Cover not available
Part of
The Perfect Volume: Papers on the perfect
Edited by Kristin Melum Eide and Marc Fryd
[Studies in Language Companion Series 217] 2021
► pp. 181–212

Chapter 8
More on hodiernality

| Escola Oficial d’Idiomes, Barcelona
This paper builds on previous work and aims to examine one of the most striking differences between the uses of the present perfect in languages such as Catalan and English, namely, a hodiernal (‘today’) reading of the perfect available under certain conditions in these Romance languages but not in English. I will specifically look into (1) the competition between tenses, (2) the role of temporal modification, and (3) the present tense. Taking into account the semantics of the present tense and a split of the perfect time interval and the reference time as in Pancheva & von Stechow (2004), I will claim that the main difference that distinguishes the hodiernal reading is due to a possible specification of the event time on a fixed position on the time line.
Keywords: hodiernal, perfect, present, perfect time span, even time modification
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The competition between the perfect and the past
  • 3.The role of temporal modification
    • 3.1Proximate demonstrative + cyclic-calendar noun
  • 4.The role of the present tense
  • 5.The role of the present tense matters in perfect constructions
  • 6.Deriving the hodiernal reading
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 9 July 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.217.08xiq
References (80)
References
Alarcos Llorach, Emilio. 1947 [1978]. Perfecto simple y perfecto compuesto. In Estudios de gramática funcional del español, E. Alarcos Llorach. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Azpiazu, Susana. 2013. Antepresente y pretérito en el español peninsular: Revisión de la norma a partir de las evidencias empíricas. Anuario de Estudios Filológicos 36: 19–32. Universidad de Extremadura. Servicio de Publicaciones.Google Scholar
. this volume. The impact of the simultaneity vector on the temporal-aspectual development of the perfect tense in Romance langauges. In The Perfect Volume: Papers on the Perfect. [Studies in Language Companion Series 217], Kristin Melum Eide & Marc Fryd (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume) DOI logo
Azpiazu, Susana & Kempas, Ilpo. 2017. Acerca del uso prehodiernal del pretérito perfecto compuesto resultativo en español. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 133(3): 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bello, Andrés. 1847 [1981]. Gramática de la lengua castellana destinada al uso de los americanos, ed. crítica de R. Trujillo. Santa Cruz de Tenerife: Instituto Universitario de Lingüística Andrés Bello-Cabildo Insular de Tenerife.Google Scholar
Bennett, Michael & Partee, Barbara. 1972 [1978]. Toward the Logic of Tense and Aspect in English. Bloomington IN: Distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier Marco. 1986. Tempo, aspetto e azione nel verbo Italiano: Il sistema dell’indicativo. Florence: Accademia Della Crusca.Google Scholar
Binnick, Robert. 1991. Time and the Verb. A Guide to Tense and Aspect. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen & Swift, Mary. 2004. Event realization and default aspect. Linguistics and Philosophy 27: 263–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bras, Myriam & Sibille, Jean. 2018. Preterit and perfect in Romance: New insights from Occitan. Conference presentation. 13th Chronos Conference, Neuchatel, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Brugger, Gerard. 2001. Temporal modification, the 24-hour rule, and the location of reference time. In Current Issues in Spanish Syntax and Semantics, Luis Silva-Villar & Javier Gutierrez-Rexach (eds), 243–270. Berlin: Mouton de Gryuter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cartagena, Nelson. 1999. Los tiempos compuestos. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua Española, Vol. 2, Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds), 2937–2951. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Colón, Germà. 1976. Sobre el perfet periphrastic “vado + infinitiu” en català, en provençal i en francès. In Problemes de llengua i literature catalanes [Actes del II Col·loqui Internacional sobre el Català], 101–144. Barcelona: Publicacions de l’Abadia de Montserrat.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Copley, Bridget. 2002. The Semantics of the Future. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Curell, Hortènsia. 1990. The Present Perfect in English and in Catalan. Uses and Meanings. PhD dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
. 2002. The present perfect in English and in Catalan. In Meaning Through Language Contrast, Vol. 1 [Pragmatics & Beyond new Series 99], Katarzyna M. Jaszczolt & Ken Turner (eds), 101–115. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. El perfet en català. In Claus D. Pusch & Andreas Wesch (eds), Verbalperiphrasen in den (ibero)romanischen Sprachen, 35–46. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Curell, Hortènsia & Coll, Mercè. 2007. On the dual nature of the Catalan present perfect. In Tense, Mood and Aspect. Theoretical and Descriptive Issues [Cahiers Chronos 17], Louis de Saussure, Jacques Moeschler & Genoveva Puskas (eds), 111–127. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 1985. Tense and Aspect Systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Declerck, Renaat, Reed, Susan & Capelle, Bert. 2006. The Grammar of the English Verb Phrase, Vol. 1: The Grammar of the English Tense System. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
De Mello, George. 1994. Pretérito compuesto para indicar acción con límite en el pasado: ‘Ayer he visto a Juan’. Boletín de la Real Academia Española LX-XIV: 611–631.Google Scholar
Demirdache, Hamida & Uribe-Etxebarria, Myriam. 2007. The syntax of time arguments. Lingua 117(2): 330–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Swart, Henriëtte. (2007). A cross-linguistic discourse analysis of the perfect. Journal of Pragmatics 39 (12): 2273-2307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eide, Kristin Melum. 2005. Norwegian Modals [Studies in Generative Grammar 74]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fløgstad, Guro & Rodriguez Louro, Celeste. this volume. Gauging expansion in synchrony: The periphrastic perfect in nineteenth-century Rioplatense Spanish. In The Perfect Volume: Papers on the Perfect. [Studies in Language Companion Series 217], Kristin Melum Eide & Marc Fryd (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume) DOI logo
García Fernández, Luis. 1999. Los complementos adverbiales temporales. La subordinación temporal. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua Española, Vol. 2, Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds), 3131–3202. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
. 2000. La gramática de los complementos temporales. Madrid: Visor.Google Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra & Pianesi, Fabio. 1997. Tense and Aspect. From Semantics to Morphosyntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
González, Paz & Verkuyl, Henk J. 2017. A binary approach to Spanish tense and aspect: On the tense battle about the past. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 6(1): 97–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hallman, Peter. 2009. Instants and intervals in the event/state distinction. Ms, University of Califorina at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Heim, Irene. 1994. Comments on Abusch’s theory of tense. In Ellipsis, Tense and Questions, H. Kamp (ed.), 141–170. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Heim, Irene & Kratzer, Angelika. 1998. Semantics in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Holmes, Philip & Hinchlifee, Ian. 1994. Swedish. A Comparative Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Iatridou, Sabine, Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Izvorsky, Roumyana. 2001. Observations about the form and meaning of the perfect. In Ken Hale. A Life in Language, Michael J. Kenstowicz (ed.), 189–238. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Bart. 2011. Present and historical perspectives on the Catalan go-past. Zeitschrift für Katalanikstik 24: 227–255.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Bart & Kunert, Hans Peter. 2014. Whatever happened to the Occitan go-past? Insights from the dialects of Gascony and Guardia Piemontese. Revue Romane 49(2): 177–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Julien, Marit. 2001. The syntax of complex tenses. The Linguistic Review 18: 125–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kempas, Ilpo. 2006. Estudio sobre el uso del pretérito perfecto prehodiernal en el español peninsular y en comparación con la variedad del español argentino hablada en Santiago del Estero. PhD dissertation, University of Helsinki.
Klein, Wolfgang. 1992. The present perfect puzzle. Language 68: 525–551. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1994. Time in Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1998. More structural analogies between pronouns and tenses. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 8, Devan Strolovitch & Aaron Lawson (eds), 92–110. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laca, Brenda. 2010. Perfect semantics: How universal are ibero-American present perfects? In Selected Proceedings of the 12th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, Claudia Borgonovo, Manuel Español-Echevarría & Philippe Prévost (eds), 1–16. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Larsson, Ida. 2009. Participles in Time. The Development of the Present Perfect in Swedish. PhD dissertation, Goteborg University.
Lundquist, Bjorn. 2012. Localizing cross-linguistic variation in tense systems: On telicity and stativity in Swedish and English. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 35(1): 27–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martínez Atienza, María. 2006. A comparative analysis between the English and Spanish aspectual systems. In Studies in Spanish Syntax, Laura Brugè (ed.), 151–174. Venecia: Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Libreria Editrice Cafoscarina.Google Scholar
. 2008. Dos formas de oposición en el ámbito románico entre el pretérito perfecto compuesto y el pretérito perfecto simple. In Tiempos compuestos y formas verbales complejas, Ángeles Carrasco (ed.), 203–230. Frankfurt/Madrid: Vervuert/Iberoamericana. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Tiempo, aspecto y modo de acción: Formas verbales y complementos temporales en español. PhD dissertation, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia.
McCawley, James D. 1971. Tense and time reference in English. In Studies in Linguistics Semantics, Charles Fillmore & D. Terence Langedoen (eds), 96–113. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
McCoard, Robert W. 1978. The English Perfect: Tense-choise and Pragmatic Inferences. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Mendia, Jon Ander, Poole, Ethan & Somerday, Megan. 2014. Perfect asymmetries. Talk given at the Southern New England Workshop in Semantics, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, 15 November.
Mittwoch, Anita. 1988. Aspects of English aspect: On the interaction of perfect, progressive and durational phrases. Linguistics and Philosophy 11: 203–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pancheva, Roumyana. 2003. The aspectual makeup of perfect participles and the interpretations of the perfect. In Perfect Explorations [Interface Explorations 2], Artemis Alexiadou, Monika Rathert, & Arnim von Stechow (eds), 277–306. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pancheva, Roumyana & von Stechow, Arnim. 2004. On the present perfect puzzle. In Proceedings of the 34th North East Linguistic Society, Vol. 2, Keir Moulton & Matthew Wolf (eds), 469–484. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Pérez Saldanya, Manuel. 1998. Del llatí al català. Morfosintaxi verbal històrica [Col·lecció Biblioteca Lingüística Catalana]. València: Universitat de València.Google Scholar
. 2002. Les relacions temporals i aspectuals. In Gramàtica del català contemporani, Vol. 3, Joan Solà, Maria Rosa Lloret, Joan Mascaró & Manuel Pérez Saldanya (eds), 2567–2662. Barcelona: Empúries.Google Scholar
Partee, Barbara. 1973. Some structural analogies between tenses and pronouns in English. Journal of Philosophy 70: 601–609. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Portner, Paul. 2003. The (temporal) semantics and (modal) pragmatics of the perfect. Linguistics and Philosophy 26: 459–510. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sydney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rathert, Monika. 2003. Universal-existential puzzles. In Perfect Explorations, Artemis Alexiadou, Monika Rathert, & Arnim von Stechow (eds), 363–380. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
RAE & ASALE (Real Academia Española & Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española). 2009. Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa Libros.Google Scholar
. Corpus de referencia del español actual (CREA) <[URL]> (29 October 2020).
Rothstein, Bjorn. 2008. The Perfect Time Span: On the Present Perfect in German, Swedish and English [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 125]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwenter, Scott & Torres Coucoullous, Rena. 2008. Defaults and indeterminacy in temporal grammaticalization: The ‘perfect’ road to perfective. Language Variation and Change 20(1): 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Serrano, María José. 1994. Del pretérito indefinido al pretérito perfecto: Un caso de cambio y gramaticalización en el español de Canarias y Madrid. Lingüística Española Actual 16(1): 21–57.Google Scholar
Schaden, Gerhard. 2007. La sémantique du Parfait: Étude des “temps composés” dans un choix de langues germaniques et romanes. PhD dissertation, Université Paris 8.
. 2009. Present perfects compete. Linguistics and Philosophy 32: 115–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schlenker, Philippe. 1999. Propositional Attitudes and Indexicality: A Cross-Categorial Approach. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Smith, Carlota. 1991. The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Squartini, Mario & Bertinetto, Pier Marco. 2000. The simple and compound past in Romance languages. In Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, Östen Dahl (ed.), 403–439. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2016. Tense and aspect. In The Oxford Guide to Romance Languages, Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds), 939–953. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
von Stechow, Arnim. 1999. Eine erweiterte Extended Now-Theorie für Perfekt und Futur. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 113: 86–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Barry. 1977. Tense and continuity. Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 199–220.Google Scholar
Veiga, Alexandre. 2012. El “Pretérito Perfecto” español y la noción temporal de ante-presente. Romanica Cracoviensa 11: 433–448.Google Scholar
Vlach, Frank. 1993. Temporal adverbials, tenses and the perfect. Linguistics and Philosophy 16: 231–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xiqués, Teresa M. 2015. Towards a Unified Account of the Present Perfect: A Study on Catalan, English and Gĩkũyũ. PhD dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
2013a. Re-examining the hodiernal present perfect: Towards a unified view. In Proceedings of ConSOLE XX, Enrico Boone, Martin Kohlberger & Maartje Schulpen (eds), 291–313. Leiden: SOLE.Google Scholar
2013b. Towards a unified account of the present perfect in Catalan and English. In Evolution in Romance Verbal, Systems [Science pour la Communication 108], Jacques Bres & Emanelle Labeau (eds), 91–113. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Corre, Eric, Henriëtte de Swart & Teresa M. Xiqués
2023. Intermediate perfects. Languages in Contrast DOI logo
Azpiazu Torres, Susana
2021. Chapter 9. The impact of the simultaneity vector on the temporal-aspectual development of the perfect tense in Romance languages. In The Perfect Volume [Studies in Language Companion Series, 217], ► pp. 214 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. The Spanish and the Portuguese Present Perfect in Discourse [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 279], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.