Cover not available
Part of
Studies at the Grammar-Discourse Interface: Discourse markers and discourse-related grammatical phenomena
Edited by Alexander Haselow and Sylvie Hancil
[Studies in Language Companion Series 219] 2021
► pp. 195–228

Chapter 7
Vietnamese expletive between grammatical subject and subjectivity marker

Nó at the syntax-pragmatics (discourse) interface

| INALCO & CNRS-EHESS, CRLAO/UMR 8563

In this paper, we undertake a systematic investigation of the peculiar behavior of the optional expletive subject pronoun nó expl in spoken Vietnamese. The first part of our study consists of an in-depth examination of its syntactic and semantic properties in comparison to those of its referential counterpart. From this overview, it appears that the distribution of nó expl is jointly determined by syntactic and discourse factors. We then critically appraise the recent analysis by Greco et al. (2018a, b), according to which nó expl imposes a specificity requirement on sentences containing it. We suggest to reinterpret this requirement as a corollary of the assessment by the speaker of a given state of affairs against her epistemic background. Pursuing the line of argumentation developed in Dao (2014) and integrating insights from Speas-Tenny’s syntactic approach to Evidentiality (Speas & Tenny 2003; Speas 2004; Tenny 2006), we argue that nó expl is best treated as an ego-evidential marker. We further show that nó expl does not intrinsically encode evidentiality but acquires its evidential import via syntactic processes.

Keywords: ego-evidentiality, optional expletive subject, subjectivity marker, Vietnamese, syntax-pragmatics (discourse) interface
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The syntax and semantics of nó expl
    • 2.1Referential nó
    • 2.2Expletive nó
  • 3.Greco et al.’s (2018a, b) analysis of nó expl
    • 3.1On the position of nó expl
    • 3.2On the interpretation of nó expl
  • 4. Nó expl , subjectivity, evidentiality
    • 4.1 Dao’s (2014) analysis of nó expl
    • 4.2 Nó expl as evidential marker
      • 4.2.1Ego-evidentiality, egophoricity
      • 4.2.2 Nó expl at the syntax-pragmatics interface
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 3 June 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.219.07dao
References
Achard, Michel
2009 The distribution of French intransitive predicates. Linguistics 47(3): 513–558. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2004 Evidentiality. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2014 The grammar of knowledge: A cross-linguistic view of evidentials and the expression of information source. In The Grammar of Knowledge: A Cross-linguistic Typology, Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M. W. Dixon (eds), 1–51. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Everaert, Martin
2004 The Unaccusativity Puzzle. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Banfield, Ann
1982 Unspeakable Sentences: Narration and Representation in the Language of Fiction. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Bennis, Hans
1986 Gaps and Dummies. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Emile
1946 Structure des relations de personne dans le verbe. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique XLIII, fasc. 1, n°126. Reprinted in Problèmes de linguistique générale, Vol. 1, 225–236. Paris: Gallimard 1966.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina
2003 On finiteness as logophoric anchoring. In Temps et point de vue/Tense and Point of View, Jacqueline Guéron & Liliane Tasmovski (eds), 213–246. Nanterre: Université Paris X.Google Scholar
Blain, Eleanor M. & Déchaine, Rose-Marie
2007 Evidential types: evidence from Cree dialects. International Journal of American Linguistics 73: 257–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
1973 Ambient “it” is meaningful too. Journal of Linguistics 9(2): 261–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Botne, Robert
1995 The pronominal origin of an evidential. Diachronica 12: 201–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brugman, Claudia M. & Macaulay, Monica
2015 Characterizing evidentiality. Linguistic Typology 19(2): 201–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cao, Xuan Hao
2004 Tiếng Việt, sơ thảo ngữ pháp chức năng (Vietnamese, an outline of Functional Grammar). Hà Nội: Nhà xuất bản Giáo dục.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. & Nichols, Johanna
1986 Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1981 Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
2001 Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999 Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis
2008 Remarks on so-called “conjunct/disjunct” systems. Paper presented at the 3rd Syntax of the World’s Languages Conference , Berlin, 25–28 September.
Dao, Huy Linh
2012 Intransitivité scindée, passif et sujet impersonnel en vietnamien. In Actes du 31e Colloque International sur le Lexique et la Grammaire, Jan Radimský (ed.), 49–55. České Budějovice: Université de Bohême du Sud à České Budějovice.Google Scholar
2013 Intransitivité scindée, passif adversatif et sujet explétif en vietnamien. Faits de Langues 41: 55–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 On expletive subject pronoun in Vietnamese: Syntax or pragmatics, or both? Paper presented at the International Conference Syntax of World’s Languages 6 (SWL 6), Pavia, Italy, 8–10 September.
2015 Inaccusativité et diathèses verbales: Le cas du vietnamien. PhD dissertation, University Nouvelle Sorbonne – Paris 3.Google Scholar
2019a Dénouer la complexité de la périphérie gauche de l’énoncé vietnamien: Aspects syntaxique et sémantique. In Complexité des structures et des systèmes linguistiques: Le cas des langues romanes, Ivaylo Burov & Giuliana Fiorentino (eds), 219–240. Sofia: CU Romanistika.Google Scholar
2019b De la subjectivité et de l’intersubjectivité linguistiques en vietnamien. Paper presented at the Seminar Subjectivité et langage , 25 October, INALCO.
Dao, Huy Linh & Do-Hurinville, Danh Thành
2013 Les structures hypothétiques en vietnamien: Mà comme marqueur de non-assertion. Travaux Linguistiques du CerLiCo 25: 227–244.Google Scholar
de Haan, Ferdinand
1999 Evidentiality and epistemic modality: Setting boundaries. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 18: 83–101.Google Scholar
2005 Encoding speaker perspective: Evidentials. In Linguistic Diversity and Language Theories [Studies in Language Companion Series 72], Zygmunt Frajzyngier, Adam Hodges & David S. Rood (eds.), 379–397. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dendale, Patrick & Tasmowski, Liliane
2001 Introduction: Evidentiality and related notions. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 339–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enfield, Nick J. & Comrie, Bernard
2015 Mainland Southeast Asian languages: State of the art and new directions, In Languages of Mainland Southeast Asia: The State of the Art, Nick J. Enfield & Bernard Comrie (eds), 1–27. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ernst, Thomas
2009 Speaker-oriented adverbs. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 27: 497–544. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi
1997 The Dynamics of Focus Structure. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Faller, Martina T.
2002 Semantics and Pragmatics of Evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Farkas, Donka F.
2002 Specificity distinction. Journal of Semantics 19: 213–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Janet Dean & Sag, Ivan A.
1982 Referential and quantificational indefinites. Linguistics and Philosophy 5: 355–398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Edward John
2001 Evidentiality and Assertion in Tibetan. PhD dissertation, University of California.Google Scholar
Greco, Ciro, Phan, Trang & Haegeman, Liliane
2018a On nó, an optional expletive in Vietnamese. In Null Subjects in Generative Grammar, Federica Cognola & Jan Casalicchio (eds), 31–51. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Greco, Ciro, Haegeman, Liliane & Phan, Trang
2018b Expletives and speaker related meaning. In Order and Structure in Syntax, II: Subjecthood and Argument Structure, Michelle Sheehan & Laura R. Bailey (eds), 69–93. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Guéron, Jacqueline & Haegeman, Liliane
2012  Je est un autre. Subject positions, point of view and the neuter pronoun tet in West Flemish. In Functional Heads, Laura Brugé, Anna Cardinaletti, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro & Cecilia Poletto (eds), 81–91. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hale, Ken L. & Keyser, Samuel Jay
1993 On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. Ms, MIT.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi & Ritter, Elizabeth
2002 Person and number in pronouns: A feature geometric analysis. Language 8(3): 482–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hellan, Lars
1981 On semantic scope. In Ambiguities in Intensional Contexts, Frank Heny (ed.), 47–81. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Huang, C. T. James
1984 On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 531–574.Google Scholar
Ionin, Tania, Ko, Heejeong & Wexler, Kenneth
2004 Article semantics in L2 acquisition: The role of specificity. Language Acquisition 12(1): 3–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kasher, Asa & Gabbay, Dov M.
1976 On the semantics and pragmatics of specific and non-specific indefinite expressions. Theoretical Linguistics 3: 145–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lahousse, Karen
2003 La complexité de la notion de topique et l’inversion du sujet nominal. Travaux de Linguistique 47: 111–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 Implicit stage topics. Discours 1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka
1995 Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sandra A.
1976 Subject and topic: A new typology of language. In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed.), 457–489. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1981 Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Milner, Jean-Claude
1978 De la syntaxe à l’interprétation. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
1986 Evidential diachrony in Northern Iroquoian. In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds), 89–112. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Nguyen, Phu Phong
1992 La deixis en vietnamien. In La deixis, Mary-Annick Morel & Laurent Danon-Boileau (eds), 177–186. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Nguyen, Van Hiep & Hoang, Thi Thu Thuy
2011 Về chủ ngữ giả trong tiếng Việt” (On dummy subject in Vietnamese). Ngôn Ngữ 270: 47–58.Google Scholar
Paykin, Katia
2010 Il pleut des idées reçues: NP expansions of weather verbs. Lingvisticae Investigationes 32(2): 253–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paris, Marie-Claude
1992 Démonstratifs et personne en chinois standard. In La deixis, Mary-Annick Morel & Laurent Danon-Boileau (eds), 165–175. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David
1995 Zero Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Phan, Trang
2013 Syntax of Vietnamese Aspect. PhD dissertation, University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1990 Relativized Minimality. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rooryck, Johan
2001a Evidentiality, Part I. GLOT International 5: 125–133.Google Scholar
2001b Evidentiality, Part II. GLOT International 5: 161–168.Google Scholar
Ruwet, Nicolas
1982 Grammaire des insultes et autres études. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
1988 Les verbes météorologiques et l’hypothèse inaccusative. In Grammaire et histoire de la grammaire. Hommage à la mémoire de Jean Stéfanini, Claire Blanche-Benveniste, André Cherval & Maurice Gross (eds), 383–402. Aix-en-Provence: Publications de l’Université de Provence.Google Scholar
Sells, Peter
1987 Aspects of logophoricity. Linguistic Inquiry 18(3): 445–479.Google Scholar
Searle, John R.
2004 Mind: A Brief Introduction. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Speas, Margaret
2004 Evidentiality, logophoricity and the syntactic representation of pragmatic features. Lingua 114: 255–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 On the syntax and semantics of evidentials. Language and Linguistics Compass 2: 940–965. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Evidentials as generalized functional heads. In Edges, Heads, and Projections: Interface Properties [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 156], Anna Maria Di Sciullo & Virginia Hill (eds), 127–150. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Speas, Margaret & Tenny, Carol
2003 Configurational properties of point of view roles. In Asymmetry in Grammar [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 57], Anna Maria Di Sciullo (ed), 315–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tamba, Irène
1992 Démonstratifs et personnels en japonais. Deixis et double structuration de l’espace discursif. La deixis, Mary-Annick Morel & Laurent Danon-Boileau (eds), 187–195. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Tenny, Carol
2006 Evidentiality, experiencers, and the syntax of sentience in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 15: 245–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Widmer, Manuel & Zúñiga, Fernando
2017 Egophoricity, involvement, and semantic roles in Tibeto-Burman languages. Open Linguistics 1: 419–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar