References (35)
References
Avis, Franz-Josef d’ & Finkbeiner, Rita. 2019. Was ist Expressivität? In Expressivität im Deutschen, Franz-Josef d’Avis & Rita Finkbeiner (eds), 1–22. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald. 2009. Corpus Linguistics in Morphology: Morphological Productivity. In Corpus Linguistics, Anke Lüdeling & Merja Kytö (eds), 899–919. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Barcelona, Antonio. 2015. Metonymy. In Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Ewa Dąbrowska & Dagmar Divjak (eds), 143–167. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baroni, Marco & Evert, Stefan. 2005. Testing the extrapolation quality of word frequency models. Proceedings of Corpus Linguistics 2005. ([URL], last checked 05/05/2021).Google Scholar
Baumann, Stefan & Riester, Arndt. 2012. Referential and lexical givenness: Semantic, prosodic and cognitive aspects. In Prosody and Meaning, Gorka Elordieta & Pilar Prieto i Vives (eds), 119–161. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bell, Allan. 1984. Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13(2): 145–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Wolf Z. 1992. Pseudopartizipien im deutschen Sprachgebrauch. Ein Nachschlage- und Übungsbuch. Heidelberg: Groos.Google Scholar
Bredel, Ursula. 2008. Die Interpunktion des Deutschen. Ein kompositionelles System zur Online-Steuerung des Lesens. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. 2010. Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dammel, Antje & Kempf, Luise. 2018. Paradigmatic Relationships in German Action Noun Formation. Zeitschrift für Wortbildung / Journal of Word Formation (ZWJW) 2018 (2): 55–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Wit, Astrid, Petré, Peter & Brisard, Frank. 2020. Standing out with the progressive. Journal of Linguistics (56/3), 479–514. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Evert, Stefan & Baroni, Marco. 2007. zipfR: Word frequency distributions in R. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Posters and Demonstrations Sessions, Sophia Ananiadou (ed), 29–32. Prague: Association for Computational Linguistics. ([URL], last checked 05/06/2021). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Finkbeiner, Rita & Meibauer, Jörg. 2016. Boris “Ich bin drin” Becker (‘Boris ‘I am in’ Becker’). Syntax, semantics and pragmatics of a special naming construction. Lingua (2016/181): 36–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fleischer, Wolfgang & Barz, Irmhild. 2012. Wortbildung der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. 4th revised edition, in collaboration with Marianne Schröder. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gaeta, Livio & Ricca, Davide. 2006. Productivity in Italian word-formation. Linguistics 44(1): 57–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grandi, Nicola & Körtvélyessy, Livia. 2015. Introduction: Why Evaluative Morphology? In Edinburgh Handbook of Evaluative Morphology, Nicola Grandi & Livia Körtvélyessy (eds), 3–20. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Stefan. 2018. Derivational morphology in flux: a case study of word-formation change in German. Cognitive Linguistics 29(1): 77–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1999. Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics 37(6): 1043–1068. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Hein, Katrin. 2017. Modeling the Properties of German Phrasal Compounds within a Usage-Based Constructional Approach. In Further investigations into the nature of phrasal compounding, Carola Trips & Jaklin Kornflit (eds), 119–148. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Hüning, Matthias & Schlücker, Barbara. 2010. Konvergenz und Divergenz in der Wortbildung. Komposition im Niederländischen und Deutschen. In Kontrastive germanistische Linguistik, Antje Dammel, Sebastian Kürschner & Damaris Nübling (eds), 783–825. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Kay, Paul & Fillmore, Charles J. 1999. Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What’s X doing Y? construction. Language 75(1): 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keller, Rudi. 1994. Language Change: The Invisible Hand in Language. Translated by Brigitte Nerlich. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kempf, Luise. 2016. Adjektivsuffixe in Konkurrenz. Wortbildungswandel vom Frühneuhochdeutschen zum Neuhochdeutschen. Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kempf, Luise & Hartmann, Stefan. 2018. Schema unification and morphological productivity: A diachronic perspective. In The construction of words. Advances in Construction Morphology, Geert Booij (ed), 441–474 (Studies in Morphology 4). Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klockow, Reinhard. 1980. Linguistik der Gänsefüßchen. Untersuchungen zum Gebrauch der Anführungszeichen im gegenwärtigen Deutsch. Frankfurt a. M.: Haag und Herchen.Google Scholar
Meibauer, Jörg. 2007. Syngrapheme als pragmatische Indikatoren: Anführung und Auslassung. In Von der Pragmatik zur Grammatik, Sandra Döring & Jochen Geilfuß-Wolfgang (eds), 21–37. Leipzig: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
. 2013. Expressive Compounds in German. Word Structure 6(1): 21–42. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Petré, Peter. 2017. The extravagant progressive: an experimental corpus study on the history of emphatic be V-ing. English Language and Linguistics 21(2): 227–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schäfer, Roland. 2015. Processing and querying large corpora with the COW14 architecture. In Challenges in the Management of Large Corpora (CMLC-3), Piotr Bański, Hanno Biber, Evelyn Breiteneder, Marc Kupietz, Harald Lüngen & Andreas Witt (eds), 28–34. [URL].Google Scholar
Schäfer, Roland & Bildhauer, Felix. 2012. Building Large Corpora from the Web Using a New Efficient Tool Chain. In Proceedings of LREC 2012, Nicoletta Calzolari, Khalid Choukri, Terry Declerck, Mehmet Uğur Doğan, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Asuncion Moreno, Jan Odijk & Stelios Piperidis (eds), 486–493.Google Scholar
Scherer, Carmen. 2019. Expressivität in der Wortbildung. Ein Überblick. In Expressivität im Deutschen, Franz-Josef d’Avis & Rita Finkbeiner (eds), 49–74. Reihe Germanistische Linguistik 318. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg & Günther, Franziska. 2016. Toward a unified socio-cognitive framework for salience in language. Frontiers in Psychology 7.1110, 1–4. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Van Haeringen, Conrad B. 1949. Participia praeverbalia. De Nieuwe Taalgids 42: 187–191.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M. & Pullum, Geoffrey K. 1987. Plain Morphology and Expressive Morphology. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (1987): 330–340. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Ivorra Ordines, Pedro & Belén López Meirama
2024.  Vete a freír cristales . Review of Cognitive Linguistics DOI logo
Ordines, Pedro Ivorra
2023.  Por mí como si te operas. Constructional idioms of rejection from a constructionist approach. Yearbook of Phraseology 14:1  pp. 89 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.