Cover not available
Part of
Particles in German, English, and Beyond
Edited by Remus Gergel, Ingo Reich and Augustin Speyer
[Studies in Language Companion Series 224] 2022
► pp. 69–94

Chapter 3
Do intensifiers lose their expressive force over time?

A corpus linguistic study

| Saarland University
This article presents a corpus study of German intensifiers, which was conducted with the goal to test the hypothesis of Biedermann (1969) that intensifiers lose their expressivity over time. Following the author, frequently used intensifiers wear out, which results in a loss of expressivity. The goal of the study is to carry out evaluations in the form of synchronic and diachronic frequency distributions. The results show that the use of intensifiers has increased. According to the data, most of them are in an ascending phase and thus, yield no support for the hypothesized loss of expressivity. Further investigations are necessary to validate the above-mentioned hypothesis. Nevertheless, this study provides the first empirical evidence of an increasing use of German intensifiers.
Keywords: corpus linguistics, expressives, expressivity, intensifiers, intensifying particles
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction and theoretical background
  • 2.Corpus study
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1General results
    • 3.2Descriptive intensifier
    • 3.3Expressive intensifiers
    • 3.4Hierarchical Cluster Analysis
  • 4.Discussion
    • 4.1Descriptive intensifier (n = 1)
    • 4.2Expressive intensifiers (n = 16)
      • 4.2.1Cluster I
      • 4.2.2Cluster II
      • 4.2.3Summary and evaluation of the results
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 16 August 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.224.03sch
References (45)
References
Bates, Douglas, Mächler, Martin, Bolker, Ben & Steve Walker. 2015 Fitting Linear Mixed Effects Models Using lme4. In: Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biedermann, Reinhard. 1969 Die deutschen Gradadverbien. PhD dissertation, University Heidelberg.
Bolinger, Dwight. 1972 Degree Words. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breindl, Eva. 2007 Intensitätspartikeln. In: Hoffmann, Ludger (ed.): Handbuch der deutschen Wortarten. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter, 397–422.Google Scholar
Cruse, D. Alan. 1986 Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
d’Avis, Franz & Rita Finkbeiner. 2019 Was ist Expressivität? In: d’Avis, Franz & Rita Finkbeiner (eds.): Expressivität im Deutschen. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter, 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferraresi, Gisella. 2014 Grammatikalisierung. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1892 Über Sinn und Bedeutung. In: Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 100, 25–50.Google Scholar
Gutzmann, Daniel. 2011 Expressive Modifiers & Mixed Expressives. In: Bonami, Olivier & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr (eds.): Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics, 8, 123–141.Google Scholar
. 2015 Use-Conditional Meaning: Studies in Multidimensional Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019 The Grammar of Expressivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hentschel, Elke. 1998 Die Emphase des Schreckens: furchtbar nett und schrecklich freundlich. In: Harden, Theo & Elke Hentschel (eds.): Particulae particularum. Festschrift für Harald Weydt zum 60. Geburtstag. Tübingen: Stauffenburg, 119–132.Google Scholar
Institut für Deutsche Sprache. 2018 Deutsches Referenzkorpus / Archiv der Korpora geschriebener Gegenwartssprache 2018-II (Release vom 12.11.2018). Mannheim: Institut für Deutsche Sprache. [URL] [07.02.2019].
Jing-Schmidt, Zhuo. 2007 Negativity bias in language: A cognitive affective model of emotive intensifiers. In: Cognitive Linguistics, 18(3), 417–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, David. 1997 The Meaning of Ouch and Oops: Explorations in the Theory of Meaning as Use. Manuscript, UCLA.Google Scholar
Keller, Rudi. 1995 Zeichentheorie. Tübingen: Francke.Google Scholar
Keller, Rudi & Ilja Kirschbaum. 2000 Bedeutungswandel. In: Der Deutschunterricht, 3, 41–53.Google Scholar
. 2003 Bedeutungswandel: eine Einführung. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kirschbaum, Ilja. 2002a Metaphorische und metonymische Muster der Adjektiv-Intensivierung. In: Katz, Graham, Reinhard, Sabine & Philip Reuter (eds.): Sinn & Bedeutung VI, Proceedings of Sixth Annual Meeting of the Gesellschaft für Semantik. Publications of the Institute of Cognitive Science: University Osnabrück, 201–215.Google Scholar
. 2002b Schrecklich nett und voll verrückt. Muster der Adjektiv-Intensivierung im Deutschen. PhD dissertation, University Düsseldorf.
Koch, Peter & Wulf Oesterreicher. 1996 Sprachwandel und expressive Mündlichkeit. In: Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik, 102, 64–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007 Schriftlichkeit und kommunikative Distanz. In: Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik, 35(3), 346–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kupietz, Marc & Holger Keibel. 2009 The Mannheim German Reference Corpus (DeReKo) as a basis for empirical linguistic research. In: Minegishi, Makoto & Yuji Kawaguchi (eds.): Working Papers in Corpus-based Linguistics and Language Education, 3. Tokyo: Tokyo University of Foreign Studies (TUFS), 53–59.Google Scholar
Lang, Ewald. 1983 Einstellungsausdrücke und ausgedrückte Einstellungen. In: Růžička, Rudolf & Wolfgang Motsch (eds.): Untersuchungen zur Semantik. Berlin: Akademie, 305–341.Google Scholar
Lorenz, Gunter R. 2002 Really worthwhile or not really significant? A corpus-based approach to the delexicalization and grammaticalization of intensifiers in Modern English. In: Wischer, Else & Gabriele Diewald (eds.): New Reflections on Grammaticalization. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins, 143–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCready, Elin. 2010 Varieties of conventional implicature. In: Semantics & Pragmatics, 3(8), 1–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Méndez-Naya, Belén. 2003 On Intensifiers and Grammaticalization: The Case of SWIÞE. In: English Studies, 84(4), 372–391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, Carita. 2000 It’s well weird. Degree modifiers of adjectives revisited: the nineties. In: Kirk, John M. (ed.): Corpora Galore: Analyses and Techniques in Describing English. Language and Computers, Vol. 30. Amsterdam/Atlanta: Rodopi, 147–160.Google Scholar
Peters, Hans. 1994 Degree Adverbs in Early Modern English. In: Kastovsky, Dieter (ed.): Studies in Early Modern English. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter, 269–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pfeifer, Wolfgang. 1995 Etymologisches Wörterbuch des Deutschen. München: dtv.Google Scholar
Potts, Christopher. 2005 The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2007 The expressive dimension. In: Theoretical Linguistics, 33(2), 165–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Jan Svartvik. 1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team: “The R Project for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.” [URL] (Version 1.1.456) [23.04.2019].
Sauer, Sebastian. 2019 Moderne Datenanalyse mit R. Daten einlesen, aufbereiten, visualisieren, modellieren und kommunizieren. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmid, Helmut. 1994 Probabilistic Part-of-Speech Tagging Using Decision Trees. In: Proceedings of International Conference on New Methods in Language Processing, Manchester, UK, 172–176.Google Scholar
. 1995 Improvements in Part-of-Speech Tagging with an Application to German. In: Proceedings of the ACL SIGDAT Workshop. Dublin, Ireland, 13–25.Google Scholar
. 1994, 1995 “Sentences with corpus hits were Part Of Speech tagged using the TreeTagger”. [URL] [11.02.2019].
. 1999. Improvements in Part-of-Speech Tagging with an Application to German. In: Susan Armstrong, Kenneth Ward Church, Pierre Isabelle, Sandra Manzi, Evelyne Tzoukermann & David Yarowsky (Hg.), Natural Language Processing Using Very Large Corpora (Text, speech and language technology 11), 13–25. Dordrecht [u. a.]: Springer.Google Scholar
Spiegel Online: “Titelbilder und Heftarchive”. [URL] [20.10.2019].
Tagliamonte, Sali. 2008 So different and pretty cool! Recycling intensifiers in Toronto, Canada. In: English Language and Linguistics, 12(2), 361–394. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali & Chris Roberts. 2005 So weird; so cool; so innovative: The use of intensifiers in the television series Friends. In: American Speech, 80(3), 280–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ward, Joe H. 1963 Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function. In: Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 236–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wickham, Hadley. 2016 ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wickham, Hadley, François, Romain, Henry, Lionel & Kirill Müller. 2019 dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation. R package version 0.8.0.1.Google Scholar