Cover not available
Part of
Different Slants on Grammaticalization
Edited by Sylvie Hancil and Vittorio Tantucci
[Studies in Language Companion Series 232] 2023
► pp. 104–123

Chapter 4
Tracking Jespersen’s cycle in Veronese and Bresciano

Diatopic variation in sentential negation

| University of Verona
| University of Graz
This article provides an insight in the expression of sentential negation in two Italo-Romance varieties, i.e., Bresciano and Veronese. The fieldwork data gathered in Lumezzane (BS), Brescia, San Giovanni Lupatoto (VR) and Nogara (VR) shows an intriguing range of variation. The Veronese peripheral data displays the particle mia (local form of mica) as a reinforcing negative element; central Bresciano shows a homogeneous pattern of postverbal negation, whereas in Lumezzanese the negative particle mia is completely grammaticalized. The general picture illustrates homogeneous negation patterns across the analysed structures, with all three stages of Jespersen’s cycle represented.
Keywords: Jespersen's cycle, sentential negation, Italo-Romance, Veronese, Bresciano
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1The expression of sentential negation: An introduction
    • 1.2Grammaticalization of mica in standard and local varieties
      • 1.2.1Mica in Modern and Old Italian
      • 1.2.2Mica in Italo-Romance varieties
  • 2.Methodology and research questions
  • 3.Data analysis
    • Indicative
    • Protasis
    • Imperatives
    • Subjunctive subordinates
  • Discussion and conclusion
  • Note to the glossing system
  • Notes
  • List of abbreviations
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 13 July 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.232.04tag
References (45)
References
Ashby, William J. 1981. The loss of the negative particle ne in French: A syntactic change in progress. Language 57(3): 674–687. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan. 2009. The Jespersen cycle. In Cyclical Change [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 146], Elly van Gelderen (ed.), 73–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benincà, Paola & Poletto, Cecilia. 2004. Topic, focus and V2: Defining the CP sub-layers. In The Structure of IP and CP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. II, Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 52–75. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola & Damonte, Federico. 2009. Varianti sintattiche inter- e intra-individuali nelle grammatiche dialettali. In I parlanti e le loro storie. Competenze linguistiche, strategie comunicative, livelli di analisi. Atti del convegno Carini-Valderice, 23–25 ottobre 2008, Luisa Amenta & Giuseppe Paternostro (eds), 185–194. Palermo: Centro Studi Filogici e Linguistici Siciliana.Google Scholar
Bernini, Giuliano & Ramat, Paolo. 1996. Negative Sentences in the Languages of Europe. A Typological Approach. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Carlier, Anne, De Mulder, Walter & Lamiroy, Béatrice. 2012. The pace of grammaticalization in a typological perspective. Folia Linguistica 2: 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1976. Mica. Annali della Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia dell’Università di Padova 1: 101–112.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 1979. Typology of Sentence Negation. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dohi, Atsushi. 2019. La particella pa nelle varietà del ladino dolomitico con particolare attenzione al fassano. PhD dissertation, University of Trento.
Garzonio, Jacopo & Poletto, Cecilia. 2015. On preverbal negation in Sicilian and syntactic parasitism. In Italo-Romance Morphosyntax, Diego Pescarini & Silvia Rossi (eds). A special issue of Isogloss. Open Journal of Romance Languages 2015: 132–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garzonio, Jacopo. 2019. Not even a crumb of negation: On mica in Old Italian. In Linguistic Variation: Structure and Interpretation, Ludovico Franco & Paolo Lorusso (eds), 263–282. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia. 1997. The Landscape of Polarity Items. PhD dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
. 2000. Negative …Concord? Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 475–523. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1966. Synchronic and diachronic universals in phonology. Language 42(2): 508–517. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grevisse, Maurice & Goosse, André. 2016. Le bon usage. Gembloux: Duculot.Google Scholar
Horn, Lawrence R. 1989. A Natural History of Negation. Chicago IL: The Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1917. Negation in English and Other Languages. Copenhagen: A.F. HØst.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Negative attraction and negative concord in English grammar. Language 48(4): 773–818. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ladusaw, William. 1996. Negation and polarity items. In The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, Shalom Lappin (ed.), 311–331. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Laka, Miren Itziar. 1990. Negation in Syntax: On the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Lamiroy, Béatrice & De Mulder, Walter. 2011. Degrees of grammaticalization across languages. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), 292–308. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manzini, M. Rita & Savoia, Leonardo M. 2002. Negative adverbs are neither Adv nor Neg. In Proceedings of North East Linguistic Society 31, Masako Hirotani (ed.), 326–46. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Manzini, M. Rita & Savoia, Leonardo M. 2011. Grammatical Categories: Variation in Romance Languages. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. 1912. L’évolution des formes grammaticales. Scientia 6(12): 384.Google Scholar
Merchant, Jason. 2006. Why no(t)? Style 40(1–2): 20–23. A Festschrift for John Robert (Háj) Ross.Google Scholar
Payne, John R. 1985. Negation. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. I: Clause Structure, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 197–242. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Penello, Nicoletta & Pescarini, Diego. 2008. La negazione: Variazione dialettale ed evoluzione diacronica. Quaderni di lavoroASIt 8: 42–56.Google Scholar
Pescarini, Diego. 2009. ‘Presuppositional’ negation, modality and the {addressee}. Padua Working Papers 3: 22–27.Google Scholar
Pescarini, Diego & Penello, Nicoletta. 2012. L’avverbio mica fra widening semantico e restrizioni sintattiche’. In Linguaggio e Cervello/Semantica. Paper presented at XLII Annual Meeting of the Società di Linguistica Italiana, Pisa, Italy, September 25–26, Pier Marco Bertinetto, Valentina Bambini & Irene Ricci (eds). Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Pescarini, Diego & Donzelli, Giulia. 2017. La negazione nei dialetti della Svizzera italiana. Vox Romanica 76: 74–96.Google Scholar
Pescarini, Diego. 2022. A quantitative approach to microvariation: Negative marking in central Romance. Languages 7: 87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia. 2000. The Higher Functional Field. Evidence from Northern Italian Dialects. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar [Kluwer Handbooks of Linguistics 1], Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 271–327. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Roussou, Anna. 2003. Syntactic Change: A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Solà, Joan, Lloret, Maria Rosa, Mascaró, Joan, Pérez Saldanya, Manuel. 2008. Gramàtica del català contemporani. Barcelona: Editrial Empuries.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Heine, Bernd (eds). 1991. Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 2: Types of Grammatical Markers [Typological Studies in Language 19:2]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliani, Marta & Rabanus, Stefan. (In press). The cycle in language change: Insights from diachronic phonology and syntax of negation. Evolutionary Linguistic Theory 4(2), 191–228.
Travis, Lisa DeMena. 1984. Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Visconti, Jacqueline. 2009. From “textual” to “interpersonal”: On the diachrony of the Italian particle mica. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(5): 937–950. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Visconti, Jacqueline & Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard. 2009. On the diachrony of “reinforced” negation in French and Italian. In Grammaticalization and Pragmatics: Facts, Approaches, Theoretical Issues, Corinne Rossari, Claudia Ricci & Adriana Spiridon (eds), 137–71. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella. 1997. Negation and Clausal Structure: A Comparative Study of Romance Languages. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2001. Sentential negation. In The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, Mark Baltin & Chris Collins (eds). Hoboken NJ: Wiley & Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2004. Sentential Negation and Negative Concord. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
. 2007. Negation in natural language: On the form and meaning of negative elements. Language and Linguistics Compass 1(5): 498–518. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. On French negation. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 34(1): 447–458. DOI logoGoogle Scholar