Chapter published in:
Extravagant Morphology: Studies in rule-bending, pattern-extending and theory-challenging morphology
Edited by Matthias Eitelmann and Dagmar Haumann
[Studies in Language Companion Series 223] 2022
► pp. 233–254

Wild words

The case of morphologically embedded general extenders

| University of Bologna
| University of Bologna
In this paper we analyse the formal and functional ‘extravagance’ of general extenders embedded within morphological schemas, either at the end of coordinate compounds, or as constituents of complex words, especially at the end of lists of complex words formed according to the same schema. After discussing two case studies from Italian (eccetera ‘etcetera’ and tutto ‘everything/all’), we conclude that complex words containing general extenders are ‘wild words’, namely ‘contextuals’ (Clark & Clark 1979) that are created to meet specific communicative needs and are meant not to be stored. As such, they serve as a strategy to create ‘ad hoc categories’ (Mauri & Sansò 2018a). The relationship of ‘wild words’ with lists is also explored and deemed crucial both for their semantic interpretation and for explaining their collocation within morphological structures.
Keywords: ad hoc categories, contextuals, lists, general extenders, pragmatics, word formation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.General extenders and lists
  • 3.Analysis
    • 3.1Case study 1: eccetera ‘etcetera’
    • 3.2Case study 2: tutto ‘everything/all’
    • 3.3Summing up
  • 4.Theoretical discussion
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 16 March 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.223.10mas
References
Arcodia, Giorgio Francesco
2010 Coordinating compounds. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(9): 863–873. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barotto, Alessandra & Mauri, Caterina
2018 Constructing lists to construct categories. Italian Journal of Linguistics 30(1): 95–134.Google Scholar
Barsalou, Lawrence W.
1983 Ad hoc categories. Memory and Cognition 11(3): 211–227. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie
1983 English Word-Formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, Claire
1990 Un modèle d’analyse syntaxique “en grilles” pour les productions orales. Anuario de Psicología 47: 11–28.Google Scholar
Bonvino, Elisabetta, Cortés Velásquez, Diego & Fiorenza, Elisa
2018 “Sopratavola soprammobile come dite voi”: Lists in L1 and L2. Italian Journal of Linguistics 30(1): 201–230.Google Scholar
Booij, Geert
2009 Lexical integrity as a formal universal: a constructionist view. In Universals of Language Today, Sergio Scalise, Elisabetta Magni & Antonietta Bisetto (eds), 83–100. Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 Construction Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Channell, Joanna
1994 Vague Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chelliah, Shobhana L.
1997 A Grammar of Meithei. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny
2007 Discourse variation, grammaticalisation and stuff like that. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(2): 155–193. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Eve V. & Clark, Herbert H.
1979 When nouns surface as verbs. Language 55(4): 767–811. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Mauro, Tullio, Mancini, Federico, Vedovelli, Massimo & Voghera, Miriam
1993 Lessico di frequenza dell’italiano parlato. Milano: Etaslibri.Google Scholar
Dines, Elizabeth R.
1980 Variation in discourse: ‘And stuff like that’. Language in Society 9(1): 13–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dubois, Sylvie
1992 Extension particles etc. Language Variation and Change 4(2): 179–204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fiorentini, Ilaria
2018 Eccetera eccetera e così via di seguito. I general extenders dell’italiano contemporaneo. In CLUB Working Papers in Linguistics 2, Francesca Masini & Fabio Tamburini (eds), 20–39. Bologna: AMS Acta – Alma Mater Studiorum – Università di Bologna.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele
1995 Constructions. A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2006 Constructions at Work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goria, Eugenio & Masini, Francesca
(2021) Category-building lists between grammar and interaction: a constructionist view. In Building Categories in Interaction (Studies in Language Companion Series, 220), Caterina Mauri, Eugenio Goria & Ilaria Fiorentini, (eds). 73–110. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1999 Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics 37(6): 1043–1068. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin
2014 Construction Grammar and Its Application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas & Trousdale, Graeme
(eds) 2013 The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
1990 List construction as a task and resource. In Interactional Competence, George Psathas (ed), 63–92. New York: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
Kahane, Sylvain & Pietrandrea, Paola
2012 Types d’entassement en français. In Actes du 3e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française (CMLF 2012), 1809–1828.Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, Adam, Baisa, Vít, Bušta, Jan, Jakubíček, Miloš, Kovář, Vojtěch, Michelfeit, Jan, Rychlý, Pavel & Suchomel, Vít
2014 The Sketch Engine: Ten years on. Lexicography 1(1): 7–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Malkiel, Yakov
1959 Studies in irreversible binomials. Lingua 8: 113–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Masini, Francesca
2009 Phrasal lexemes, compounds and phrases: A constructionist perspective. Word Structure 2(2): 254–271. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Masini, Francesca & Arcodia, Giorgio Francesco
2018 Listing between lexicon and syntax: Focus on frame-naming lists. Italian Journal of Linguistics 30(1): 135–172.Google Scholar
Masini, Francesca & Audring, Jenny
2019 Construction Morphology. In The Oxford Handbook of Morphological Theory, Jenny Audring & Francesca Masini (eds), 365–389. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Masini, Francesca, Mauri, Caterina & Pietrandrea, Paola
2018 List constructions: Towards a unified account. Italian Journal of Linguistics 30(1): 49–94.Google Scholar
Mauri, Caterina & Sansò, Andrea
2017 Strategie linguistiche per la costruzione online di categorie: un quadro tipologico. In Tipologia e ‘dintorni’. Il metodo tipologico alla intersezione di piani d’analisi, Giuseppe Brincat & Sandro Caruana (eds), 209–232. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
2018a Linguistic strategies for ad hoc categorization: Theoretical assessment and cross-linguistic variation. Folia Linguistica Historica 39(1): 1–35.Google Scholar
2018b Un approccio tipologico ai general extenders . In Tipologia, acquisizione, grammaticalizzazione. Typology, Acquisition, Grammaticalization Studies, Marina Chini & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds), 63–72. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Mauri, Caterina, Goria, Eugenio & Fiorentini, Ilaria
2019 Non-exhaustive lists in spoken language. Constructions and Frames 11(2): 290–316. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Montermini, Fabio
2008 Il lato sinistro della morfologia. La prefissazione in italiano e nelle lingue del mondo. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Overstreet, Maryann
1999 Whales, Candlelight, and Stuff Like That: General Extenders in English Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2005 And stuff und so: Investigating pragmatics expressions in English and German. Journal of Pragmatics 37(11): 1845–1864. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Selting, Margret
2007 Lists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction as an interactional resource. Journal of Pragmatics 39(3): 483–526. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wälchli, Bernhard
2005 Co-compounds and Natural Coordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M. & Pullum, Geoffrey K.
1987 Plain morphology and expressive morphology. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Jon Aske, Natasha Beery, Laura Michaelis & Hana Filip (eds), 330–340. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistic Society. CrossrefGoogle Scholar