Chapter in:
Reference: From conventions to pragmatics
Edited by Laure Gardelle, Laurence Vincent-Durroux and Hélène Vinckel-Roisin
[Studies in Language Companion Series 228] 2023
► pp. 5370
References
Abbott, Barbara
2010Reference. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Achard, Michel
1998Representation of Cognitive Structures: Syntax and Semantics of French Sentential Complements. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Laurie Halse
2006[1999]Speak. New York NY: Penguin/Platinum Edition.Google Scholar
Beauchamp Jr., Emerson
1951A study of “it:” Handbook treatment and magazine. American Speech 26(3): 173–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
1973Ambient it is meaningful too. Journal of Linguistics 9(2): 261–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1977Meaning and Form. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1970Meaning and the Structure of Language. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1981Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Cornish, Francis
1996 “Antecedentless” anaphors: Deixis, anaphora, or what? Some evidence from English and French. Journal of Linguistics 32: 19–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011[1999]Anaphora, Discourse, and Understanding: Evidence from English and French. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cotte, Pierre
1998[1996]L’explication grammaticale de textes anglais, 2nd edn. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Dexter
2014Season 8. Developed by Charles Manos, Jr. Showtime Networks.Google Scholar
El Kaladi, Ahmed
1998Le pronom it et le cumul des fonctions. In Du percevoir au dire, Danielle Leeman & Annie Boone (eds), 183–203. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles
1985Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gardelle, Laure
2010Article défini, pronoms personnels de 3e personne et démonstratifs: Approche comparée de l’accès à la référence. Anglophonia 14(28): 33–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015Let her rain, she’s snowing pretty good: The use of feminine pronouns with weather verbs in colloquial English. Folia Linguistica 49(2): 353–379. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
2001[1984]Syntax: An Introduction, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette, Hedberg, Nancy & Zacharski, Ron
1993Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69(2): 274–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hedberg, Nancy, Gundel, Jeanette & Borthen, Kaja
2019Different senses of “referential.” In The Oxford Handbook of Reference, Jeanette Gundel & Barbara Abbott (eds), 100–116. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K.
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
James, Henry
1998[1897]What Maisie Knew [Oxford World’s Classics]. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1933Essentials of English Grammar. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
1949A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, Part VII. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1993aGrammatical traces of some “invisible” semantic constructs. Language Sciences 15: 323–355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993bReference-point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 4: 1–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011On the subjects of impersonals. In Cognitive Linguistics: Convergence and Expansion, Mario Brdar, Stefan T. Gries & Milena Žic-Fuchs (eds), 179–217. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maillard, Michel
1985L’impersonnel français de il à ça . In Autour de l’impersonnel, Jacques Choreyras (ed.), 63–118. Grenoble: Ellug.Google Scholar
Mathurin, Élise
2018Le pronom IT et la question de la référence. PhD dissertation, Aix-Marseille Université.
Mondorf, Britta
2016 “Snake legs it to freedom:” Dummy it as pseudo-object. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 12(1): 73–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neveux, Julie
2012 It girl, it bag et le pronom it: Le sens du pronom neutre non anaphorique. Anglophonia 16(32): 63–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pearsall, Thomas E. & Cunningham, Donald H.
1988[1978]How to Write for the World of Work. Toronto: Holt.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen F.
1978A comparison of wh-clefts and it-clefts in discourse. Language. 54(4): 883–906. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Recanati, François
2007It is raining (somewhere). Linguistics and Philosophy 30(1): 123–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seppänen, Aimo
2002On analysing the pronoun IT. English Studies 83(5): 442–462. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seppänen, Aimo & Seppänen, Ruth
1980On the non-anaphoric use of the pronoun it: Part two. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 81(3): 264–277.Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna
2008Ways of impersonalizing: Pronominal vs. verbal strategies. In Current Trends in Contrastive Linguistics: Functional and Cognitive Perspectives [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics 60], María de los Ángeles Gómez González, J. Lachlan Mackenzie & Elsa M. González Álvarez (eds), 3–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Michael B.
2004Cataphoric pronouns as mental space designators: Their conceptual import and discourse function. In Cognitive and Communicative Approaches to Linguistic Analysis [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics 51], Ellen Contini-Morava, Robert S. Kirsner & Betsy Rodríguez-Bachiller (eds), 61–90. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Solt, Stephanie
2015Vagueness and imprecision: Empirical foundations. Annual Review of Linguistics 2015(1): 107–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strawson, Peter F.
1950On referring. Mind. 59(235): 320–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar