Cover not available
Part of
Free Variation in Grammar: Empirical and theoretical approaches
Edited by Kristin Kopf and Thilo Weber
[Studies in Language Companion Series 234] 2023
► pp. 260–283

Chapter 9
Syntactic priming and individual preferences

A corpus-based analysis

ORCID logo | Freie Universität Berlin,
This paper analyses the relation between syntactic priming/persistence and individual preferences in the variation between the two forms of the Spanish past subjunctive (-ra vs -se). The analysis finds that the probability of repetition of one of these variants is governed by an interaction between individual preferences and the difference between self- and other-priming. Previous use of a variant by another speaker is more likely to lead to persistence than previous use by the current speaker in the case that the current speaker does not usually prefer usage of the variant in question. However, if the current speaker prefers usage of the variant in question, this situation is inverted. These findings suggest that for speakers who prefer usage of the primed variant, self-priming in corpus data might actually be more adequately explained as an effect of individual preferences.
Keywords: variation, persistence, priming, subjunctive, Spanish, sociolinguistics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Persistence and individual variation
  • 3.The case study: Variation in the Spanish past subjunctive
    • 3.1Data
    • 3.2Persistence as a predictor of the variation between -ra and -se
    • 3.3Modelling the influence of individual preferences
    • 3.4Discussion of results
  • 4.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 31 October 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.234.09ros
References (59)
References
Adli, Aria. 2013. Syntactic variation in French Wh-questions: A quantitative study from the angle of Bourdieu’s sociocultural theory. Linguistics 51(3): 473–515. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alarcos Llorach, Emilio. 1999. Gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Anderson, Ana M. 2017. Receding or Resurgent? On the Use of Cantase (and Cantara) in Galician Spanish. Doctoral dissertation. Minnesota: University of Minnesota.
Asratián, Arucia. 2007. Variación -ra/-se en el español hablado en Caracas. Boletín de lingüística 19(5): 5–41.Google Scholar
Bargh, John A. & Chartrand, Tanya L. 2000. The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. In Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology Psychology, Harry T. Reis & Charles M. Judd (eds), 253–285. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bartón, Kamil. 2020. MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference. R package version 1.43.17. [URL] (3 March 2023).
Becker, Martin. 2008. From temporal to modal: Divergent fates of the Latin synthetic pluperfect in Spanish and Portuguese. In The Paradox of Grammatical Change. Perspectives from Romance [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 293], Ulrich Detges & Richard Waltereit (eds), 147–179. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bermejo, Víctor L. 2019. El pretérito imperfecto de subjuntivo en la Península Ibérica del siglo XX. Verba 46: 313–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bock, Kathryn J. 1986. Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology 18(3): 355–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bock, Kathrin J., Dell, Gary S., Chang, Franklin & Onishi, Kristine H. 2007. Persistent structural priming from language comprehension to language production. Cognition 104(3): 437–458. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bock, Kathrin J. & Griffin, Zenzi M. 2000. The persistence of structural priming: Transient activation or implicit learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 129(2): 177–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight L. 1956. Subjunctive -ra and -se: “Free Variation”? Hispania 39(3): 345–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Callaghan, Matthew & Travis, Catherine E. 2020. Priming as a diagnostic of grammatical constructions: Second-person singular in Chilean Spanish. Languages 6(1): 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Richard. 1995. The scope and limits of switch reference as a constraint on pronominal subject expression. Hispanic Linguistics 6(7): 1–27.Google Scholar
Cameron, Richard & Flores-Ferrán, Nydia. 2004. Perseveration of subject expression across regional dialects of Spanish. Spanish in Context 1(1): 41–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cappelle, Bert. 2009. Can we factor out free choice? In Describing and Modeling Variation in Grammar [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs [TiLSM] 204], Andreas Dufter, Jürg Fleischer & Guido Seiler (eds), 183–201. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cho, Sun-Joo, Watson, Duane, Jacobs, Cassandra & Naveiras, Matthew. 2020. A Markov Mixed-Effect Multinomial Logistic Regression Model for nominal repeated measures with an application to syntactic self-priming effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research 56(3): 476–495. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christ, Christina & Feldhausen, Ingo. 2021. Die -ra/-se-Alternation beim subjuntivo imperfecto im europäischen Spanisch: Eine soziolinguistische Korpusstudie. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 137(3): 827–859. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2019. Corpus del español, News on the Web. [URL] (3 March 2023).
Dell, Gary. 1986. A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review 93(3): 283–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dell, Gary, Burger, Lisa & Svec, William. 1997. Language production and serial order: A functional analysis and a model. Psychological Review 104(1): 123–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeMello, George. 1993. -ra vs. -se subjunctive: a new look at an old topic. Hispania 76(2): 235–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diessel, Holger. 2011. Review article of “Language, usage and cognition” by Joan Bybee. Language 87: 830–844. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fricke, Melinda & Kootstra, Gerrit J. 2016. Primed codeswitching in spontaneous bilingual dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language 91: 181–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gradoville, Michael. 2019. The role of individual variation in variationist corpus-based studies of priming. Italian Journal of Linguistics 31(1): 93–124.Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan T. 2005. Syntactic priming: a corpus-based approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 34(4): 365–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan T. & Kootstra, Gerrit J. 2017. Structural priming within and across languages. A corpus-based perspective. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20(2): 235–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guajardo, Gustavo. 2021. Two subjunctives or three? A multimodel analysis of subjunctive tense variation in complement clauses in Spanish. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 26(2): 248–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guzmán Naranjo, Matías. 2017. The se-ra Alternation in Spanish Subjunctive. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 13(1): 97–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin & Correia Saavedra, David. 2016. The unidirectionality of semantic changes in grammaticalization: An experimental approach to the asymmetric priming hypothesis. English Language and Linguistics 22(3): 357–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaccard, James. 2001. Interaction Effects in Logistic Regression [Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences 135, Sage university papers series 07–135]. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage University Papers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Cassandra L., Cho, Sun-Joo & Watson, Duane G. 2019. Self-priming in production: Evidence for a hybrid model of syntactic priming. Cognitive Science 43(7): e12749. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, Florian & Snider, Neal. 2013. Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: Syntactic priming is affected by the prime’s prediction error given both prior and recent experience. Cognition 127(1): 57–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Implicit learning and syntactic persistence: surprisal and cumulativity. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, July 23 – 26, 2008 Washington, D.C., USA, Bradley C. Love, Ken McRae & Vladimir M. Sloutsky (eds), 1028–1033. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Jäger, Gerhard & Rosenbach, Anette. 2008. Priming and unidirectional language change. Theoretical Linguistics 34(2): 85–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaschak, Michael P. 2007. Long-term structural priming affects subsequent patterns of language production. Memory & Cognition 35(5): 925–937. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaschak, Michael P., Kutta, Timothy J. & Schatschneider, Christopher. 2011. Long-term cumulative structural priming persists for (at least) one week. Memory & Cognition 39(3): 381–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kempas, Ilpo. 2011. Sobre la variación en el marco de la libre elección entre cantara y cantase en el español peninsular. Moenia 17: 243–264.Google Scholar
Lemon, Francis. 1925. The relative frequency of the subjunctive forms in –se and –ra. Hispania 8(5): 300–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mahowald, Kyle, James, Ariel, Futrell, Richard & Gibson, Edward. 2016. A meta-analysis of syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language 91: 5–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyerhoff, Miriam. 2006. Introducing Sociolinguistics. London, New York, Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pereira Scherre, María. 2001. Phrase level parallelism effect on noun phrase number agreement. Language Variation and Change 13(1): 91–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pickering, Martin J. and Ferreira, Victor S. 2008. Structural priming: a critical review. Psychological Bulletin 134(3): 427–459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poplack, Shana. 1980. The notion of the plural in Puerto Rican Spanish: Competing constraints on (s) deletion. In Locating Language in Time and Space, William Labov (ed), 55–67. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
PRESEEA. 2014. Corpus del Proyecto para el estudio sociolingüístico del español de España y de América. Alcalá de Henares: Universidad de Alcalá. [URL] (17 May 2023).
R Development Core Team. 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [URL] (3 March 2023).
Rojo, Guillermo & Vázquez Rozas, Victoria. 2014. Sobre las formas en «-ra» en el español de Galicia. In Perspectives in the study of Spanish language variation. Papers in the honor of Carmen Silva-Corvalán [Verba: Anuario Galego de Filoloxía 72], Andrés Enrique-Arias, Manuel Gutiérrez, Alazne Landa & Francisco Ocampo (eds), 237–270. Santiago de Compostela: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.Google Scholar
Rosemeyer, Malte. 2015. How usage rescues the system: persistence as conservation. In Variation in Language: System- and Usage-based Approaches [linguae & litterae 50], Aria Adli, Marco García García & Göz Kaufmann (eds), 289–311. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. Variación diatópica en la evolución del pluscuamperfecto sintético. In Variación diatópica y morfosintaxis en la historia del español, Blanca Garrido Martín, María del Carmen Moral del Hoyo & Matthias Raab (eds), 197–222. Santiago de Compostela: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.Google Scholar
Rosemeyer, Malte & Schwenter, Scott A. 2019. Entrenchment and persistence in language change: the Spanish past subjunctive. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 15(1): 167–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2010. Entrenchment, salience, and basic levels. In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics [Oxford Handbooks], Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 117–138. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sussman Goldberg, Barbara. 1995. The -ra and -se opposition in Spanish. In Meaning as Explanation. Advances in Linguistic Sign Theory [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs [TiLSM] 84], Ellen Contini-Morava & Barbara Sussman Goldberg (eds), 381–404. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2005. Language users as creatures of habit: a corpus-based analysis of persistence in spoken English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1(1): 113–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Morphosyntactic Persistence in Spoken English. A Corpus Study at the Intersection of Variationist Sociolinguistics, Psycholinguistics, and Discourse Analysis [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs [TiLSM] 177]. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt, Grafmiller, Jason, Bresnan, Joan, Rosenbach, Anette, Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Todd, Simon. 2017. Spoken syntax in a comparative perspective: The dative and genitive alternation in varieties of English. Glossa 86(1): 1–27.Google Scholar
Tamminga, Meredith. 2016. Persistence in phonological and morphological variation. Language Variation and Change 28(3): 335–356. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Veiga Rodríguez, Alexandre. 1996. La forma verbal española cantara en su diacronía. Santiago de Compostela: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.Google Scholar
Weiner, E. Judith & Labov, William. 1983. Constraints on the agentless passive. Journal of Linguistics 19(1): 29–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wright, Leavitt O. 1926. The indicative forms in –ra in Spanish America. Hispania 9(5): 288–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar