We analyze sign locations in 776 signs from 16 antonym pairs across 27 sign languages to examine metaphorical mappings of
emotional valence (positive vs. negative) along different spatial axes. We conduct both an automatic and a manual analysis of sign location
and movement direction, to investigate cross-linguistic patterns of spatial valence contrasts. Contrary to our hypothesis, negative valence
concepts are generally articulated higher up than their positive counterparts. However, when we consider movement in space, we find that
although signs generally move downward over time, positive valence concepts are associated with upward movements more often than their
negative counterparts. This points to a systematic pattern for vertical valence contrasts – a known metaphor across languages – iconically
mapped onto physical sign articulation. We similarly, but surprisingly, find a difference in movements along the sagittal axis, such that
outward movement is associated with positive valence concepts more often than negative.
Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1). 1–48.
Boroditsky, Lera. 2000. Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition 75(1). 1–28.
Brennan, Mary. 2005. Conjoining word and image in British Sign Language (BSL): An exploration of metaphorical signs in BSL. Sign Language Studies 5(3). 360–382.
Cao, Zhe, Gines Hidalgo, Tomas Simon, Shih-En Wei & Yaser Sheikh. 2018. OpenPose: realtime multi-person 2D pose estimation using Part Affinity Fields. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.08008.
Cao, Zhe, Tomas Simon, Shih-En Wei & Yaser Sheikh. 2017. Realtime multi-person 2D pose estimation using part affinity fields. CVPR.
Casasanto, Daniel & Kyle Jasmin. 2012. The hands of time: Temporal gestures in English speakers. Cognitive Linguistics 23(4). 643–674.
Cienki, Alan & Cornelia Müller. 2008. Metaphor and gesture. Vol. 31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Crasborn, Onno. 2011. The other hand in sign language phonology. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, vol. 11, 223–240. Malden, MA & Oxford: Blackwell.
Crasborn, Onno & Han Sloetjes. 2008. Enhanced ELAN functionality for sign language corpora. 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2008), 3rd Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Construction and Exploitation of Sign Language Corpora, 39–43.
Davidson, Donald. 1978. What metaphors mean. Critical Inquiry 5(1). 31–47.
Dingemanse, Mark, Damián E. Blasi, Gary Lupyan, Morten H. Christiansen & Padraic Monaghan. 2015. Arbitrariness, iconicity, and systematicity in language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 191. 603–615.
Elliot, Andrew J.2006. The hierarchical model of approach-avoidance motivation. Motivation and Emotion 30(2). 111–116.
European Sign Language Center. 2012. Spread the Sign. [URL] (3 September, 2015).
Jantunen, Tommi. 2015. How long is the sign?Linguistics 53(1). 93–124.
Klima, Edward S. & Ursula Bellugi. 1979. The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria, Matti Miestamo & Carl Börstell. 2017. Impossible but not difficult: A typological study of lexical vs. derived antonyms. Paper presented at SLE 2017. University of Zürich, Switzerland.
Kuznetsova, Alexandra, Per B. Brockhoff & Rune H. B. Christensen. 2017. lmerTest Package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software 82(13). 1–26.
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
McNeill, David. 1992. Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Meier, Brian P. & Michael D. Robinson. 2004. Why the sunny side is up: Associations between affect and vertical position. Psychological Science 15(4). 243–247.
Meir, Irit. 2010. Iconicity and metaphor: Constraints on metaphorical extension of iconic forms. Language 86(4). 865–896.
Meir, Irit & Ariel Cohen. 2018. Metaphor in Sign Languages. Frontiers in Psychology 91. 1025.
Meir, Irit, Carol Padden, Mark Aronoff & Wendy Sandler. 2007. Body as subject. Journal of Linguistics 431. 531–563.
Meir, Irit, Carol Padden, Mark Aronoff & Wendy Sandler. 2013. Competing iconicities in the structure of languages. Cognitive Linguistics 24(2). 309–343.
Meir, Irit & Oksana Tkachman. 2018. Iconicity. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford University Press.
Miozzo, Michele, Michael Villabol, Eduardo Navarrete & Francesca Peressotti. 2020. Hands show where things are: The close similarity between sign and natural space. Cognition 1961. 104106.
Nagy, William Elmer. 1974. Figurative patterns and redundancy in the lexicon. San Diego, CA: University of California PhD dissertation.
Núñez, Rafael E. & Kensy Cooperrider. 2013. The tangle of space and time in human cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17(5). 220–229.
Núñez, Rafael E. & Eve Sweetser. 2006. With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science 30(3). 401–450.
Ooms, Jeroen. 2018. magick: Advanced graphics and image-processing in R.[URL]
Östling, Robert, Carl Börstell & Servane Courtaux. 2018. Visual iconicity across sign languages: Large-scale automated video analysis of iconic articulators and locations. Frontiers in Psychology 91. 725.
Perniss, Pamela, Robin L. Thompson & Gabriella Vigliocco. 2010. Iconicity as a general property of language: Evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in Psychology 11. 227.
R Core Team. 2019. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL: [URL]
Reddy, Michael J.1979. The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In Andrew Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought, 284–310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taub, Sarah F.2001. Language from the body: Iconicity and metaphor in ASL. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tyrone, Martha E. & Claude E. Mauk. 2010. Sign lowering and phonetic reduction in American Sign Language. Journal of Phonetics 38(2). 317–328.
Wickham, Hadley. 2009. ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag. [URL].
Wilcox, Phyllis Perrin. 2000. Metaphor in American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Winter, Bodo, Tyler Marghetis & Teenie Matlock. 2015. Of magnitudes and metaphors: Explaining cognitive interactions between space, time, and number. Cortex 641. 209–224.
Woodin, Greg & Bodo Winter. 2018. Placing abstract concepts in space: Quantity, time and emotional valence. Frontiers in Psychology 91. 2169.
Yap, Defu, Laura Staum Casasanto & Daniel Casasanto. 2014. Metaphoric iconicity in signed and spoken languages. In Paul Bello, Marcello Guarini, Marjorie McShane & Brian Scassellati (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 1808–1813. [URL] (27 October, 2018).
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
Bauer, Anastasia, Anna Kuder, Marc Schulder, Job Schepens & Laura Morett
2024. Phonetic differences between affirmative and feedback head nods in German Sign Language (DGS): A pose estimation study. PLOS ONE 19:5 ► pp. e0304040 ff.
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria, Matti Miestamo & Carl Börstell
2024. A cross-linguistic study of lexical and derived antonymy. Linguistics
Börstell, Carl
2023. Lexical comprehension within and across sign languages of Belgium, China and the Netherlands. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 8:1
Flaherty, Molly, Asha Sato & Simon Kirby
2023. Documenting a Reduction in Signing Space in Nicaraguan Sign Language Using Depth and Motion Capture. Cognitive Science 47:4
Keränen, Jarkko
2023. Cross-modal iconicity and indexicality in the production of lexical sensory and emotional signs in Finnish Sign Language. Cognitive Linguistics 34:3-4 ► pp. 333 ff.
Mansoory, Bahareh & Vahid Nassiri
2022. Testing the body specificity hypothesis: A comparative study of the Persian language and the Persian Sign language. Acta Psychologica 223 ► pp. 103496 ff.
Skorobohatova, O. О., I. I. Stepanchenko & M. V. Orobinska
2022. ПАРАДИГМАТИЧНА СИСТЕМА ГРАМАТИЧНИХ ОДИНИЦЬ (НА МАТЕРІАЛІ ПОЕТИЧНИХ ТВОРІВ). Лінгвістичні дослідження :56 ► pp. 244 ff.
Скоробогатова, Олена Олександрівна, Іван Іванович Степанченко & Марія Володимирівна Оробінська
2022. ПАРАДИГМАТИЧНА СИСТЕМА ЛЕКСИЧНИХ ОДИНИЦЬ (НА МАТЕРІАЛІ ПОЕТИЧНИХ ТЕКСТІВ). Наукові записки Харківського національного педагогічного університету ім. Г. С. Сковороди "Літературознавство" 1:99 ► pp. 120 ff.
Pouw, Wim, Mark Dingemanse, Yasamin Motamedi & Aslı Özyürek
2021. A Systematic Investigation of Gesture Kinematics in Evolving Manual Languages in the Lab. Cognitive Science 45:7
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.