Chapter 16
From have-omission to supercompounds
A wealth of English perfects
This paper adopts an historical perspective to
shed light on syntactic patterns exhibiting
have-omission or have-doubling in
a language – English – where the forms in question have gone largely
unreported over the centuries, or have tended to be discarded as
‘non-standard’ by prescriptive grammarians. At least one subtype of
supercompounds investigated here is reported for the first time in
this paper. Explanations for the attested patterns involve e.g.
prescriptivism, a universal tendency to avoid the (near-) adjacency
of identical grammatical structures, and the normative pressure to
ban several occurrences of have. In a comparison
with cognate structures in closely related languages, semantic
traits of these constructions are identified, e.g. irrealis
(have-omission), resultative, and experiential
(supercompounds). Nevertheless, a remainder of the examples are not
captured by these semantic descriptions, but possibly result from
functional overlap between modal and perfect constructions, or
“copying” of morphosyntactic features across constructions in a
discourse.
Article outline
- Introduction
- 1.
Have-less non-finite Perfect
constructions
- 2.From the modal pluperfect to supercompound perfects
- 3.Concluding remarks
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
References
References (62)
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2006 Serial verbs constructions in a typological
perspective. In
Serial Verb Constructions: A Cross-linguistic
Typology,
Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald &
Robert M. W. Dixon (eds), 1–68. Oxford: OUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Andersen, Gisle
1995 Omission of the Primary Verbs be and
have in London Teenage Speech – A
Sociolinguistic Study. PhD dissertation, University of Bergen.
Anderwald, Lieselotte
2009 The Morphology of English Dialects: Verb-formation in
Non-standard English. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Apothéloz, Denis
2010 Le passé surcomposé et la valeur de parfait
existentiel.
Journal of French Language Studies 20(2): 105–126.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Beal, Joan C.
1997 Syntax and morphology. In
The Edinburgh History of the Scots Language,
Charles Jones (ed.), 335–377. Edinburgh: EUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bullokar, William
1586 Bref Grammar for English. London: Edmund Bollifant.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Close, Joanne
2004 English Auxiliaries: A Syntactic Study of
Contraction and Variation. PhD dissertation, University of York.
Dahl, Östen
2000 Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Declerck, Renaat
1991 Tense in English: Its Structure and Use in
Discourse. London: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Denison, David
1993 English Historical Syntax. Harlow: Longman.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Denison, David
2000 Combining English auxiliaries. In
Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in
English [
Studies in Language Companion Series 53],
Olga Fischer,
Annette Rosenbach &
Dieter Stein (eds), 111–147. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Denison, David
2012a Non-inflecting verbs in Modern
English. Unpublished communication: AUTOUR DU VERBE / AROUND THE VERB: Colloque en l’honneur de Claude Delmas Université de Paris 3
21–22 September 2012 <
[URL]
Denison, David
2012b On the history of English (and) word
classes. Plenary talk given at ICEHL17, Zurich, 20 August.
[URL]
Eide, Kristin Melum
2005 Norwegian Modals [
Studies in Generative Grammar 74]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fenn, Peter
1987 A Semantic and Pragmatic Examination of the English
Perfect. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fischer, Olga
1992 Syntax. In
The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. 2. 1066–1476,
Norman Blake (ed.), 207–408. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fischer, Olga, van Kemenade Ans, Koopman Willem & van der Wurff, Wim
2001 The Syntax of Early English. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fryd, Marc
2017 Some remarks on have-less
perfect constructions in English. In
Aorists and Perfects: Synchronic and Diachronic
Perspectives [
Cahiers Chronos 29],
Marc Fryd &
Pierre-Don Giancarli (eds), 203–244. Leiden: Brill.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gonzalez Diaz, V.
2003 Adjective comparison in Renaissance
English.
SEDERI: Journal of the Spanish Society for English
Renaissance Studies 13: 87–100.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grant, William & Dixon, James Main
1921 Manual of Modern Scots. London: CUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hall, F.
1882 On the English perfect participle used
infitivally.
The American Journal of Philology 3(11): 297–316.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hickey, Raymond
2010 Attitudes and concerns in eighteenth-century
English. In
Eighteenth-Century English. Ideology and Change,
Raymond Hickey (ed.), 235–268. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hudson Beatty, Judith & Buss, Helen M.
(eds) 2003 Undelivered Letters to Hudson’s Bay Company Men on the
Northwest Coast of America, 1830–57. Vancouver BC: University of British Columbia Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hundt, Marianne, Hay, Jennifer & Gordon, Elizabeth
2008 New Zealand English: Morphosyntax. In
Varieties of English: The Pacific and Australia,
Kate Burridge &
Bernd Kortmann (eds), 305–340. Berlin: De Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jespersen, Otto
1912 Growth and Structure of the English Language. Leipzig: G.B. Teubner.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Julien, Marit
2002 Optional ha in Swedish and
Norwegian.
Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 5: 67–95.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Keightley, Thomas
1866 The Shakespeare-Expositor: An Aid to the Perfect
Understanding of Shakespeare’s Plays. London: J.R. Smith.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Keromnes, Yvon
2015 Il faut sauver le soldat Reichenbach: Des formes
simples, composées et surcomposées en allemand, anglais et
français. Presented at the
Grammatical Aspect and Aktionsart workshop,
held at the Université de Nancy, 26 May.
Kern, Johan H.
1912 De met het participium praeteriti imschreven
werkwoordsformen in’t Nederlands. Amsterdam: Johannes Müller.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kjellmer, Göran
2003 On nonoccurring have in Modern
English.
Studia Neophilologica 75: 11–20.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kytö, Merja & Romaine, Suzanne
Larsson, Ida
2014 Double supine.
Nordic Atlas of Language Structures (NALS)
Journal 1.
[URL]> (
3 November 2020).
Lowth, Robert
1762 A Short Introduction to English Grammar. London: A. Millar.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McCawley, James D.
1971 Tense and time reference in
English. In
Studies in Linguistic Semantics,
Charles Fillmore &
D. Terence Langendoen (eds), 96–113. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Michael, Ian
1970 English Grammatical Categories and the Tradition to
1800. Cambridge: CUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Molencki, Rafal
1999a A history of the English perfect
infinitive.
Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 34: 91–121.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Molencki, Rafal
1999b A History of English Counterfactuals. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Molencki, Rafal
2007 Proscriptive prescriptivists: On the loss of the
‘pleonastic’ perfect infinitive. In
Insights into Late Modern English,
Marina Dossena &
Charles Jones (eds), 175–196. Bern: Peter Lang.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moore Smith, George Charles
1910 The omission of ‘have’ before a past
participle.
The Modern Language Review 5: 346–347.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Musan, Renate & Rathert, Monika
2011 Tense across Languages. Berlin: De Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Noonan, Michael
1985 Complementation. In
Complex Constructions,
Timothy Shopen (ed.), 42–140. Cambridge: CUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Phillipps, Kenneth C.
1970 Jane Austen’s Language. London: André Deutsch.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Poutsma, Hendrik
1926 A Grammar of Late Modern English, Part II: The Parts of
Speech, Section II: The Verb and the Particles. Groningen: P. Noordhoff.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Priestley, Joseph
1761 The Rudiments of English Grammar. London.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Robinson, M.
1973 Modern literary Scots: Fergusson and
after. In
Lowland Scots: Occasional Papers n°2,
Adam Jack Aitken (ed.), 38–55. Edinburgh: Association for Scottish Literary Studies.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rogers, Nicholas
2002 The middling orders. In
A Companion to Eighteenth-Century Britain,
Harry Thomas Dickinson (ed.), 172–182. Oxford: Blackwell.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rohdenburg, Günter
2001 Mechanisms of syntactic change: The rise and fall
of prepositional constructions in late Modern
English. Paper presented at the
Later Modern English conference
, Edinburgh.
Sampson, Geoffrey
2002 Regional variation in the English verb qualifier
system.
English Language and Linguistics 6: 17–30.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shannon, Thomas
1995 Toward a cognitive explanation of perfect
auxiliary variation: Some modal and aspectual effects in the
history of Germanic.
American Journal of Germanic Linguistics &
Literatures 7: 129–163.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Siddiqi, Daniel & Carnie, Andrew
2012 The English modal had.
Snippets 25: 18–20.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Squartini, Mario
1998 Verbal periphrases in Romance. Aspect, actionality, and
grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tulloch, Graham
1980 The Language of Walter Scott. A Study of his Scottish
and Period Language. London: André Deutsch.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Visser, Fredericus Theodorus
1973 An Historical Syntax of the English Language, Vol. III, 2nd half. Leiden: Brill.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wiklund, Anna-Lena
1998 Morphosyntactic Parasites as Underspecified
Heads: On the Double Supine Construction. Licentiate thesis, University of Umeå.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wiklund, Anna-Lena
2001 Dressing up for vocabulary insertion: the parasitic supine.
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19.1: 199–228.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wiklund, Anna-Lena
2005 The Syntax of Tenselessness. On Copying
Constructions in Swedish. PhD dissertation, University of Umeå.
Wiklund, A-L.
2007 The Syntax of Tenselessness: Tense/Mood/Aspect-agreeing
Infinitivals [
Studies in Generative Grammar 92]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zandvoort, Reinard Willem
1932 On the perfect of experience.
English Studies 14(1–6): 11–20.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by 1 other publications
Eitler, Tamás & Gábor Vadász
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.