Article published in:
Impersonal human reference in Sign Languages
Edited by Gemma Barberà and Patricia Cabredo Hofherr
[Sign Language & Linguistics 21:2] 2018
► pp. 349378
References
Brentari, Diane, Alessio di Renzo, Jonathan Keane & Virginia Volterra
2015Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic sources of a handshape distinction expressing agentivity. Topics in Cognitive Science 7(1). 95–123. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark
2011The meaning and use of ideophones in Siwu. Nijmegen: Radboud University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Hwang, So-One, Nozomi Tomita, Hope Morgan, Rabia Ergin, Deniz Ilkbaşaran, Sharon Seegers, Ryan Lepic & Carol Padden
2016Of the body and the hands: patterned iconicity for semantic categories. Language and Cognition 91. 573–602. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kohler, Wolfgang
1929Gestalt psychology. New York: Liveright.Google Scholar
Lepic, Ryan, Carl Börstell, Gal Belsitzman & Wendy Sandler
2016Taking meaning in hand. Sign Language & Linguistics 19(1). 37–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mandel, Mark
1977Iconic devices in ASL. In Lynn Friedman (ed.), On the other hand: New perspectives on American Sign Language, 57–107. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
McKee, David & Graeme Kennedy
2000Lexical comparison of signs from American, Australian, British and New Zealand Sign Languages. In Karen Emmorey & Harlan Lane (eds.), The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, 49–76. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Nyst, Victoria
2007A descriptive analysis of Adamorobe Sign Language (Ghana). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam PhD dissertation. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
2010Sign languages in West Africa. In Brentari, D. (ed.), Sign languages (Cambridge language surveys), 405–432. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2015The sign language situation in Mali. Sign Language Studies 15(2). 126–150. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016aSize and shape depictions in the manual modality: a taxonomy of iconic devices in Adamorobe Sign Language. Semiotica 2101. 75–104.Google Scholar
2016bThe depiction of size and shape in gestures accompanying object descriptions in Anyi (Côte d’Ivoire) and in Dutch (The Netherlands). Gesture 15(2). 156–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ohala, John J.
1983Cross-language use of pitch: an ethological view. Phonetica 40(1). 1–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1984An ethological perspective on common cross-language utilization of F0 of voice. Phonetica 41(1). 1–16. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, Gerardo, Beyza Sümer & Aslı Őzyürek
2014Type of iconicity matters: Bias for action-based signs in sign language acquisition. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 36(36). 1114–1119.Google Scholar
Padden, Carol, Irit Meir, Mark Aronoff & Wendy Sandler
2010The grammar of space in two new sign languages. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages (Cambridge language surveys), 570–592. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Padden, Carol, Irit Meir, So-One Hwang, Ryan Lepic, Sharon Seegers & Tory Sampson
2013Patterned iconicity in sign language lexicons. Gesture 13(3). 181–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perniss, Pamela
2007Achieving spatial coherence in German Sign Language narratives: The use of classifiers and perspective. Lingua 117(7). 1315–1338. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perniss, Pamela, Robin L. Thompson & Gabriella Vigliocco
2010Iconicity as a general property of language: evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in Psychology 1:227 (December).Google Scholar
Pinsonneault, Dominique
1999Lexique des signes utilisés par les sourds au Mali. Bamako: Editions Donniya.Google Scholar
Shaw, Emily & Yves Delaporte
2010New perspectives on the history of American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 11(2). 158–204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tano, Angoua
2014Un corpus de référence de la Langue des Signes de Bouakako (LaSiBo). Leiden University Centre for Linguistics, Universiteit Leiden.Google Scholar
2016Etude d’une langue des signes émergente de Côte d’Ivoire: l’exemple de la langue des signes de Bouakako (LaSiBo). Leiden: University of Leiden PhD dissertation. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Tano, Angoua & Victoria Nyst
2018Comparing body-part size and shape constructions in village sign languages with co-speech gesture. Sign Language Studies 18(4). 517–545. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taub, Sarah F.
2001Language from the body: Iconicity and metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Westermann, Diedrich
1927Laut, Ton und Sinn in westafrikanischen Sudansprachen. In Sprachwissenschaftliche und andere Studien, Carl Meinhof gewidmet, 315–328. Glückstadt & Hamburg: Augustin.Google Scholar
Wittmann, Henri
1991Classification linguistique des langues signées non vocalement. Revue Québécoise de Linguistique Théorique et Appliquée 10(1). 215–288.Google Scholar
Zwitserlood, Inge
2003Classifying hand configurations in Nederlandse Gebarentaal (Sign Language of the Netherlands). Utrecht: University of Utrecht PhD dissertation. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
2012Classifiers. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.). Sign language: An international handbook, 158–186. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

DINGEMANSE, MARK, MARCUS PERLMAN & PAMELA PERNISS
2020. Construals of iconicity: experimental approaches to form–meaning resemblances in language. Language and Cognition 12:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Nyst, Victoria
2019. The impact of cross-linguistic variation in gesture on sign language phonology and morphology. Gesture 18:2-3  pp. 343 ff. Crossref logo
Nyst, Victoria, Marta Morgado, Timothy Mac Hadjah, Marco Nyarko, Mariana Martins, Lisa van der Mark, Evans Burichani, Tano Angoua, Moustapha Magassouba, Dieydi Sylla, Kidane Admasu & Anique Schüller
2021. Object and handling handshapes in 11 sign languages: towards a typology of the iconic use of the hands. Linguistic Typology 0:0 Crossref logo
Safar, Josefina
2020. “When you were that little…”. Gesture 19:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.