Part of
Different Slants on Grammaticalization
Edited by Sylvie Hancil and Vittorio Tantucci
[Studies in Language Companion Series 232] 2023
► pp. 237262
Andrason, Alexander
2020Ideophones as linguistic “rebels” – The extra-systematicity of ideophones in Xhosa. Part 1. Asian and African Studies 29(2): 119–165.Google Scholar
2021Ideophones as linguistic “rebels” – The extra-systematicity of ideophones in Xhosa. Part 2. Asian and African Studies 30(1): 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andrason, Alexander & Dlali, Mawande
2020The (crucial yet neglected) category of interjections in Xhosa. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 73(2): 159–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andrason, Alexander, Phiri, Admire & Fehn, Anne-Maria. M.
forthcoming. Onomatopoeias in Tjwao. Canadian Journal of Linguistics.
Brinton, Laurel J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2005Lexicalization and Language Change. [Research Surveys in Linguistics]. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H.
2016Depicting as a method of communication. Psychological Review 123(3): 324–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019Depicting in communication. In Human Language: From Genes to Behavior, Peter Hagoort (ed.). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coulmas, Florian
(ed.) 1981Explorations in Standardized Communication Situations and Prepatterned Speech, Vol. 2: Conversational Routine [Janua Linguarum. Series Maior, 96]. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Diffloth, Gérard
1972Notes on expressive meaning. Papers of the Chicago Linguistic Society 8: 440–447.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark
2011The Meaning and Use of Ideophones in Siwu. PhD dissertation, Radboud University, Nijmegen.
2012Advances in the cross-linguistic study of ideophones. Language and Linguistics Compass 6(10): 654–672. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013Ideophones and gesture in everyday speech. Gesture 13(2): 143–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017aExpressiveness and system integration: On the typology of ideophones, with special reference to Siwu. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 70(2): 363–384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017bOn the margins of language: Ideophones, interjections and dependencies in linguistic theory. In Dependencies in Language, Nicholas J. Enfield (ed.), 195–202. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
2018Redrawing the margins of language: Lessons from research on ideophones. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 3(1): 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019‘Ideophone’ as a comparative concept. In Ideophones, Mimetics, and Expressives [Iconicity in Language and Literature 16], Kimi Akita & Prashant Pardeshi (eds.), 13–33. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021Ideophones. In The Oxford Handbook of Word Classes, Eva van Lier (ed.). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark & Akita, Kimi
2017An inverse relation between expressiveness and grammatical integration: On the morphosyntactic typology of ideophones, with special reference to Japanese. Journal of Linguistics 53(3): 501–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doke, Clement Martyn
1935Bantu Linguistic Terminology. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Dwyer, David & Moshi, Lioba
2003Primary and grammaticalized ideophones. In Linguistic Typology and Representation of African Languages, John M. Mugane (ed.), 173–185. Trenton NJ: Africa World Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan & Green, Melanie
2006Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A.
1976The structure and use of politeness formulas. Language in Society 5: 137–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1981The structure and use of politeness formulas. (Reprint of Ferguson 1976) In Explorations in Standardized Communication Situations and Prepatterned Speech, Vol. 2: Conversational Routine [Janua Linguarum. Series Maior 96], Florian Coulmas (ed.), 21–36. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haiman, John
2018Ideophones and the Evolution of Language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, B.
2023The Grammar of Interactives. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Heine, B. & Kuteva, T.
2007The Genesis of Grammar: A Reconstruction [Studies in the Evolution of Language 9]. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J.
1991On some principles of grammaticization. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 1: Theoretical and Methodological Issues [Typological Studies in Language 19: 1], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2003Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide
2017Basque ideophones from a typological perspective. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 62(2): 196–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janda, Laura A.
2015Cognitive linguistics in the year 2015. Cognitive Semantics 1: 131–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jendraschek, Gerd
2012A Grammar of Iatmul. Habilitationsschrift, Universität Regensburg.Google Scholar
Kaplan, David
1999The meaning of ouch and oops: Explorations in the theory of meaning as use, transcribed by Elizabeth Coppock. Howison Lecture in Philosophy, delivered at the University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
Kita, Sotaro
1997Two-dimensional semantic analysis of Japanese mimetics. Linguistics 35: 379–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koo, Hyun Jung & Rhee, Seongha
2018aIdeophones and attenuatives in Korean. Paper presented at the 51st Annual Meeting, Societas Linguistica Europaea, Tallinn University, Estonia 29 August1 September 1.Google Scholar
Kuteva, Tania, Heine, Bernd, Hong, Bo, Long, Haiping, Narrog, Heiko & Rhee, Seongha
2019World Lexicon of Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meinard, Maruszka Eve Marie
2015Distinguishing onomatopoeias from interjections. Journal of Pragmatics 76: 150–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narrog, Heiko & Heine, Bernd
2021Grammaticalization. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Nübling, Damaris
2004Die prototypische Interjektion: Ein Definitionsvorschlag. Zeitschrift für Semiotik 26(1–2): 11–46.Google Scholar
Stange-Hundsdörfer, Ulrike
Taylor, John R.
1995Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno
1967Linguistics and Philosophy. Ithaca CA: Cornell University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Voeltz, F. K. Erhard & Kilian-Hatz, Christa
(eds) 2001Ideophones [Typological Studies in Language 44]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar