Communicative Organization in Natural Language
The semantic-communicative structure of sentences
The book defines the concept of Semantic-Communicative Structure [= Sem-CommS]-a formal object that is imposed on the starting Semantic Structure [= SemS] of a sentence (under text synthesis) in order to turn the selected meaning into a linguistic message. The Sem-CommS is a system of eight logically independent oppositions: 1. Thematicity (Rheme vs. Theme), 2. Givenness (Given vs. Old), 3. Focalization (Focalized vs. Non-Focalized), 4. Perspective (Foregrounded vs. Backgrounded), 5. Emphasis (Emphasized vs. Non-Emphasized), 6. Presupposedness (Presupposed vs. Non-Presupposed), 7. Unitariness (Unitary vs. Articulated), 8. Locutionality (Communicated vs. Signaled). The values of these oppositions mark particular subnetworks of the starting SemS and thus allow for the distinction between sentences such as (a) A man killed a dog vs. The dog was killed by a man, (b) John washed the window vs. It was John who washed the window or (c) It hurts! vs. Ouch! The proposed Sem-Comm-oppositions are conceived as an attempt at sharpening the well-known notions of Topic ~ Comment, Focus, etc. Possible linguistic strategies for expressing the values of the Sem-Comm-oppositions in different languages are discussed at some length, with linguistic illustrations.
[Studies in Language Companion Series, 57] 2001. xii, 393 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Introduction: Six Basic Questions Answered | p. 1
-
I. General Characterization of the Semantic-Communicative Structure of Sentences | p. 15
-
II. Basic Categories of Semantic-Communicative Structure | p. 93
-
III. Sem-Comm-Oppositions: Linguistic Comments and Illustrations | p. 273
-
-
Subject Index | p. 381
-
Name Index | p. 389
-
Language Index | p. 391
“Mel'cuk's approach to communicative organization is another important contribution to our thinking about the need for crystal-clear definitions when working with linguistic phenomena and their dimensions of variation. It is rather difficult for a reviewer to find points for negative criticism. To sum up, the book is to be recommended to anyone working in the domain of Information Packaging from any perspective. It will not fail to stimulate both functionalists/typologists and formal linguists to get rid of terminological and notional vagueness when addressing the problem of what is communicated through natural language utterances.”
Andrea Sanso', University of Pavia, Italy in Linguist List Vol-13-1852, 2002
Cited by (39)
Cited by 39 other publications
Erjavec, Tomaž
Levy, Paulette & Teodoro Juárez Esteban
Rygaev, Ivan
Hernández-Green, Néstor
Domínguez, Mónica, Mireia Farrús & Leo Wanner
Mel’čuk, Igor Aleksandrovich
Fang, Yu & Haitao Liu
Iordanskaja, Lidija & Igor Mel’čuk
2021. Minimodel of semantic synthesis of Russian sentences.
Lingvisticae Investigationes
44:1 ► pp. 101 ff.
Ruiz Yepes, Guadalupe
Sun, Weiwei, Yufei Chen, Xiaojun Wan & Meichun Liu
Schlund, Katrin
Gaatone, David
Inglis, Douglas
2017. Khamti Shan anti-ergative construction. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 40:2 ► pp. 133 ff.
Ritchie, Sandy
Sanromán Vilas, Begoña
Sobotka, Piotr & Magdalena Żabowska
Gargett, Andrew, Simon Mille & John Barnden
Milićević, Jasmina & Àngels Catena
Kozlova, Inna
Mazziotta, Nicolas
2014. Coordination of verbal dependents in Old French. In Dependency Linguistics [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 215], ► pp. 141 ff.
Polguère, Alain
Tremblay, Antoine & David Beck
Zhang, Hongxin & Haitao Liu
Torterat, Frédéric
Wanner, Leo, Bernd Bohnet, Nadjet Bouayad-Agha, François Lareau & Daniel Nicklaß
Alonso Ramos, Margarita & Leo Wanner
Kenkel, James & Robert Yates
Beck, David
Jousse, Anne-Laure, Alain Polguère & Ophélie Tremblay
da Cunha, Iria, Silvia Fernández, Patricia Velázquez Morales, Jorge Vivaldi, Eric SanJuan & Juan Manuel Torres-Moreno
Mel’čuk, Igor & Leo Wanner
Kahane, Sylvain & Igor Mel’čuk
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Main BIC Subject
CF: Linguistics
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General