Agency and Impersonality
Their Linguistic and Cultural Manifestations
Author
In this monograph the author probes the fundamental nature of the concept of agency and its importance to human language and cognition. Whereas previous studies focused on grammatical manifestations this original work addresses such issues as the strong relationship between agency and responsibility, a philosophical interpretation of the concept of agency and a variety of epistemic attitudes towards agency that strongly influence our view of the world. Different cultures and languages process and express agency differently. To illustrate the co-relation between the linguistic expressions of agency and cultural stereotypes that lurk behind individual natural languages, the author analyses Japanese and English parallel corpora. It is shown that English tends to highlight agency in expressing actions and events, whereas Japanese largely obfuscates agency through impersonalising potential agents. Through the case studies on these languages this book sheds light on the close connection between language, thought and culture and contributes to the resurging interest in linguistic relativity.
[Studies in Language Companion Series, 78] 2006. x, 152 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
Acknowledgements |
ix
|
List of Abbreviations |
xi
|
1. Introduction
|
1–9
|
2. What is agency?
|
11–37
|
3. Linguistic treatment of agency and its manifestations in Japanese and English: With reference to the concept of ‘impersonality’
|
39–69
|
4. Agency, impersonality and world-view: With reference to linguistic and socio-cultural relativity
|
71–117
|
5. Some enigmas concerning agency, impersonality and ‘reality’
|
119–130
|
Notes
|
131–136
|
References
|
137–144
|
Index
|
145–151
|
“I found this book always interesting to read, due to the author's wit and entertaining style of writing, which is truly admirable.”
Heiko Narrog, Tohoku University, on Linguist List http://linguistlist.org/issues/18/18-402, 2007
Cited by
Cited by 17 other publications
Binder, Jeffrey R., Lisa L. Conant, Colin J. Humphries, Leonardo Fernandino, Stephen B. Simons, Mario Aguilar & Rutvik H. Desai
Conti, Luz
Gardelle, Laure & Sandrine Sorlin
Höglund, Mikko
2014. Active and passive infinitive, ambiguity and non-canonical subject with ready. In Corpus Interrogation and Grammatical Patterns [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 63], ► pp. 239 ff. 
Livnat, Zohar
Lorés-Sanz, Rosa & Isabel Herrando-Rodrigo
Nelson, Diane & Virve-Anneli Vihman
Perera, C. K. & A. K. Srivastava
Pizarro Pedraza, Andrea & Barbara De Cock
2022. Taboo effects at the syntactic level. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 113 ff. 
Toivonen, Heidi
Toivonen, Heidi & Marco Caracciolo
Vihman, Virve-Anneli & Diane Nelson
Wang, Yong
Wang, Yong & Yingfang Zhou
Wolf, Oliver Olsen & Geraint A. Wiggins
Zhang, Weiwei, Dirk Geeraerts & Dirk Speelman
杨, 格晴
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects & Metadata
Linguistics
BIC Subject: CF – Linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General