Part of
Language Complexity: Typology, contact, changeEdited by Matti Miestamo, Kaius Sinnemäki and Fred Karlsson
[Studies in Language Companion Series 94] 2008
► pp. 265–285
Edited by Matti Miestamo, Kaius Sinnemäki and Fred Karlsson
[Studies in Language Companion Series 94] 2008
► pp. 265–285
The simplicity of creoles in a cross-linguistic perspective
This paper discusses the possibility of quantifying complexity in languages in general, and in creoles in particular. It argues that creoles are indeed different from non-creoles, primarily in being less complex. While this has been argued before, this is the first attempt to prove it through the use of an extensive typological database. It is noteworthy that the diff ering complexity is not related to the relative lack of morphology in creoles, since they are also simpler than analytical languages. Finally, the parallels between pidgins and creoles (and in particular the fact that languages sociologically intermediate between the two categories are also structurally intermediate) support the increasingly questioned belief that pidgins are born out of pidgins.
Cited by
Cited by 51 other publications
Agostinho, Ana Lívia
2023. Word prosody of African versus European-origin words in Afro-European creoles. Linguistic Typology 27:2 ► pp. 481 ff. 
Andrason, Alexander
2021. Сашко-lect: The translanguaged grammar of a hyper multilingual global nomad. Part 3 – Contact languages and translanguaging. Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis 138:3 ► pp. 119 ff.
Bakker, Peter
Bakker, Peter
2015. Creoles, creole studies and sign languages. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 30:2 ► pp. 357 ff.
Bakker, Peter
2015. Creole languages have no… — but they do have…. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 30:1 ► pp. 167 ff.
Bakker, Peter
2016. You got Gungbe, but we got the numbers. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 31:2 ► pp. 419 ff.
Bakker, Peter
2016. Creoles as hybrid languages. <i>WORD</i> 62:4 ► pp. 228 ff.
Bakker, Peter
2017. Chapter 16. Feature pools show that creoles are distinct languages due to their special origin. In Creole Studies – Phylogenetic Approaches, ► pp. 369 ff.
Bakker, Peter
2017. Chapter 2. Key concepts in the history of creole studies. In Creole Studies – Phylogenetic Approaches, ► pp. 5 ff.
Bakker, Peter
Bakker, Peter & Aymeric Daval-Markussen
2013. Creole studies in the 21st century: A brief presentation of the special issue on creole languages. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 45:2 ► pp. 141 ff.
Benítez-Burraco, Antonio & Steven Moran
2024. Editorial: The adaptive value of languages: non-linguistic causes of language diversity, volume II. Frontiers in Psychology 15
Berdicevskis, Aleksandrs, Arturs Semenuks & Vera Kempe
2022. Imperfect language learning reduces morphological overspecification: Experimental evidence. PLOS ONE 17:1 ► pp. e0262876 ff.
Bisang, Walter
2015. Hidden complexity – The neglected side of complexity and its implications. Linguistics Vanguard 1:1 ► pp. 177 ff.
Blasi, Damián E., Susanne Maria Michaelis & Martin Haspelmath
2017. Grammars are robustly transmitted even during the emergence of creole languages. Nature Human Behaviour 1:10 ► pp. 723 ff.
Blaxter, Tamsin
2021. Diachronic dialectology: new methods and case studies. Transactions of the Philological Society 119:S1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Daval-Markussen, Aymeric
2013. First steps towards a typological profile of creoles. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 45:2 ► pp. 274 ff.
Daval-Markussen, Aymeric & Peter Bakker
Fedorova, Kapitolina
2021. The choice of forms in contact varieties. In Language Contact in the Territory of the Former Soviet Union [IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society, 50],
Foltz, Anouschka
2022. Chapter 3. Beyond the English passive. In Syntactic Priming in Language Acquisition [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 31], ► pp. 35 ff.
Fon Sing, Guillaume
Forker, Diana
2021. Complexity and Its Relation to Variation. Frontiers in Communication 6
Galarza Ballester, Maria Teresa
2016. A socio-historical account of the formation of the creole language of Antigua. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 31:2 ► pp. 288 ff.
Gil, David
2020. Chapter 3. Dual heritage. In Austronesian Undressed [Typological Studies in Language, 129], ► pp. 119 ff.
Gil, David
2021. Tense–aspect–mood marking, language-family size and the evolution of predication. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 376:1824
Goldshtein, Yonatan
2017. Chapter 9. The simple emerging from the complex. In Creole Studies – Phylogenetic Approaches, ► pp. 193 ff.
Hackert, Stephanie
2021. Creole Distinctiveness?. In English and Spanish, ► pp. 92 ff.
Haspelmath, Martin & Susanne Maria Michaelis
2017. Analytic and synthetic. In Language Variation - European Perspectives VI [Studies in Language Variation, 19], ► pp. 3 ff.
Henri, Fabiola
2021. Morphomic structure in Mauritian Kreol: On change, complexity and creolization. Morphology 31:4 ► pp. 447 ff.
Henri, Fabiola & Olivier Bonami
2019. Prédire l’agglutination de l’article en mauricien. Faits de Langues 49:1 ► pp. 113 ff.
Hickey, Raymond
2020. Contact and Language Shift. In The Handbook of Language Contact, ► pp. 149 ff.
Holz Nunes, Ariele Helena & Ana Lívia Agostinho
2022. Propriedades estruturais dos ideofones no kreyòl. Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos 64 ► pp. e022019 ff.
Jacobs, Bart
2023. Guyanais vs. Gardiol: Broken transmission vs. grammatical continuity. Lingua 296 ► pp. 103625 ff.
Jacobs, Bart & Mikael Parkvall
2021. How ‘Portuguese’ are Palenquero and Chabacano really?. Revue Romane. Langue et littérature. International Journal of Romance Languages and Literatures 56:2 ► pp. 235 ff.
Jourdan, Christine
2021. Pidgins and Creoles: Debates and Issues. Annual Review of Anthropology 50:1 ► pp. 363 ff.
Kouwenberg, Silvia & John Victor Singler
2018. Creolization in Context: Historical and Typological Perspectives. Annual Review of Linguistics 4:1 ► pp. 213 ff.
Laub, Robert W.
2021. The effects of language ecology on syntactic structure. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2017 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 355], ► pp. 194 ff.
McWhorter, John
2019. Contact languages: A comprehensive guide. Edited by Peter Bakker and Yaron Matras. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 34:1 ► pp. 171 ff.
Meakins, Felicity
Meakins, Felicity
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
2021. Complexity and Relative Complexity in Generative Grammar. Frontiers in Communication 6
Operstein, Natalie & Allyson Walker
2012. Review of Bhatt & Veenstra (2011): Creoles and Typology. Journal of Historical Linguistics 2:2 ► pp. 301 ff.
Pereltsvaig, Asya
Danae Perez, Marianne Hundt, Johannes Kabatek & Daniel Schreier
2021. English and Spanish,
Saldana, Carmen, Kenny Smith, Simon Kirby & Jennifer Culbertson
2021. Is Regularization Uniform across Linguistic Levels? Comparing Learning and Production of Unconditioned Probabilistic Variation in Morphology and Word Order. Language Learning and Development 17:2 ► pp. 158 ff.
Sessarego, Sandro
2020. Not all grammatical features are robustly transmitted during the emergence of creoles. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 7:1
Shcherbakova, Olena, Volker Gast, Damián E. Blasi, Hedvig Skirgård, Russell D. Gray & Simon J. Greenhill
2023. A quantitative global test of the complexity trade-off hypothesis: the case of nominal and verbal grammatical marking. Linguistics Vanguard 9:s1 ► pp. 155 ff.
Siegel, Jeff, Benedikt Szmrecsanyi & Bernd Kortmann
2014. Measuring analyticity and syntheticity in creoles. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 29:1 ► pp. 49 ff.
Solovyev, Valery Dmitrievich, Marina Ivanovna Solnyshkina & Danielle S. McNamara
2022. Computational linguistics and discourse complexology: Paradigms and research methods. Russian Journal of Linguistics 26:2 ► pp. 275 ff.
Szeto, Pui Yiu, Jackie Yan-ki Lai & Umberto Ansaldo
Webb, Eric Russell
2013. Pidgins and Creoles. In The Oxford Handbook of Sociolinguistics, ► pp. 301 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.