Part of
Building Categories in Interaction: Linguistic resources at work
Edited by Caterina Mauri, Ilaria Fiorentini and Eugenio Goria
[Studies in Language Companion Series 220] 2021
► pp. 18
References (22)
References
Barsalou, Lawrence W. 1983. Ad hoc categories. Memory and Cognition 11(3): 211–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991. Deriving categories to achieve goals. In The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, Gordon H. Bower (ed.), 1–64. San Diego CA: Academic Press. (Reprinted in Goal-driven Learning, Ashwin Ram & David Leake (eds), 121–176. 1995. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press/Bradford Books).Google Scholar
2003. Situated simulation in the human conceptual system. In Language and Cognitive Processes 18: 513–562. (Reprinted in Conceptual Representation, Helen Moss & James Hampton (eds), 513–566. Hove: Psychology Press).Google Scholar
2010. Ad hoc categories. In The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the Language Sciences, Patrick C. Hogan (ed.), 87–88. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Berlin, Brent & Kay, Paul. 1969. Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution [The David Human Series Philosophy and Cognitive Science Reissues 19]. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Croft, William & Cruse, Alan D. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daniel, Michael & Moravcsik, Edith. 2013. The associative plural. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew Dryer, David Gil, Bernard Comrie (eds), Chapter 36. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. <[URL]> (22 March 2021).
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 2003. Space in Language and Cognition: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mauri, Caterina. 2017. Building and interpreting ad hoc categories: A linguistic analysis. In Formal Models in the Study of Language, Joanna Blochowiak, Cristina Grisot, Stephanie Durrleman, & Christopher Laenzlinger (eds), 297–326. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mauri, Caterina & Sansò, Andrea. 2018. Linguistic strategies for ad hoc categorization: Theoretical assessment and cross-linguistic variation. Folia Linguistica 52(s39–1): 1–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mauri, Caterina & Sansò Andrea (eds). 2020. Ad Hoc Categorization and Language: The Construction of Categories in Discourse. Special Issue of Languages Sciences 81.Google Scholar
Mauri, Caterina & Sansò, Andrea. In press. Heterogeneous plurals: A diachronic typology of associative and similative plurals. To appear in Linguistic Typology. DOI logo
Montaut, Annie. 2009. Reduplication and ‘echo words’ in Hindi/Urdu. In Annual Review of South Asian Languages and Linguistics, Rajendra Singh (ed.), 21–91. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Overstreet, Maryann. 1999. Whales, Candlelight and Stuff Like That: General Extenders in English Discourse. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2005. And stuff und so: Investigating pragmatic expressions in English and German. Journal of Pragmatics 37: 1845–1864. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor H. 1973. Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 4(3): 328–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1975. The nature of mental codes for color categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1(4): 303–322.Google Scholar
Selting, Margret. 2007. Lists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction as an interactional resource. Journal of Pragmatics 39(3): 483–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Carston, Robyn. 2007. A unitary approach to lexical pragmatics: Relevance, inference and ad hoc concepts. In Pragmatics, Noel Burton-Roberts (ed.), 230–259. Houndmills: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Fedriani, Chiara & Piera Molinelli
2022. Managing turns, building common ground, planning discourse. Pragmatics & Cognition 29:2  pp. 347 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.