Cover not available
Part of
Paradigms in Word Formation: Theory and applications
Edited by Alba E. Ruz, Cristina Fernández-Alcaina and Cristina Lara-Clares
[Studies in Language Companion Series 225] 2022
► pp. 129–152

Chapter 6
Derivational paradigms

The case of English combining forms

 | University of Pisa, Italy
This chapter investigates a set of ten English combining forms attested in the Oxford English Dictionary between 1980 and 1997 and discusses the suitability of paradigms for the conceptualisation of analogy-based combining-form combinations. In this chapter, the focus is on the secreted type of combining forms, which involve both abbreviation and secretion, as in initial Franken- (from Frankenstein, in Frankenfood) or final -erati (from literati, in glitterati), respectively used to refer to ‘genetically modified –’ and ‘a prominent or elite group related to –’. Using a corpus-based approach, the chapter shows that secreted combining forms offer word-formation paradigms that apply to series of similar words in the lexicon and are applicable to other new words which are at the basis of English vocabulary expansion.
Keywords: derivational paradigms, paradigmatic morphology, combining forms, secretion, analogy
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Paradigmatic word formation and derivational paradigms
  • 3.Combining forms
  • 4.Materials and methods
  • 5.Analysis of derivational paradigms
    • 5.1Alterna-
    • 5.2Franken-
    • 5.3m-
    • 5.4must-
    • 5.5robo-
    • 5.6-ati/-erati
    • 5.7-babble
    • 5.8-core
    • 5.9-istan
    • 5.10-verse
  • 6.Analogy, potentiality, and availability
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 19 September 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.225.06mat
References (37)
References
Aronoff, Mark. 1983. Potential words, actual words, productivity and frequency. In Proceedings of the XIIIth International Congress of Linguists, August 29–September 4, 1982, Tokyo, Shirō Hattori & Kazuko Inoue (eds), 163–171. Tokyo: Permanent International Committee on Linguistics.Google Scholar
Bagasheva, Alexandra. 2020. Paradigmaticity in compounding. In Paradigmatic Relations in Word Formation, Jesús Fernández-Domínguez, Alexandra Bagasheva & Cristina Lara-Clares (eds), 21–48. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 1983. English Word-formation. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Morphological Productivity. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. The borderline between derivation and compounding. In Morphology and its Demarcations [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 264], Wolfgang U. Dressler, Dieter Kastovsky, Oskar E. Pfeiffer & Franz Rainer (eds), 97–108. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2022. Interlocking paradigms in English compounds. In Paradigms in Word Formation: Theory and Applications [Studies in Language Companion Series 225], Alba E. Ruz, Cristina Fernández-Alcaina & Cristina Lara-Clares (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie, Lieber, Rochelle & Plag, Ingo. 2013. The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie, Beliaeva, Natalia & Tarasova, Elizaveta. 2019. Recalibrating productivity: Factors involved. Zeitschrift für Wortbildung / Journal of Word Formation 3(1): 44–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Becker, Thomas. 1993. Back-formation, cross-formation, and ‘bracketing paradoxes’ in paradigmatic morphology. In Yearbook of Morphology 1993, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 1–25. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beliaeva, Natalia. 2019. Blending creativity and productivity: On the issue of delimiting the boundaries of blends as a type of word formation. Lexis [Online] 14: 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bonami, Olivier & Strnadová, Jana. 2019. Paradigm structure and predictability in derivational morphology. Morphology 29(2): 167–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Booij, Geert. 2010. Construction Morphology. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Booij, Geert & Hüning, Matthias. 2014. Affixoids and constructional idioms. In Extending the Scope of Construction Grammar, Ronny Boogaart, Timothy Colleman & Gijsbert Rutten (eds), 77–106. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cetnarowska, Bożena. 2022. Paradigm families in compounding: The case of English compound nouns headed by -er deverbal nouns. In Paradigms in Word Formation: Theory and Applications [Studies in Language Companion Series 225], Alba E. Ruz, Cristina Fernández-Alcaina & Cristina Lara-Clares (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2016–. Corpus of News on the Web (NOW). <[URL]> (6 May 2020).
Díaz-Negrillo, Ana. 2020. Neoclassical word formation in English: A paradigm-based account of -scope formations. In Paradigmatic Relations in Word Formation, Jesús Fernández-Domínguez, Alexandra Bagasheva & Cristina Lara-Clares (eds), 213–261. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U. 1989. Prototypical differences between inflection and derivation. STUF-Language Typology and Universals 42: 3–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000. Extragrammatical vs. marginal morphology. In Extragrammatical and Marginal Morphology, Ursula Doleschal & Anna M. Thornton (eds), 1–10. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Eitelmann, Matthias, Haugland, Kari & Haumann, Dagmar. 2020. From engl-isc to whatever-ish: A corpus-based investigation of -ish derivation in the history of English. English Language & Linguistics 24(4): 801–831. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Domínguez, Jesús, Bagasheva, Alexandra & Lara-Clares, Cristina (eds). 2020. Paradigmatic Relations in Word Formation. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fradin, Bernard. 2000. Combining forms, blends and related phenomena. In Extragrammatical and Marginal Morphology, Ursula Doleschal & Anna M. Thornton (eds), 11–59. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Hathout, Nabil & Namer, Fiammetta. 2019. Paradigms in word formation: What are we up to? Morphology 29(2): 153–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehrer, Adrienne. 1998. Scapes, holics, and thons: The semantics of combining forms. American Speech 73(1): 3–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Blendalicious. In Lexical Creativity, Texts and Contexts [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics 58], Judith Munat (ed.), 115–133. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mattiello, Elisa. 2016. Analogical neologisms in English. Italian Journal of Linguistics 28(2): 103–142.Google Scholar
. 2017. Analogy in Word-Formation. A Study of English Neologisms and Occasionalisms. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Online Etymology Dictionary. 2021. <[URL]> (6 May 2021).
Oxford English Dictionary Online (OED). 2021. OUP. <[URL]> (6 May 2020).
Plank, Frans. 1994. Inflection and derivation. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Vol. 3, Ronald E. Asher & J. M. Y. Simpson (eds), 1671–1678. Oxford: Pergamon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raffelsiefen, Renate. 1992. Relating Words: A New Approach to English Morphology. PhD dissertation, University of Washington.
Rainer, Franz. 2012. Morphological metaphysics: Virtual, potential and actual words. Word Structure 5(2): 165–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Saussure, Ferdinand. 1916. Cours de Linguistique Générale. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Štekauer, Pavol. 2014. Derivational paradigms. In The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology, Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 354–369. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevens, Christopher M. 2005. Revisiting the affixoid debate. On the grammaticalization of the word. In Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen, Torsten Leuschner, Tanja Mortelmans & Sarah de Groodt (eds), 71–83. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stump, Gregory T. 1991. A paradigm-based theory of morphosemantic mismatches. Language 67: 675–725. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Marle, Jaap. 1985. On the Paradigmatic Dimension of Morphological Creativity. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Warren, Beatrice. 1990. The importance of combining forms. In Contemporary Morphology, Wolfgang U. Dressler, Hans C. Luschützky, Oskar E. Pfeiffer & John R. Rennison (eds), 111–132. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Fábregas, Antonio
2022. Structural and lexical aspects of the morphology of English participles. In Paradigms in Word Formation [Studies in Language Companion Series, 225], ► pp. 285 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.