Part of
Reconnecting Form and Meaning: In honour of Kristin Davidse
Edited by Caroline Gentens, Lobke Ghesquière, William B. McGregor and An Van linden
[Studies in Language Companion Series 230] 2023
► pp. 99122
References

Corpora

CLMET_3.0
The Corpus of Late Modern English Texts, version 3.0, 1710–1720. Compiled by Hendrik De Smet, Hans-Jürgen Diller & Jukka Tyrkkö. c.34 million words.
COCA. The Corpus of Contemporary American English
1990–2019, version 2020 Compiled by Mark Davies. [URL]. Over a billion words.
COHA. Corpus of Historical American English
1820–2019, version 2021 Compiled by Mark Davies. [URL]. c.400 million words.
EEBO. Early English Books Online
1470s to 1690sOnline corpus created as part of the SAMUELS PROJECT (2014–2016). c.755 million words.Google Scholar
TIME. Time Magazine Corpus
2007– Compiled by Mark Davies. [URL]. c.100 million words.
Aijmer, Karin
2016Pragmatic markers as constructions. The case of anyway . In Outside the Clause. Form and Function of Extra-clausal Constituents [Studies in Language Companion Series 178], Gunther Kaltenböck, Evelien Keizer & Arne Lohmann (eds), 29–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna, Smirnova, Elena, Sommerer, Lotte & Gildea, Spike
2015Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language 18]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergs, Alexander & Diewald, Gabriele
2008Constructions and Language Change. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Börjars, Kersti, Vincent, Nigel & Walkden, George
2015On constructing a theory of grammatical change. Transactions of the Philological Society 113: 363–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L.
2010Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caffi, Claudia
2013On mitigation. In Pragmatics of Speech Actions, Marina Sbisà & Ken Turner (eds), 258–286. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
2001Radical Construction Grammar. Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cruse, D. Alan
1986Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
2011Impoliteness. Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan & Kytö, Merja
2010Early Modern English Dialogues. Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Davidse, Kristin & Vandelanotte, Lieven
2011Tense use in direct and indirect speech in English. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 236–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik
2012The course of actualization. Language 88(4): 601–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013Spreading Patterns. Diffusional Change in the English System of Complementation. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger
2017Usage-based linguistics. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics, Mark Aronoff (ed.). Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019The Grammar Network. How Linguistic Structure is Shaped by Language Use. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul & Heritage, John
1992Analyzing talk at work. An introduction. In Talk at Work. Interaction in Institutional Settings, Paul Drew & John Heritage (eds), 3–65. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul, Ogden, Richard & Curl, Traci
2009Affiliation and disaffiliation in interaction. EXRC Grant report RES-000-23-0035.Google Scholar
Finkbeiner, Rita
2019Reflections on the role of pragmatics in Construction Grammar. Constructions and Frames 11(2): 171–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flach, Susanne
2020Constructionalization and the Sorites paradox. In Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series 178], Lotte Sommerer & Elena Smirnova (eds), 45–67. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
1996Pragmatic markers. Pragmatics 6: 167–190.Google Scholar
2010Pragmatic competence. The case of hedging. In New Approaches to Hedging, Gunther Kaltenböck, Wiltrud Mihatsch & Stefan Schneider (eds), 15–34. Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995Constructions. A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2004Pragmatics and argument structure. In Handbook of Pragmatics, Laurence R. Horn & Gregory Ward (eds), 538–561. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2006Constructions at Work. The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2013Constructionist approaches. In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds), 15–31. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Güldemann, Tom
2012Thetic speaker-instantiating quotative indexes as a cross-linguistic type. In Quotatives. Cross-linguistic and Cross-disciplinary Perspectives [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 15], Isabelle Buchstaller & Ingrid van Alphen (eds), 117–142. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael & Culpeper, Jonathan
2018Integrative pragmatics and (im)politeness theory. In Pragmatics and its Interfaces, Cornelia Ilie & Neal R. Norrick (eds), 213–239. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John
1984A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In Structures of Social Action, J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds), 299–345. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2018Turn-initial particles in English. The cases of Oh and well . In Between Turn and Sequence. Turn-initial Particles across Language [Studies in Language and Social Interaction 31], John Heritage & Marja-Leena Sorjonen (eds), 155–190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin
2008Germanic Future Constructions. A Usage-based Approach to Language Change [Constructional Approaches to Language 7]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013Constructional Change in English. Developments in Allomorphy, Word-Formation and Syntax. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018Three open questions in diachronic construction grammar. In Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language 21], Evie Coussé, Joel Olofsson & Peter Andersson (eds), 22–39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Israel, Michael
1996The way constructions grow. In Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language, Adele Goldberg (ed.), 217–230. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. & Taavitsainen, Irma
2000Diachronic speech act analysis. From flyting to flaming. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1(1): 67–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne & Barlow, Michael
2000Introduction. A usage-based conception of language. In Usage-Based Models of Language, Michael Barlow & Suzanne Kemmer (eds), vii–xxviii. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Lewis, Diana M.
2000Some Emergent Discourse Connectives in English. Grammaticalization via Rhetorical Patterns. PhD dissertation, University of Oxford.
Lohmann, Arne & Koops, Christian
2016Aspects of discourse marker sequencing. Empirical challenges and theoretical implications. In Outside the Clause. Form and Function of Extra-Clausal Constituents [Studies in Language Companion Series 178], Gunther Kaltenböck, Evelien Keizer & Arne Lohmann (eds), 417–446. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McGregor, William B.
1997Semiotic Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Nølke, Henning
2006The semantics of polyphony (and the pragmatics of realization). Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 38: 137–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017Linguistic Polyphony. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petré, Peter
2014Constructions and Environments. Copular, Passive, and Related Constructions in Old and Middle English. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019How constructions are born. The role of patterns in the constructionalization of be going to INF. In Patterns in Language and Linguistics. New Perspectives on a Ubiquitous Concept, Beatrix Busse & Ruth Möhlig-Falke (eds), 157–192. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Potts, Christopher
2007The expressive dimension. Theoretical Linguistics 33(2): 165–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987Discourse Markers. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
2020Dynamics of a Linguistic System. Usage, Conventionalization, and Entrenchment. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spronck, Stef & Nikitina, Tatiana
2019Reported speech forms a dedicated syntactic domain. Linguistic Typology 23(1): 119–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma & Jucker, Andreas H.
2008Speech acts now and then. Towards a pragmatic history of English. In Speech Acts in the History of English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 176], Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds), 1–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina
2008Toward a unified theory of politeness, impoliteness, and rudeness. In Impoliteness in language, Derek Bousfield & Miriam Locher (eds), 54–89. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2020aThe development of “digressive” discourse–topic shift markers in English. Journal of Pragmatics 156: 121–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020bExpressions of stance-to-text. Discourse management markers as stance markers. Language Sciences 82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2022aDiscourse Structuring Markers in English. A Historical Constructionalist Perspective on Pragmatics [Constructional Approaches to Language 33]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2022bTen Lectures on a Diachronic Constructionalist Approach to Discourse Structuring Markers. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme
2013Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trousdale, Graeme & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2021Rethinking constructionalization. The history of by the way . Paper presented at ISLE 6, Joensuu, June.
Vandelanotte, Lieven
2009Speech and Thought Representation in English. A Cognitive-Functional Approach. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar