Abstract published In:
Sign Language & Linguistics: Online-First Articles
Dissertation abstract

Morphological reduplication in Sign Language of the Netherlands

A typological and theoretical perspective

 | University of Amsterdam
Article outline
  • Chapter 1: Background on reduplication and OT
  • Chapter 2: Plural reduplication in NGT
  • Chapter 3: Aspectual reduplication in NGT
  • Chapter 4: Reciprocal reduplication in NGT
  • Chapters 5 & 6: Towards a constraint-based analysis of NGT reduplication
  • Chapter 7: General typological and theoretical contributions of the dissertation
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 23 January 2025
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.00093.van
References (35)
References
Boersma, Paul. 1997. How we learn variation, optionality, and probability. Proceedings of the Institute of Phonetic Sciences of the University of Amsterdam 211. 43–58.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Bruce Hayes. 2001. Empirical tests of the gradual learning algorithm. Linguistic Inquiry 32(1). 45–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul & David Weenink. 2020. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer, version 6.1.27. URL: [URL]. Accessed 14 October 2020.
Börstell, Carl. To appear. Iconic plurality across modalities. In Olga Fischer, Kimi Akita & Pamela Perniss (eds.), The Oxford handbook of iconicity in language. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bybee, Joan L. 1985. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crasborn, Onno & Inge Zwitserlood. 2008. The Corpus NGT: An online corpus for professionals and laymen. In Onno Crasborn, Thomas Hanke, Eleni Efthimiou, Inge Zwitserlood & Ernst Thoutenhoofd (eds.), Construction and exploitation of sign language corpora: 3rd workshop on the representation and processing of sign languages, 44–49. Paris: ELDA.Google Scholar
Crasborn, Onno, Inge Zwitserlood & Johan Ros. 2008. The Corpus NGT: A digital open access corpus of movies and annotations of Sign Language of the Netherlands. URL: [URL]. Accessed 26 March 2020.
Dahl, Östen & Viveka Velupillai. 2013. Perfective/imperfective aspect. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. URL: [URL]. Accessed 16 March 2022.
Downing, Laura J. & Sharon Inkelas. 2015. What is reduplication? Typology and analysis part 2/2: The analysis of reduplication. Language and Linguistics Compass 9(12). 516–528. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Downing, Laura J. & Barbara Stiebels. 2012. Iconicity. In Jochen Trommer (ed.), The morphology and phonology of exponence, 379–426. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ergin, Rabia, Ann Senghas, Ray Jackendoff & Lila Gleitman. 2020. Structural cues for symmetry, asymmetry, and non-symmetry in Central Taurus Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 23(1/2). 171–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Everaert, Martin. 2000. Types of anaphoric expressions: Reflexives and reciprocals. In Zygmunt Frajzyngier & Traci S. Curl (eds.), Reciprocals: Forms and functions, 31–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harder, Rita, Corline Koolhof & Trude Schermer. 2003. Meervoud in de NGT: Verslag van een onderzoek in het kader van OCW subsidie 2003 1 [Plurality in NGT: Report of a study in the context of OCW subsidy 2003]. URL: [URL]. Accessed 7 July 2021.
Harley, Heidi & Maria Florez Leyva. 2009. Form and meaning in Hiaki (Yaqui) verbal reduplication. International Journal of American Linguistics 75(2). 233–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce & May Abad. 1989. Reduplication and syllabification in Ilokano. Lingua 771. 331–374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoiting, Nini & Dan I. Slobin. 2001. Typological and modality constraints on borrowing: Examples from the Sign Language of the Netherlands. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Foreign vocabulary in sign languages: A cross-linguistic investigation of word formation, 121–138. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kimmelman, Vadim. 2018. Reduplication and repetition in Russian Sign Language. In Rita Finkbeiner & Ulrike Freywald (eds.), Exact repetition in grammar and discourse, 91–109. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klima, Edward S. & Ursula Bellugi. 1979. The signs of language. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Klomp, Ulrika. 2021. A descriptive grammar of Sign Language of the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam PhD dissertation.
Kouwenberg, Silvia & Darlene LaCharité. 2015. Arbitrariness and iconicity in total reduplication: Evidence from Caribbean Creoles. In Daniela Rossi (ed.), The why and how of total reduplication: Current issues and new perspectives, 971–991. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nyst, Victoria, Marta Morgado, Timothy Mac Hadjah, Marco Nyarko, Mariana Martins, Lisa van der Mark, Evans Burichani, Tano Angoua, Moustapha Magassouba, Dieydi Sylla, Kidane Admasu & Anique Schüller. 2021. Object and handling handshapes in 11 sign languages: Towards a typology of the iconic use of the hands. Linguistic Typology 26(3). 573–604. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oomen, Marloes. 2016. The marking of two aspectual distinctions in Sign Language of the Netherlands (NGT). Linguistics in Amsterdam 9(2). 30–55.Google Scholar
Oomen, Marloes & Roland Pfau. 2017. Signing not (or not): A typological perspective on standard negation in Sign Language of the Netherlands. Linguistic Typology 21(1). 1–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palfreyman, Nick. 2019. Variation in Indonesian Sign Language: A typological and sociolinguistic analysis. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach. 2003. Optimal reciprocals in German Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 6(1). 3–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Plural formation in German Sign Language: Constraints and strategies. In Helen Leuninger & Daniela Happ (eds.), Gebärdensprachen: Struktur, Erwerb, Verwendung ( Linguistische Berichte — Sonderheft 15), 111–144. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
. 2016. Modality and meaning: Plurality of relations in German Sign Language. Lingua 1701. 69–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prince, Alan & Paul Smolensky. [1993] 2004. Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers. [Technical report CU-CS-696-93, Department of Computer Science, University of Colorado at Boulder, and technical report TR-2, Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, April 1993.]. DOI logo
Rathmann, Christian G. 2005. Event structure in American Sign Language. Austin: The University of Texas at Austin PhD dissertation.
Rubino, Carl. 2013. Reduplication. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), WALS online, v2020.3 [Data set]. URL: [URL]. Accessed 4 October 2023. Zenodo, DOI logo
Spaelti, Philip. 1997. Dimensions of variation in multi-pattern reduplication. Santa Cruz: University of California Santa Cruz PhD dissertation.
Sutton-Spence, Rachel & Bencie Woll. 1999. The linguistics of British Sign Language: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Boven, Cindy. 2020. Fill the gap: A novel test to elicit nominal plurals in NGT. FEAST. Formal and Experimental Advances in Sign language Theory 31. 56–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Boven, Cindy & Marloes Oomen. 2021. Habituals in Sign Language of the Netherlands: A corpus-based study. Linguistics in Amsterdam 14(1). 160–184.Google Scholar
Zwitserlood, Inge & Sibylla Nijhof. 1999. Pluralization in Sign Language of the Netherlands (NGT). In Jan Don & Ted Sanders (eds.), OTS yearbook 1998–1999, 58–78. Utrecht: Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS.Google Scholar