Cover not available
Part of
The Perfect Volume: Papers on the perfect
Edited by Kristin Melum Eide and Marc Fryd
[Studies in Language Companion Series 217] 2021
► pp. 87–116

Chapter 4
Structural and functional variations of the perfect in the Lezgic languages

| Institute of Linguistics RAS | HSE University

The paper presents a study of the morphological and semantic properties of the perfects in nine Lezgic languages, the southern branch of the East Caucasian (Nakh-Daghestanian) language family. Morphologically, the perfects belong to the perfective subsystem. They are usually periphrastic, with a tendency to become synthetic due to auxiliary loss or merger. The functions of the perfects vary among the languages of the group, but mostly include the ‘current relevance’ perfect proper and the resultative (stative). The experiential meaning is associated with the perfect only in a few languages. In two languages (Agul and Archi), the perfect has further evolved into an indirective evidential past, although the diachronically earlier perfect and resultative functions are still retained. Throughout the paper, I compare the perfects to the aorists, which are the most frequent perfective past tenses of the Lezgic languages. The aorists are much less polyfunctional than the perfects and are mostly synthetic, although periphrastic source models are also attested for them.

Keywords: East Caucasian languages, perfect, resultative, indirect evidential, aorist, tense and aspect systems, grammaticalization
Article outline
  • 1.The Lezgic languages: General profile
  • 2.The Lezgic tense and aspect systems: An overview
    • 2.1Aspectual stems
    • 2.2Periphrastic forms
    • 2.3The place of aorists and perfects in the paradigm
  • 3.Variations in the structure of the aorists and the perfects
    • 3.1The aorists
    • 3.2The perfects
  • 4.Variations in the functions of aorists
  • 5.Variations in the functions of the perfects
    • 5.1Perfect proper (‘current relevance’) meaning
    • 5.2Resultative meaning
    • 5.3Experiential meaning
    • 5.4Indirective evidential meanings
  • 6.Towards the diachronic account of the Lezgic perfects
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 9 July 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.217.04mai
References (43)
Alekseev, Mikhail E.
1985 Voprosy sravnitel’no-istoričeskoj grammatiki lezginskix jazykov. Morfologija. Sintaksis (The problems of comparative-historical grammar of the Lezgic languages: Morphology. Syntax). Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Alekseev, M. E.
1994a Rutul. In The Indigenous Languages of the Caucasus, Vol. 3: North East Caucasian Languages, Part 2, Rieks Smeets (ed.), 213–258. Delmar NY: Caravan.Google Scholar
1994b Budukh. In The Indigenous Languages of the Caucasus, Vol. 3: North East Caucasian Languages, Part 2, Rieks Smeets (ed.), 259–296. Delmar NY: Caravan.Google Scholar
Arkadiev, Peter & Maisak, Timur
2018 Grammaticalization in the North Caucasian languages. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds), 116–145. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Authier, Gilles
2009 Grammaire Kryz (Langue caucasique d’Azerbaïdjan, dialecte d’Alik). Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Babaliyeva, Ayten
2007 Présentation du dialecte lezgi de Yargun (Azerbaïdjan): Grammaire, textes glosés et traduits. Mémoire principal de Master II. Paris: École Pratique des Hautes Études.Google Scholar
Bogomolova, N. K.
2013 Prefiksal’nyj perfekt v tabasaranskom jazyke (The prefixal Perfect in Tabasaran). In Problemy jazyka: Sbornik naučnyx statej po materialam Vtoroj konferencii-školy ‘Problemy jazyka: vzgljad molodyx učenyx’, 40–54. Moscow: Institut jazykoznanija RAN.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William
1994 The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1976 Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen
1985 Tense and Aspect Systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
(ed.) 2000 Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 20–6]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daniel, Michael
2018 Aspectual stems in three East Caucasian languages. In The Semantics of Verbal Categories in Nakh-Daghestanian Languages: Tense, Aspect, Evidentiality, Mood/Modality, Diana Forker & Timur Maisak (eds), 247–266. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Dobrushina, N. R.
2006 Grammatičeskie formy i konstrukcii so značeniem opasenija i predosterezhenija (Grammatical forms and constructions with apprehensional and precautionary meaning). Voprosy jazykoznanija 2: 28–67.Google Scholar
Eide, Kristin Melum & Fryd, Marc
2021 Introduction. In The Perfect Volume: Papers on the Perfect [Studies in Language Companion Series 217]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ganenkov, Dmitry & Maisak, Timur
2020 Nakh-Dagestanian languages. In The Oxford Handbook of Languages of the Caucasus, Maria Polinsky (ed.), 87–145. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Gippert, Jost, Schulze, Wolfgang, Aleksidze, Zaza & Mahé, Jean-Pierre
2008 The Caucasian Albanian Palimpsests of Mount Sinai, 2 Vols. Turnhout: Brépols.Google Scholar
Greed, Teija
2017 Evidential coding in Lezgi. Languages of the Caucasus 2: 1–33. [URL]> (10 October 2020).
Haspelmath, Martin
1993 A Grammar of Lezgian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kibrik, Aleksandr E.
1977a Opyt strukturnogo opisanija arčinskogo jazyka, T. 2: Taksonomičeskaja grammatika (A structural description of the Archi language, Vol. 2: Taxonomic grammar). Moscow: Moscow State University.Google Scholar
1977b Opyt strukturnogo opisanija arčinskogo jazyka, T. 3: Dinamičeskaja grammatika (A structural description of the Archi language, Vol. 3: Dynamic grammar). Moscow: Moscow State University.Google Scholar
1994 Archi. In The Indigenous Languages of the Caucasus, Vol. 3: North East Caucasian Languages. Part 2, Rieks Smeets (ed.), 297–365. Delmar NY: Caravan.Google Scholar
Kibrik, Aleksandr E. & Testelec, Jakov G.
(eds) 1999 Elementy caxurskogo jazyka v tipologičeskom osveščenii (Aspects of Tsakhur from a typological perspective). Moscow: Nasledie.Google Scholar
Lindstedt, Jouko
2000 The perfect – Aspectual, temporal and evidential. In Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 20–6], Östen Dahl (ed.), 365–384. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Magometov, Aleksandr A.
1965 Tabasaranskij jazyk: Issledovanie i teksty (The Tabasaran language: Description and texts). Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
1970 Agul’skij jazyk: Issledovanija i teksty (The Agul language: Description and texts). Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
Maisak [Majsak], Timur A.
2008 Glagol’naja paradigma udinskogo jazyka (nidžskij dialekt) (Verbal paradimh of Udi, the Nizh dialect). In Udinskij sbornik: grammatika, leksika, istorija jazyka, Mikhail E. Alekseev, Timur A. Majsak, Dmitry S. Ganenkov & Yury A. Lander (eds), 96–161. Moscow: Academia.Google Scholar
Maisak, Тimur
2011 The present and the future within the Lezgic tense and aspect systems. In Tense, Aspect, Modality and Finiteness in East Caucasian Languages, Gilles Authier & Timur A. Maisak (eds), 25–66. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Maisak [Majsak], Timur A.
2012 Pričastnye formy v vido-vremennoj sisteme agul’skogo jazyka (Participle-based forms in the tense-aspect system of Agul). In Acta Linguistica Petropolitana VIII(2). Issledovanija po teorii grammatiki. Vyp. VI: Tipologija aspektual’nyx sistem i kategorij, 228–289.Google Scholar
2016 Perfekt i Aorist v nidžskom dialekte udinskogo jazyka (Perfect and Aorist in the Nizh dialect of Udi). In Acta Linguistica Petropolitana XII(2). Issledovanija po teorii grammatiki. Vyp. VII: Tipologija perfekta, 315–378.Google Scholar
Maisak, Timur
2018 The aorist/perfect distinction in Nizh Udi. In The Semantics of Verbal Categories in Nakh-Daghestanian Languages: Tense, Aspect, Evidentiality, Mood/Modality, Diana Forker & Timur Maisak (eds), 120–165. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
2020 Grammaticalization in Lezgic (East Caucasian). In Grammaticalization Scenarios: Cross-linguistic Variation and Universal Tendencies, Vol. 1: Grammaticalization Scenarios from Europe and Asia, Walter Bisang & Andrej Malchukov (eds), 309–360. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maisak [Majsak], Timur A. & Merdanova, Solmaz R.
2016 Perfekt i smežnye značenija v agul’skom jazyke (Perfect and related meanings in Agul). In Acta Linguistica Petropolitana XII(2). Issledovanija po teorii grammatiki. Vyp. VII: Tipologija perfekta, 379–422.Google Scholar
Maisak, Timur & Tatevosov, Sergei
2007 Beyond evidentiality and mirativity: Evidence from Tsakhur. In L’Énonciation médiatisée, II: Le traitement épistémologique de l’information: illustrations amérindiennes et caucasiennes, Zlatka Guentchéva & Jon Landaburu (eds), 377–406. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
Makhmudova [Maxmudova], Svetlana M.
2001 Morfologija rutul’skogo jazyka (Morphology of the Rutul language). Moscow: IYaz RAN. Google Scholar
Maslov, Jurij S.
1988 Resultative, perfect, and aspect. In Typology of Resultative Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 12], Vladimir P. Nedjalkov (ed.), 63–85. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nedjalkov, Nedjalkov P. & Jaxontov, Sergej Je
1988 The typology of resultative constructions. In Typology of Resultative Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 12], Vladimir P. Nedjalkov (ed.), 3–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paperno, Denis
2006 On the uses of so-called evidential form in Archi. Ms. [URL]> (10 October 2020).
Plungian, Vladimir A. & van der Auwera, Johan
2006 Towards a typology of discontinuous past marking. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 59: 317–349.Google Scholar
Sulejmanov, Nadir D.
1993 Sravnitel’no-istoričeskoe issledovanie dialektov agul’skogo jazyka (A comparative-historical study of Agul dialects). Makhachkala: IJaLI DNC RAN.Google Scholar
Talibov, Bukar B.
2007 Buduxskij jazyk (The Budugh language). Moscow: Academia.Google Scholar
Tatevosov, Sergei
2001 From resultatives to evidentials: Multiple uses of the perfect in Nakh-Daghestanian languages. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 443–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van den Berg, Helma
2005 The East Caucasian language family. Lingua 115: 147–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xanmagomedov, Bejdullax G.-K. & Šalbuzov, Kim T.
2001 Tabasaransko-russkij slovar’ [Tabasaran-Russian dictionary]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by 1 other publications

Verhees, Samira
2019. General converbs in Andi. Studies in Language 43:1 ► pp. 195 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.