The Prominence of Tense, Aspect and Mood
| Central Institute of Indian Languages, Mysore
The book puts forth an exciting hypothesis for the typologist. Its major claim is that languages can generally be regarded as belonging to a tense-prominent, aspect-prominent or mood-prominent language type. This grouping can be based upon the relative prominence that languages attach to one or the other of the three verbal categories, namely tense, aspect and mood, by grammaticalizing the chosen category to a greater degree than others, and by making it more obligatory, more systematic and more pervasive than others. The grouping, however, involves a gradation, as is indeed the case with other typological groupings, with some languages manifesting the relevant characteristic more strikingly than others.
There are several characteristics that can be correlated with the relative prominence that languages attach to verbal categories. For example, tense-prominent languages tend to have mostly active but not stative verbs. They also tend to keep adjectives as a distinct category, or group them with nouns but not with verbs. Verbal forms used for foregrounding generally belong to the most prominent verbal category. These and other similar correlations make this typological classification worth pursuing. The book also contains a descriptive study of the three verbal categories.
There are several characteristics that can be correlated with the relative prominence that languages attach to verbal categories. For example, tense-prominent languages tend to have mostly active but not stative verbs. They also tend to keep adjectives as a distinct category, or group them with nouns but not with verbs. Verbal forms used for foregrounding generally belong to the most prominent verbal category. These and other similar correlations make this typological classification worth pursuing. The book also contains a descriptive study of the three verbal categories.
[Studies in Language Companion Series, 49] 1999. xii, 198 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Preface | p. ix
-
List of Abbreviations | p. xi
-
Chapter 1: Introduction | p. 1
-
1.1 Universalistic and Differentiating Approaches
-
1.2 Nature of the present study
-
1.3 Organisation of the monograph
-
Part 1: A Descriptive Study
-
Chapter 2: Category of Tense | p. 13
-
2.1 Introduction
-
2.2 Deictic tense
-
2.3 Non-deictic tense
-
2.4 Distance from the reference point
-
2.5 Use of temporal adverbials
-
Chapter 3: Category of Aspect | p. 43
-
3.1 Introduction
-
3.2 Perfective and imperfective
-
3.3 Phasal aspects
-
3.4 Quantificational aspects
-
3.5 Situational and viewpoint aspects
-
3.6 Use of aspectual adverbials
-
Chapter 4: Category of Mood | p. 63
-
4.1 Introduction
-
4.2 Epistemic mood
-
4.3 Deontic Mood
-
4.4 Epistemic moods and interrogatives
-
4.5 Deontic moods and imperatives
-
4.6 Use of modal adverbials
-
Part 2: A Typological Study
-
Chapter 5: Basis of the Typology | p. 91
-
5.1 Introduction
-
5.2 Basis of tense-aspect-mood variation
-
5.3 Possibility of using alternative categories
-
5.4 Criteria for prominence
-
5.5 Nature of generalizations
-
5.6 Bias in grammars
-
5.7 Need for diachronic considerations
-
5.8 Correctable characteristics
-
Chapter 6: Classification of Languages | p. 103
-
6.1 Introduction
-
6.2 Tense-prominent languages
-
6.3 Aspect-prominent languages
-
6.4 Mood-prominent languages
-
6.5 Summary
-
Chapter 7: Correlatable Characteristics | p. 141
-
7.1 Introduction
-
7.2 Effects of decategorization
-
7.3 Ergativity split
-
7.4 Tensedness parameter
-
7.5 Absence of state verbs
-
7.6 Variations in the mode of encoding the categories
-
7.7 Differing points of view
-
7.8 Foregrounding sequential events
-
7.9 Paths of grammaticalization
-
7.10 Conclusion
-
-
Index | p. 193
Cited by
Cited by 30 other publications
Baraby, Anne-Marie
2017.
In Imperatives and Directive Strategies [Studies in Language Companion Series, 184],
Bertinetto, Pier Marco
2020. On nominal tense
.
Linguistic Typology 24:2 ► pp. 311 ff.
Bisilki, Abraham & Kofi Yakpo
2020. Adjectives in Likpakpaln (Konkomba): Structural and Areal-Typological Aspects.
Language Matters 51:2 ► pp. 3 ff.
Boneh, Nora & Łukasz Jędrzejowski
2019. Reflections on habituality across other grammatical categories
.
STUF - Language Typology and Universals 72:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Cohen, Ariel
2021. Operators vs. quantifiers: the view from linguistics.
Inquiry 64:5-6 ► pp. 564 ff.
Danielsen, Swintha & Lena Terhart
2016. Realis/irrealis as a basic grammatical distinction in Southern Arawakan languages1.
Revue de sémantique et pragmatique 38:38 ► pp. 97 ff.
de Santis, Leonardo & Luigi Battezzato
2020. Aoristo e perfetto nel greco tardo-antico.
Glotta 96:1 ► pp. 246 ff.
Garcia Landa, Jose Angel
2010. Review of 'How to Show Things with Words' (Cómo Mostrar Cosas con Palabras) (Spanish).
SSRN Electronic Journal
Gawne, Lauren
2020. Looks like a duck, quacks like a hand: Tools for eliciting evidential and epistemic distinctions, with examples from Lamjung Yolmo (Tibetic, Nepal).
Folia Linguistica 54:2 ► pp. 343 ff.
Guerini, Federica
2009. Review of Ameka & Kropp Dakubu (2008): Aspect and Modality in Kwa Languages.
Studies in Language 33:1 ► pp. 247 ff.
Guérin, Valérie
2017.
In The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology,
► pp. 911 ff.
Hölzl, Andreas
2015. A typology of negation in Tungusic.
Studies in Language 39:1 ► pp. 118 ff.
Janik, Marta Olga, Oliwia Szymańska & Barbara Łukaszewicz
2018. Setninger I Norsk Og Polsk – Definisjoner Og Inndelinger.
Folia Scandinavica Posnaniensia 25:1 ► pp. 22 ff.
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
2019.
In World Lexicon of Grammaticalization,
Levinsohn, Stephen H.
2020.
In Perfects in Indo-European Languages and Beyond [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 352],
► pp. 616 ff.
LI, JIN-JI, JI-EUN ROH, DONG-IL KIM & JONG-HYEOK LEE
2005. Contrastive Analysis and Feature Selection for Korean Modal Expression in Chinese-Korean Machine Translation System.
International Journal of Computer Processing of Languages 18:03 ► pp. 227 ff.
Lieber, Rochelle
2015.
In Introducing Morphology,
Martínez-Areta, Mikel
2020.
In Historical Linguistics 2017 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 350],
► pp. 144 ff.
Mettouchi, Amina
2012. Linguistique berbère.
École pratique des hautes études. Section des sciences historiques et philologiques. Livret-Annuaire :143 ► pp. 47 ff.
Mirsanov, Gaybullo K.
2018. ROLE OF QUANTIFIERS IN THE FORMATION OF ASPECTUAL SITUATION (IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE).
Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University (Linguistics) :2 ► pp. 109 ff.
Narrog, Heiko
2017.
In The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology,
► pp. 151 ff.
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen
2002. Recent activity in the theory of aspect: Accomplishments, achievements, or just non-progressive state?.
Linguistic Typology 6:2
Souza, Edson Rosa Francisco de & Paulo Henrique Pereira Silva de Felipe
2017. As relações de escopo entre tempo e aspecto em línguas indígenas da família Pano.
LIAMES: Línguas Indígenas Americanas 17:2 ► pp. 363 ff.
Tatevosov, Sergei
2005.
In Perspectives on Aspect,
► pp. 181 ff.
Tatevosov, Sergej
2003. The parameter of actionality.
Linguistic Typology 6:3
Tavangar, Manoochehr & Mohammad Amouzadeh
2006. Deictic projection: An inquiry into the future-oriented past tense in Persian*.
Studia Linguistica 60:1 ► pp. 97 ff.
Tournadre, Nicolas & Pierre Cadiot
2015. La défectivité du TAM dans les énoncés de sens figuré.
Syntaxe et Sémantique N° 16:1 ► pp. 39 ff.
Vajda, Edward J.
2003.
Werner Abraham and Leonid Kulikov, eds. Tense-Aspect, Transitivity and Causativity. In the series Studies in Language Companion
50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1999. Pp. xxxiv + 359. US$105.00 (hardcover)..
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 48:1-2 ► pp. 109 ff.
Velupillai, Viveka
2016. Partitioning the timeline.
Studies in Language 40:1 ► pp. 93 ff.
Wu, Tianqi & Min Wang
2022. Development of the progressive construction in Chinese EFL learners’ written production: From prototypes to marginal members.
Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 18:2 ► pp. 307 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 july 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.