: Eötvös Loránd University.Google Scholar