Chapter in:
Particles in German, English, and Beyond
Edited by Remus Gergel, Ingo Reich and Augustin Speyer
[Studies in Language Companion Series 224] 2022
► pp. 147176
References

Corpora

Kytö, Merja & Jonathan Culpeper
2006A Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760 2006 Compiled under the supervision of Merja Kytö (Uppsala University) and Jonathan Culpeper (Lancaster University).Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony & Anne Taylor
2000The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English. https://​www​.ling​.upenn​.edu​/hist​-corpora/
Kroch, Anthony, Beatrice Santorini & Lauren Delfs
2006The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English. https://​www​.ling​.upenn​.edu​/hist​-corpora/
Kroch, Anthony, Beatrice Santorini & Ariel Diertani
2016The Penn Parsed Corpus of Modern British English. https://​www​.ling​.upenn​.edu​/hist​-corpora/
Nevalainen, Terttu, Helena Raumolin-Brunberg, Jukka Keränen, Minna Nevala, Arja Nurmi, Minna Palander-Collin, Ann Taylor, Susan Pintzuk, Anthony Warner
2006Parsed Corpus of Early English Correspondence (PCEEC), Oxford Text Archive.Google Scholar
Taylor, Ann, Anthony Warner, Susan Pintzuk & Frank Beths
2003The York Toronto-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Prose. University of York: Department of Language and Linguistic Science.Google Scholar

Secondary literature

Abraham, Werner
1991The grammaticization of the German modal particles. In Approaches to grammaticalization, Vol. II: Types of grammatical markers, Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), 331–380. [Typological Studies in Language 19:2]. Amsterdam/Philadlephia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Josef
2012From modal particle to interrogative marker: a study of German denn. In Functional heads. The cartography of syntactic structures (vol.7.), Laura Brugè, Anna Cardinaletti, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro & Cecilia Poletto (eds.), 13–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Josef & Hans-Georg Obenauer
2011Discourse particles, clause structure, and question types. The Linguistic Review 28, 449–91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Josef & Volker Struckmeier
2017The status quo of research on discourse particles in syntax and semantics. In Discourse Particles: Formal Approaches to their Syntax and Semantics, Josef Bayer & Volker Struckmeier (eds.), 1–14. [Linguistische Arbeiten 564]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa & Ian Roberts
2010Subjects, Tense and verb-movement. In Parametric Variation: Null Subjects in Minimalist Theory, Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts, & Michelle Sheehan (eds.), 263–302. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J.
1996Pragmatic markers in English: Grammaticalization and discourse functions. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017The evolution of pragmatic markers in English: Pathways of change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Ian Roberts
2002Clause structure and X-second. In Functional structure in DP and IP: The cartography of syntactic structures, Vol. 1. Guglielmo Cinque (ed.), 123–166. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coniglio, Marco
2011Die Syntax der deutschen Modalpartikeln: Ihre Distribution und Lizenzierung in Haupt- und Nebensätzen. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Den Besten, Hans
1983On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules. In On the formal nature of the Westgermania, Werner Abraham (ed.), 47–131. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellegard, Alvar
1953The auxiliary do: The establishment and regulation of its use in English. [Gothenburg Studies in English. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
Enkvist, Nils E.
1986More about the textual functions of the Old English adverbial þa. Linguistics across historical and geographical bounderies: In honour of Jacek Fisiak on the occassion of his fiftieth birthday, Dieter Kastovsky & Aleksander Szwedek (eds.), 301–309. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Olga
1992Syntax. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, vol. II, Norman Blake (ed.), 207–408. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga, Ans van Kemenade, , Willem Koopman & Wim van der Wurff
2000The Syntax of Early English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
2009An account of discourse markers. International Review of Pragmatics 1: 293–320. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gelderen, Elly van
2001The syntax of mood particles in the history of English. Folia Linguistica Historica XXII. 301–330. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grosz, Patrick
2016Information structure and discourse particles. In The Oxford handbook of information structure, Caroline Féry, & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds.), 336–358. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haeberli, Eric
2000Adjuncts and the syntax of subjects in Old and Middle English. In Diachronic syntax: Models and mechanisms, Susan Pintzuk, George Tsoulas & Anthony Warner (eds.), 109–131. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2002Observations on the Loss of Verb Second in the History of English’. In Studies in Comparative Syntax, Jan-Wouter Zwart and Werner Abraham (eds.), 245–72. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haeberli, Eric & Tabea Ihsane
2016Revisiting the loss of verb movement in the history of English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 34, 497–542. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Han, Chung-hye
2000The evolution of do-support in English imperatives. In Diachronic syntax: Models and Mechanisms, eds. Susan Pintzuk, George Tsoulas, & Anthony Warner, 275–295. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haselow, Alexander
2011Discourse marker and modal particle: the functions of utterance-final then in spoken English. Journal of Pragmatics 43. 6303–6323. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Discourse organization and the rise of final then in the history of English. In English Historical Linguistics 2010. Selected Papers from the Sixteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 16), Pécs 23–27 August 2010, Irén Hegedűs and Alexandra Fodor (eds.), 153–175. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kemenade, Ans van
2011Secondary negation and Information Structure organization in the History of English. In The Evolution of Negation: Beyond the Jespersen Cycle, Pierre Larrivee & Richard Ingham (eds.), 77–114. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Rethinking the loss of V2. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, Elizabeth Closs Traugott and Terttu Nevalainen (eds.), 1182–1199. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kemenade, Ans van & Bettelou Los
2006Discourse adverbs and clausal syntax in Old and Middle English’. In The Handbook of the History of English, Ans van Kemenade and Bettelou Los (eds.), 224–248. London: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kemenade, Ans van & Tanja Milicev
2012Syntax and discourse in Old and Middle English word order. In Grammatical Change: Origins, Nature, Outcomes, Dianne Jonas, John Whitman & Andrew Garrett (eds.), 239–254. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kemenade, Ans van & Marit Westergaard
2012Syntax and Information Structure: Verb Second variation in Middle English. In Information Structure and Syntactic Change, Anneli Meurmann-Solin, Bettelou Los & Maria José Lopez-Couso (eds.), 87–118. [Oxford Studies in the History of English 1]. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kemenade, Ans van & Meta Links
2020Discourse particles in early English: Clause structure, pragmatics and discourse management. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 5(1), 3. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Komen, Erwin R.
2013CorpusStudio. Nijmegen: Radboud University Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
2008Basic notions of information structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55, 243–276. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kroch, Anthony
1989Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1: 199–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lenker, Ursula
2010Argument and Rhetoric: Adverbial Connectors in the History of English . [Topics in English Linguistics 64]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, David
1979Principles of Diachronic Syntax. [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 23]. New York and London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Links, Meta, Ans van Kemenade, & Stefan Grondelaers
2017Correlatives in earlier English: change and continuity in the expression of interclausal dependencies. Language Variation and Change, 27.3. 365–392. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan
1999Phrase Structures in competition: Variation and change in Old English word order. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian
1985Agreement parameters and the development of English modal auxiliaries. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 3. 21–58.Google Scholar
1993Verbs and Diachronic Syntax. [Natural Language and Linguistic Theory]. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Struckmeier, Volker
2014Ja doch wohl C? Modal particles as C-related elements. Studia Linguistica 68(1). 16–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Ann & Susan Pintzuk
2012Rethinking the OV/VO alternation in Old English: The effect of complexity, grammatical weight, and information status. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, Elizabeth Traugott & Terttu Nevalainen (eds.). Oxford Handbooks Online.Google Scholar
Thurmair, Maria
1989Modalpartikeln und ihre Kombinationen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth
2016On the rise of types of clause-final pragmatic markers in English. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17:1, 26–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Warner, Anthony
1993English Auxiliaries: Structure and History. [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997The structure of parametric change, and V-movement in the history of English. In Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, Ans van Kemenade & Nigel Vincent (eds.), 380–394. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2006Variation and the interpretation of change in periphrastic do. In The Handbook of the History of English, Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds.), 45–67. Malden, MA & Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wårvik, Brita
2013Participant continuity and narrative structure: Defining discourse marker functions in Old English. Folia Linguistica Historica 34. 209–242. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Connective or “disconnective” discourse marker? Old English þa, multifunctionality and narrative structuring. In Connectives in Synchrony and Diachrony in European Languages, Anneli Meurman-Solin & Ursula Lenker (eds.). [Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English, Volume] Helsinki, Varieng. http://​www​.helsinki​.fi​.ru​.idm​.oclc​.org​/varieng​/series​/volumes​/08​/index​.html
Wouden, Ton van der & Ad Foolen
2015Dutch particles in the right periphery. In Final Particles, Sylvie Hancil, Alexander Haselow, Margje Post (eds.), 221–247. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwart, Jan Wouter
2011The Syntax of Dutch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar