The Prominence of Tense, Aspect and Mood
Author
The book puts forth an exciting hypothesis for the typologist. Its major claim is that languages can generally be regarded as belonging to a tense-prominent, aspect-prominent or mood-prominent language type. This grouping can be based upon the relative prominence that languages attach to one or the other of the three verbal categories, namely tense, aspect and mood, by grammaticalizing the chosen category to a greater degree than others, and by making it more obligatory, more systematic and more pervasive than others. The grouping, however, involves a gradation, as is indeed the case with other typological groupings, with some languages manifesting the relevant characteristic more strikingly than others.
There are several characteristics that can be correlated with the relative prominence that languages attach to verbal categories. For example, tense-prominent languages tend to have mostly active but not stative verbs. They also tend to keep adjectives as a distinct category, or group them with nouns but not with verbs. Verbal forms used for foregrounding generally belong to the most prominent verbal category. These and other similar correlations make this typological classification worth pursuing. The book also contains a descriptive study of the three verbal categories.
There are several characteristics that can be correlated with the relative prominence that languages attach to verbal categories. For example, tense-prominent languages tend to have mostly active but not stative verbs. They also tend to keep adjectives as a distinct category, or group them with nouns but not with verbs. Verbal forms used for foregrounding generally belong to the most prominent verbal category. These and other similar correlations make this typological classification worth pursuing. The book also contains a descriptive study of the three verbal categories.
[Studies in Language Companion Series, 49] 1999. xii, 198 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Preface | p. ix
-
List of Abbreviations | p. xi
-
Chapter 1: Introduction | p. 1
-
1.1 Universalistic and Differentiating Approaches
-
1.2 Nature of the present study
-
1.3 Organisation of the monograph
-
Part 1: A Descriptive Study
-
Chapter 2: Category of Tense | p. 13
-
2.1 Introduction
-
2.2 Deictic tense
-
2.3 Non-deictic tense
-
2.4 Distance from the reference point
-
2.5 Use of temporal adverbials
-
Chapter 3: Category of Aspect | p. 43
-
3.1 Introduction
-
3.2 Perfective and imperfective
-
3.3 Phasal aspects
-
3.4 Quantificational aspects
-
3.5 Situational and viewpoint aspects
-
3.6 Use of aspectual adverbials
-
Chapter 4: Category of Mood | p. 63
-
4.1 Introduction
-
4.2 Epistemic mood
-
4.3 Deontic Mood
-
4.4 Epistemic moods and interrogatives
-
4.5 Deontic moods and imperatives
-
4.6 Use of modal adverbials
-
Part 2: A Typological Study
-
Chapter 5: Basis of the Typology | p. 91
-
5.1 Introduction
-
5.2 Basis of tense-aspect-mood variation
-
5.3 Possibility of using alternative categories
-
5.4 Criteria for prominence
-
5.5 Nature of generalizations
-
5.6 Bias in grammars
-
5.7 Need for diachronic considerations
-
5.8 Correctable characteristics
-
Chapter 6: Classification of Languages | p. 103
-
6.1 Introduction
-
6.2 Tense-prominent languages
-
6.3 Aspect-prominent languages
-
6.4 Mood-prominent languages
-
6.5 Summary
-
Chapter 7: Correlatable Characteristics | p. 141
-
7.1 Introduction
-
7.2 Effects of decategorization
-
7.3 Ergativity split
-
7.4 Tensedness parameter
-
7.5 Absence of state verbs
-
7.6 Variations in the mode of encoding the categories
-
7.7 Differing points of view
-
7.8 Foregrounding sequential events
-
7.9 Paths of grammaticalization
-
7.10 Conclusion
-
-
Index | p. 193
Cited by
Cited by 38 other publications
Baraby, Anne-Marie
2017. Imperatives and evidentiality in Innu. In Imperatives and Directive Strategies [Studies in Language Companion Series, 184], 
Bisilki, Abraham & Kofi Yakpo
Boneh, Nora & Łukasz Jędrzejowski
Cohen, Ariel
Collart, Aymeric & Hung-Kuan Su
2022. Expressing the existence of an event with ‘you (to have) + VP’ in Taiwan Mandarin. Concentric. Studies in Linguistics 48:2 ► pp. 249 ff. 
Collart, Aymeric & Elizabeth Zeitoun
Danielsen, Swintha & Lena Terhart
de Santis, Leonardo & Luigi Battezzato
Garcia Landa, Jose Angel
Gawne, Lauren
Guerini, Federica
2009. Review of Ameka & Kropp Dakubu (2008): Aspect and Modality in Kwa Languages. Studies in Language 33:1 ► pp. 247 ff. 
Guérin, Valérie
Hölzl, Andreas
Janik, Marta Olga, Oliwia Szymańska & Barbara Łukaszewicz
KAMACI GENCER, Duygu
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
Levinsohn, Stephen H.
2020. Chapter 18. The perfect in context in texts in English, Sistani Balochi and New Testament Greek. In Perfects in Indo-European Languages and Beyond [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 352], ► pp. 616 ff. 
Li, Dongqi
LI, JIN-JI, JI-EUN ROH, DONG-IL KIM & JONG-HYEOK LEE
Martínez-Areta, Mikel
2020. Ergative from passive in Proto-Basque. In Historical Linguistics 2017 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 350], ► pp. 144 ff. 
Mettouchi, Amina
Mirsanov, Gaybullo K.
Narrog, Heiko
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen
Sharma, Ghanshyam
Souza, Edson Rosa Francisco de & Paulo Henrique Pereira Silva de Felipe
Tatevosov, Sergei
Tavangar, Manoochehr & Mohammad Amouzadeh
Tournadre, Nicolas & Pierre Cadiot
Vajda, Edward J.
Velupillai, Viveka
Win, Lai Yee & Fang Geng
Wu, Tianqi & Min Wang
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.