References
Adger, David
2006Combinatorial Variability. Journal of Linguistics 42(3): 505–530. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adger, David & Trousdale, Graeme
2007Variation in English syntax: theoretical implications. English Language & Linguistics 11(2): 261–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anttila, Arto
2002Variation and phonological theory. In The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, Jack K. Chambers, Peter Trudgill & Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds), 206–243. Malden (MA), Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight L.
1977Meaning and Form. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
1956Subjunctive -ra and -se: Free Variation. Hispania 39(3): 345–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campe, Petra
1999Der adnominale Genitiv im heutigen Deutsch. Versuch einer kognitiv-linguistischen Analyse des reinen Kasus im Vergleich zu alternativen Konstruktionen. Dissertation. Leuven: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
Cappelle, Bert
2009Can we factor out free choice? In Describing and Modeling Variation in Grammar [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs [TiLSM] 204], Guido Seiler, Andreas Dufter & Jürg Fleischer (eds), 183–202. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1957Syntactic structures [Janua Linguarum Series Minor 4]. ’s-Gravenhage: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cornips, Leonie E. A. & Corrigan, Karen P.
(eds) 2005Syntax and variation: Reconciling the biological and the social [Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science Series 4, Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 265]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
2000Explaining language change: an evolutionary approach [Longman Linguistics Library]. Harlow, New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Dammel, Antje & Schallert, Oliver
(eds) 2019Morphological Variation. Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives. Vol. 207. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Cock, Barbara
2020Intersubjective Impersonals in Context: A Multivariate Analysis of Spanish Uno and Se in Spoken Language. Catalan Journal of Linguistics (Special Issue): 93–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Smet, Isabeau & Van de Velde, Freek
2020Semantic differences between strong and weak verb forms in Dutch. Cognitive Linguistics 31(3): 393–416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dufter, Andreas, Fleischer, Jürg & Seiler, Guido
(eds) 2009Describing and Modeling Variation in Grammar (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs [TiLSM]). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Rod
1999Item versus system learning: explaining free variation. Applied Linguistics 20(4): 460–480. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, John L.
1958Social influences on the choice of a linguistic variant. Word 14(1): 47–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure [Cognitive Theory of Language and Culture]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1966Language universals: with special reference to feature hierarchies. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan T.
2003Multifactorial Analysis in Corpus Linguistics: A Study of Particle Placement [Open Linguistics Series]. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Haiman, John
1980The Iconicity of Grammar: Isomorphism and Motivation. Language 56(3): 515–535. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hinrichs, Lars & Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt
2007Recent changes in the function and frequency of Standard English genitive constructions: a multivariate analysis of tagged corpora. English Language and Linguistics 11(3): 437–474. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hubbell, Allan F.
1950The Pronunciation of English in New York City. Consonants and Vowels. New York: King’s Crown Press, Columbia University. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joos, Martin
1968[1959]The isolation of styles. In Readings in the Sociology of Language, Joshua A. Fishman (ed), 185–191. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kager, René
1999Optimality Theory [Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd
2010Areal variation in syntax. In Language and Space: an international handbook of linguistic variation. Vol.1: Theories and methods [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschat 30.1], Peter Auer & Jürgen E. Schmidt (eds), 837–864. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroch, Anthony
1989Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1: 199–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994Morphosyntactic variation. In Papers from the 30th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society: Vol. 2: The parasession on variation in linguistic theory, Katherine Beals (ed), 180–201. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
2001Syntactic change. In The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory [Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics], Mark Baltin & Chris Collins (eds), 699–729. Malden (MA), New York: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
1966aThe social stratification of English in New York. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
1966bThe Linguistic Variable as a Structural Unit. Washington Linguistics Review 3: 4–22.Google Scholar
1972Sociolinguistic patterns [Conduct and Communications Series]. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David
1999The Development of Language. Acquisition, Change, and Evolution [Blackwell/Maryland Lectures in Language and Cognition]. Malden, MA, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Meyerhoff, Miriam
2019Unnatural bedfellows? The sociolinguistic analysis of variation and language documentation. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 49(2): 229–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, Gereon
2003Optionality in optimality-theoretic syntax. In The Second Glot International State-of-the-Article Book [Studies in Generative Grammar 61], Lisa Cheng & Rint Sybesma (eds), 289–321. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
1983Grammatical Theory. Its Limits and Its Possiblilities. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nowak, Jessica
2011Zur Herausbildung semantischer Differenzierungen bei Konjugationsdubletten. Jahrbuch für Germanistische Sprachgeschichte 2(1): 312–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Preston, Dennis R.
1996Variationist Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition. In Second language acquisition and linguistic variation [Studies in Bilingualism (SiBil)], Dennis R. Preston & Robert Bayley (eds), 1–45. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Röthlisberger, Melanie
2018Regional variation in probabilistic grammars: A multifactorial study of the English dative alternation. Dissertation. [URL]
Seiler, Guido
2004On three types of dialect variation and their implications for linguistic theory. Evidence from verb clusters in Swiss German dialects. In Dialectology meets Typology: Dialect Grammar from a Cross-Linguistic Perspective [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs [TiLSM] 153], Bernd Kortmann (ed), 367–399. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
2003Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication 23(3–4): 193–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sonderegger, Stefan
1979Grundzüge deutscher Sprachgeschichte. Vol. 1: Einführung – Genealogie – Konstanten. Diachronie des Sprachsystems. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sutter, Gerd
2009Towards a multivariate model of grammar: The case of word order variation in Dutch clause final verb clusters. In Describing and Modeling Variation in Grammar [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs [TiLSM] 204], Andreas, Dufter, Jürg Fleischer & Guido Seiler (eds), 225–254. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt, Rosenbach, Anette, Bresnan, Joan & Wolk, Christoph
2014Culturally conditioned language change? A multivariate analysis of genitive constructions in ARCHER. In Late Modern English Syntax, Marianne Hundt (ed), 133–152. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trubetzkoy, Nikolai S.
1969[1939]Principles of Phonology. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Uhrig, Peter
2015Why the Principle of No Synonymy is Overrated. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 63(3): 323–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Werth, Alexander, Bülow, Lars, Pfenninger, Simone & Schiegg, Markus
(eds) 2021Intra-individual Variation in Language [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs [TiLSM] 363]. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter
1996Verb clusters in continental West Germanic dialects. In Microparametric Syntax and Dialect Variation [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 139], James R. Black & Virginia Motapanyane (eds), 229–258. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar