Part of
Discourse Phenomena in Typological Perspective
Edited by Alessandra Barotto and Simone Mattiola
[Studies in Language Companion Series 227] 2023
► pp. 1334

Digital sources

Perseus Perseus Digital Library http://​www​.consul​.embrussia​.ru​/node​/164
HNC Hellenic National Corpus http://​hnc​.ilsp​.gr
Aijmer, Karin
1996Swedish modal particles in a contrastive perspective. Language Sciences 18(1–2): 393–427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009Does English have modal particles? In Corpus Linguistics: Refinements and Reassessments, Antoinette Renouf & Andrew Kehoe (eds), 111–130. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Aijmer, Karin & Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie
(eds) 2006Pragmatic Markers in Contrast. Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Al-Bataineh, Hussein
2020The syntax of Arabic vocatives. Brill’s Journal of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics 12(2): 328–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alm, Maria, Behr, Janina & Fischer, Kerstin
2018Modal particles and sentence type restrictions: A construction grammar perspective. Glossa 3(1): 1–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Antonov, Anton
2015Verbal allocutivity in a crosslinguistic perspective. Linguistic Typology 19(1): 55–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ariel, Mira
2009Discourse, grammar, discourse. Discourse Studies 11(1): 5–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Josef & Struckmeier, Volker
(eds) 2017Discourse Particles: Formal Approaches to their Syntax and Semantics. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar
2010Capturing particulars and universals in clause linkage: A multivariate analysis. In Clause Linking and Clause Hierarchy: Syntax and Pragmatics [Studies in Language Companion Series 121], Isabelle Bril (ed.), 51–102. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015Distributional typology: Statistical inquiries into the dynamics of linguistic diversity. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, 2nd edn, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), 901–924. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar & Zúñiga, Fernando
2017The ‘word’ in polysynthetic languages. In The Oxford Handbook of Polysynthesis, Vol. 1, Michael Fortescue, Marianne Mithun & Nicholas Evans (eds), 158–185. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane
2002Relevance and Linguistic Meaning. The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Dunstan, Chumakina, Marina & Corbett, Greville G.
(eds) 2013Canonical Morphology and Syntax, 1st edn. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L.
1985Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form [Typological Studies in Language 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan
2010Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1976Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Croft, William
2001Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003Typology and Universals, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Daniel, Michael & Spencer, Andrew
2009The vocative – An outlier case. In The Oxford Handbook of Case, Andrej L. Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 626–634. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth, Cornillie, Bert & Pietrandrea, Paola
(eds) 2013aDiscourse Markers and Modal Particles: Categorization and Description [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 234] Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013bModal particles and discourse markers: Two sides of the same coin? In Degand, Cornillie & Pietrandrea (eds), 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
2006Discourse particles and modal particles as grammatical elements. In Approaches to Discourse Particles, Kerstin Fischer (ed), 403–426. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew
2013aPosition of polar question particles. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL] (20 July 2020).
2013bPolar questions. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). [URL] (20 July 2020).
Du Bois, John W.
2003Discourse and grammar. In The New Psychology of Language. Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, Vol. II, Michael Tomasello (ed), 47–85. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
van Emde Boas, Evert, Rijksbaron, Abert, Huitink, Luuk & de Bakker, Matthieu
2019The Cambridge Grammar of Classical Greek. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin
2006Frames, constructions, and invariant meanings: The functional polysemy of discourse particles. In Approaches to Discourse Particles, Kerstin Fischer (ed), 427–448. Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin & Alm, Maria
Fraser, Bruce
1996Pragmatic markers. Pragmatics 6(2): 167–190.Google Scholar
Haselow, Alexander
2013Arguing for a wide conception of grammar: The case of final particles in spoken discourse. Folia Linguistica 47(2): 375–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2007Preestablished categories don’t exist: Consequences for language description and typology. Linguistic Typology 11(1): 119–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language 86(3): 663–687. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011The indeterminacy of word segmentation and the nature of morphology and syntax. Folia Linguistica 45(1): 31–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015Defining vs. diagnosing linguistic categories: A case study of clitic phenomena. In How Categorical are Categories?, Joanna Blaszczak, Dorota Klimek-Jankowska & Krzysztof Migdalski (eds), 273–304. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018How comparative concepts and descriptive linguistic categories are different. In Aspects of Linguistic Variation, Daniël Olmen, Tanja Mortelmans & Frank Brisard (eds), 83–113. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021Bound forms, welded forms, and affixes: Basic concepts for morphological comparison. Voprosy Jazykoznanija 1: 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hölzl, Andreas
2018A Typology of Questions in Northeast Asia and Beyond: An Ecological Perspective. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Kibrik, Andrey A.
2011Reference in Discourse. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kibrik, Andrej A.
2019Rethinking agreement: Cognition-to-form mapping. Cognitive Linguistics 30(1): 37–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
2015Discourse and grammar. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Deborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton & Deborah Schiffrin (eds), 9–41. Hoboken NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Obe, Rie & Haberland, Hartmut
2019Japanske interaktive partikler i dansk oversættelse. NyS, Nydanske Sprogstudier 1(57): 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Panov, Vladimir
2020aFinal particles in Asia: Establishing an areal feature. Linguistic Typology 24(1): 13–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020bThe marking of uncontroversial information in Europe: presenting the enimitive. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 52(1): 1–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rakhilina, Ekaterina & Bychkova, Polina
2023Towards pragmatic construction typology: The case of discourse formulae. In Discourse Phenomena in Typological Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series 227], Alessandra Barotto & Simone Mattiola (eds), XXX–XXX. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume).Google Scholar
Rinas, Karsten
2006Die Abtönungspartikeln doch und ja: Semantik, Idiomatisierung, Kombinationen, tschechische Äquivalente. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Sanzheev, G. D., Bertagaev, T. A. & Cydendambaev, C. B.
1962Grammatika Burjatskogo jazyka. Moskva: IVL.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987Discourse Markers. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schoonjans, Steven
2013Modal particles: Problems in defining a category. In Degand, Cornillie & Pietrandrea (eds), 134–161.Google Scholar
Spencer, Andrew & Luís, Ana
2012Clitics: An Introduction. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spyropoulos, Vassilios, Holton, David, Mackridge, Peter & Philippaki-Warburton, Irene
2012Greek: A Comprehensive Grammar, 2nd ed. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thurmair, Maria
1989Modalpartikeln und ihre Kombinationen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vastenius, Anu
2011Expressive particles in Serbian, Bulgarian, Greek and Kurdish. BA thesis, Lunds universitet.
Wackernagel, Jacob
1892[2020]On a Law of Indo-European Word Order: Über ein Gesetz der indogermanischen Wortstellung. Zenodo. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weydt, Harald
1989Sprechen mit Partikeln. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M.
1985Clitics and particles. Language 61(2): 283–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar