Chapter published in:
Particles in German, English, and Beyond
Edited by Remus Gergel, Ingo Reich and Augustin Speyer
[Studies in Language Companion Series 224] 2022
► pp. 6994
References
Bates, Douglas, Mächler, Martin, Bolker, Ben & Steve Walker
2015 Fitting Linear Mixed Effects Models Using lme4. In: Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biedermann, Reinhard
1969 Die deutschen Gradadverbien. PhD dissertation, University Heidelberg.
Bolinger, Dwight
1972 Degree Words. The Hague: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Breindl, Eva
2007 Intensitätspartikeln. In: Hoffmann, Ludger (ed.): Handbuch der deutschen Wortarten. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter, 397–422.Google Scholar
Cruse, D. Alan
1986 Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
d’Avis, Franz & Rita Finkbeiner
2019 Was ist Expressivität? In: d’Avis, Franz & Rita Finkbeiner (eds.): Expressivität im Deutschen. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter, 1–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferraresi, Gisella
2014 Grammatikalisierung. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob
1892 Über Sinn und Bedeutung. In: Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 100, 25–50.Google Scholar
Gutzmann, Daniel
2011 Expressive Modifiers & Mixed Expressives. In: Bonami, Olivier & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr (eds.): Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics, 8, 123–141.Google Scholar
2015 Use-Conditional Meaning: Studies in Multidimensional Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019 The Grammar of Expressivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hentschel, Elke
1998 Die Emphase des Schreckens: furchtbar nett und schrecklich freundlich . In: Harden, Theo & Elke Hentschel (eds.): Particulae particularum. Festschrift für Harald Weydt zum 60. Geburtstag. Tübingen: Stauffenburg, 119–132.Google Scholar
Institut für Deutsche Sprache
2018 Deutsches Referenzkorpus / Archiv der Korpora geschriebener Gegenwartssprache 2018-II (Release vom 12.11.2018). Mannheim: Institut für Deutsche Sprache. www​.ids​-mannheim​.de​/DeReKo [07.02.2019].
Jing-Schmidt, Zhuo
2007 Negativity bias in language: A cognitive affective model of emotive intensifiers. In: Cognitive Linguistics, 18(3), 417–433. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, David
1997 The Meaning of Ouch and Oops: Explorations in the Theory of Meaning as Use. Manuscript, UCLA.Google Scholar
Keller, Rudi
1995 Zeichentheorie. Tübingen: Francke.Google Scholar
Keller, Rudi & Ilja Kirschbaum
2000 Bedeutungswandel. In: Der Deutschunterricht, 3, 41–53.Google Scholar
2003 Bedeutungswandel: eine Einführung. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kirschbaum, Ilja
2002a Metaphorische und metonymische Muster der Adjektiv-Intensivierung. In: Katz, Graham, Reinhard, Sabine & Philip Reuter (eds.): Sinn & Bedeutung VI, Proceedings of Sixth Annual Meeting of the Gesellschaft für Semantik. Publications of the Institute of Cognitive Science: University Osnabrück, 201–215.Google Scholar
2002b Schrecklich nett und voll verrückt. Muster der Adjektiv-Intensivierung im Deutschen. PhD dissertation, University Düsseldorf.
Koch, Peter & Wulf Oesterreicher
1996 Sprachwandel und expressive Mündlichkeit. In: Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik, 102, 64–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 Schriftlichkeit und kommunikative Distanz. In: Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik, 35(3), 346–375. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kupietz, Marc & Holger Keibel
2009 The Mannheim German Reference Corpus (DeReKo) as a basis for empirical linguistic research. In: Minegishi, Makoto & Yuji Kawaguchi (eds.): Working Papers in Corpus-based Linguistics and Language Education, 3. Tokyo: Tokyo University of Foreign Studies (TUFS), 53–59.Google Scholar
Lang, Ewald
1983 Einstellungsausdrücke und ausgedrückte Einstellungen. In: Růžička, Rudolf & Wolfgang Motsch (eds.): Untersuchungen zur Semantik. Berlin: Akademie, 305–341.Google Scholar
Lorenz, Gunter R.
2002 Really worthwhile or not really significant? A corpus-based approach to the delexicalization and grammaticalization of intensifiers in Modern English. In: Wischer, Else & Gabriele Diewald (eds.): New Reflections on Grammaticalization. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins, 143–161. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCready, Elin
2010 Varieties of conventional implicature. In: Semantics & Pragmatics, 3(8), 1–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Méndez-Naya, Belén
2003 On Intensifiers and Grammaticalization: The Case of SWIÞE. In: English Studies, 84(4), 372–391. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, Carita
2000 It’s well weird. Degree modifiers of adjectives revisited: the nineties. In: Kirk, John M. (ed.): Corpora Galore: Analyses and Techniques in Describing English. Language and Computers, Vol. 30. Amsterdam/Atlanta: Rodopi, 147–160.Google Scholar
Peters, Hans
1994 Degree Adverbs in Early Modern English. In: Kastovsky, Dieter (ed.): Studies in Early Modern English. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter, 269–288. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pfeifer, Wolfgang
1995 Etymologisches Wörterbuch des Deutschen. München: dtv.Google Scholar
Potts, Christopher
2005 The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2007 The expressive dimension. In: Theoretical Linguistics, 33(2), 165–198. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Jan Svartvik
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team
The R Project for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.” http://​www​.R​-project​.org/ (Version 1.1.456) [23.04.2019].
Sauer, Sebastian
2019 Moderne Datenanalyse mit R. Daten einlesen, aufbereiten, visualisieren, modellieren und kommunizieren. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, Helmut
1994 Probabilistic Part-of-Speech Tagging Using Decision Trees. In: Proceedings of International Conference on New Methods in Language Processing, Manchester, UK, 172–176.Google Scholar
1995 Improvements in Part-of-Speech Tagging with an Application to German. In: Proceedings of the ACL SIGDAT Workshop. Dublin, Ireland, 13–25.Google Scholar
1994, 1995Sentences with corpus hits were Part Of Speech tagged using the TreeTagger”. http://​www​.cis​.uni​-muenchen​.de​/~schmid​/tools​/TreeTagger/ [11.02.2019].
1999Improvements in Part-of-Speech Tagging with an Application to German. In: Susan Armstrong, Kenneth Ward Church, Pierre Isabelle, Sandra Manzi, Evelyne Tzoukermann & David Yarowsky (Hg.), Natural Language Processing Using Very Large Corpora (Text, speech and language technology 11), 13–25. Dordrecht [u. a.]: Springer.Google Scholar
Spiegel Online
Tagliamonte, Sali
2008 So different and pretty cool! Recycling intensifiers in Toronto, Canada. In: English Language and Linguistics, 12(2), 361–394. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali & Chris Roberts
2005 So weird; so cool; so innovative: The use of intensifiers in the television series Friends. In: American Speech, 80(3), 280–300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ward, Joe H.
1963 Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function. In: Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 236–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wickham, Hadley
2016 ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wickham, Hadley, François, Romain, Henry, Lionel & Kirill Müller
2019 dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation. R package version 0.8.0.1.Google Scholar