Article published in:Special Issue in Memory of Irit Meir
Edited by Diane Lillo-Martin, Wendy Sandler, Marie Coppola and Rose Stamp
[Sign Language & Linguistics 23:1/2] 2020
► pp. 112–141
Spatial metaphors in antonym pairs across sign languages
We analyze sign locations in 776 signs from 16 antonym pairs across 27 sign languages to examine metaphorical mappings of emotional valence (positive vs. negative) along different spatial axes. We conduct both an automatic and a manual analysis of sign location and movement direction, to investigate cross-linguistic patterns of spatial valence contrasts. Contrary to our hypothesis, negative valence concepts are generally articulated higher up than their positive counterparts. However, when we consider movement in space, we find that although signs generally move downward over time, positive valence concepts are associated with upward movements more often than their negative counterparts. This points to a systematic pattern for vertical valence contrasts – a known metaphor across languages – iconically mapped onto physical sign articulation. We similarly, but surprisingly, find a difference in movements along the sagittal axis, such that outward movement is associated with positive valence concepts more often than negative.
Keywords: spatial metaphor, antonymy, sign languages, typology, iconicity, phonology
Published online: 30 October 2020
[ p. 139 ]References
Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker
Börstell, Carl, Ryan Lepic & Gal Belsitzman
Cao, Zhe, Gines Hidalgo, Tomas Simon, Shih-En Wei & Yaser Sheikh
Cao, Zhe, Tomas Simon, Shih-En Wei & Yaser Sheikh
Casasanto, Daniel & Kyle Jasmin
Cooperrider, Kensy & Rafael Núñez
Crasborn, Onno & Han Sloetjes
Dingemanse, Mark, Damián E. Blasi, Gary Lupyan, Morten H. Christiansen & Padraic Monaghan
Elliot, Andrew J.
European Sign Language Center
2012 Spread the Sign. http://www.spreadthesign.com (3 September, 2015).
Kimmelman, Vadim, Maria Kyuseva, Yana Lomakina & Daria Perova[ p. 140 ]
Klima, Edward S. & Ursula Bellugi
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria, Matti Miestamo & Carl Börstell
2017 Impossible but not difficult: A typological study of lexical vs. derived antonyms. Paper presented at SLE 2017. University of Zürich, Switzerland.
Kuznetsova, Alexandra, Per B. Brockhoff & Rune H. B. Christensen
Lepic, Ryan, Carl Börstell, Gal Belsitzman & Wendy Sandler
Meier, Brian P. & Michael D. Robinson
Meir, Irit, Carol Padden, Mark Aronoff & Wendy Sandler
Meir, Irit & Oksana Tkachman
Miozzo, Michele, Michael Villabol, Eduardo Navarrete & Francesca Peressotti
Nagy, William Elmer
Núñez, Rafael E. & Kensy Cooperrider
Núñez, Rafael E. & Eve Sweetser
2018 magick: Advanced graphics and image-processing in R. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=magick
Östling, Robert, Carl Börstell & Servane Courtaux
Perniss, Pamela, Robin L. Thompson & Gabriella Vigliocco[ p. 141 ]
R Core Team
2019 R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL: https://www.R-project.org/
Reddy, Michael J.
Taub, Sarah F.
Tyrone, Martha E. & Claude E. Mauk
2009 ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag. http://ggplot2.org.
Wilcox, Phyllis Perrin
Winter, Bodo, Tyler Marghetis & Teenie Matlock
Woodin, Greg & Bodo Winter
Yap, Defu, Laura Staum Casasanto & Daniel Casasanto
2014 Metaphoric iconicity in signed and spoken languages. In Paul Bello, Marcello Guarini, Marjorie McShane & Brian Scassellati (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 1808–1813. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0r65g5r0 (27 October, 2018).