Cover not available
Part of
Particles in German, English, and Beyond
Edited by Remus Gergel, Ingo Reich and Augustin Speyer
[Studies in Language Companion Series 224] 2022
► pp. 209–242

Chapter 8
A comparative study of German auch and Italian anche

Functional convergences and structural differences

| Ca' Foscari UniversityVenice
| University of Bergamo
| University of Trento
In this paper we carry out a systematic comparison between the German and Italian particles auch and anche (meaning “also”) and provide a formal account of the data couched within the cartographic approach to syntax (Cinque 1999; Rizzi 1997; Cinque & Rizzi 2010). Based on the available literature and on novel data, we show that in both languages this particle exhibits three main functions: (i) additive particle; (ii) connective adverb (residual in Italian) and (iii) modal particle – which correlate with a different syntactic status of the particle (head or maximal projection) and with a different position within the clause. When used as an additive particle, auch/anche lexicalize a head in the lower portion of the clause and function as focalizers (in the sense of Kayne 1998, 2005). When they are connective adverbs, they are maximal projections hosted in a functional projection dedicated to adverbs. Finally, when used as a modal particle auch/anche are heads found in the higher portion of the IP layer. German auch and Italian anche are however not identical, since when used as an additive particle, German auch, but not Italian anche, is compatible with discontinuous constructions in which a given XP in the scope of auch can be moved to Spec,CP leaving auch within the clause. Moreover, German auch is compatible with a variety of illocutionary types in its use as a modal particle, whereas anche can only be used in declarative clauses. We show that the former fact follows from asymmetries in movement options between the two languages (topics move in German but not in Italian) and the latter results from the nature of anche as a polarity item.
Keywords: additive particle, connective adverb, focalizer, verum focus, Common Ground management, polarity item, concessive clause
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Auch and anche as additive particles and adverbs
    • 2.1Additive particle
      • 2.1.1Main properties
      • 2.1.2Discontinuous constructions
      • 2.1.3Derivation
    • 2.2Connective adverb
  • 3.Auch/anche as modal particles
    • 3.1Auch as a modal particle
    • 3.2Anche as a modal particle
    • 3.3Analysis of auch/anche as a modal particle
    • 3.4Italian anche in concessive clauses
  • 4.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 16 August 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.224.08cog
References (90)
References
Abraham, Werner. 1991. The grammaticalization of the German modal particles. In Approaches to Grammaticalization Vol. II, Elisabeth Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), 331–380. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Modalpartikel und Mirativeffekte. In Grammatische Funktionen aus Sicht der japanischen und deutschen Linguistik, Shin Tanaka, Elisabeth Leiss, Werner Abraham & Yasuhiro Fujinawa (eds), 75–107. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Altmann, Hans. 1976. Die Gradpartikeln im Deutschen. Untersuchungen zu ihrer Syntax, Semantik und Pragmatik. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andorno, Cecilia. 2000. Focalizzatori fra connessione e messa a fuoco: Il punto di vista delle varietà di apprendimento. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
. 2008. Ancora su anche, anche su ancora. Per uno studio comparativo dell’apprendimento e della gestione di strategie coesive in L2. In Diachronica et Synchronica. Studi in onore di Anna Giacalone Ramat, Romano Lazzeroni, Emanuele Banfi, Giuliano Bernini, Marina Chini & Giovanna Marotta (eds), 29–52. Pisa: ETS Edizioni.Google Scholar
Badan, Linda 2020. Italian discourse markers. The case of guarda che. Studia Linguistica 74: 303–336. DOI logo
Battllori, Montserrat & Maria LLUÏSA Hernanz . 2013. Emphatic Polarity from Latin to Romance. Lingua, 128: 9–30.Google Scholar
Bayer, Josef & Roland Hinterhölzl & Andreas Trotzke . 2015. Issues in discourse-oriented syntax. In Discourse-oriented Syntax, Josef Bayer, Roland Hinterhölzl, Andreas Trotzke (eds.), 1–12. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Josef & Volker Struckmeier . 2017. Discourse particles: Formal approaches to their syntax and semantics. Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana. 2004. Aspects of the low IP Area. In The Structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume 2, Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 16–51. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benazzo, Sandra & Christine Dimroth . 2015. Additive Particles in Romance and Germanic Languages: Are They Really Similar? Linguistik Online 71: 9–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benincà, Paola. 1988. Costruzioni con ordini marcati degli elementi. In Grande Grammatica Italiana di Consultazione, Vol. 1, Lorenzo Renzi (ed.), 115–195 (pp. 119–129 in collaboration with Giampaolo Salvi). Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
. 2001. The position of Topic and Focus in the left periphery. In Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds.), Current Studies in Italian Syntax: Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi, 39–64. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola & Cecilia Poletto. 2004. Topic, Focus and V2. In The Structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 2, Luigi, Rizzi (ed.), 52–75. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Besten, Hans den. 1983. On the interaction of root transformations and lexical delective rules. In On Formal Syntax of the Westgermania, Werner Abraham (ed.), 47–131. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bossuyt, Tom, Ludovic De Cuypere & Torsten Leuschner. 2018. Emergence phenomena in German “W-immer/auch”-subordinators. In Grammar and Corpora 2016, Eric Fuß, Marek Konopka, Beata Trawiński, Ulrich H. Waßner (eds), 97–120. Heidelberg: Heidelberg University Publishing.Google Scholar
Bublitz, Wolfram. 1978. Ausdruckweisen der Sprechereinstellung im Deutschen und im Englischen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Büring, Daniel. 1999. “Topic”. In Focus – Linguistic Cognitive and Computational Perspectives, P. Bosch & R. v. der Sand (eds), 142–165. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna. 2011. German and Italian Modal Particles and Clause Structure. Linguistic Review 28: 493–531. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. What do you do if you do not have modal particles? In Charting the landscape of linguistics. On the scope of Josef Bayer’s work, Ellen Brandner, Anna Czypionka, Constantin Freitag & Andreas Trotzke, 16–21. Konstanz: University of Konstanz.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Michael Starke . 1999. The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of three classes of pronouns. In Clitics in the Languages of Europe. Empirical Approaches to Language Typology, Henk van Riemsdijk (ed.), 145–233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1987. Cognitive constrains on information flow. In Coherence and grounding in discourse, Russel S. Tomlin (ed), 21–51. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1990. Types of A-bar dependencies. MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1991. Mica: Note di sintassi e pragmatica. In Teoria linguistica e sintassi italiana, Guglielmo Cinque, 311–323. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo & Luigi Rizzi . 2010. Mapping Spatial PPs: An Introduction. In Mapping Spatial PPs. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume 6, Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (eds), 3–25. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cognola, Federica. 2013. The mixed OV/VO syntax of Mòcheno main clauses: on the interaction between high and low left periphery. In Theoretical Approches to Disharmonic Word Orders, Theresa Biberauer and Michelle Sheehan (eds.), 106–135. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cognola, Federica & Norma Schifano . 2018 a. On the marking of negative presupposition in regional varieties of Italian. In Comparative and Diachronic Perspectives on Romance Syntax, Gabriela Pană Dindelegan, Adina Dragomirescu, Irina Nicula & Alexandru Nicolae (eds), 433–453. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
. 2018 b. On ben in Trentino Regional Italian. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 13. Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ 29, Nijmegen, Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 13 [RLLT 13], Berns, Janine, Haike Jacobs & Dominique Nouveau (eds), 55–74. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018 c. Mica, ben, benissimo: on the expression of negative and positive polarity in Italian. Talk given a the 44. Incontro di Grammatica Generativa, University of Roma Tre – 1–3 March 2018.
Coniglio, Marco. 2008. Modal Particles in Italian. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 18: 91–129.Google Scholar
. 2009. Deutsche Modalpartikeln in Haupt- und Nebensätzen. In Modalität. Epistemik und Evidentialität bei Modalverb, Adverb, Modalpartikel und Modus, Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds.), 191–221. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
. 2011. Die Syntax der deutschen Modalpartikeln: Ihre Distribution und Lizenzierung in Haupt- und Nebensätzen. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coniglio, Marco & Iulia Zegrean . 2012. Splitting up Force. In Main Clause Phenomena: New Horizons [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 190], Lobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman & Rachel Nye (eds), 229–256. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
COSMAS II (Corpus Search, Management and Analysis System). [URL]>, 1991–2016. Mannheim: Institut für Deutsche Sprache
De Cesare, Anna-Maria. 2004. L‘avverbio anche e il rilievo informativo del testo. In La lingua nel testo, il testo nella lingua, Angela Ferrari (ed.), 191–218. Torino: Istituto dell’Atlante Linguistico Italiano.Google Scholar
. 2010. On the focusing adverbs. A discussion based on Italian data. Linguistik online 44: 99–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Additive focus adverbs in canonical word orders. A corpus-based study of It. anche, Fr. aussi and E. also in written news, Linguistik Online 71: 31–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele. 1997. Grammatikalisierung. Einführung in Sein und Werden grammatischer Formen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Abtönungspartikeln. In Handbuch der deutschen Wortarten, Ludger Hoffmann (ed.), 117–142. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
DeReKo: [URL] (2.9.2019)
Diewald, Gabriele. 2015. Modal particles in different communicative types. In On the interaction of constructions with register and genre, Kerstin Fischer & Kiki Nikiforidou (eds), 218–257. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Franco, Irene, Olga Kellert, Guido Mensching & Cecilia Poletto . 2016. A diachronic study of the (negative) additive anche in Italian. Caplletra 61 (Tardor, 2016): 227–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara & Roland Hinterhölzl . 2007. Types of Topics in German and Italian. In On Information Structure, Meaning and Form, Kerstin Schwabe & Susanne Winkler (eds.), 87–116. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gelderen, Elly van. 2004. Grammaticalization as Economy. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra. 2010. About the speaker: Towards a syntax of indexicality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1983. Topic Continuity in Discourse: An Introduction. In Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Crosslanguage Study, Talmy Givón (ed), 5–41. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haider, Hubert. 2010. The Syntax of German. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hernanz, Maria-Lluïsa. 2010. Assertive bien in Spanish and the Left Periphery. In Mapping the Left Periphery, Paola Benincà & Nicola Munaro (eds), 19–62. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland. 2006. Scrambling, Remnant Movement, and Restructuring in West Germanic. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland & Nicola Munaro . 2015. On the interpretation of modal particles in non-assertive speech acts in German and Bellunese. In Discourse-oriented syntax, Josef Bayer, Roland Hinterhölzl & Andreas Trotzke (eds.), 41–70. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Höhle, Tilman. 1988. VERUM-Fokus. Sprache und Pragmatik 5 , 2–7.Google Scholar
. 1992. Über Verum-Fokus in Deutschen. In Informationsstruktur und Grammatik. [Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft 4/1991- 1992], Joachim Jacobs (ed), 112–141. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 2015. Verb second. In An International Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Research, Tibor Kiss & Artemis Alexiadou (eds), 342–382. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
IDS, Datenbank für Gesprochenes Deutsch (DGD), FOLK <[URL]>, (2.9.2019).
Kayne, Richard S. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. MIT Press.Google Scholar
1998. Overt vs Covert Movement. Syntax 1.2: 128–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005. Movement and Silence. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kolmer, Agnes. 2012. Pronomina und Pronominalklitika im Cimbro. Untersuchungen zum grammatischen Wandel einer Deutschen Minderheitensprache in romanischer Umgebung. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 2008. Basic notions of information structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55, 243–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. Additive particles under stress. In Proceedings of SALT VIII, Davon Strolovitch & Aaron Lawson (eds), 111–128. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard. 1989. On the historical development of focus particles. In Sprechen mit Partikeln, Harald Weydt (ed.), 318–329. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 1991. The Meaning of Focus Particles. A Comparative Perspective. London/ New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. 1976. Subject, theme, and the speaker’s empathy – A reexamination of relativization phenomena. In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed), 417–444. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Laka, Itziar. 1990. Negation in Syntax: On the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.
Leonetti, Manuel & Victoria Escandell-Vidal . 2009. Fronting and verum focus in Spanish. In Focus and Background in Romance Languages, Andreas Dufter & Jacob, Daniel (eds), 155–204. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Masi, Stefania. 1996. Deutsche Modalpartikeln und ihre Entsprechungen im Italienischen: Äquivalente für doch, ja, denn, schon und wohl. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Munaro, Nicola. 2012. Sulla sintassi dei focalizzatori in alcuni dialetti italo-romanzi. Quaderni di Lavoro ASIt 14: 107–122.Google Scholar
Pasch, Renate, Ursula Brauße, Eva Breindl & Ulrich Hermann Waßner . 2003. Handbuch der deutschen Konnektoren, vol. 1. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia. 2014. The Syntax of Old Italian. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2008. The syntax of focus negation. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 18: 179–202.Google Scholar
Reis, Marga & Inger Rosengren . 1997. A Modular Approach to the Grammar of Additive Particles: the Case of German auch. Journal of Semantics 14: 237–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Repp, Sophie. 2013. Common ground management: Modal particles, illocutionary negation and VERUM. In Beyond Expressives – Explorations in Use-conditional Meaning, Daniel Gutzmann & Hans-Martin Gärtner (eds.), 231–274. Leiden, Boston: Emerald. CRISPI Series.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar. A Handbook of Generative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi & Giuliano Bocci . 2017. Left Periphery of the Clause: Primarily Illustrated for Italian. In Blackwell Companion to Syntax, II edition. Blackwell Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schifano, Norma; Cognola, Federica. 2020. From macro to nano: A parametric hierarchy approach to the diatopic and diachronic variation of Italian ben, Syntactic Architecture and Its Consequences: Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives – Volume 1, Berlino, Language Science Press, vol. Volume 1: Syntax inside the grammar, pp. 233–251 (ISBN 978-3-96110-275-4; 978-3-96110-276-1) (ISSN 2568-7336).Google Scholar
Sudhoff, Stefan. 2008. Focus particles in the German middlefield. In The discourse potential of underspecified structures: Event structures and information structure, Anita Steube (ed), 439–459. New York: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Focus Particles in German. Syntax, prosody, and information structure. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Fokuspartikeln innerhalb von DPn im Deutschen. In 40 Jahre Partikelforschung, Elke Hentschel & Theo Harden (eds.), 169–181. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Thaler, Verena. 2016. Italian mica and its use in discourse: An interactional account. Journal of Pragmatics 103, 49–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thurmair, Maria. 1989. Modalpartikeln und ihre Kombinationen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 2006. On the semantic motivation of syntactic verb movement to C in German. Theoretical Linguistics 32: 257–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Visconti, Jacqueline. 2009. From “textual” to “interpersonal”: On the diachrony of the Italian particle mica. Journal of Pragmatics 41/5: 937–950. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waltereit. 2006. Abtönung: Zur Pragmatik Und Historischen Semantik Von Modalpartikeln Und Ihren Funktionalen Äquivalenten in Romanischen Sprachen. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waltereit, Richard. 2001. Modal particles and their functional equivalents. A speech-act theoretic approach. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 1391–1417. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weydt, Harald. 1969. Abtönungspartikel: Die deutschen Modalwörter und ihre französischen Entsprechungen. Bad Homburg: Gehlen.Google Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella. 1997. Negation and Clausal Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Malte. 2004. Discourse particles in the left periphery. ZAS Papers in Linguistics (ZASPiL) 35: 543–566. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Discourse particles. In Semantics (= Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft HSK 33.2, Klaus von Heusinger, Claudia Maienborn & Paul Portner (eds), 2011–2038. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar