Part of
Reconnecting Form and Meaning: In honour of Kristin Davidse
Edited by Caroline Gentens, Lobke Ghesquière, William B. McGregor and An Van linden
[Studies in Language Companion Series 230] 2023
► pp. 7195
References
Abraham, Werner, Leiss, Elisabeth & Fujinawa, Yasuhiro
(eds) 2020Thetics and Categoricals [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 262]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Abraham, Werner
2020Introduction. What this volume is about. In Abraham, Leiss & Ysuhiro (eds), 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, Tom
2016Phasal dynamism and the unfolding of meaning as text. English Text Construction 9(1): 143–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, Tom & O’Grady, Gerard
2019Language characterology and textual dynamics. A crosslinguistic exploration in English and Scottish Gaelic. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 51(2): 124–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belligh, Thomas
2020Are theticity and sentence-focus encoded grammatical categories in Dutch? In Abraham, Leiss & Ysuhiro (eds), 33–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bourgoin, Charlotte, O’Grady, Gerard & Davidse, Kristin
2021Managing information flow through prosody in it-clefts. English Language and Linguistics 25(3): 485–511. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brentano, Franz
1973[1874]Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint, Linda L. McAlister (ed). Antos C. Rancurello, D. B. Terrell, & Linda L. McAlister (trans.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Byrne, Michel
2002Gràmar na Gàidhlig. Cearsiadar: Stòrlann-Acair.Google Scholar
Cotter, Colleen
1994Focus in Irish and English. Contrast and Contact. In Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session Dedicated to the Contributions of Charles J. Fillmore, Susanne Gahl (ed.), 134–144. Berkeley CA: BLS. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuno, Susumo
1972Functional sentence perspective: A case study from Japanese and English. Linguistic Inquiry 3: 269–320.Google Scholar
Kuroda, Sige-Yuki
1972The categorical and the thetic judgment. Foundations of Language 9: 153–185.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1987Aboutness as a cognitive category. The thetic-categorical distinction revisited. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session and Parasession on Grammar and Cognition, John Aske, Natasha Beery, Laura Michaelis & Hana Filip (eds), 366–381. Berkeley CA: BLS. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000When subjects behave like objects. Studies in Language 24(3): 611–682. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mac Cana, Proinsias
1973On Celtic word order and the Welsh ‘abnormal’ sentence. Ériu 24: 90–120.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Flora
2009Còco Is Crùbagan. Cocoa and Crabs. A Hebridean Childhood. South Lochs: Islands Books Trust.Google Scholar
Marty, Anton
1918Gesammelte Schriften. Halle: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Ó Maolalaigh, Roibeard & MacAonghuis, Iain
2008Gaelic in Twelve Weeks. Edinburgh: Birlinn.Google Scholar
Rosengren, Inger
1997The thetic/categorical distinction revisited once more. Linguistics 35: 439–480. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen
1987The thetic/categorical revisited distinction. Linguistics 25: 511–580. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995 “Theticity” and VS order: A case study. In Verb-Subject Order and Theticity in European Languages [Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 48], Yaron Matras & Hans-Jürgen Sasse (eds), 3–31. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006Theticity. In Pragmatic Organization of Discourse in the Languages of Europe, Giuliano Bernini & Marcia L. Schwartz (eds), 255–308. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmerling, Susan
1976Aspects of English Sentence Stress. Austin TX: University of Texas Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, Dan I.
1996From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”. In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, John Gumperz & Stephen Levinson (eds), 70–96. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar