Lexical Functions in Lexicography and Natural Language Processing

• Abbreviations and Notations | p. xvii
• Introduction
  Leo Wanner | 
• 1 On lf Relations | p. 3
• 1.1 Paradigmatic lf Relations
• 1.2 Syntagmatic lf Relations
• 2 Lexical Functions in the Overall Framework of mtt | p. 23
• 3 Outline of the Volume | p. 25
• Lexical Functions: A Tool for the Description of Lexical Relations in a Lexicon
  Igor Mel’čuk | 
• 1 Preliminary Remarks | p. 37
• 2 On the Concept of Lexical Function | p. 39
• 3 Simple Standard Lexical Functions | p. 45
• 3.1 Classification of Simple Standard lfs
• 3.2 List of Simple Standard lfs
• 4 Special Phenomena Related to Lexical Functions | p. 72
• 4.1 Complex lfs
• 4.2 Configurations of lfs
• 4.3 Fused Elements of Values of lfs
• 5 Presentation of the Values of lfs in Lexical Entries | p. 74
• 5.1 Elements of the Value f(L) as Subentries in L's Entry
• 5.2 Generalizing over the Values of lfs
• 6 Linguistic Nature of Lexical Functions | p. 79
• 6.1 Semantic Aspect of lfs
• 6.2 Phraseological Aspect of lfs
• 6.3 LFs in Linguistic Representations
• 6.4 Universality of lfs
• 6.5 New Simple Standard lfs?
• 7 Lexical Functions in Computer Applications | p. 91
• 7.1 Lfs and Lexical Choices
• 7.2 Lfs and Communicative Structure
• 7.3 Lfs and Text Cohesion
• Lexical Functions Across Languages
  Joseph E. Grimes | 
• 1 Introduction | p. 103
• 2 Lexical Functions Are a Heuristic Tool | p. 104
• 3 Why Do Lexical Functions Work? | p. 107
• Using Lexical Functions for the Extraction of Collocations from Dictionaries and Corpora
  Ulrich Heid | 
• 1 Introduction | p. 115
• 2 Automatic Exploration of Language Resources | p. 117
• 2.1 Analysis of Dictionary Articles
• 2.2 Analysis of Text Corpora
• 2.3 Collocation Discovery in Linguistic Resources: Dictionaries vs. Corpora
• 3 Exploiting lf Definitions for Discovery Procedures | p. 122
• 3.1 Part of speech Combinations in Syntagmatic lfs
• 3.2 Using the Definitions of Operi, Funci, and Laborij for Corpus Exploration
• 3.3 Exploiting Correlations between Semantic and Collocational Properties for Corpus Exploration Purposes
• 4 Extracting Collocations from Dictionaries | p. 133
• 4.1 Problems of the Representation of Collocations in Dictionaries
• 4.2 An Analysis of a Few Collocationally Rich Dictionaries
• 4.3 Collocation Extraction from Definition Dictionaries
• 4.4 Augmenting Lexical Descriptions with Information from Text Corpora
• 5 Summary | p. 144
• A Classification and Description of Lexical Functions for the Analysis of their Combinations
  Margarita Alonso-Ramos and Agnès Tutin | 
• 1 Introduction | p. 147
• 2 Classification of Lexical Functions | p. 148
• 2.1 Brief Review of Previous Classifications of lfs
• 2.2 A New Classification of lfs
• 2.3 Justification of Our Classification
• 3 Descriptive Parameters | p. 158
• 3.1 Semantic Parameters
• 3.2 Syntactic Categories
• 4 Combinations of Lexical Functions | p. 160
• 4.1 Complex lfs
• 4.2 Compound lfs
• 4.3 LF Configurations
• 4.4 Internal Syntax of lf Combinations
• 5 Conclusion | p. 164
• A Case of Aspectual Polysemy, with Implications for Lexical Functions
  Alexander Nakhimovsky | 
• 1 Introduction | p. 169
• 2 Telic and Atelic Readings | p. 170
• 3 Atelic Perfectives in Russian | p. 174
• 4 Aspectual Functions of Oper1 in English | p. 177
• 5 Lexical Functions and Grammatical Meanings | p. 178
• On Dictionary Entries for Support Verbs: The Cases of Russian VESTI, PROVODIT′ and PROIZVODIT′
  Tilmann Reuther | 
• 1 Focussing on the Problem | p. 181
• 2 Examples from the tks and the Deribas Glossary | p. 183
• 2.1 Tks
• 2.2 Deribas Glossary
• 3 Semantic Links of Operi-Verbs | p. 187
• 3.1 Vesti
• 3.2 Provodit′/Provesti
• 3.3 Proizvodit′/Proizvesti
• 3.4 Support Verb Semantics: Step 1
• 4 Semantic Groups of Nouns in Oper-Collocations | p. 192
• 4.1 Vesti
• 4.2 Provodit′/Provesti
• 4.3 Proizvodit′/Proizvesti
• 4.4 Support Verb Semantics: Step 2
• 5 Contextual Factors for the Choice of Support Verbs | p. 199
• 5.1 Context Expressed by Adverbials of Time
• 5.2 Context Expressed by Adverbials of Manner and Instrument
• 6 Lexical Entries for the Support Verb vesti in the ecd Format | p. 201
• 7 Concluding Remarks | p. 203
• Lexical Functions and Lexical Inheritance for Emotion Lexemes in German
  Igor Mel’čuk and Leo Wanner | 
• 1 Introduction | p. 209
• 1.1 The Statement of the Problem
• 1.2 The Data
• 1.3 The Methodology
• 1.4 The Structure of the Paper
• 2 Semantic and Syntactic Information in the ECD | p. 214
• 2.1 Semantic Zone
• 2.2 Syntactic Zone
• 3 Emotion Lexemes in German | p. 215
• 3.1 Semantics of Emotion Lexemes in German
• 3.2 Government Patterns of Emotion Lexemes in German
• 3.3 Restricted Lexical Co-occurrence of Emotion Lexemes in German
• 4 Towards a More Efficient Representation of Lexicographic Information | p. 228
• 4.1 Discussion of Lexical Co-occurrence/Meaning Correlations
• 4.2 Implementing Syntactic Inheritance in an ecd
• 4.3 Implementing Lexical Inheritance Principle in an ecd
• 4.4 Full vs. Compressed Lexical Entries: angst, hoffnung, wut
• 4.5 The Lexical Entry of gefühl: the Generic Lexeme of the Semantic Field of Emotions
• 5 Conclusions | p. 241
• Some Procedural Problems in the Implementation of Lexical Functions for Text Generation
  Lidija Iordanskaja, Myung-Hee Kim and Alain Polguère | 
• 1 Introduction | p. 279
• 2 Use of Lexical Functions in the lfs/rts Systems | p. 281
• 3 General Principles behind the Implementation of Lexical Functions | p. 282
• 4 Levels of Transition Where Lexical Functions Are Used | p. 284
• 4.1 SemR ⇒ DSyntR Transition
• 4.2 DSyntR ⇒ SSyntR Transition
• 5 Encoding the Values of Lexical Functions in the Lexicon | p. 288
• 6 Implementation of Lexical Function Paraphrasing | p. 289
• 7 Lf Paraphrasing Rules Used in the lfs/rts Systems | p. 291
• 7.1 Six cases of RedSemR ⇒ DSyntR Transition Rules Using lfs
• 7.2 Criteria for Choosing Among Transition Rules
• 8 Conclusion | p. 296
• Generating Cohesive Text Using Lexical Functions
  Woongjae Lee and Martha W. Evens | 
• 1 Introduction | p. 299
• 2 The Generation Process | p. 300
• 3 The Choice of Referring Expressions | p. 302
• 4 Generating Appropriate Collocations | p. 304
• 5 The Lexical Database | p. 306
• 6 Summary | p. 306
• ruslo: An Automatic System for Derivation in Russian
  Natal'ja Percova | 
• 1 Introduction: Automatic System for Russian Derivation | p. 307
• 2 Linguistic Information in ruslo | p. 309
• 2.1 Formal Information
• 2.2 Semantic Information
• 3 Material for Further Research: Xlebnikov's Neologisms | p. 316
• Subject Index | p. 336
• Name Index | p. 353

Cited by 29 other publications

Alghamdi, Ayman & Eric Atwell

2017. Towards Comprehensive Computational Representations of Arabic Multiword Expressions. In Computational and Corpus-Based Phraseology [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 10596], ► pp. 415 ff.

Alonso Ramos, Margarita

2019. Verbos de apoyo, funciones léxicas y traducción automática. Revista de Lexicografía 6 ► pp. 155 ff.

Avgustinova, Tania & Leonid Iomdin

2019. Towards a Typology of Microsyntactic Constructions. In Computational and Corpus-Based Phraseology [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 11755], ► pp. 15 ff.

Barrios Rodríguez, María Auxiliadora

2022. Lexical Semantic Mind Maps Based on Collocations as a Tool for Teaching Vocabulary: A Case Study. In Computational and Corpus-Based Phraseology [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 13528], ► pp. 16 ff.

Bolshakov, I.A. & A. Gelbukh

2001. 2001 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. e-Systems and e-Man for Cybernetics in Cyberspace (Cat.No.01CH37236), ► pp. 1688 ff.

Bouveret, Myriam

2002. Review of Cowie (2001): Phraseology. Theory, Analysis, and Applications. Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication 8:1 ► pp. 170 ff.

Calvo, Hiram & Alexander Gelbukh

2006. DILUCT: An Open-Source Spanish Dependency Parser Based on Rules, Heuristics, and Selectional Preferences. In Natural Language Processing and Information Systems [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3999], ► pp. 164 ff.

Cortés-Rodriguez, Francisco J.

2016. Revisiting Aktionsart types for lexical classes. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 14:2 ► pp. 498 ff.

Friedman, Elie

2022. The dialectics of the securitization and desecuritization of African asylum seekers discourse in Israel. Journal of Multicultural Discourses 17:1 ► pp. 44 ff.

Fähndrich, Johannes, Sebastian Ahrndt & Sahin Albayrak

2014. Are There Semantic Primes in Formal Languages?. In Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence, 11th International Conference [Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 290], ► pp. 397 ff.

Hamel, Marie-Josée

2010. Prototype d’un dictionnaire électronique de reformulation pour apprenants avancés de français langue seconde. Recherche et pratiques pédagogiques en langues de spécialité - Cahiers de l APLIUT :Vol. XXIX N° 1 ► pp. 73 ff.

2012. Testing aspects of the usability of an online learner dictionary prototype: a product- and process-oriented study. Computer Assisted Language Learning 25:4 ► pp. 339 ff.

Khoo, Christopher S. G. & Jin-Cheon Na

2007. Semantic relations in information science. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 40:1 ► pp. 157 ff.

Lux-Pogodalla, Veronika

2020. Des graphes lexicaux pour donner à voir des motifs de confusion entre unités lexicales ?. Lidil :62

Mairal-Usón, Ricardo & Pamela Faber

2021. Rutas de acceso al léxico en un entorno lexicográfico. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 16:1 ► pp. 63 ff.

Makarova Tominec, Irina

2021. Težave pri usvajanju ruskega besedja in novi rusko-slovenski slovar za začetnike. Jezikoslovni zapiski 27:1 ► pp. 59 ff.

Milićević, Jasmina & Àngels Catena

2015. Translational Mismatches Involving Clitics (Illustrated from Serbian ~ Catalan Language Pair). In Modern Computational Models of Semantic Discovery in Natural Language [Advances in Linguistics and Communication Studies, ], ► pp. 235 ff.

Milićević, Jasmina & Marie-Josée Hamel

2008. Un dictionnaire de reformulation pour les apprenants du français langue seconde. Revue de l'Université de Moncton ► pp. 145 ff.

Montero‐Martínez, Silvia & Mercedes García de Quesada

2003. Terminological analysis for translation. Perspectives 11:4 ► pp. 293 ff.

Murphy, M. Lynne

2003. Semantic Relations and the Lexicon,

Tsedryk, Alexandra

2020. Vers le réemploi lexical en français L2 : effet d’exercices de reformulation et d’un enseignement explicite sur l’apprentissage de collocations. Repères :61

Visser, Henriëtte

1999. CALLex: a CALL game to study lexical relationships based on a semantic database. ReCALL 11:S1 ► pp. 50 ff.

Wanner, Leo, Bernd Bohnet, Nadjet Bouayad-Agha, François Lareau & Daniel Nicklaß

2010. MARQUIS: GENERATION OF USER-TAILORED MULTILINGUAL AIR QUALITY BULLETINS. Applied Artificial Intelligence 24:10 ► pp. 914 ff.

Žabokrtský, Zdeněk, Daniel Zeman & Magda Ševčíková

2020. Sentence Meaning Representations Across Languages: What Can We Learn from Existing Frameworks?. Computational Linguistics 46:3 ► pp. 605 ff.

[no author supplied]

2014. Automated Grammatical Error Detection for Language Learners, Second Edition [Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies, ],

2015. Semantics [Studies in Language Companion Series, 168],

2019. Références bibliographiques. In Le Lexique des émotions, ► pp. 329 ff.

2020. Lexical Semantics for Terminology [Terminology and Lexicography Research and Practice, 20],

2022. Конструкции с опорным глаголом в русском и итальянском языках / Support Verb Constructions. A Russian-Italian Contrastive Analysis [Biblioteca di Studi Slavistici, 49],

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Main BIC Subject

Main BISAC Subject