Abstract published in:
Impersonal human reference in Sign Languages
Edited by Gemma Barberà and Patricia Cabredo Hofherr
[Sign Language & Linguistics 21:2] 2018
► pp. 390–397
Dissertation abstract

Universal quantification in the nominal domain in American Sign Language (The University of Texas at Austin, 2017)

| Bowling Green State University
Published online: 22 March 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.00026.lis
References

Selected references

Abner, Natasha & Ronnie B. Wilbur
2017 Quantification in American Sign Language. In Edward L. Keenan & Denis Paperno (eds.), Handbook of quantifiers in natural language: Volume II, 21–59. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brentari, Diane & Carol A. Padden
2001 Native and foreign vocabulary in American Sign Language: A lexicon with multiple origins. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Foreign vocabulary in sign languages: A cross-linguistic investigation of word formation, 87–119). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gil, David
1995 Universal quantifiers and distributivity. In Emmon Bach, Eloise Jelinek, Angelika Kratzer & Barbara H. Partee (eds.), Quantification in natural languages, 321–362. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1995 Diachronic sources of “all” and “every”. In Emmon Bach, Eloise Jelinek, Angelika Kratzer & Barbara H. Partee (eds.), Quantification in natural languages, 363–382. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane & Richard P. Meier
2011 On the linguistic status of ‘agreement’ in sign languages. Theoretical Linguistics 371. 95–141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, Florian
2013 Maximality and definite plurals – experimental evidence. In Emmanuel Chemla, Vincent Homer & Grégoire Winterstein (eds.), Proceedings of Sinn and Bedeutung 171, 509–526. Paris.Google Scholar
Shaw, Emily & Yves Delaporte
2010 New perspectives on the history of American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 11(2). 158–204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar