Cover not available
Abstract published In:
Sign Language & Linguistics
Vol. 22:1 (2019) ► pp.129–139
Dissertation abstracts

Türk İşaret Dilinde uyum

Şablon biçimbilim açısından bir inceleme

| University of Pompeu Fabra | Ankara University
Published online: 9 October 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.00030.mak
References (16)
References
Battison, Robin. 1978. Lexical borrowing in American Sign Language. Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press.Google Scholar
Brentari, Diane. 2012. Phonology. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach, & Bencie Woll (eds.). Sign language: An international handbook, 21–54. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brentari, Diane & Carol Padden. 2001. Native and foreign vocabulary in American Sign Language: A lexicon with multiple origins. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Foreign vocabulary in sign languages, 87–119. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth. 1993. Space in Danish Sign Language: The semantics and morphosyntax of the use of space in a visual language. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Fernald, Theodore & Donna Jo Napoli. 2000. Exploitation of morphological possibilities in signed languages: Comparison of American Sign Language with English. Sign Language & Linguistics 31. 3–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liddell, Scott. 1984. Unrealized-inceptive aspect in American Sign Language: feature insertion in syllabic frames. In David Testen, Veena Mishra & Joseph Drogo (eds.), Papers from the 20th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 257–270. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Makaroğlu, Bahtiyar & Hasan Dikyuva (eds.). 2017. Güncel Türk İşaret Dili Sözlüğü [Contemporary Turkish Sign Language dictionary]. Ankara: Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanlığı. Retrieved from [URL]
McCarthy, John. 1979. Formal problems in semitic phonology and morphology. Cambridge, MA: MIT PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
. 1981. A prosodic theory of nonconcatenative morphology. Linguistic Inquiry 121. 373–418.Google Scholar
McDonald, Betsy Hicks. 1982. Aspects of the American Sign Language predicate system. University of Buffalo PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Padden, Carol. 1983. Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. San Diego, CA: University of California PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
. 1988. Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
. 1990. The relation between space and grammar in ASL verb morphology. In Ceil Lucas (ed.), Sign language research: Theoretical issues, 118–132. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy & Diane Lillo-Martin. 2006. Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schembri, Adam. 2003. Rethinking ‘classifiers’ in signed languages. In Karen Emmorey (ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages, 3–34. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schembri, Adam & Trevor Johnston. 2007. Sociolinguistic variation in fingerspelling in Australian Sign Language (Auslan): A pilot study. Sign Language Studies 7(3). 319–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Kayabaşı, Demet & Kadir Gökgöz
2023. The Causative-Inchoative Alternation and Age-of-Acquisition Effects on Multi-predicate Constructions in Turkish Sign Language. Language Learning and Development 19:2 ► pp. 125 ff. DOI logo
MAKAROĞLU, Bahtiyar
2020. TÜRK İŞARET DİLİNDE GÖNDERİMSELLİK VE İŞARET ALANI. Dil Dergisi 1:171 ► pp. 9 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.