Part of
Anaphors in Text: Cognitive, formal and applied approaches to anaphoric referenceEdited by Monika Schwarz-Friesel, Manfred Consten and Mareile Knees
[Studies in Language Companion Series 86] 2007
► pp. 145–164
Edited by Monika Schwarz-Friesel, Manfred Consten and Mareile Knees
[Studies in Language Companion Series 86] 2007
► pp. 145–164
The non-subject bias of German demonstrative pronouns
This paper presents evidence from both corpus studies and psycholinguistic experiments regarding the referential preferences of German personal pronouns (er sie, es) and demonstrative pronouns (der die, das). Both types of pronouns are naturally used in German to refer to both animate and inanimate referents, but they appear to have different preferences with respect to their choice of antecedents: While personal pronouns show a slight preference for antecedents which are grammatical subjects, demonstrative pronouns show a strong bias for non-subject antecedents.
Cited by
Cited by 34 other publications
Baumann, Peter, Lars Konieczny & Barbara Hemforth
2014. Conversational Implicatures in Anaphora Resolution: Alternative Constructions and Referring Expressions. In Psycholinguistic Approaches to Meaning and Understanding across Languages [Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, 44], ► pp. 197 ff. 
Becker, Martin, Jakob Egetenmeyer & Stefan Hinterwimmer
2021. Perspective in German and French: Divergences in Formal Marking and Temporal Anchoring. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 51:2 ► pp. 321 ff.
Bittner, Dagmar & Milena Kuehnast
2012. Comprehension of intersentential pronouns in child German and child Bulgarian. First Language 32:1-2 ► pp. 176 ff.
BLYTHING, Liam P., Maialen IRAOLA AZPIROZ, Shanley ALLEN, Regina HERT & Juhani JÄRVIKIVI
2022. The influence of prominence cues in 7- to 10-year-olds’ pronoun resolution: Disentangling order of mention, grammatical role, and semantic role. Journal of Child Language 49:5 ► pp. 930 ff.
Bott, Oliver & Torgrim Solstad
2023. The production of referring expressions is influenced by the likelihood of next mention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 76:10 ► pp. 2256 ff.
Burmester, Juliane, Antje Sauermann, Katharina Spalek & Isabell Wartenburger
2018. Sensitivity to salience: linguistic vs. visual cues affect sentence processing and pronoun resolution. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 33:6 ► pp. 784 ff.
CHAMORRO, GLORIA, ANTONELLA SORACE & PATRICK STURT
2016. What is the source of L1 attrition? The effect of recent L1 re-exposure on Spanish speakers under L1 attrition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19:3 ► pp. 520 ff.
COLE, MARCELLE
2017. Pronominal anaphoric strategies in the West Saxon dialect of Old English. English Language and Linguistics 21:2 ► pp. 381 ff.
Colonna, Saveria, Sarah Schimke & Barbara Hemforth
2014. Information Structure and Pronoun Resolution in German and French: Evidence from the Visual-World Paradigm. In Psycholinguistic Approaches to Meaning and Understanding across Languages [Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, 44], ► pp. 175 ff.
García-Sierra, Adrián, Juan Silva-Pereyra, Graciela Catalina Alatorre-Cruz & Noelle Wig
2021. An Event-Related Brain Potential (ERP) Study of Complex Anaphora in Spanish. Frontiers in Psychology 12
Hert, Regina, Juhani Järvikivi & Anja Arnhold
2024. The Importance of Linguistic Factors: He Likes Subject Referents. Cognitive Science 48:4
Hinterwimmer, Stefan
2020. Zum Zusammenspiel von Erzähler- und Protagonistenperspektive in den Brenner-Romanen von Wolf Haas. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 48:3 ► pp. 529 ff.
Hoffmann, Thomas
2015. Cognitive Sociolinguistic Aspects of Football Chants: The Role of Social and Physical Context in Usage-based Construction Grammar. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 63:3 ► pp. 273 ff.
Jonasson, Kerstin
2009. Formes lexicales et pronominales dans des chaînes de référence en français et suédois. Syntaxe & Sémantique N° 10:1 ► pp. 111 ff.
Järvikivi, Juhani, Pirita Pyykkönen-Klauck, Sarah Schimke, Saveria Colonna & Barbara Hemforth
2014. Information structure cues for 4-year-olds and adults: tracking eye movements to visually presented anaphoric referents. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 29:7 ► pp. 877 ff.
Kuehnast, Milena & Eva Meier
2019. Implicit causality of action verbs at the interface between conceptual structure and discourse coherence relations. Questions and Answers in Linguistics 5:1 ► pp. 11 ff.
Kunz, Kerstin & Erich Steiner
2012. Towards a comparison of cohesive reference in English and German. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 6:1-3 ► pp. 219 ff.
Lam, Suet‐Ying & Heeju Hwang
2022. How Does Topicality Affect the Choice of Referential Form? Evidence From Mandarin. Cognitive Science 46:10
Masiero, Federica
2018. Die Übersetzung des Possessivpronomens dritter Person bei Bezugsambiguitäten: eine kontrastive Studie Deutsch / Italienisch. Lebende Sprachen 63:1 ► pp. 168 ff.
Eric Mathieu & Robert Truswell
2017. Micro-change and Macro-change in Diachronic Syntax,
Patterson, Clare & Petra B. Schumacher
2021. Interpretation preferences in contexts with three antecedents: examining the role of prominence in German pronouns. Applied Psycholinguistics 42:6 ► pp. 1427 ff.
Patterson, Clare, Petra B. Schumacher, Bruno Nicenboim, Johannes Hagen & Andrew Kehler
2022. A Bayesian Approach to German Personal and Demonstrative Pronouns. Frontiers in Psychology 12
Petrova, Svetlana
2018. Discourse prominence and the selection of anaphora – evidence from pronouns in historical German. In Linguistic Foundations of Narration in Spoken and Sign Languages [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 247], ► pp. 93 ff.
Roberts, Leah, Marianne Gullberg & Peter Indefrey
2008. ONLINE PRONOUN RESOLUTION IN L2 DISCOURSE: L1 Influence and General Learner Effects. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 30:3 ► pp. 333 ff.
Sauermann, Antje & Natalia Gagarina
2017. Grammatical Role Parallelism Influences Ambiguous Pronoun Resolution in German. Frontiers in Psychology 8
Schimke, Sarah, Israel de la Fuente, Barbara Hemforth & Saveria Colonna
2018. First Language Influence on Second Language Offline and Online Ambiguous Pronoun Resolution. Language Learning 68:3 ► pp. 744 ff.
Schumacher, Petra B., Jana Backhaus & Manuel Dangl
2015. Backward- and Forward-Looking Potential of Anaphors. Frontiers in Psychology 6
Schwarz, Florian
2013. Two Kinds of Definites Cross‐linguistically. Language and Linguistics Compass 7:10 ► pp. 534 ff.
Speyer, Augustin
2018. A centering theoretic account for the changing usage of anaphoric expressions in the history of German. In Linguistic Foundations of Narration in Spoken and Sign Languages [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 247], ► pp. 119 ff.
Tomaszewicz-Özakın, Barbara & Petra B. Schumacher
2022. Anaphoric Pronouns and the Computation of Prominence Profiles. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 51:3 ► pp. 627 ff.
VAN KEMENADE, ANS
2017. A response to Cole. English Language and Linguistics 21:2 ► pp. 409 ff.
Vogel, Ralf
2019. Grammatical taboos. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 38:1 ► pp. 37 ff.
Yoo, Myung Hye & Rebecca Tollan
2023. Transitivity and non-uniform subjecthood in agreement attraction. Memory & Cognition
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.