Cover not available
Part of
Free Variation in Grammar: Empirical and theoretical approaches
Edited by Kristin Kopf and Thilo Weber
[Studies in Language Companion Series 234] 2023
► pp. 284–314

Chapter 10
Optionality, variation and categorial properties

The case of plural marking in Yucatec Maya

ORCID logo | Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
In this paper, I propose a semantic account of the optionality of plural marking in Yucatec Maya (Mayan; Mexico) which pins the variation in plural marking on the variation in noun denotations (Chierchia 1998; Borer 2005; Deal 2017; Moroney 2021). I argue that this optionality is not a free variation. I further argue that the noun denotations vary between apportionable and generic, which is manifested in the option of a pseudopartitive operation (Selkirk 1977; Higginbotham 1994) available at the final stage of the interpretation of the nouns in the semantics. The fact that, by this account, the computation of Yucatec constructions that involve counting yields correct results provides further supporting evidence for the proposed analysis.
Keywords: semantics, number, plural marking, optionality, Mayan languages, Yucatec, pseudopartitive operator
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Plural marking in Yucatec
  • 3.Variation unexplained
    • 3.1Morphosyntactic analysis of the Yucatec plural marker
    • 3.2Interpretation of the plural morpheme
      • 3.2.1Degree of animacy
      • 3.2.2Argument structure
      • 3.2.3Numerical quantification
    • 3.3Not a case of free variation
  • 4.The condition of the variation
    • 4.1Individuation and (pseudo-)partitivity
    • 4.2Analysis
    • 4.3Compositionality
      • 4.3.1Pluralised nouns
      • 4.3.2Numeral-classifiers with bare nouns
      • 4.3.3Numeral classifiers with pluralised nouns
  • 5.Further discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 31 October 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.234.10yu
References (81)
References
Alexiadou, Artemis. 2011. Plural mass nouns and the morpho-syntax of number. In Proceedings of the 28th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Mary Byram Washburn, Katherine McKinney-Bock, Erika Varis, Ann Sawyer & Barbara Tomaszewicz (eds), 33–41. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Andrade, Manuel J. 1955. A Grammar of Modern Yucatec [Microfilm Manuscripts on Middle American Cultural Anthropology 7.41]. Chicago: University of Chicago Library.Google Scholar
Bale, Alan & Coon, Jessica. 2014. Classifiers are for numerals, not for nouns: Consequences for the mass/count distinction. Linguistic Inquiry 45(4): 695–707. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bale, Alan, Coon, Jessica & Arcos López, Nicolás. 2019. Classifiers, partitions, and measurements: Exploring the syntax and semantics of sortal classifiers. Glossa 4(1): 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blair, Robert W. & Vermont-Salas, Refugio. 1967. Spoken Yucatec Maya. Book 2: Lessons 13–18, transcribed by Norman A. McQuown. Chicago: University of Chicago, Department of Anthropology.Google Scholar
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen. 2002. The grammar of time reference in Yukatek Maya [LINCOM Studies in Native American Lingustics 44]. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 2005. Structuring Sense. Vol. 1: In Name Only [Oxford linguistics]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan & Kanerva, Jonni M. 1989. Locative inversion in Chicheŵa: A case study of factorization in grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 20(1): 1–50.Google Scholar
Briceño Chel, Fidencio. 1996. La frase nominal en el maya yucateco. Estudios de Lingüística Aplicada 23/24: 95–104.Google Scholar
. 2002. Lengua e identidad entre los mayas de la península de Yucatán. Los investigadores de la cultura maya 10(2): 370–379.Google Scholar
. 2006. Los verbos del maya yucateco actual. Chapingo: INALI, Instituto Nacional de Lenguas Indígenas.Google Scholar
Bricker, Victoria. 1981. The source of the ergative split in yucatec maya. Journal of Mayan Linguistics 2(2): 83–127.Google Scholar
Butler, Lindsay K. 2011. The Morphosyntax and Processing of Number Marking in Yucatec Maya. PhD thesis. Arizona: University of Arizona.
2012. Crosslinguistic and experimental evidence for non-Number plurals. Linguistic Variation 12(1): 27–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013. Non-Number plurals. In Proceedings of the 42nd Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, held at University of Toronto, November 11–13, 2011. Vol. 1, Stefan Keine & Shayne Sloggett (eds), 105–118. University of Massachusetts, Department of Linguistics: GLSA Publications.Google Scholar
Butler, Lindsay K., Bohnemeyer, Jürgen & Jaeger, T. Florian. 2014. Syntactic constraints and production preferences for optional plural marking in Yucatec Maya. In Zwischen Kern und Peripherie: Untersuchungen zu Randbereichen in Sprache und Grammatik. Festschrift zum 64. Geburtstag von Norbert Fries [Studia grammatica 76], Antonio Machicao y Priemer, Andreas Nolda & Athina Sioupi (eds), 181–207. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1998. Reference to kinds across language. Natural Language Semantics 6(4): 339–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chung, Sandra. 2000. On reference to kinds in Indonesian. Natural Language Semantics 8(2): 157–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comisión de Difusión del Alfabeto Maya (CDAM). 1984. Alfabeto maya acordado en la reunión de agosto de 1984. Mérida: INEA/Academia de la Lengua Maya de Yucatán.Google Scholar
Gillon, Carrie. 2015. Innu-aimun plurality. Lingua 162: 128–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1981. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 2000. Number [Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dalrymple, Mary & Mofu, Suriel. 2012. Plural semantics, reduplication, and numeral modification in Indonesian. Journal of Semantics 29(2): 229–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dardjowidjojo, Soenjono. 1978. Sentence Patterns of Indonesian [Pali language texts: Southeast Asia]. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Dayal, Veneeta. 2012. Bangla classifiers: Mediating between kinds and objects. Rivista di Linguistica 24(2): 195–226.Google Scholar
Deal, Amy Rose. 2017. Countability distinctions and semantic variation. Natural Language Semantics 25(2): 125–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67(3): 547–619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
England, Nora C. 2011. Plurality agreement in some eastern Mayan languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 77(3): 397–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gleitman, Lila R. 1994. Words, words, words… . Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences 346(1315): 71–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure [Cognitive Theory of Language and Culture Series]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument structure [Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 18]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez-Bravo, Rodrigo. 2015. Las Cláusulas Relativas en Maya Yucateco [Estudios de lingüistica 22]. Mexico City: El Colegio de México, Centro de Estudios Lingüísticos y Literarios.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez-Bravo, Rodrigo & Uth, Melanie. 2020. Functional projections and language contact: the case of plural marking of Spanish nouns in Yucatec Maya. Typology of Morphosyntactic Parameters 3(4): 80–104.Google Scholar
Hanks, William F. 1984. The evidential core of deixis in Yucatec Maya. In Papers from the Twentieth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, April 26–27, 1984, 154–172, Joseph Drogo, Veena Mishra & David Testen (eds). Chicago: University of Chicago, Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Higginbotham, Jim. 1994. Mass and count quantifiers. Linguistics and Philosophy 17(5): 447–480. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). 2010. [URL] (March 13, 2023).
Jackendoff, Ray. 1983. Semantics and Cognition [Current Studies in Linguistics]. Cambridge, MA, London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2002. English particle constructions, the lexicon, and the autonomy of syntax. In Verb-Particle Explorations [Interface Explorations [IE] 1], Nicole Dehé, Ray Jackendoff, Andrew McIntyre & Silke Urban (eds), 67–94. Berlin, Boston: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jenks, Peter. 2011. The hidden structure of Thai noun phrases. PhD thesis. Harvard: Harvard University.
Jiang, Li J. 2018. Definiteness in Nuosu Yi and the theory of argument formation. Linguistics and Philosophy 41(1): 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Kyumin & Melchin, Paul B. 2018. On the complementary distribution of plurals and classifiers in East Asian classifier languages. Language and Linguistics Compass 12(4). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria. 2001. ‘A piece of cake’ and ‘a cup of tea’: partitive and pseudo-partitive nominal constructions in the Circum-Baltic languages. In The Circum-Baltic Languages: Typology and Contact. Vol. 2: Grammar and Typology [Studies in language companion series], Osten Dahl & Maria Koptjevskaja Tamm (eds), 523–568. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kouneli, Maria. 2019. Plural marking on mass nouns: evidence from Greek. In Gender and Noun Classification [Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics], Éric Mathieu, Myriam Dali & Gita Zareikar (eds), 234–248. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 2008. On the plurality of verbs. In Event Structures in Linguistic Form and Interpretation [Language, Context and Cognition 5], Johannes Dölling, Tatjana Heyde-Zybatow & Martin Schäfer (eds), 269–300. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 1987. Nominal Reference and Temporal Constitution: Towards a Semantics of Quantity. In Proceedings of the Sixth Amsterdam Colloquium on Formal Methods in the Study of Language, April 13–16, 1987, Jeroen Groenendijk, Martin Stokhof & Frank Veltman (eds.), 153–173. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam, ITLI.Google Scholar
Landman, Fred. 1996. Plurality. In The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory [Blackwell handbooks in linguistics], Shalom Lappin (ed), 425–457. Oxford et al.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1998. Possession in Yucatec Maya. Structures – functions – typology. [LINCOM Studies in Native American Linguistics 4]. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
. 2015. Valency classes in Yucatec Maya. In Valency classes in the world’s languages. Vol. 2: Case studies from Austronesia and the Pacific, the Americas, and theoretical outlook [Comparative handbooks of linguistics 1.2], Bernard Comrie & Andrej Malchukov (eds), 1427–1480. Berlin, Boston: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Textos mayas. [URL] (March 13, 2023).
Levin, Theodore, Lyskawa, Paulina & Ranero, Rodrigo. 2020. Optional agreement in Santiago Tz’utujil (Mayan) is syntactic. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 39(3): 329–355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Link, Godehard. 1983. The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: A lattice-theoretical approach. In Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language [Grundlagen der Kommunikation und Kognition/Foundations of Communication and Cognition], Rainer Bäuerle, Christoph Schwarze & Arnim von Stechow (eds), 302–323. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Little, Carol R., Moroney, Mary & Royer, Justin. 2022. Classifying classifiers. In Proceedings of Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on the Semantics of Under-Represented Languages in the Americas (SULA 11), Seung Suk Lee & Yixiao Song (eds), 145–160. Amherst, MA: GSLA Publications.Google Scholar
Löbel, Elisabeth. 1994. KP/DP-syntax: Interaction of case-marking with referential and nominal features. Theoretical Linguistics 20(1): 37–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lønning, Jan T. 1987. Mass terms and quantification. Linguistics and philosophy 10(1): 1–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lucy, John. 1992. Language Diversity and Thought: A Reformulation of the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis [Studies in the Social and Cultural Foundations of Language 12]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martinet, André. 1955. Économie des changements phonétiques: Traité de phonologie diachronique. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
McNay, Anna. 2007. Split Topicalisation and Pseudo-Partitivity. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 13(1, 19): 239–252Google Scholar
Monforte, Jorge, Dzul, Lázaro & Gutiérrez-Bravo, Rodrigo. 2010. Narraciones Mayas. Mexico City: Instituto Nacional de Lenguas Indígenas.Google Scholar
Moroney, Mary R. 2021. Definiteness and quantification: Evidence from Shan. PhD thesis. Cornell: Cornell University.
Nomoto, Hiroki. 2013. Number in classifier languages. PhD thesi. Minnesota: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Pfeiler, Barbara. 2009. The acquisition of numeral classifiers and optional plural marking in Yucatec Maya. In Development of Nominal Inflection in First Language Acquisition. A Cross-Linguistic Perspective [Studies on Language Acquisition [SOLA] 30], Ursula Stephany & María D. Voeikova (eds), 91–110. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinker, Steven. 1989. The acquisition of argument structure. In Language, Cognition, and Human Nature, Steven Pinker (ed), 160–179. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roeper, Peter. 1983. Semantics for mass terms with quantifiers. Noûs 17(2): 251–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rutkowski, Pawel. 2006. The syntactic structure of grammaticalized partitives (pseudo-partitives). University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 13(1, 26): 337–350.Google Scholar
Schellenbach, Daniela. 2018. Grammatical Intuitions and Literacy: a case study on Yucatec Maya. Master’s thesis. Bielefeld: Bielefeld University.
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1977. Some remarks on noun phrase structure. In Formal syntax, Peter Culicover, Thomas Wasow & Adrian Akmajian (eds), 285–316. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Skopeteas, Stavros & Verhoeven, Elisabeth. 2009. The interaction between topicalization and structural constraints: Evidence from Yucatec Maya. The Linguistic Review 26(2/3): 239–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith-Stark, Thomas C. 1974. The plurality split. In Papers from the Tenth Regional Meeting Chicago Linguistic Society, April 19–21, 1974, Michael W. La Galy, Robert A. Fox & Anthony Bruck (eds), 657–667. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Stickney, Helen. 2007. From Pseudopartitive to Partitive. In Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA), Alyona Belikova, Luisa Meroni & Mari Umeda, 406–415. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Tonhauser, Judith. 2003. Focus constructions in Yucatec Maya. In Proceedings of Second Conference on the Semantics of Under-Represented Languages in the Americas (SULA 2), Jan Anderssen, Paula Menéndez-Benito & Adam Werle (eds), 203–223. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, GLSA.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, Nikolai S. 1939. Grundzüge der Phonologie [Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 7]. Prague: Cercle Linguistique.Google Scholar
Tsoulas, George. 2008. On the grammar of number and mass terms in Greek. In Proceedings of the 2007 Workshop in Greek Syntax and Semantics at MIT [MITWPL 57], Clair Halpert, Jeremy Hartman & David Hill (eds), 131–146. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Uth, Melanie & Gutiérrez-Bravo, Rodrigo. 2018. La marcación de número en los préstamos españoles del maya yucateco: variación y restricciones. Cuadernos de Lingüística de El Colegio de México 5(1): 183–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vázquez-Rojas Maldonado, Violeta, García Fajardo, Josefina, Gutiérrez-Bravo, Rodrigo & Pozas Loyo, Julia. 2018. The definite article in Yucatec Maya: the case of le… o’. International Journal of American Linguistics 84(2): 207–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhoeven, Elisabeth. 2007. Experiential constructions in Yucatec Maya: A typologically based analysis of a functional domain in a Mayan language [Studies in Language Companion Series 87]. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilhelm, Andrea. 2008. Bare nouns and number in Dëne Sułiné. Natural Language Semantics 16(1): 39–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiltschko, Martina. 2008. The syntax of non-inflectional plural marking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26(3): 639–694. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xrakovskij, Viktor. 1997. Semantic types of the plurality of situations and their natural classification. In Typology of Iterative Constructions [LINCOM studies in theoretical linguistics 04], Viktor S. Xrakovskij (ed), 3–64. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Yu, Alan C. L. 2003. Pluractionality in Chechen. Natural Language Semantics 11(3): 289–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yu, Yidong. 2020. Optional Plural Marking in Yucatec Maya. Ms. Göttingen: Georg-August-Universität Göttingen. [Handout at General Linguistics Colloquium, Sprachwissenschaftliches Seminar].Google Scholar
. Forthcoming. Pluralizing Entities and Events in Yucatec Maya. PhD thesis. Göttingen: Georg-August-Universität Göttingen.