Part of
Different Slants on Grammaticalization
Edited by Sylvie Hancil and Vittorio Tantucci
[Studies in Language Companion Series 232] 2023
► pp. 118
References (128)
References
Aarts, Bas. 2007. Syntactic Gradience: The Nature of Grammatical Indeterminacy. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Aijmer, Karin. 1997. I think – An English modal particle. In Modality in Germanic Languages: Historical and Comparative Perspectives, Toril Swan & Olaf Jansen-Westvik (eds), 1–47. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andersen, Henning. 2001. Actualization and the (uni)directionality of change. In Actualization: Linguistic Change in Progress [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 219], Henning Andersen (ed.) 225–248. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter & Günthner, Susanne. 2005. Die Entstehung von Diskursmarkern im Deutschen. Ein Fall von Grammatikalisierung? In Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen, Torsten Leuschner, Tanja Mortelmanns & Sarah De Groodt (eds), 335–362. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar & Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2002. On the final though: A case of grammaticalization? In Wischer & Diewald (eds), 345–361. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beuls, Katrien & Steels, Luc. 2013. Agent-based models of strategies for the emergence and evolution of grammatical agreement. PLoS ONE 8: e58960. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bisang, Walter, Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. & Wiemer, Björn (eds). 2009. What Makes Grammaticalization: A Look from its Fringes and its Components. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bopp, Franz. 1816. Über das Conjugationssystem der Sanskritsprache in Vergleichung mit jenem der griechischen, lateinischen, persischen und germanischen Sprache [Documenta Semiotica – Serie 1], reprint 1975. Frankfurt: Andreäsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Börjars, Kerstin & Vincent, Nigel. 2011. Grammaticalization and directionality. In Narrog & Heine (eds), 162–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boye, Kasper & Harder, Peter. 2012. A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language 88: 1–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breban, Tine & Kranich, Svenja (eds). 2015. What Happens after Grammaticalization? Secondary Grammaticalization and Other Late Stage Processes. Special issue of Language Sciences 47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. (2001). From matrix clause to pragmatic marker: The history of look-forms. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 2(2): 177–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017. The Evolution of Pragmatic Markers in English: Pathways of Change. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2005. Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. 2010. Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., Perkins, Revere D. & Pagliuca, William. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle (ed.). 2001. Grammaticalization: A Critical Assessment. Special issue of Language Sciences 23(2–3).Google Scholar
Coussé, Evie, Andersson, Peter & Olofsson, Joel (eds). 2018. Grammaticalization Meets Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Grammar 21]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William. 2000. Explaining Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
. 2007. The origins of grammar in the verbalization of experience. Cognitive Linguistics 18(3): 339–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. The origins of grammaticalization in the verbalization of experience. Linguistics 48(1): 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin, Breban, Tine, Brems, Lieselotte & Mortelmans, Tanja (eds). 2012. In Grammaticalization and Language Change: New Reflections [Studies in Language Companion Series 130]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth & Evers-Vermeul, Jacqueline. 2015. Grammaticalization or pragmaticalization of discourse markers? More than a terminological issue. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16(1): 59–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth & Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie. 2011. Introduction: Grammaticalization and (inter)subjectification of discourse markers. Linguistics 49(2): 287–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Smet, H. (2016). Entrenchment effects in language change. In Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge (pp. 75–99). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Detges, Ulrich & Waltereit, Richard. 2002. Grammaticalization vs. reanalysis: A semantic-pragmatic account of functional change in grammar. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 21: 151–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diessel, Holger. 2006. Demonstratives, joint attention, and the emergence of grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 17: 463-489. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Grammaticalization and language acquisition. In Narrog & Heine (eds), 130-141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dik, Simon C. 1997. The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part 2: Complex and Derived Constructions [Functional Grammar Series 21]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele. 2011a. Grammaticalization and pragmaticalization. In Narrog & Heine (eds), 450–461. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011b. Pragmaticalization (defined) as grammaticalization of discourse functions. Linguistics 49(2): 365–390. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Nick C. & Larsen-Freeman, Diane. 2006. Language emergence: Implications for applied linguistics – Introduction to the special issue. Applied linguistics 27(4): 558–589. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erman, Britt & Kotsinas, Ulla-Britt. 1993. Pragmaticalization: The case of ba and you know. Studier i Modern Sprakvetenskap 10: 76–92.Google Scholar
Fanego, Teresa. 2010. Paths in the development of elaborative discourse markers: Evidence from Spanish. In Subjectification, Intersubjectification, and Grammaticalization, Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 197–237. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Carles J. 1988. The mechanisms of “construction grammar”. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 14: 35–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Olga. 2006. On the position of adjectives in Middle English. English Language and Linguistics 10(2): 253–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. On analogy as the motivation for grammaticalization. Studies in Language 32(2): 336–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Olga, Rosenbach, Anette & Stein, Dieter (eds). 2000. Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English [Studies in Language Companion Series 53]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von der Gabelentz, Georg. 1891. Die Sprachwissenschaft. Ihre Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse. Leipzig: Weigel Nachf. 2. überarbeitete Aufl.: Leipzig: Tauchnitz, 1901.Google Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly. 2004. Grammaticalization as Economy [Linguistik Atuell/Linguistics Today 71]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gisborne Nicholas & Patten, Amanda. 2011. Grammaticalization and construction grammar. In Narrog & Heine (eds), 92–104.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1971. Historical syntax and synchronic morphology: An archaeologist’s field trip. Chicago Linguistic Society 7: 394–415.Google Scholar
. 2009. The Genesis of Syntactic Complexity. Diachrony, Ontogeny, Neuro-cognition, Evolution. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Günthner, Susanne & Mutz, Katrin. 2004. Grammaticalization vs. pragmaticalization? The development of pragmatic markers in German and Italian. In Bisang, Himmelmann & Wiemer (eds), 77–107.Google Scholar
Haiman, John. 1994. Ritualization and the development of language. Perspectives of Grammaticalization [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 109], William Pagliuca (ed.) 3–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hancil, Sylvie & König, Ekkehard (eds). 2014. Grammaticalization. Theory and Data [Studies in Language Companion Series 162]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hancil, Sylvie, Breban, Tine, & José Vicente Lozano (eds). 2018. New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series 202]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Alice C. & Campbell, Lyle. 1995. Historical Syntax in Cross-linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haselow, Alexander. 2014. Sequentiality in dialogue as a trigger for grammaticalization. In Hancil & König (eds), 203–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Left vs. right periphery in grammaticalization. In Smith, Trousdale & Waltereit (eds), 157–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haselow, Alexander & Hancil, Sylvie. 2018. Rethinking language change from a dialogic perspective. Language Sciences 68: 1–5. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1999. Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics 37: 1031–1068. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. On directionality in language change with particular reference to grammaticalization. In Up and Down the Cline – The Nature of Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 59], Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde & Harry Perridon (eds), 17–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees. 2011. The grammaticalization of tense and aspect. In Narrog & Heine (eds), 580–594. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2002. On the role of context in grammaticalization. In Wischer & Diewald (ed.), 83–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Reh, Mechtild. 1984. Grammaticalization and Reanalysis in African Languages. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Reh, Mechthild. 1984. Grammaticalization and Reanalysis in African Languages. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Claudi, Ulrike & Hünnemeyer, Friederike. 1991. Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 1991. On some principles of grammaticization. In Traugott & Heine (eds), Vol. 1, 17–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. 2003. Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keller, Rudi. 1994. On Language Change: The Invisible Hand in Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1995[1982]. Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Munich: Lincom. First published in 1982 as Thoughts on Grammaticalization: A Programmatic Sketch [Arbeiten des Kölner Universalien-Projektes]. Cologne: University of Cologne.Google Scholar
. 2004. Theory and method in grammaticalization. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 32(2): 152–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenker, Ursula. 2000. Soplice and witodlice: Discourse markers in Old English. In Fischer, Rosenbach & Stein (eds), 229–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
López-Couso, María José & Seoane, Elena (eds). 2008. Rethinking Grammaticalization: New Perspectives [Typological Studies in Language 76]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. 1912. L’évolution des formes grammaticales. Scientia (Rivista di Scienza) 12(26). Reprint: Meillet 1921:130–148, 6.Google Scholar
von Mengden, Ferdinand & Simon, Horst (eds). 2014. What is it Then, This Grammaticalization? Special issue of Folia Linguistica 48(2). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mosegaard Hansen, Maj-Britt. 1998. The semantic status of discourse markers. Lingua 104(3–4): 235–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narrog, Heiko & Heine, Bernd. 2011. The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
(eds). 2018. Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. Grammaticalization. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick. 1998. Language Form and Language Function. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Nicolle, Steve. 2011. Pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. In Narrog & Heine (eds), 401–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noël, Dirk. 2007. Diachronic construction grammar and grammaticalization theory. Functions of Language 14(2), 177–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norde, Muriel. 2009. Degrammaticalization. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norde, Muriel, Beijering, Karen & Lenz, Alexandra (eds). 2013. Current Trends in Grammaticalization Research. Special issue of Language Sciences 36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nuyts, Jan. 2012. Notions of (inter)subjectivity. English Text Construction 5(1): 53–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petré, Peter & Van de Velde, Freek. 2018. The real-time dynamics of the individual and the community in grammaticalization. Language 94(4), 867–901. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pons Bordería, Salvador & Loureda, Óscar (eds). (2018). Beyond Grammaticalization and Discourse Markers. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prévost, Sophie. 2011. A propos from verbal complement to discourse marker: A case of grammaticalization? Linguistics 49(2): 391–413. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramat, Paolo. 1992. Thoughts on degrammaticalization. Linguistics 30: 549–560. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramat, Anna Giacalone & Hopper, Paul J. (eds). 1998. The Limits of Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 37]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ren, Wei. 2022. Effects of proficiency and gender on learners’ use of the pragmatic marker ba. Lingua 277, 103405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Roussou, Anna. 2003. Syntactic Change. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian & Blondeau, Hélène. 2007. Language change across the lifespan: /r/ in Montreal French. Language 83: 560–588. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwenter, Scott A. & Waltereit, Richard. 2010. Presupposition accommodation and language change. In Davidse, Vandelanotte & Cuyckens (eds), 75–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmid, H. J. (2020). The dynamics of the linguistic system: Usage, conventionalization, and entrenchment. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Seoane, Elena & María José López-Couso (eds). 2008. Theoretical and Empirical Issues in Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 77]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Andrew D. M., Trousdale, Graeme & Waltereit, Richard (eds). 2015. New Directions in Grammaticalization Research [Studies in Language Companion Series 166]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sommerer, Lotte & Smirnova, Elena (eds). 2020. Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Grammar 27]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stathi, Katerina, Gehweiler, Elke & König, Ekkehard (eds.). (2010). Grammaticalization: Current Views and Issues [Studies in Language Companion Series 119] Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tabor, Whitney & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1998. Structural scope expansion and grammaticalization. In Ramat & Hopper (eds), 229–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & D’Arcy, Alexandra. 2009. Peaks beyond phonology: Adolescence, incrementation, and language change. Language 85: 58–108. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Tantucci, V. (2015). Traversativity and grammaticalization: The aktionsart of 过 guo as a lexical source of evidentiality. Chinese Language and Discourse, 6(1), 57–100.Google Scholar
Tantucci, Vittorio. 2017a. From immediate to extended intersubjectification: A gradient approach to intersubjective awareness and semasiological change. Language and Cognition 9(1): 88–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017b. An evolutionary approach to semasiological change: Overt influence attempts through the development of the Mandarin -ba particle. Journal of Pragmatics 120: 35–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. From co-actionality to extended intersubjectivity: Drawing on language change and ontogenetic development. Applied Linguistics 41(2): 185–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. Language and Social Minds: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Intersubjectivity. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tantucci, Vittorio, Culpeper, Jonathan & Di Cristofaro, Matteo. 2018. Dynamic resonance and social reciprocity in language change: The case of Good morrow. Language Sciences 68: 6–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tantucci, V., & Di Cristofaro, M. (2020). Entrenchment inhibition: Constructional change and repetitive behaviour can be in competition with large-scale “recompositional” creativity. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 16(3), 547–579.Google Scholar
Tantucci, Vittorio & Di Cristofaro, Matteo. 2021. Pre-emptive interaction in language change and ontogeny: The case of [there is no NP]. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 17(3): 715–742. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tantucci, Vittorio & Wang, Aiqing. 2018. Illocutional concurrences: The case of evaluative speech acts and face-work in spoken Mandarin and American English. Journal of Pragmatics 138: 60–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020a. From co-actions to intersubjectivity throughout Chinese ontogeny: A usage-based analysis of knowledge ascription and expected agreement. Journal of Pragmatics 167: 98–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020b. Diachronic change of rapport orientation and sentence-periphery in Mandarin. Discourse Studies 22(2): 146–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2022. Resonance as an applied predictor of cross-cultural interaction: Constructional priming in Mandarin and American English interaction. Applied Linguistics, 43(1): 115–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina. 2011. The pragmatic variable: Toward a procedural interpretation. Language in Society 40(3): 343–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1995. Subjectification in grammaticalization. In Subjectivity and Subjectivisation, Dieter Stein & Susan Wright (eds), 31–54. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. From subjectification to intersubjectification. In Motives for Language Change, Raymond Hickey (ed.) 124–139. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Discussion article: Discourse markers, modal particles, and contrastive analysis, synchronic and diachronic. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 6: 139–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2022. Discourse Structuring Markers in English: A Historical Constructionalist Perspective on Pragmatics [Constructional Approaches to Language 33]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Dasher, Richard B. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Heine, Bernd (eds). 1991a. Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 1: Theoretical and Methodological Issues [Typological Studies in Language 19:1]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(eds). 1991b. Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 2: Types of Grammatical Markers [Typological Studies in Language 19:2]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme (eds). (2010). Gradience, Gradualness and Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 90]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Change. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Bogaert, Julie. 2011. I think and other complement-taking mental predicates: A case of and for constructional grammaticalization. Linguistics 49(2): 295–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van linden, An, Verstraete, Jean-Christophe & Davidse, Kristin (eds). 2010. Formal Evidence in Grammaticalization Research [Typological Studies in Language 94]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Olmen, Daniel, Cuyckens, Hubert & Ghesquière, Lobke (eds). 2016. Aspects of Grammaticalization:(Inter)Subjectification and Directionality. Berlin. De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhagen, Arie. 2005. Constructions of Intersubjectivity: Discourse, Syntax and Cognition. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Wischer, Ilse. 2000. Grammaticalization versus lexicalization: Methinks there is some confusion. In Fischer, Rosenbach & Stein (eds), 355–370. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wischer, Ilse & Diewald, Gabriele (eds). 2002. New Reflections on Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 49]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wu, Fu Xiang. 2005. “Hanyu tibiaoji “le” “zhe” weishenme bu neng qianzhixing shiyong (Why the aspectual markers “le” and “zhe” are not obligatory). Contemporary Linguistics 3.Google Scholar
Wüllner, Franz. 1831. Über Ursprung und Urbedeutung der Sprachlichen Formen. Münster.Google Scholar
Ziegeler, Debra. 1997. Retention in ontogenetic and diachronic grammaticalization. Cognitive Linguistics 8: 207–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar