Cover not available
Part of
Paradigms in Word Formation: Theory and applications
Edited by Alba E. Ruz, Cristina Fernández-Alcaina and Cristina Lara-Clares
[Studies in Language Companion Series 225] 2022
► pp. 129–152

Chapter 6
Derivational paradigms

The case of English combining forms

| University of Pisa , Italy

This chapter investigates a set of ten English combining forms attested in the Oxford English Dictionary between 1980 and 1997 and discusses the suitability of paradigms for the conceptualisation of analogy-based combining-form combinations. In this chapter, the focus is on the secreted type of combining forms, which involve both abbreviation and secretion, as in initial Franken- (from Frankenstein, in Frankenfood) or final -erati (from literati, in glitterati), respectively used to refer to ‘genetically modified –’ and ‘a prominent or elite group related to –’. Using a corpus-based approach, the chapter shows that secreted combining forms offer word-formation paradigms that apply to series of similar words in the lexicon and are applicable to other new words which are at the basis of English vocabulary expansion.

Keywords: derivational paradigms, paradigmatic morphology, combining forms, secretion, analogy
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Paradigmatic word formation and derivational paradigms
  • 3.Combining forms
  • 4.Materials and methods
  • 5.Analysis of derivational paradigms
    • 5.1Alterna-
    • 5.2Franken-
    • 5.3m-
    • 5.4must-
    • 5.5robo-
    • 5.6-ati/-erati
    • 5.7-babble
    • 5.8-core
    • 5.9-istan
    • 5.10-verse
  • 6.Analogy, potentiality, and availability
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 19 September 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.225.06mat
References (37)
Aronoff, Mark
1983 Potential words, actual words, productivity and frequency. In Proceedings of the XIIIth International Congress of Linguists, August 29–September 4, 1982, Tokyo, Shirō Hattori & Kazuko Inoue (eds), 163–171. Tokyo: Permanent International Committee on Linguistics.Google Scholar
Bagasheva, Alexandra
2020 Paradigmaticity in compounding. In Paradigmatic Relations in Word Formation, Jesús Fernández-Domínguez, Alexandra Bagasheva & Cristina Lara-Clares (eds), 21–48. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie
1983 English Word-formation. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 Morphological Productivity. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 The borderline between derivation and compounding. In Morphology and its Demarcations [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 264], Wolfgang U. Dressler, Dieter Kastovsky, Oskar E. Pfeiffer & Franz Rainer (eds), 97–108. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2022 Interlocking paradigms in English compounds. In Paradigms in Word Formation: Theory and Applications [Studies in Language Companion Series 225], Alba E. Ruz, Cristina Fernández-Alcaina & Cristina Lara-Clares (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie, Lieber, Rochelle & Plag, Ingo
2013 The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie, Beliaeva, Natalia & Tarasova, Elizaveta
2019 Recalibrating productivity: Factors involved. Zeitschrift für Wortbildung / Journal of Word Formation 3(1): 44–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Becker, Thomas
1993 Back-formation, cross-formation, and ‘bracketing paradoxes’ in paradigmatic morphology. In Yearbook of Morphology 1993, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 1–25. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beliaeva, Natalia
2019 Blending creativity and productivity: On the issue of delimiting the boundaries of blends as a type of word formation. Lexis [Online] 14: 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bonami, Olivier & Strnadová, Jana
2019 Paradigm structure and predictability in derivational morphology. Morphology 29(2): 167–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Booij, Geert
2010 Construction Morphology. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Booij, Geert & Hüning, Matthias
2014 Affixoids and constructional idioms. In Extending the Scope of Construction Grammar, Ronny Boogaart, Timothy Colleman & Gijsbert Rutten (eds), 77–106. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cetnarowska, Bożena
2022 Paradigm families in compounding: The case of English compound nouns headed by -er deverbal nouns. In Paradigms in Word Formation: Theory and Applications [Studies in Language Companion Series 225], Alba E. Ruz, Cristina Fernández-Alcaina & Cristina Lara-Clares (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Mark
2016– Corpus of News on the Web (NOW). [URL] (6 May 2020).
Díaz-Negrillo, Ana
2020 Neoclassical word formation in English: A paradigm-based account of -scope formations. In Paradigmatic Relations in Word Formation, Jesús Fernández-Domínguez, Alexandra Bagasheva & Cristina Lara-Clares (eds), 213–261. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U.
1989 Prototypical differences between inflection and derivation. STUF-Language Typology and Universals 42: 3–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000 Extragrammatical vs. marginal morphology. In Extragrammatical and Marginal Morphology, Ursula Doleschal & Anna M. Thornton (eds), 1–10. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Eitelmann, Matthias, Haugland, Kari & Haumann, Dagmar
2020 From engl-isc to whatever-ish: A corpus-based investigation of -ish derivation in the history of English. English Language & Linguistics 24(4): 801–831. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Domínguez, Jesús, Bagasheva, Alexandra & Lara-Clares, Cristina
(eds) 2020 Paradigmatic Relations in Word Formation. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fradin, Bernard
2000 Combining forms, blends and related phenomena. In Extragrammatical and Marginal Morphology, Ursula Doleschal & Anna M. Thornton (eds), 11–59. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Hathout, Nabil & Namer, Fiammetta
2019 Paradigms in word formation: What are we up to? Morphology 29(2): 153–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehrer, Adrienne
1998 Scapes, holics, and thons: The semantics of combining forms. American Speech 73(1): 3–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 Blendalicious. In Lexical Creativity, Texts and Contexts [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics 58], Judith Munat (ed.), 115–133. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mattiello, Elisa
2016 Analogical neologisms in English. Italian Journal of Linguistics 28(2): 103–142.Google Scholar
2017 Analogy in Word-Formation. A Study of English Neologisms and Occasionalisms. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Online Etymology Dictionary
2021 <[URL] (6 May 2021).
Oxford English Dictionary Online (OED)
2021 OUP. [URL] (6 May 2020).
Plank, Frans
1994 Inflection and derivation. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Vol. 3, Ronald E. Asher & J. M. Y. Simpson (eds), 1671–1678. Oxford: Pergamon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raffelsiefen, Renate
1992 Relating Words: A New Approach to English Morphology. PhD dissertation, University of Washington.
Rainer, Franz
2012 Morphological metaphysics: Virtual, potential and actual words. Word Structure 5(2): 165–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Saussure, Ferdinand
1916 Cours de Linguistique Générale. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Štekauer, Pavol
2014 Derivational paradigms. In The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology, Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 354–369. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevens, Christopher M.
2005 Revisiting the affixoid debate. On the grammaticalization of the word. In Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen, Torsten Leuschner, Tanja Mortelmans & Sarah de Groodt (eds), 71–83. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stump, Gregory T.
1991 A paradigm-based theory of morphosemantic mismatches. Language 67: 675–725. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Marle, Jaap
1985 On the Paradigmatic Dimension of Morphological Creativity. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Warren, Beatrice
1990 The importance of combining forms. In Contemporary Morphology, Wolfgang U. Dressler, Hans C. Luschützky, Oskar E. Pfeiffer & John R. Rennison (eds), 111–132. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by 1 other publications

Fábregas, Antonio
2022. Chapter 11. Structural and lexical aspects of the morphology of English participles. In Paradigms in Word Formation [Studies in Language Companion Series, 225], ► pp. 285 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.