Chapter published in:
Particles in German, English, and Beyond
Edited by Remus Gergel, Ingo Reich and Augustin Speyer
[Studies in Language Companion Series 224] 2022
► pp. 209242
References
Abraham, Werner
1991The grammaticalization of the German modal particles. In Approaches to Grammaticalization Vol. II, Elisabeth Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), 331–380. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017Modalpartikel und Mirativeffekte. In Grammatische Funktionen aus Sicht der japanischen und deutschen Linguistik, Shin Tanaka, Elisabeth Leiss, Werner Abraham & Yasuhiro Fujinawa (eds), 75–107. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Altmann, Hans
1976Die Gradpartikeln im Deutschen. Untersuchungen zu ihrer Syntax, Semantik und Pragmatik. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Andorno, Cecilia
2000Focalizzatori fra connessione e messa a fuoco: Il punto di vista delle varietà di apprendimento. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
2008Ancora su anche, anche su ancora. Per uno studio comparativo dell’apprendimento e della gestione di strategie coesive in L2. In Diachronica et Synchronica. Studi in onore di Anna Giacalone Ramat, Romano Lazzeroni, Emanuele Banfi, Giuliano Bernini, Marina Chini & Giovanna Marotta (eds), 29–52. Pisa: ETS Edizioni.Google Scholar
Badan, Linda
2020. Italian discourse markers. The case of guarda che. Studia Linguistica 74: 303–336. Crossref
Battllori, Montserrat & Maria LLUÏSA Hernanz
2013Emphatic Polarity from Latin to Romance. Lingua, 128: 9–30.Google Scholar
Bayer, Josef & Roland Hinterhölzl & Andreas Trotzke
2015Issues in discourse-oriented syntax. In Discourse-oriented Syntax, Josef Bayer, Roland Hinterhölzl, Andreas Trotzke (eds.), 1–12. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Josef & Volker Struckmeier
2017Discourse particles: Formal approaches to their syntax and semantics. Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana
2004Aspects of the low IP Area. In The Structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume 2, Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 16–51. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benazzo, Sandra & Christine Dimroth
2015Additive Particles in Romance and Germanic Languages: Are They Really Similar? Linguistik Online 71: 9–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benincà, Paola
1988Costruzioni con ordini marcati degli elementi. In Grande Grammatica Italiana di Consultazione, Vol. 1, Lorenzo Renzi (ed.), 115–195 (pp. 119–129 in collaboration with Giampaolo Salvi). Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
2001The position of Topic and Focus in the left periphery. In Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds.), Current Studies in Italian Syntax: Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi, 39–64. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola & Cecilia Poletto
2004Topic, Focus and V2. In The Structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 2, Luigi, Rizzi (ed.), 52–75. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Besten, Hans den
1983On the interaction of root transformations and lexical delective rules. In On Formal Syntax of the Westgermania, Werner Abraham (ed.), 47–131. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bossuyt, Tom, Ludovic De Cuypere & Torsten Leuschner
2018Emergence phenomena in German “W-immer/auch”-subordinators. In Grammar and Corpora 2016, Eric Fuß, Marek Konopka, Beata Trawiński, Ulrich H. Waßner (eds), 97–120. Heidelberg: Heidelberg University Publishing.Google Scholar
Bublitz, Wolfram
1978Ausdruckweisen der Sprechereinstellung im Deutschen und im Englischen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Büring, Daniel
1999 “Topic”. In Focus – Linguistic Cognitive and Computational Perspectives, P. Bosch & R. v. der Sand (eds), 142–165. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna
2011German and Italian Modal Particles and Clause Structure. Linguistic Review 28: 493–531. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015What do you do if you do not have modal particles? In Charting the landscape of linguistics. On the scope of Josef Bayer’s work, Ellen Brandner, Anna Czypionka, Constantin Freitag & Andreas Trotzke, 16–21. Konstanz: University of Konstanz.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Michael Starke
1999The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of three classes of pronouns. In Clitics in the Languages of Europe. Empirical Approaches to Language Typology, Henk van Riemsdijk (ed.), 145–233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1987Cognitive constrains on information flow. In Coherence and grounding in discourse, Russel S. Tomlin (ed), 21–51. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
2001Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1990Types of A-bar dependencies. MIT Press.Google Scholar
1991Mica: Note di sintassi e pragmatica. In Teoria linguistica e sintassi italiana, Guglielmo Cinque, 311–323. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
1999Adverbs and Functional Heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo & Luigi Rizzi
2010Mapping Spatial PPs: An Introduction. In Mapping Spatial PPs. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume 6, Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (eds), 3–25. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cognola, Federica
2013The mixed OV/VO syntax of Mòcheno main clauses: on the interaction between high and low left periphery. In Theoretical Approches to Disharmonic Word Orders, Theresa Biberauer and Michelle Sheehan (eds.), 106–135. Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cognola, Federica & Norma Schifano
2018 aOn the marking of negative presupposition in regional varieties of Italian. In Comparative and Diachronic Perspectives on Romance Syntax, Gabriela Pană Dindelegan, Adina Dragomirescu, Irina Nicula & Alexandru Nicolae (eds), 433–453. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
2018 bOn ben in Trentino Regional Italian. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 13. Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ 29, Nijmegen, Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 13 [RLLT 13], Berns, Janine, Haike Jacobs & Dominique Nouveau (eds), 55–74. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018 cMica, ben, benissimo: on the expression of negative and positive polarity in Italian. Talk given a the 44. Incontro di Grammatica Generativa, University of Roma Tre – 1–3 March 2018.
Coniglio, Marco
2008Modal Particles in Italian. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 18: 91–129.Google Scholar
2009Deutsche Modalpartikeln in Haupt- und Nebensätzen. In Modalität. Epistemik und Evidentialität bei Modalverb, Adverb, Modalpartikel und Modus, Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds.), 191–221. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
2011Die Syntax der deutschen Modalpartikeln: Ihre Distribution und Lizenzierung in Haupt- und Nebensätzen. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coniglio, Marco & Iulia Zegrean
2012Splitting up Force. In Main Clause Phenomena: New Horizons [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 190], Lobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman & Rachel Nye (eds), 229–256. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
COSMAS II (Corpus Search, Management and Analysis System)
http://​www​.ids​-mannheim​.de​/cosmas2/, 1991–2016. Mannheim: Institut für Deutsche Sprache
De Cesare, Anna-Maria
2004L‘avverbio anche e il rilievo informativo del testo. In La lingua nel testo, il testo nella lingua, Angela Ferrari (ed.), 191–218. Torino: Istituto dell’Atlante Linguistico Italiano.Google Scholar
2010On the focusing adverbs. A discussion based on Italian data. Linguistik online 44: 99–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Additive focus adverbs in canonical word orders. A corpus-based study of It. anche, Fr. aussi and E. also in written news, Linguistik Online 71: 31–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
1997Grammatikalisierung. Einführung in Sein und Werden grammatischer Formen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Abtönungspartikeln. In Handbuch der deutschen Wortarten, Ludger Hoffmann (ed.), 117–142. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
2015Modal particles in different communicative types. In On the interaction of constructions with register and genre, Kerstin Fischer & Kiki Nikiforidou (eds), 218–257. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Franco, Irene, Olga Kellert, Guido Mensching & Cecilia Poletto
2016A diachronic study of the (negative) additive anche in Italian. Caplletra 61 (Tardor, 2016): 227–258. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara & Roland Hinterhölzl
2007Types of Topics in German and Italian. In On Information Structure, Meaning and Form, Kerstin Schwabe & Susanne Winkler (eds.), 87–116. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gelderen, Elly van
2004Grammaticalization as Economy. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra
2010About the speaker: Towards a syntax of indexicality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1983Topic Continuity in Discourse: An Introduction. In Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Crosslanguage Study, Talmy Givón (ed), 5–41. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haider, Hubert
2010The Syntax of German. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hernanz, Maria-Lluïsa
2010Assertive bien in Spanish and the Left Periphery. In Mapping the Left Periphery, Paola Benincà & Nicola Munaro (eds), 19–62. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland
2006Scrambling, Remnant Movement, and Restructuring in West Germanic. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland & Nicola Munaro
2015On the interpretation of modal particles in non-assertive speech acts in German and Bellunese. In Discourse-oriented syntax, Josef Bayer, Roland Hinterhölzl & Andreas Trotzke (eds.), 41–70. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Höhle, Tilman
1988VERUM-Fokus. Sprache und Pragmatik 5 , 2–7.Google Scholar
1992Über Verum-Fokus in Deutschen. In Informationsstruktur und Grammatik. [Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft 4/1991- 1992], Joachim Jacobs (ed), 112–141. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders
2015Verb second. In An International Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Research, Tibor Kiss & Artemis Alexiadou (eds), 342–382. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
IDS, Datenbank für Gesprochenes Deutsch (DGD), FOLK
Kayne, Richard S.
1994The Antisymmetry of Syntax. MIT Press.Google Scholar
1998Overt vs Covert Movement. Syntax 1.2: 128–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Movement and Silence. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kolmer, Agnes
2012Pronomina und Pronominalklitika im Cimbro. Untersuchungen zum grammatischen Wandel einer Deutschen Minderheitensprache in romanischer Umgebung. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
2008Basic notions of information structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55, 243–276. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999Additive particles under stress. In Proceedings of SALT VIII, Davon Strolovitch & Aaron Lawson (eds), 111–128. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard
1989On the historical development of focus particles. In Sprechen mit Partikeln, Harald Weydt (ed.), 318–329. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
1991The Meaning of Focus Particles. A Comparative Perspective. London/ New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu
1976Subject, theme, and the speaker’s empathy – A reexamination of relativization phenomena. In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed), 417–444. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Laka, Itziar
1990Negation in Syntax: On the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.
Leonetti, Manuel & Victoria Escandell-Vidal
2009Fronting and verum focus in Spanish. In Focus and Background in Romance Languages, Andreas Dufter & Jacob, Daniel (eds), 155–204. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Masi, Stefania
1996Deutsche Modalpartikeln und ihre Entsprechungen im Italienischen: Äquivalente für doch, ja, denn, schon und wohl . Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Munaro, Nicola
2012Sulla sintassi dei focalizzatori in alcuni dialetti italo-romanzi. Quaderni di Lavoro ASIt 14: 107–122.Google Scholar
Pasch, Renate, Ursula Brauße, Eva Breindl & Ulrich Hermann Waßner
2003Handbuch der deutschen Konnektoren, vol. 1. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia
2014The Syntax of Old Italian. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2008The syntax of focus negation. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 18: 179–202.Google Scholar
Reis, Marga & Inger Rosengren
1997A Modular Approach to the Grammar of Additive Particles: the Case of German auch . Journal of Semantics 14: 237–309. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Repp, Sophie
2013Common ground management: Modal particles, illocutionary negation and VERUM. In Beyond Expressives – Explorations in Use-conditional Meaning, Daniel Gutzmann & Hans-Martin Gärtner (eds.), 231–274. Leiden, Boston: Emerald. CRISPI Series.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1997The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar. A Handbook of Generative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi & Giuliano Bocci
2017Left Periphery of the Clause: Primarily Illustrated for Italian. In Blackwell Companion to Syntax, II edition. Blackwell Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schifano, Norma; Cognola, Federica
2020From macro to nano: A parametric hierarchy approach to the diatopic and diachronic variation of Italian ben, Syntactic Architecture and Its Consequences: Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives – Volume 1, Berlino, Language Science Press, vol. Volume 1: Syntax inside the grammar, pp. 233–251 (ISBN 978-3-96110-275-4; 978-3-96110-276-1) (ISSN 2568-7336).Google Scholar
Sudhoff, Stefan
2008Focus particles in the German middlefield. In The discourse potential of underspecified structures: Event structures and information structure, Anita Steube (ed), 439–459. New York: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Focus Particles in German. Syntax, prosody, and information structure. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Fokuspartikeln innerhalb von DPn im Deutschen. In 40 Jahre Partikelforschung, Elke Hentschel & Theo Harden (eds.), 169–181. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Thaler, Verena
2016Italian mica and its use in discourse: An interactional account. Journal of Pragmatics 103, 49–69. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thurmair, Maria
1989Modalpartikeln und ihre Kombinationen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Truckenbrodt, Hubert
2006On the semantic motivation of syntactic verb movement to C in German. Theoretical Linguistics 32: 257–306. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Visconti, Jacqueline
2009From “textual” to “interpersonal”: On the diachrony of the Italian particle mica. Journal of Pragmatics 41/5: 937–950. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Waltereit
2006Abtönung: Zur Pragmatik Und Historischen Semantik Von Modalpartikeln Und Ihren Funktionalen Äquivalenten in Romanischen Sprachen. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Waltereit, Richard
2001Modal particles and their functional equivalents. A speech-act theoretic approach. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 1391–1417. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weydt, Harald
1969Abtönungspartikel: Die deutschen Modalwörter und ihre französischen Entsprechungen. Bad Homburg: Gehlen.Google Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella
1997Negation and Clausal Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Malte
2004Discourse particles in the left periphery. ZAS Papers in Linguistics (ZASPiL) 35: 543–566. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Discourse particles. In Semantics (= Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft HSK 33.2, Klaus von Heusinger, Claudia Maienborn & Paul Portner (eds), 2011–2038. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar