Chapter published in:
Particles in German, English, and Beyond
Edited by Remus Gergel, Ingo Reich and Augustin Speyer
[Studies in Language Companion Series 224] 2022
► pp. 2568
References

Corpora

Bonner Frühneuhochdeutschkorpus
COSMAS II web [Corpus Search, Management and Analysis System]
DTA [Deutsches Textarchiv]
MHDBDB [Mittelhochdeutsche Begriffsdatenbank]
Altmann, Hans
2007Gradpartikel. In Handbuch der deutschen Wortarten, Ludger Hoffmann (ed.), 357–385. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Aulete digital. [o dicionário da língua portuguesa na internet]
Axel-Tober, Katrin
2012(Nicht-)kanonische Nebensätze im Deutschen. Synchrone und diachrone Aspekte. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barack, Karl A.
(ed.) 1863Des Teufels Netz: satirisch-didaktisches Gedicht aus der ersten Hälfte des fünfzehnten Jahrhunderts. Stuttgart: Litterarischer Verein.Google Scholar
Bayer, Josef
1996Directionality and Logical Form: On the Scope of Focusing Particles and Wh-in-Situ. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beltrama, Andrea
2016Bridging the Gap: Intensifiers between Semantic and Social Meaning. PhD dissertation, University of Chicago.
BMZ [Mittelhochdeutsches Wörterbuch. Mit Benutzung des Nachlasses von Georg Friedrich Benecke ausgearbeitet von Wilhelm Müller und Friedrich Zarncke]
Bonacchi, Silvia
2017What does reduplication intensify? The semantics and pragmatics of reduplicated forms in Italian and their equivalents in German. In Exploring Intensification: Synchronic, Diachronic and Cross-linguistic Perspectives, Maria Napoli & Miriam Ravetto (eds), 289–303. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bouma, Gosse, Petra Hendriks & Jack Hoeksema
2007Focus particles inside prepositional phrases: A comparison of Dutch, English and German. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 10(1): 1–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Büring, Daniel & Katharina Hartmann
2001The Syntax and Semantics of Focus-Sensitive Particles in German. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 19. 229–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Allan M. & Elizabeth F. Loftus
1975A Spreading-Activation Theory of Semantic Processing. Psychological Review 82(6): 407–428. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Kuthy, Kordula & Arndt Riester
2014Alternative semantics, focus domains and contrast. Annotating Corpora with Information Structure ESSLLI 2014 21 August 2014 http://​www​.sfs​.uni​-tuebingen​.de​/~kdk​/esslli14​/rooth​-wagner​-buering​.pdf> (8 June 2019).
Demske, Ulrike
2009Zur Markierung von Konsekutivität im Deutschen: Diachrone Aspekte. In Koordination und Subordination im Deutschen [Sonderheft der Linguistischen Berichte 16], Veronika Ehrich, Christian Fortmann, Ingo Reich & Marga Reis (eds), 43–66. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
de Vries, Hanna
2010Evaluative Degree Modification of Adjectives and Nouns. MA Thesis, Utrecht University.
Diewald, Gabriele
2002A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. In New Reflections on Grammaticalization. International Symposium, Potsdam, 17–19 June 1999 [Typological Studies in Language 49], Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds), 103–120. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Konstruktionen und Paradigmen. In Konstruktionsgrammatik. Themenheft der Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik, Clemens Knobloch (ed.), 37: 445–468. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DLE [Diccionario de la lengua Española]
Drubig, H. Bernhard
2003Toward a typology of focus and focus constructions. Linguistics 41(1): 1–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DWB [Deutsches Wörterbuch von Jacob und Wilhelm Grimm]
DWDS [Digitales Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. Das Wortauskunftssystem zur deutschen Sprache in Geschichte und Gegenwart.] Berlin-Brandenburgischen Akademie der Wissenschaften
Eberhardt, Ira
2017From a focus particle to a conjunction: Diachronic and synchronic analysis of German zumal . Language 93(2): e66–e96. < Crossref.Google Scholar
Eberhardt, Ira & Katrin Axel-Tober
(accepted). On the divergent developments of two German causal subjunctions: Syntactic reanalysis and the evolution of causal meaning. In Łukasz Jędrzejowski & Constanze Fleczoreck eds Micro- and Macro-variation of Causal Clauses. Synchronic and Diachronic Insights Studies in Language Companion Series. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company
Eckardt, Regine
2001Reanalysing selbst . Natural Language Semantics 9: 371–412. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Meaning Change in Grammaticalization. An Enquiry into Semantic Reanalysis. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Falaus, Anamaria
2013Introduction: Alternatives in semantics and pragmatics. In Alternatives in Semantics [Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Language and Cognition], 1–35. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://​hal​.archives​-ouvertes​.fr​/hal​-01158558​/file​/AFalaus​_Alternatives%20in%20semantics%20intro%20%281%29​.pdf> (19 March 2019) Crossref
Filippi-Deswelle, Catherine
2014Lexical and grammatical gradability: Surprise and grading, Sapir and Culioli. https://​hal​-normandie​-univ​.archives​-ouvertes​.fr​/hal​-01706139> (8 June 2019).
Frey, Werner
2011Peripheral adverbial clauses, their licensing and the prefield in German. In Satzverknüpfung – Zur Interaktion von Form, Bedeutung und Diskursfunktion, Eva Breindl, Gisella Ferraresi & Anna Volodina (eds), 41–77. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gast, Volker
2017The scalar operator even and its German equivalents: Pragmatic factors determining the use of auch, selbst and sogar . In Focus on Additivity. Multifaceted Views on Focusing Modifiers, Anna M. De Cesare (ed.), 201–234. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gast, Volker & Johan van der Auwera
2011Scalar additive operators in the languages of Europe. Language 87: 2–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ghesquière, Lobke & Kristin Davidse
2011The development of intensification scales in noun-intensifying uses of adjectives: Sources, paths and mechanisms of change. English Language and Linguistics 15: 251–277. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gutzmann, Daniel & Katharina Turgay
2012Expressive intensifiers in German: Syntax-semantics mismatches. In Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 9, Iñíon Christopher (ed.), 149–166. http://​www​.cssp​.cnrs​.fr​/eiss9/.
Haegeman, Liliane
2003Conditional clauses: External and internal syntax. Mind & Language 18: 317–339. Crossref.Google Scholar
Hansonius Soxo, Petrus
1586Entdeckung der grossen Thorheit. Ingolstadt: David Sartorium.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2002World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Helbig, Gerhard
1994Lexikon deutscher Partikeln. 3rd ed. Berlin/München/Leipzig/Wien/Zürich/New York: Langenscheidt, Verl. Enzyklopädie.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J.
1991On some principles of grammaticization. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 17–36. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey Pullum
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Iwasaki, Shoichi & Preeya Ingkaphirom
2005A Reference Grammar of Thai. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1972Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge/ Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Joachim
1983Fokus und Skalen: zur Syntax und Semantik der Gradpartikeln im Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1986Abtönungsmittel als Illokutionstypmodifikatoren. Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 27, 100–111.Google Scholar
Jäger, Marion
2017Focus Particles and Extraction. An Experimental Investigation of German and English Focus Particles in Constructions with Leftward Association. PhD dissertation, Tübingen University.
Keller, Rudi & Ilja Kirschbaum
2000Bedeutungswandel. Der Deutschunterricht 3: 41–53.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher
1999Projecting the Adjective: The Syntax and Semantics of Gradability and Comparison. New York: Garland Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher & Louise McNally
2005Scale structure, degree modification, and the semantics of gradable predicates. Language 81: 345–381. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kirschbaum, Ilja
2002 Schrecklich nett und voll verrückt. Muster der Adjektiv-Intensivierung im Deutschen. PhD dissertation, Düsseldorf University.
König, Ekkehard
1989On the historical development of focus particles. In Sprechen mit Partikeln, Harald Weydt (ed.), 318–329. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Johan van der Auwera
1988Clause integration in German and Dutch conditionals, concessive conditionals, and concessives. In Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 18], John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 101–134. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
1999Additive particles under stress. In Proceedings of SALT 8, Dara Strolovitch & Aaron Lawson (eds), 111–128. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Lühr, Rosemarie
2010Fokuspartikeln im Althochdeutschen. In Mikrostrukturen und Makrostrukturen im älteren Deutsch vom 9. bis zum 17. Jahrhundert: Text und Syntax. [Berliner Sprachwissenschaftliche Studien 19], Yvon Desportes, Franz Simmler & Claudia Wich-Reif (eds), 103–120. Berlin: Weidler.Google Scholar
McNally, Louise
2016Modification. In Cambridge Handbook of Formal Semantics, M. Aloni & P. Dekker (eds), 442–466. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Melnichuk, Oleksandr et al.
2003Etimologichny slovnik ukrainskoy movi. Vol. 4. Kiev: Naukova dumka.Google Scholar
Méndez-Naya, Belén
2017Co-occurrence and iteration of intensifiers in Early English. English Text Construction 10(2): 249–273. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Hans-Georg
2004Reduplikationen im Türkischen. Morphologische Untersuchungen. [Turkologica 56]. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu & Matti Rissanen
2002Fairly pretty or pretty fair? On the development and grammaticalization of English downtoners. Language Sciences 24(3–4): 359–380. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
OED [Oxford English Dictionary]
Orenstein, Dina & Yael Greenberg
2021Approximation derived from a scalar exclusive particle associating with covert focus: The case of Hebrew be-sax ha-kol . Glossa: Journal of General Linguistics, 6 (1), 5. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pasch, Renate, Ursula Brauße, Eva Breindl & Ulrich H. Waßner
2003Handbuch der deutschen Konnektoren: Linguistische Grundlagen der Beschreibung und syntaktische Merkmale der deutschen Satzverknüpfer (Konjunktionen, Satzadverbien und Partikeln). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pfeifer, Wolfgang et al.
1993Etymologisches Wörterbuch des Deutschen. Electronic version in DWDS. https://​www​.dwds​.de​/wb​/wb​-etymwb.
Plank, Frans
1979Zur Affinität von selbst und auch . In Die Partikeln der deutschen Sprache, Harald Weydt (ed.), 269–284. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pleteršnik, Maks
2006Slovensko-nemški slovar: tiskana izdaja 1894–1985, 2006. https://​fran​.si/.
Reis, Marga
1997Zum syntaktischen Status unselbständiger Verbzweit-Sätze. In Sprache im Fokus. Festschrift für Heinz Vater zum 65. Geburtstag, Christa Dürscheid, Karl Heinz Ramers & Monika Schwarz (eds), 121–144. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Reis, Marga & Inger Rosengren
1997A modular approach to the grammar of additive particles: The case of German auch . Journal of Semantics 14: 237–309. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rooth, Mats
1985Association with Focus. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
1992A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1(1): 75–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sant, Charlotte
2019‘Very Monday feeling’: The degree modification of complex nominals, Paper presented at Modification of Complex Predicates (MoCP) , Düsseldorf (23–24 May 2019), 1–6.
Schares, Thomas
2005Untersuchungen zu Anzahl, Umfang und Struktur der Artikel der Erstbearbeitung des Deutschen Wörterbuchs von Jacob Grimm und Wilhelm Grimm. PhD dissertation, Trier University.
Schmidt, Jessica
(this volume). Do intensifiers lose their expressive force over time? A corpus linguistic study.
Sudhoff, Stefan
2010aFocus Particles in German: Syntax, Prosody, and Information Structure. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010bFokuspartikeln innerhalb von DPn im Deutschen. In 40 Jahre Partikelforschung, Theo Harden & Elke Hentschel (eds), 169–181. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
2012Fokuspartikelinventare des Niederländischen und Deutschen. In Nicht-flektierende Wortarten, Björn Rothstein (ed.), 203–223. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth
2006The semantic development of scalar focus modifiers. In Handbook on the History of English, Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds), 335–359. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trubachev, O. N.
(ed.) 1977Etimologicheskij Slovar slavjanskih jazykov. 4th ed. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Visconti, Jacqueline
2005On the origins of scalar particles in Italian. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 6(2): 237–261. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov & I. Marvin Herzog
1968Empirical Foundations for a Theory of Language Change. Austin: UT Press.Google Scholar
Zeevat, Henk
2009 “Only” as a mirative particle. In Focus at the Syntax-Semantics Interface, Arndt Riester & Edgar Onea (eds), 121–140. Stuttgart: Universitätsbibliothek der Universität Stuttgart. CrossrefGoogle Scholar