The Prominence of Tense, Aspect and Mood

| Central Institute of Indian Languages, Mysore
ISBN 9789027230522 (Eur) | EUR 105.00
ISBN 9781556199356 (USA) | USD 158.00
ISBN 9789027298737 | EUR 105.00 | USD 158.00
The book puts forth an exciting hypothesis for the typologist. Its major claim is that languages can generally be regarded as belonging to a tense-prominent, aspect-prominent or mood-prominent language type. This grouping can be based upon the relative prominence that languages attach to one or the other of the three verbal categories, namely tense, aspect and mood, by grammaticalizing the chosen category to a greater degree than others, and by making it more obligatory, more systematic and more pervasive than others. The grouping, however, involves a gradation, as is indeed the case with other typological groupings, with some languages manifesting the relevant characteristic more strikingly than others.
There are several characteristics that can be correlated with the relative prominence that languages attach to verbal categories. For example, tense-prominent languages tend to have mostly active but not stative verbs. They also tend to keep adjectives as a distinct category, or group them with nouns but not with verbs. Verbal forms used for foregrounding generally belong to the most prominent verbal category. These and other similar correlations make this typological classification worth pursuing. The book also contains a descriptive study of the three verbal categories.
[Studies in Language Companion Series, 49]  1999.  xii, 198 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
Cited by

Cited by 30 other publications

Baraby, Anne-Marie
2017.  In Imperatives and Directive Strategies [Studies in Language Companion Series, 184], Crossref logo
Bertinetto, Pier Marco
2020. On nominal tense . Linguistic Typology 24:2  pp. 311 ff. Crossref logo
Bisilki, Abraham & Kofi Yakpo
2020. Adjectives in Likpakpaln (Konkomba): Structural and Areal-Typological Aspects. Language Matters 51:2  pp. 3 ff. Crossref logo
Boneh, Nora & Łukasz Jędrzejowski
2019. Reflections on habituality across other grammatical categories . STUF - Language Typology and Universals 72:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Cohen, Ariel
2021. Operators vs. quantifiers: the view from linguistics. Inquiry 64:5-6  pp. 564 ff. Crossref logo
Danielsen, Swintha & Lena Terhart
2016. Realis/irrealis as a basic grammatical distinction in Southern Arawakan languages1. Revue de sémantique et pragmatique 38:38  pp. 97 ff. Crossref logo
de Santis, Leonardo & Luigi Battezzato
2020. Aoristo e perfetto nel greco tardo-antico. Glotta 96:1  pp. 246 ff. Crossref logo
Garcia Landa, Jose Angel
2010. Review of 'How to Show Things with Words' (Cómo Mostrar Cosas con Palabras) (Spanish). SSRN Electronic Journal Crossref logo
Gawne, Lauren
2020. Looks like a duck, quacks like a hand: Tools for eliciting evidential and epistemic distinctions, with examples from Lamjung Yolmo (Tibetic, Nepal). Folia Linguistica 54:2  pp. 343 ff. Crossref logo
Guerini, Federica
2009. Review of Ameka & Kropp Dakubu (2008): Aspect and Modality in Kwa Languages. Studies in Language 33:1  pp. 247 ff. Crossref logo
Guérin, Valérie
2017.  In The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology,  pp. 911 ff. Crossref logo
Hölzl, Andreas
2015. A typology of negation in Tungusic. Studies in Language 39:1  pp. 118 ff. Crossref logo
Janik, Marta Olga, Oliwia Szymańska & Barbara Łukaszewicz
2018. Setninger I Norsk Og Polsk – Definisjoner Og Inndelinger. Folia Scandinavica Posnaniensia 25:1  pp. 22 ff. Crossref logo
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
2019.  In World Lexicon of Grammaticalization, Crossref logo
Levinsohn, Stephen H.
2020.  In Perfects in Indo-European Languages and Beyond [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 352],  pp. 616 ff. Crossref logo
2005. Contrastive Analysis and Feature Selection for Korean Modal Expression in Chinese-Korean Machine Translation System. International Journal of Computer Processing of Languages 18:03  pp. 227 ff. Crossref logo
Lieber, Rochelle
2015.  In Introducing Morphology, Crossref logo
Martínez-Areta, Mikel
2020.  In Historical Linguistics 2017 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 350],  pp. 144 ff. Crossref logo
Mettouchi, Amina
2012. Linguistique berbère. École pratique des hautes études. Section des sciences historiques et philologiques. Livret-Annuaire :143  pp. 47 ff. Crossref logo
Mirsanov, Gaybullo K.
2018. ROLE OF QUANTIFIERS IN THE FORMATION OF ASPECTUAL SITUATION (IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE). Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University (Linguistics) :2  pp. 109 ff. Crossref logo
Narrog, Heiko
2017.  In The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology,  pp. 151 ff. Crossref logo
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen
2002. Recent activity in the theory of aspect: Accomplishments, achievements, or just non-progressive state?. Linguistic Typology 6:2 Crossref logo
Souza, Edson Rosa Francisco de & Paulo Henrique Pereira Silva de Felipe
2017. As relações de escopo entre tempo e aspecto em línguas indígenas da família Pano. LIAMES: Línguas Indígenas Americanas 17:2  pp. 363 ff. Crossref logo
Tatevosov, Sergei
2005.  In Perspectives on Aspect,  pp. 181 ff. Crossref logo
Tatevosov, Sergej
2003. The parameter of actionality. Linguistic Typology 6:3 Crossref logo
Tavangar, Manoochehr & Mohammad Amouzadeh
2006. Deictic projection: An inquiry into the future-oriented past tense in Persian*. Studia Linguistica 60:1  pp. 97 ff. Crossref logo
Tournadre, Nicolas & Pierre Cadiot
2015. La défectivité du TAM dans les énoncés de sens figuré. Syntaxe et Sémantique N° 16:1  pp. 39 ff. Crossref logo
Vajda, Edward J.
2003.  Werner Abraham and Leonid Kulikov, eds. Tense-Aspect, Transitivity and Causativity. In the series Studies in Language Companion 50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1999. Pp. xxxiv + 359. US$105.00 (hardcover).. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 48:1-2  pp. 109 ff. Crossref logo
Velupillai, Viveka
2016. Partitioning the timeline. Studies in Language 40:1  pp. 93 ff. Crossref logo
Wu, Tianqi & Min Wang
2022. Development of the progressive construction in Chinese EFL learners’ written production: From prototypes to marginal members. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 18:2  pp. 307 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 july 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects & Metadata


BIC Subject: CF – Linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  99011172 | Marc record