Cover not available
Part of
Predication in African Languages
Edited by James Essegbey and Enoch O. Aboh
[Studies in Language Companion Series 235] 2024
► pp. 263–283

Chapter 10
From injecting to planting

The semantics of dó

| University of Florida
Ewe, like many Kwa languages, has very few verbs. Some of them are said to be meaningless or light because they either do not have a translation equivalent in Standard Average European languages (SAE) or, where they do, they appear on the surface to have several meanings. In this paper, I discuss one of these verbs, namely dó. Although Westermann (1933) has only one entry for dó, he provides more than 20 subentries all with different categories of internal arguments. The entries include ‘to stretch out’, ‘trade’, ‘lend’, ‘fix a price’, and ‘plant. Rongier (2015), on the other hand, has more than a hundred entries for dó. Following Ameka (2019), I argue that while the multiple interpretations are presented in the dictionaries as though they are different meanings, they are actually contextual interpretations. I argue that when the argument structure constructions in which the verb occurs, and the semantics of the arguments with which it occurs are taken into consideration, many of the different interpretations that are provided for dó fall out from one invariant meaning.
Keywords: argument structure construction, dó, Ewegbe, monosemy, verb semantics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Dictionary-based analysis
  • 3.Separating meaning from interpretation
  • 4.On the semantics of dó
    • 4.1One-place construction with dó
    • 4.2Two-place with dó
      • 4.2.1Dó with items of clothing
      • 4.2.2Dó with plants
      • 4.2.3Dó with solid food
      • 4.2.4Dó with needles and tobacco
      • 4.2.5Dó with non-count entities
      • 4.2.6Dó with price
      • 4.2.7Dó with money
      • 4.2.8Dó with debt
      • 4.2.9Dó with voice
      • 4.2.10Dó with directional ɖa or allative prepositional phrase
      • 4.2.11Dó with emotions
    • 4.3Three-place construction with dó
    • 4.4Conclusion
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 18 July 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.235.10ess
References (18)
References
Ameka, Felix. 1990. The grammatical packaging of experiencers in Ewe: A study in the semantics of syntax. Australian Journal of Linguistics 10(2): 139–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. ‘The nut opens’ and ‘hunger ends’: Verb constructions at the syntax-semantics interface. In The Grammar of Verbs and their Arguments: A Cross-linguistic Perspective, James Essegbey, Dalina Kallulli & Adam Bodomo (eds), 59–84. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Ameka, Felix & Terkourafi, Marina. 2019. What if…? Imagining non-Western perspectives on pragmatic theory and practice. Journal of Pragmatics 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clements, George N. 1972. The Verbal Syntax of Ewe. PhD dissertation, University of London.
Essegbey, James. 1999. Inherent Complement Verbs Revisited: Towards Understanding Argument Structure in Ewe. Leiden: Leiden University (MPI Dissertation Series).
Fillmore, Charles J., Kay, Paul & O’connor, Mary C. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language 64(3): 501–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goddard, Cliff & Wierzbicka, Anna. 2014. Words and Meanings: Lexical Semantics Across Domains, Languages and Cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele. 1995. A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry. 2004. How to become a ‘Kwa’ Verb. Journal of West African Languages 30(2): 68–88.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1995. Three levels of meaning. In Grammar and Meaning: Essays in Honour of Sir John Lyons, 90–115. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000. Presumptive Meanings. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Makkai, Adam. 1972. Idiom Structure in English. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rongier, Jacques. 2015. Dictionaire Éwé -Français. Parisː L‘Harmattan.Google Scholar
Ruhl, Charles. 1989. On monosemy: A Study in Linguistic Semantics. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Westermann, Diedrich. 1930. A Study of the Ewe Language. [translated by L. Bickford-Smith] London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1928. Eʋefialaː Ewe-English Dictionary. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.Google Scholar
Westermann, Diedrich & Bryan, Margaret. 1952. Languages of West Africa. Handbook of African Languages 2. London: Oxford University Press for International African Institute.Google Scholar
Wilkins, David P. & Hill, Deborah L. 1995. When “GO” means “COME” Cognitive Linguistics 6: 209–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar